Μπορεί κάποιος να μου εξηγήσει γιατί έχει πέσει η τιμή του Bitcoin τόσο πολύ τις τελευταίες 2 μέρες?
Πιστεύω πως ένας απο τους λόγους είναι και η "άνοδος" των alcoins... Επειδή αρκετοί τελευταία έχουν αρκετά κέρδη απο την άνοδο του btc και μυρίζονται ότι το btc ίσως δεν ανέβει άλλο, κάνουν diversification στα alts, οπότε έχουμε αρκετά btc που "μετατρέπονται" σε altcoins, αυτός τώρα που μοσχοπούλησε τo altcoin1 σίγουρα θα μετατρέψει μεγάλο μέρος των bitcoin αυτών άμεσα σε ευρώ/δολάρια. |
|
|
|
Απ'οτι φαινεται η πραγματικη χρηση ειναι ανυπαρκτη.
Το marketshare δλδ δεν αντιπροσωπευει ουτε transactions, ουτε volume transacted πανω στο δικτυο, αλλα speculation.
Σήμερα ίσως. Aυτό όμως δε σημαίνει ότι τα πράγματα δεν θα βελτιωθούν και άλλο για τα alts ή ότι δεν θα χειροτερεύσουν για το btc, τουλάχιστον η "αγορά" αυτό δείχνει κατα τη γνώμη μου. Το speculation τώρα, ζει και βασιλεύει, το btc οτι ήταν να δώσει φαίνεται πως το έδωσε με το halving και την αναμονή για το EFT. Πάμε για άλλα τώρα.... |
|
|
|
Behold the poor bagholder who doesn't realize when he got profited from.
Instead of writing one line sophistries, I would apreciate it if you spent some time to answer my seven questions in my previous post. Thank you. |
|
|
|
This is crypto and Dan actions over several years speaks volumes. I was a huge supporter of BTS and was gullible to believe in Larimers. There was so much BS that the market eventually gave up. Luckily i didn't make the same mistake with Steemit. Dan leaving Steemit is a pattern. Stay away.
 |
|
|
|
@Smooth Hope you are fucking happy with yourself supporting this scam. I didn't know that a "resignation" makes something a scam. Satoshi scamed us all!  We all know what this means for steem, What exactly does it "mean"? I will repeat my question, does a "resignation" makes something a scam? Who benefits from your constant baseless "accusations"? do you have some kind of personal "vendetta" against Dan Larimer or smooth? He literally milked millions of dollars from this project
How did you come up with this very unspecific number? what "math" or proof did you use? The whole project goes against everything that they teach in economics 101
Would you care to be more specific? it may help to solve steem's "problems" afterall! or you have no clue what you are talking about? See you at 0 bagholder.
That's a very bold statement, none of the 666 coins listed in scamcoinmarketcap has 0 value, yes a very bold statement indeed! See you in moon smartass! p.s On your way out, don't forget to get some Dash eww, this $#!& has a "better chart". |
|
|
|
@Smooth Hope you are fucking happy with yourself supporting this scam. I didn't know that a "resignation" makes something a scam. Satoshi scamed us all! |
|
|
|
Στα περισσότερα από αυτά δεν βοηθάει καθόλου και ο υπερπληθωρισμός τους.
Πως ορίζεις τον "υπερπληθωρισμό"? π.χ το bitcoin πότε έπαψε να έχει "υπερπληθωρισμό" ? μετά το τελευταίο halvening? πιο πριν? Με 1800 νέα bitcoin να δημιουργούνται καθημερινά ο "πληθωρισμός" του τρέχει περίπου με 4% σήμερα... |
|
|
|
Σε λίγο πάντως θα πλημμυρίσουμε απο άρθρα... "Γιατί η απόρριψη για το ΕΤF είναι οτι καλύτερο θα μπορούσε να συμβεί στο Bitcoin!" LOL  |
|
|
|
Funny. So those billboards were funded by community, while no-one from that community spent a single cent..? Revolutionary  . What is "funny" is that's exactly how bitcoin mining works! What is indeed Revolutionary is that STEEM is not electricity/power hungry and can allocate the "miners rewards" to blogers, they can use the rewards as they see fit. Nope. This analogy is irrelevant. Bitcoin miners spend a lot of money to get those Bitcoins - either via renting, or buying that expensive equipment, finding a place to run it, so it can be both secure and noise-tolerant, with capability of dissipating all that heat... Setting up the farms, monitoring all those devices for heat and power consumption... That is a lot of work and money. Been there done that. While with such kinds of Steem "funding" nobody spends anything - nethier miney, nor an effort. Even the amount of time spent is negligible. Spend 10 minutes to post such crowdfunding request, then each voter spends 5 seconds top vote. Cheap and effective (while it works)... Even the occational advertizing crowfunding request may be considered "work" and it's beneficial imo if it helps to spread the adoption of the specific blockchain, what use or what "value" can pure POW have in a blockchain if this specific blockchain is dead in 2 years? Sure, such crowdfunds are beneficial to spread the adoption of a blockchain, its nothing to argue with... The idea of that crowdfund was good too (very good, actually). But the fact money can be generated without spending comparable effort (being it work or funds) raises concerns. If Steem rewards authors to the same extend to what they get if they publish the same work on regular media, the platform would be viable. Even if Steem rewards authors 2x what they get elsewhere, it could be viable and flourishing. But while it rewards 10x of the real value, or rewards for something of zero value (like copying or re-broadcasting content), the price would fall. I hope this will stabilize at some point, but developers need to create incentives for buying and holding Steem, be it a share in the company generating revenue from ads, or something else. There is not much if anything that I disagree with. Only two points to add, first about rewards, at this point rewards indeed can go way up or way down but my belief is that this is temporarily because it's too early, with time and more users/adoption I hope that this will be resolved. But the fact money can be generated without spending comparable effort (being it work or funds) raises concerns.
