Busy testing...

Very soon.

When can we expect the update for this?

Will be a new project, Bram Still lots of work to be done by Bjorn (and Patrick). So not online yet. I just mentioned it, because this is a great idea, I think.

I totally agree with you! This one is well organized and easy to navigate and the other is hard to follow, hard on the eyes and just plain ugly, sorry....

Yep, we're working on something amazeballs for the 20th of September. Hope we can deliver like always

Today mainly bitcoin and guldencoin getting purchases from litebit.
http://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/litebit/

Don't worry so much about what other coins are doing/saying

Just keep focusing on positive ways to move this coin forward, people are not stupid they will recognise which coins are the leaders and which are the followers and only the leaders will remain in the long term.

I am generating/managing this release over the last two weeks 1000km away from home, on a poor internet connection, sitting in my nieces plastic kiddies chair (Because my mothers house doesn't have proper office furniture), while visiting my fiance who has just had a successful transplant (for which we have waited for 2 years) in between flights back and forth back home where I also need to try manage my house and business.
A very happy but also very stressful time in my life.

So you will forgive me if the whims of when some random person on the forum wants us to release has exactly 0 impact on our release schedule. We are releasing today because we happen to be ready today, no other reason.
If you want to buy packages then that is of course great, go ahead, but don't think that such actions are going to place pressure on anybody to do anything faster.

In terms of features I know things may not be moving as fast as some had hoped would happen since I joined, know that we are doing a lot of unglamorous behind the scene work first, getting things like automated builds working 100% etc. etc. to build a solid foundation to work on.
In my experience trying to build features without such things is silly, any idiot can add a few flashy features, doing so in a maintainable professional manner that is not a nightmare going forward is an entirely different story, I only do the second kind of development.

Sorry, sold out my man.

Great Buerra! What a fantastic support for this coin there is!  

Thanks guys, much appreciated.

Like I said, I am a miner. I already have a working system in place that takes the temporary mining aspect out, and transforms it into a consistent way of mining. Upon re-thinking and re-calculating the numbers used in the current IPO and the idea behind it, it is possible to provide a consistent 100 MH to the network with a rough 1 BTC difference. So easy translated, 7.5 BTC can provide a consistent 100 MH of hashing power with no time limit on it. That's the easy part for me.

With this, I run into a few 'probems'. The first, being the required initial needed investment to pull this off. I am not that "in-depth", yet, in the community to know if there would be enough support to make this work with the help of the premine for the first batch (see also my "secondly" next) as a promo.

Secondly, in case of a positve potential, my mind tends towards building up a muliple of consistent mining. Not with the help of the premine, but stand-alones. Yet not to much, to leave some room for feature Guldencoin users, and also preventing to some extend that a lot of NLG would/could be directed to a few users with deep pockets. The picture I have in mind, is a maximum of 10x 100 MH lifetime IPO Guldencoin contracts. I could use some feedback is this is reasonable (the idea of a consistent 1 TH backbone hashing power).

Thirdly, with consistent mining in mind, I could use some advice on the pools on which to direct the hasing towards. I always used hardcoreminers, but I do not know who the owner is or on what level it is tied with Guldencoin. I simply do not know if there are any pools, and which ones they would be, that are more directly tied to Guldencoin; for example, like http://digihash.co is with Digibyte.

Fourthly, I could use some advice on possibilities in sharing NLG address accessibility or if processes could be automated in terms of payouts in relation to the amount of shares. For example, let's say we could indeed realize a 10x a 100 MH lifetime contract. I would be happy to take on the part to realize what is needed to provide these 10x 100 MH, but in relation to the 'contract takers' I do not know if I would feel comfortable with the control over persistent 1 TH of NLG mining towards the community. Or put it more simply, if I were to be hit by a truck, it would be nice that the persistent mining doesn't go down with me 


Furthermore, I would like to add the statement, if positive received, that I would make the consistent mining something like an "NLG exclusive", or something like that. With the help of it's community, a consistent backbone of hashing can be build for any coin. But I don't want to help the other coins, I want to help building the Guldencoin. There is some very good and dedicated enthousiasm in this community, and I believe in this coin. Dutchies to the moon... 

Think he will be positively surprised and say so.  No worries. Investeerder is about targets in planning being made. Good right to do so.
Dev team has delivered, gives him more trust to invest.

I will buy all remaining packages if the development team deliver next release by friday.

Just released by Buerra:

Very nice community mining offer when "switching gears" will take place  

1) Get your share of total mined coins.
2) Get your coins from the investment in this IPO.

https://community.guldencoin.com/t/community-mining-ipo-switching-gears-session/1150
(English in the second part of the link)

Total packages to be sold: 100.
Packages left: 86 (edit: 79 now......  75..... 71......goes fast  )

Just as with the IPO for the iOS wallet, hope this will be also such a succes! Maybe Rijk can make a nice promo eyecatcher for this?

Overnight we successfully built the windows wallet of the new codebase, today we will be doing OSX and start testing, but here is the kicker, we are probably looking at a middle of August for release as we are working on something else to be released with the code base update. More on this later but MaNI still to confirm if the idea can be implemented successfully.

Define "success" and which formula?