In the States generally a tense atmosphere in relation to kriptovalyutam.They have not figured out yet, but already taxed))) Of course Bitcoin is a very risky investment! BUT! Who does not take risks, he does not drink champagne.it's all calculated.Highly risky investments, always bring the highest income! If you are not ready to take risks, then you should not expect big returns.If the situation was more predictable, it would no longer be Bitcoin)

They are already considering it. Since if you do not work with this, you can simply lose control over the situation. What is unacceptable, especially for the world monetary fund))) Another issue is that they can not yet find a way to properly regulate the crypto currency . In particular because of the dramatically changing course. And the anonymity of operations.Put yourself in the place of the government, how would you do. Of course everyone knows everything and the government only pretends that they do not know what they are dealing with) But for the general public an illusion of choice is created, otherwise panic will arise.

Of course the situation should change, just need more time. Many do not yet understand with what they are dealing. In order for Bitcoin to become a currency, its rate should grow seriously. And for this it is necessary to popularize it and of course invest. It is not a matter of one day and not even one year. The world is already ready for these changes.Our task is to bring the conceived business to the coveted culmination.

The fear of losing money is a normal phenomenon for a person. I think it's not necessary to explain why))) People are also afraid of everything new and what they do not understand-this is also absolutely normal. Do not laugh at them and throw them aside.After all, without the participation of ordinary people, the crypto will not be able to reach the designated goal. The fear and risk factor can not be removed anywhere, they need to learn how to work with them.

Indonesia in general is very poorly developed economically. It is a fairly poor state greatly lagging behind in the development of the economy. In some of its parts, generally the money appeared less than a century ago) Therefore, it is not worth waiting for them to connect quickly to new technologies. And even more so as from this to repulse.Also, the state has fairly strict laws, which in turn will also impede the acquaintance with the Bitcoins.

I think that everything is not so simple. And my story is an example of this (I lost a lot of money by going to the wrong places for bitcoins (I sold several when the rate was 800 and bought when the rate was 17000 (((Now I'm following the schedule closely and analyze every fluctuation before the operation. Otherwise, it is possible to burn out. Rotors are aware of the movement of the course from secret sources.

Yes, of course, we know and are very happy about it! The leaders are the great Switzerland with Falcon Privat Bank! In addition to bitcoin, they already work with the ligtcoins etherium and bitcoin cash. As the development grows, the tariffs for operations and the conditions for their conduct will change. The bank also warns of all nuances and dangers of running a crypto business.And to open an account with this bank you need a lot of money)))))))

When we had money for investment, we divided them into two parts. The first part is big, we put it in the bank. But not just on the savings account, but in the mutual fund, which depends on the exchange rate. The second part was placed on the crypto-currency exchange. bank, not that they gave an income, but quite the contrary (((Because of the dollar's rate leap, we even lost. And regretted that I invested in the crypt

Mining of bitcoins - because of "consumption of a huge amount of electricity and heated speculation with virtual currencies". This may include, in particular, the direct restriction of the supply of electricity to miners. In China, almost 80% of the world's mining capacities are located, and their closure can seriously affect the market of bitcoins.

2017 was marked by the fact that representatives of world religions began to think about their crypto-currency. There were Jewish beatcoen, Christian Christkoins, and today the head of the staff of the Council of Muftis of Russia Madina Kalimullina said that in the next couple of years, Islamic crypto currency can be created for the implementation of Islamic banking (different from the Western banking system).Contrary to the expectations of many, the Islamic world is also in the topic.

I recently had a daughter and although she is a small baby, I understand perfectly what it is about. She still does not know how to talk and she's already being so cunning. Just try to deny her anything, how she will inexperably cry, or think of some other way to get what she wants. I can not even imagine what will happen next and how to refuse correctly.))

