|
I don't think it is completely based on the bounty allocation but the value and quality of the project. Its possible to get a bounty with low allocation turning out to be highly rewarding due to better value than a bounty with much allocation and less value. It is always better to see the potentials and commitment in a project before enrolling for their bounty, this way, you stand a chance to get rewarded sooner than later.
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly this is not the case as most hunters will rather dump for peanuts and move on. It is however interesting to know that, holding still pays. I participated in the Aidus bounty a couple of months ago and when the tokens were distributed, the prices crashed insanely but I held my rewards and recently, I was able to make over $750 selling them off which of course is massive gains. I still encourage people to hold at least a percentage of their earnings. After all, why will anyone want to labor for peanuts?
|
|
|
|
|
Of course they are and it depends strictly on the kind of bounty or airdrop. It is true that bounties and airdrops don't pay as much as they use to but at least they still pay. It depends mostly on luck and your ability to find decent opportunities. Recently, BOMB token which was given mostly as airdrop to holders was able to pay so much and a lot of people made some decent income just by holding it. This is one of several opportunities out there and it shows that airdrops still pay.
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely not! IEO is the new buzz and truly worthy of the hype. This not only provide decent opportunity for investments but mostly guaranteed to offer better returns on investments than the ICOs. IEO offers more security and better confidence on the part of the investors than ICO could ever offer. ICOs have proven to be rip offs and I wouldn't advice anyone to take ICOs seriously anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, it is almost impossible to get a fully functional EOS wallet for free. The developers themselves made it that way. You need to pay some charges to have your wallet created. EOSLynx happens to be the one with the least charges from my research and it offers a simple yet secure EOS wallet. You can check it. If you find a free wallet on the Internet, it most likely might be a scam so it is is better you get yourself a good and highly recommended wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
Absolutely! BNB hasn't even started. With the introduction of binance launch pad, the value of BNB has risen considerably due to its demand and use case. This shows what to expect in the near future. Binance is leading the way in terms of exchange activities and this gives it custom platform token a lot of utility. This can only lead to more appreciation in value over time. BNB is still a good investment in my humble opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you should set your objectives right. If you are not meeting them, it means something is wrong and you aren't doing it properly. It could mean that you still need to be properly grounded in trading. If that's the case, then you need to take some time and learn the system again and try to find what works for you. This way, you will be comfortable with your strategy and stick by it.
|
|
|
|
|
I can strongly relate to your experience. Not only have I been a beneficiary of perseverance and patience, I have earn some pretty good profits in crypto by taking calculated risks and investments that turned out great even though it took some time. Crypto is highly unpredictable and as such I implore everyone never to give up easily.
|
|
|
|
#Proof of authentification Bitcointalk Username: EmmaBen Bcnex Email: airdropgodx24@gmail.com Telegram Username: @KryptoIce Campaign: Signature |
|
|
|
|
In my own opinion, any project without team members or whitepaper should be dealt with cautiously as the project's team and its whitepaper both constitute the first index to gauge credibility and trust in the feature strides of such a project. But they are very many of such coins out here that have no bearing whatsoever. Such information can easily be found in coinmarketcap.com. Many coins there don't even have a working website, talk less of a team or whitepaper.
However, I believe too that some very few projects available also are doing pretty well without even without any form of physical or even pictorially relatable team members and/or blueprint.
Bitcoin for instance has a whitepaper, but it is hard to say with authority that this one or that one is a team member of the bitcoin project.
|
|
|
|
|
I am never surprised! Ethereum has delivered below expectations, at least so I think. Which is the reason why it dropped consistently in its price right from about $1000, also partly influenced by bitcoin's lose of price too.
|
|
|
|
|
If there is any project I truly believe in to be credible and honest about the mission and objectives, that project is the John MacAfee backed Chris Koerner's No Bullshit (No BS) token. The project team is seeking to research into ICOs or cryptocurrencies to offer potential investors reliable and honest enough investment information on the best possible ICOs to invest in. This project has practical utility values which is worth commending because there are only a few of such reliable crypto research and reviews solutions offering services around.
I strongly believe in the nearest possible future success of this coin (No BS), and I am holding my share dearly, patiently awaiting the rewards day.
|
|
|
|
|
Asides those reasons you gave, many of them are dead because they are pure scam. Simple! Most of them project creators scammed people. That's it.
|
|
|
|
|
I see no reason why this should be heated up. Whether it is Satoshi Nakamoto or James A. Donald does not matter any more. And I do not believe they are one and the same persons.
|
|
|
|
|
Does it really matter whether Satoshi Nakamoto is this or that?
It is clear that that name "Satoshi Nakamoto" is a Pseudonym, and for very obvious and credible reasons. But why should an American or Australian or Britain, despite the many other American or Australian or British Pseudonyms opt for Japanese?
|
|
|
|
|
Light humour indeed.
I think he subtly made it clear that he is absolutely in support of cryptocurrency, and bitcoin in particular.
He may already have large volumes in possession, and only gave information about it in a passive manner. For someone like Elon musk to support BitCoin wont be a surprise because the guy has demonstrated his adventurous character through his successful business venture.
I wish him success to his current troubles.
|
|
|
|
|
Good thread, good thoughts! I have reasoned similarly also. But I don't think 10 years from now will still be classified as an "early adopters" stage. Even now!
|
|
|
|
90% of those who are talking about "death of bitcoin" are the same people who are trying so hard to buy bitcoin when it drops a small 5% so that they can accumulate a tiny bit more.
the rest (10%) are the newbies who fall for the 90% FUD and are scared of the situation.
Haha. I find this humorous. You mean a constituent of 10% of total investors creating FUD pitholes for a whooping 90% naive others?? Crypto is a funny place though!! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
