|
Is there no moderator at all for the scandinavian forum? 5 of the last 6 topics are spam and they have been there for 4 days now. I reported them yesterday but they have not been removed.
I'll volunteer if no one else does, there's not a lot of activity in that forum so it wouldn't be too hard.
|
|
|
|
Grattis D.H. till domänen. Jag kollade upp den för nåt halvår sedan, såg att den var ledig, och lät den vara. Hade du tänkt göra något företag runt din domän, eller ska den bli en community-site?
Jag ser gärna att den blir en typ av community-sajt där svenska användare kan samlas. Såväl de som bara vill använda Bitcoin som de som vill dyka ner i tekniska detaljer. Därmed inte sagt att jag inte tänker försöka tjäna några kronor på den (jag fick betala lite för den så de pengarna kan åtminstone vara trevligt att få tillbaka). Om det blir något företag av det eller inte beror på vilken skala det blir... så det får framtiden utvisa. Jag har även reggat domänen bitcoin.org.se som jag kan tänka mig att använda till något som är helt icke-vinstdrivande om det finns behov för det. |
|
|
|
Jag är lite emot att göra bitcoin alltför användarvänligt för tillfället. Det krävs en del datortekniska färdigheter för att kunna använda sig av bitcoins på ett säkert sätt. Ännu mer för att förstå hur det funkar. En bra idé vore väl att locka datornördar först, de kommer inse hur uppenbart det är att skydda wallet.dat filen! Och så är det mer sannolikt att de kommer bidra till projektets utveckling.
Förstår vad du menar men jag tror vi måste börja försöka locka "vanliga" användare också, annars är jag rädd att vi fastnar i nörd-facket för alltid. När vanliga användare börjar få upp ögonen för Bitcoin finns det större anledning för investerare att satsa pengar på lite större, mer seriösa Bitcoin-projekt, vilket t.ex. kan ge oss e-plånböcker som folk faktiskt vågar lita på. Det finns mängder av småprojekt som folk sitter och hackar ihop hemma (och en del av dem är jättebra, missförstå mig inte) men väldigt få större projekt, sådana som kanske även har en rejäl budget för marknadsföring. Jag får försöka få till något som lockar nördarna men som ändå inte skrämmer bort alla Svenssons. Jag deltar gärna med att hjälpa till med översättning och att posta på forumet för att introducera folk, kanske ge bort .01 BTC till nykomlingar för att de ska få testa hur man använder sig av de.
Jättekul att höra! |
|
|
|
Anything that does not have the words "bit" or "coin" in it would stand out.  |
|
|
|
Jag planerar att starta upp www.bitcoin.se under en relativt snar framtid. Min tanke är att det kan bli en portal för att locka svenska användare. Alltså, introduktion på svenska, busenkla instruktioner för hur man börjar använda Bitcoin, troligtvis en nyhetsfokuserad blogg, ett forum. Någon gång hoppas jag också vi kan ordna ett nybörjarvänligt sätt att köpa Bitcoins i Sverige, utan att behöva skapa konton på utländska exchanges och föra över pengar till utländska bankkonton. Vad mer kan vi göra, rent konkret, för att få svenskar att börja använda Bitcoin? Vad vill ni att bitcoin.se ska vara? |
|
|
|
An opinion piece by Rick Falkvinge in Swedish technology and IT newspaper "Ny Teknik". Has quite a lot of readers, 135 comments on that article so far. http://www.nyteknik.se/asikter/debatt/article3237279.ece(It's in swedish, could probably be translated using Google Translate with decent results) |
|
|
|
Oops, I was not aware of that, thanks. The "million bitcoin homepage" seems to be a different concept though, where you have to keep paying to hold on to your pixels. The BitPixel page is expensive (10BTC/block) but you get to be part of a lottery when (if?) all pixels are sold, doesn't seem very likely that that will happen anytime soon though. The BitPixel site has a cheaper "BitWall" page, but then you're not on the front page. So...I'll leave my site up for a while at least to see if it catches any interest. |
|
|
|
Ill take that offer.
