Repaid + little fee  60fcc1e97d33471a22e8eb2882814ba785aa35c2aa4d3c03d1297825d3b5c791 |
|
|
|
|
Ragazzi, confermo che la vicenda è stata risolta: il trust è stato modificato in neutral, e benché non veritiero è il massimo che si potesse ottenere da un tizio come Timelord.
Ho chiuso il post nella sezione Reputation e chiudo anche questo.
Grazie ancora a tutti voi per il prezioso supporto e per il conforto che mi avete dato.
|
|
|
|
|
I think this post has come to an end.
My mission was to report an abuse I suffered and make it public so that everyone could draw conclusions.
The discussion points have been many and the contributions you have provided have been appreciated.
I hope that timelord can change his mind about his mistakes. Outside of the initial anger, I don't hold any grudges against him.
I am a borrower, the more quality there is among the borrowers, the lower the cost I will pay for my loans, however I appreciate everyone's work in helping to make the lending section safer.
This post will be closed now.
Thanks again for your support and for your valuable contribution.
|
|
|
|
No matter about made a mistake, could happen. But why he continue with his conviction? Why he continue an ideological fight without any reasons an left inappropriate and false feedback? Sometimes the Reputation board reminds me of the clique of mean girls that we all had to deal with in high school. Timelord2067 has made himself an easy target, he made a mistake with the feedback ratings he left, then another by taking the communities response personally and digging in his heals rather than admitting his mistake. Rather human of him, yes, and obviously gives the mean girls and drama queens a great opportunity to kick a man while he's down.
But, can any of you mean girls tell me with absolute honesty that you've never made the same mistakes? Honestly?
Didn't think so.
If it's one thing I've learned about Timelord over the years is that no matter how many of these attacks he's withstood, he'll take it like a man. It won't change him or the effort he puts into this forum. Right or wrong, that kind of strength of character is far more admirable than a bunch of giggly schoolgirls rushing to kick a man while he's down.
|
|
|
|
Su questo non sono propriamente d'accordo. Il suo comportamento è stato inqualificabile. Ha lanciato accuse e nonostante sia stato smentito ha continuato a perseverare e sta continuando.
non ha fatto alcuna scorrettezza
|
|
|
|
He is a liar and he continues to persevere in his errors and falsehoods
Luckily I saved and quoted in this post all the lies he wrote.
He continues to accuse without any evidence. He changed the charges against me, but still red and i'm still a scammer on his opinion
Freedom of expression is a right for everyone, but slandering a person is not part of freedom of expression.
Dear Timelord, is so hard to admit, "Sorry I made a mistake"
|
|
|
|
Sembrerebbe di si! Un pò mi dispiace per Timelord, anche perchè il suo contributo per sgamare scammer e truffe è spesso stato preziono: sarebbe bastato ammettere di essersi sbagliato, e invece ha perseverato.
Quindi alla fine hai risolto?
Spero che alla fine per te sia andato tutto bene, mi ricordo che era successo in passato con accuse fantasiose ai danni del nostro merit rascal.
Purtroppo qua ci sta gente che non ha niente che fare, come diciamo in sicilia
|
|
|
|
Confermo. Ma mi sorge un dubbio: posto che lo scambio avviene da address Utente A ad address Utente B , se A o B hanno problemi chi mi dice che la controparte non si trovi comunque impegata. Esempio pratico: - A è un malfattore e vende porcherie illegali - B, in buona fede acquista / vende tramite P2P binance le sue crypro ad A - A va sotto indagine per quello che ha fatto - B molto probabilmente avrà aanche i suoi casini in quanto a cascata si troverà a dover dimostrare di non avere rapporti con A. Come ne usciamo indenni? Certamente B avrà le sue belle grane. Quindi lasciamo perdere ogni scambio P2P (mia opinione personale) ....
D'altro canto come giustamente dice HedgeFx non vorrei rischiare di trovarmi delle grane inconsapevolmente per reati che non ho commesso.
...
Credo che HedgeFx nella sua risposta si riferisse a quanto avviene nei sistemi p2p, non al trading via cex. Tu però parli di Binance e quello è un cex, non un sistema p2p. Lascio comunque confermare l'interpretazione a HedgeFx. |
|
|
|
There is something shady: why suspend withdrawals and don't lock deposits? Also on they webpage there isn't any warning about: so they want people continue to deposits? This look like an exit scam. Hope i'm wrong.... |
|
|
|
You are missing one important thing: Timelord accused me of investing in ponzi but I do not invest and promote any ponzi. Ponzi and MLM are scam. I also reported the user to moderator (this guy made lot of post that was deleted by moderator after my report: https://bpip.org/Profile?id=3546817). Did you notice that HedgeFx left a negative tag to member @N30W_414 for promoting Ponzi, a month before the Timelord accused him of investing in a Ponzi scheme? What kind of Pantomime of truth is involved in TL analysis?