Since I studied psychology this topic is very interesting for me from the point of view of psychology.
 Traditional money makes us greedy and inhumane - this is evidenced by most studies. Cryptocurrencies, in turn, are able to fill humanity with compassion, tenderness and love. These digital assets can fundamentally change our psychology and enhance our sense of happiness. The secret lies in how these types of currencies function: traditional money increases, and often even creates the so - called "money-empathy"gap.
 The main principles of cryptocurrencies are: decentralization, peer-to-peer architecture and lack of borders and approvals. The above features allow cryptocurrencies to "reprogram" human psychology.
 Because traditional money is controlled by banking cartels and national governments, people's psychology - their behavior, emotions and thought processes - is closely related to money. As a result, the master - slave model is created. At the same time, people who have money associate them, consciously or subconsciously, with the power and ability to control everything. In other words, money is suppressing our neural networks, making people greedy and mean. This destroys a person's innate propensity for empathy (empathy), creating a "money - empathy" gap, which has been confirmed experimentally.
 On the other hand, the cryptocurrency forms a completely different model. It is a network model based on the principle of communication, cooperation and sharing. This "friend-friend" model is formed due to the characteristic features of cryptocurrencies - decentralization, peer-to-peer transactions and the absence of boundaries and approvals. People perceive each other as a partner (or "friend") in joint financial activities. That is, people have every reason to treat others compassionately. Money is no longer associated with greed and power. The paradigm of interaction is based on the honesty of the algorithm. Despite the fact that Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies portend the formation of a new paradigm based on compassion, the real nature of their ability to change the human psychology has yet to be studied. But because the psychology of a person depends on the environment, it is possible to say that crypto currencies have already begun to alter humanity, making him more compassionate.

And I just think the opposite. Peak popularity Bitcoin last winter. Then the masses learned about it and many people buy BTC for a high price. Since the beginning of this year, there has been a big decline in the market, many people lost money. Popularity and demand decreased. Big "Bosses" push the price down and buy bitcoins from the population. Soon when all laws will be adopted and everything will be ligalized, the blockchain and crypto-currencies will completely enter our life. Then it willis be year when crypto goes mainstream. I think it will not be earlier than 2020.

Malta is great. The sea, sun, good weather. The only thing that the island is small and there is not enough space for everyone. So now the first to move in large companies such as Binace, and others will look for another places with the same attractive laws. Most likely it will be the same small countries as Malta. I think we'll hear about them soon.

A suo tempo già xp trasmetteva in forma criptata verso siti Microsoft. La stessa, interpellata, ha sempre sostenuto che i dati inviati non erano in alcun modo riferibili all'utente. Ma siccome erano criptati, cosa contenessero effetivamente questi dati, lo sapevano solamente quelli di Microsoft.

A proposito di browser, è noto da un po di tempo che a causa dei costi esorbitanti, anche gli sviluppatori firefox per continuare a tenere in vita il progetto abbiano accettato dei "compromessi". Se poi aggiungiamo le sue migliaia di "estensioni & co." non controllate che si possono installare..

Le mie sono congetture riguardo al solo anonimato, qualsiasi sia il sistema operativo. Fare l'upgrade a win 10 non è obbligatorio anche se porterlo fare gratuitamente fa gola a molti, me compreso. Per ora l'ho fatto solo sul mio winpad ma qualcosa è andato storto, funziona malissimo e non riesco a fare il downgrade a win 8.1.


Hai centrato l'obiettivo. Con il secondo non ti connetti mai da casa tua fin dal suo primo avvio e usi sempre connessioni wifi libere spesso diverse e comunque mai riconducibili a te.
Usare win. ios o linux non saprei. Di ios si legge che quelli della Apple fanno un buon lavoro per la privacy dei loro utenti, l'ha sostenuto anche Snowden. Di Linux, sempre Snowden, se la memoria non mi inganna, parla molto bene di Tails.

Me lo devo tradurre, sembra interessante.

L'IP lo puoi paragonare all'indirizzo di casa tua, se usi il tuo, risalire a te (e al tuo pc) per chi è del mestiere è un gioco da ragazzi e addio anonimato.

Non bisogna usare la propria connessione internet ma usare wifi liberi, la connessione internet in chiaro fornisce una quantità pazzesca di dati (non solo sfruttabili a fine di marketing) su chi la usa, addirittura ho letto che dai dati forniti è possibile tracciare in maniera univoca il pc connesso (e di conseguenza chi lo usa) come una sorta di impronta digitale informatica univoca e, al pari delle impronte digitali dei polpastrelli, non c'è ne possono essere due uguali al mondo.
Su Nexus di qualche mese fa ho letto la notizia che tra i finanziatori del progetto Tor, c'è un anche ente di sicurezza britannico che avrebbe elargito qualche milione
di dollari. Le agenzie di sicurezza governative sono per il ferreo controllo dei cittadini, non per la loro libertà.
Comunque su internet si dice che Tor non sia cosi sicuro come sembra, sarà per quello che il gruppo di Anonymous non l'ha mai usato?