Email send
Grouver picked blocks #1 and #2. Others who want free blocks, just write what blocks you want in this thread, no need to send an e-mail. I will PM instructions to those who reply in this thread. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin Poster is a site similar to the well known million dollar homepage but with the purpose of promoting Bitcoin. Pixels can only be bought using bitcoins and links must point to something related to bitcoin (this could be an exchange, a blog, an information site, a merchant accepting bitcoin, a news article, or even your own forum profile page). Pixels are 1 bitcent/pixel and are bought in blocks of 10x10 pixels (1 BTC/block). The first 25 people to respond to this post with two block numbers will get those two blocks (200 pixels) for free. That includes an image, a link and a mouseover text (max 50 characters). Forum accounts created today (or later) are not eligible.For buying additional pixels simply send an e-mail to bitcoinposter@gmail.com with the subject "Order" and information on what blocks you want to buy. Check out the site for terms and conditions. Welcome! www.bitcoinposter.com |
|
|
|
I wouldn't trust Google when it comes to language. Have you ever tried Google Translate?  Hey, let's do that! "Vires in Numeris" -> "Strength in Numbers" "Vis in Numeris" -> "Do you want in Numbers" "vis in numeris" -> "to do in the numbers" Pick your choice. |
|
|
|
We're working on exactly this, and it should be available sometime next week on the Bitbills website.
Great to hear, thanks! |
|
|
|
|
Could you please make it possible for us non-miners to view the result of the poll?
|
|
|
|
It should be desktop environment specific, nothing to do with the browser:
Thanks. But I think I'll keep it at explicit drag&drop. Having the browser being able to send commands to the bitcoin client without user intervention is just a too big a potential security hole. I suggest that you use a confirmation box in the client before executing whatever the link is trying to do. After all it's much more intuitive to click links than to drag them. |
|
|
|
I want a site where I can "redeem" a private key. See this thread. |
|
|
|
|
Does anybody know if this has been implemented anywhere yet? I'll gladly send a donation to the person who puts up a web site like this.
|
|
|
|
Banks are insured and regulated, online wallets are not. Would you take out your wallet or purse and hand it to a stranger gambling at a casino simply because you did not want to carry it around? It's not just that banks are regulated that makes people trust them. People trust Google (e.g. Gmail) or Microsoft (e.g. Hotmail) with personal secrets, stuff that is more important than thousands of dollars. They do this because the service is convenient to use and because they are pretty damn sure that Google or Microsoft won't give away their secrets to anyone else. Really, everyone use webmail instead of installed mail programs now. For most people online wallets will be the natural way to use Bitcoin in the future, we just need some reputable people running them. The recent scandals have been hobby projects who grew too quickly. |
|
|
|
i don't care, about the other users
This is where you differ from most people in this thread. End thread? |
|
|
|
see? wikipedia disagree with you.
Not really. Here's some more text from that wikipedia page (also, note that BTCrow wrote "ethical full-disclosure"): Even among those who believe in disclosure there are differing policies about when, to whom, and how much to disclose.
Some believe that in the absence of any public exploits for the problem, full and public disclosure should be preceded by disclosure of the vulnerability to the vendors or authors of the system. This private advance disclosure allows the vendor time to produce a fix or workaround. This philosophy is sometimes called responsible disclosure.
|
|
|
|
Every loan creates money. If you have a problem with money creation, you have a problem with lending.
If I borrow money to buy a house, the money I borrowed is still in circulation because I gave it to the person who sold me the house. However, now there is an IOU in circulation as well -- the future money I will earn to pay that mortgage is now already in circulation.
I agree that IOU's are created but not necessarily money created. Whether those IOU's are money or not is just a matter of definition. In the real world we often see IOU's as money. Take as an example the balance on your bank account. This is just a statement that the bank owes you X dollars (i.e. an IOU), yet we refer to it as money, and we use it as money (when we transfer money to a friend using the same bank). People often confuse the "IOU-money" that the bank creates with the "central bank money" that they owe you. |
|
|
|
Banks originated as goldsmiths who stored people's gold and gave out paper certificates representing the quantity of gold that was stored. This was a valuable service, because storing gold was hard, and paying people with gold was hard. Bitcoins are very different. Storing them is in principle easy, especially if you have a bitcoin-only device as I advocated here, and paying people with them is easy. All of the reasons for putting your gold in the bank are thus irrelevant for bitcoins. First of all, to store bitcoins safely you need to educate yourself on how to do it. This takes a lot of effort for people who aren't tech-savvy so there is obviously a need for companies providing this service (safe storage). Second, banks today aren't primarily about safe storage. You lend your money to the bank. They pay you some interest because they can use the money to earn more money (e.g. by lending it to someone else at a higher interest). This service makes just as much sense with Bitcoin as with central bank money and will naturally also exist in a Bitcoin economy. Mods: Move this to Economics? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