[/i] |
|
|
|
Thank you Gazeta for your suggestion, I am a very emotional person, passionate like most of those who live on the Mediterranean coasts. Yes, i understand how trust works, and from my last mishap I have learned further things. I changed trust on PS34 (using more appropriate words ) . My apologies to him and to all people i could have offended for my inappropriate words. My judgment of his actions remains negative. About flags, as Loycev said, the only thing i can do is withdraw it. And it was done. I made a mistake opening it, due to my inexperience. HedgeFx, please make sure you follow LV's guide for correct use of Marketplace Trust system. This is not a system for retaliatory feedbacks. It should be used for financial deals when giving positive and negative ratings. When you have to share anything else you can use a neutral feedback. In case you simply do or don't trust someone's judgement you can add that person to your trust list or remove the user from your trust list. Be aware that trust lists and Marketplace Trust system are two different mechanisms and you properly understand them if you want to use them. Scammer flags are another mechanism, different than the 2 ones mentioned above and you should also make sure you understand this system prior using it. For more information about how Flag system works please follow this thread. In case you'll use these 3 mechanisms incorrectly you'll only risk to look as ridiculous as the baboon looks. And I don't think you want that, do you? For example, regarding this: I understood and I followed your advice: I changed the color of trust. You should make sure that you changed the type of your feedback not because LV asked you to, but because you actually understood how the system works. And, if you actually understood all these, then besides changing your previous feedback from negative to neutral you should also modify these ones:  1. Your flag against TimeLord is incorrect, as he did not scam anybody. Furthermore, the flag was already opposed by multiple DT users. You should delete that feedback mentioning the flag, as it is irrelevant.2. The second highlighted feedback from the picture is another example that you misused Marketplace Trust system. You gave a negative feedback to a spammer. The spammer is spamming, not scamming. Therefore, since there is no financial loss, that feedback should be a neutral one, not negative.
As LV already stated, the community sided with you and undid the damage. I personally also involved in this conflict, after fillippone brought it to my attention, and I exposed (again) TimeLord's idiocies, hypocrisy and misuse of forum mechanisms. As you probably observed, he has already about 8 DT exclusions or so. You should make sure you are not making same mistakes he did. If you'll do it, you'll looks like a clown, just like he does. I hope this will help you understand that you really need to study well Marketplace Trust, Flags and Trust list systems, in order to use them wisely and correctly. |
|
|
|
No, I'm not stubborn. I just feel very offended and let the anger take over. I understood and I followed your advice: I changed the color of trust.
I think he's a stubborn person and won't listen to other users' opinion. When someone make a mistake, I can still forgive him because it might his first time react to this situation. But if he still stand with his opinion when everyone already told him, the problem is his behavior, not his ignorance.
|
|
|
|
I respect you ( like I respect many others here) : I’ll go to change color. Thank for suggestions: anger drive me into this kind of mistake, sorry.
@HedgeFX: the wording of your current feedback is accurate, it's only the color that's wrong (and damages your own reputation).
|
|
|
|
No, you can't say i'm the same as him. NO. I don't accuse anyone. I don't say timelord is a scammer. He left me 3 - i repeat 3 - warning on my trust. Each one only based on his convinctions, whitount any evidence . From my side timelord acted with the intention of ruining my reputation and the fact that he deleted all the messages that disavowed him confirms my thesis. My negative trust is more than justified: Timelord's actions could have compromised all my sacrifices. It is right to leave a negative trust to a person who takes an action that harms you. And timelord acted with intent to harm me.
** Of course my trust will change if timelord withdraws or changes the trusts he left me
But, What do you guys do? Some prominent members asked you to remove the feedback you left, not because your words seemed angry. They asked because of its color. You just deleted and re-wrote your old feedback, and it's still negative. You misused the trust system, the same as him. So, What is the difference between you and him?
|
|
|
|
There is not only Neapolitan pizza: practically every region has its own variant of pizza. And they are all very good The best thing is that pizza is democratic and belongs to everyone: in some places you can buy a pizza for even less than 3 euros. And don't believe those who invent pizzas with gold and caviar: the real pizza is made with poor ingredients, such as tomatoes, sardines, black olives, olive oil, basil, mozzarella.
Situation is similar in a big part of Europe (and I guess US) as well, there are pizzerias everywhere. But its true, you are the kings of pizza, and I would add that you have generally the best cuisine in the world (Greece is a close 2nd to me).
Out of curiosity I just checked Google maps and in 500 meters radius of the place I live at the moment (very touristy city) there are 7 pizzerias. Unfortunately, I am very picky when it comes to pizza (more experience, higher demands) and rarely eat at any of those places so to actually get a very good neapolitan pizza I have to travel 4-5 km.
|
|
|
|
And you did a good thing not making any more pizzas  I was joking of course, but the real pizza is the Italian one: here we have at least one pizzeria in every neighborhood  We make pizzas like Germans drink beer, or Spaniards make paella  The last (and only) pizza I posted was 3 years ago. And I didn't even make it, my wife did. |
|
|
|
Le ho fatte vedere a mio cugino che fa il pizzaiolo. E niente, sono al pronto soccorso che aspetto di essere medicato dopo aver ricevuto un mattarello in testa A parte gli scherzi, questa dobbiamo vincerla NOI, perchè a giudicare dalle foto postate, il 90% di chi ha partecipato non ha mai visto una pizza in vita sua. In questo post potete vedere una carrellata delle prime 40 pizze inviate al concorso, ci sono creazioni alquanto, come dire, interessanti... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