While a legitimate blogger spents time and effort in order to create a quality post and thus creates some "work", I believe that the same aplies also to someone that creates a legitimate advertising campaing post and later does some more "work" in order to see the objective of his campaign fullfiled, the "advertizing sign" won't just simply apear by itself afterall, some more work needs to be done for this. Of course there will be "scammers" that will not fullfil their promises and they will run away with the money, or others that will try to take advantage of any "exploit" and "steal" funds, I can't really say much here except that I hope that there will not be a lot of cases that funds are given to "risky campaigns" or lost to "bad actors". Also I don't really know if there is a huge difference bettween money getting stolen at the "minting" process or after the minting process while sitting at an excange, ofcourse if there are lots of money "stolen" at the minting process this can be really harmfull. |
|
|
|
Funny. So those billboards were funded by community, while no-one from that community spent a single cent..? Revolutionary . What is "funny" is that's exactly how bitcoin mining works! What is indeed Revolutionary is that STEEM is not electricity/power hungry and can allocate the "miners rewards" to blogers, they can use the rewards as they see fit. Nope. This analogy is irrelevant. Bitcoin miners spend a lot of money to get those Bitcoins - either via renting, or buying that expensive equipment, finding a place to run it, so it can be both secure and noise-tolerant, with capability of dissipating all that heat... Setting up the farms, monitoring all those devices for heat and power consumption... That is a lot of work and money. Been there done that. While with such kinds of Steem "funding" nobody spends anything - nethier miney, nor an effort. Even the amount of time spent is negligible. Spend 10 minutes to post such crowdfunding request, then each voter spends 5 seconds top vote. Cheap and effective (while it works)... Even the occational advertizing crowfunding request may be considered "work" and it's beneficial imo if it helps to spread the adoption of the specific blockchain, what use or what "value" can pure POW have in a blockchain if this specific blockchain is dead in 2 years? |
|
|
|
I made a Steemit post, but I also wanted to poll the Bitcointalk Steem folks: Do you think people are scared to upvote now days on Steemit? http://www.strawpoll.me/12479915/ri do know they are not scared to downvote. https://steemd.com/@vintagebazaaron steemd.com we can see who upvoted us (all the awesome people) but its a shame we can not see who downvoted us, id really like to see the accounts that downvote. I've made 2 blog posts, both have down votes and certainly do not deserve it, due to the time and effort put into making them (hours) and its all original content. Question is, how do the people benefit from down voting? Because if they do not benefit anything from it.... then its what? Simply out of "badness" they down vote? Maybe they removed the downvotes afterwards, steemd.com would show the downvotes(flags) as -100% or something like that, also clicking in the votes summury of your post shows the top upvoters or downvoters. |
|
|
|
Funny. So those billboards were funded by community, while no-one from that community spent a single cent..? Revolutionary . What is "funny" is that's exactly how bitcoin mining works! What is indeed Revolutionary is that STEEM is not electricity/power hungry and can allocate the "miners rewards" to blogers, they can use the rewards as they see fit. |
|
|
|
καταρχήν μόνο που διαβάζεις κάτι τέτοιοι δείχνει και το πόσο ασχετος είναι αυτός που το έχει γράψει για την τεχνολογία του blockchain.
Απο που το έβγαλες αυτό το θεϊκό συμπέρασμα? Που είδες βρε "σχετικέ" με παρωπίδες να μιλά για τεχνικά θέματα ο άνθρωπος? και βασικά σε τι διαφωνείς απ'ότι λέει?
Ρε πούστη μου λες καλά δεν μπορούν να διαβάσουν ένα βιβλίο να ξεστραβωθούν.
OYAOY!!!
Μου θυμίζουν λαϊκιστές να λένε ανοησίες και ευκολόπιστες παπάτζες
Περιμένω εναγωνίως να μας quotareis τα σημεία του άρθρου που είναι "λαϊκισμοί" "ανοησίες" και "παπάτζες"!
Και αν γουστάρουν περισσότερα transaction/sec....
Δώστε τους να φάνε παντεσπάνι? Ναι, όλοι γουστάρουν περισσότερα tps, τώρα αν εσύ ότι κρατάς σε btc το έχεις παρκαρισμένο στα ανταλλακτήρια και δε σου καίγεται καρφί, αυτό είναι άλλο θέμα! |
|
|
|
...και ότι φταίει για όλα το blocksize μπλα μπλα.. Δηλαδή άμα γίνει το blocksize πενταπλάσιο θα ανταγωνιστεί το bitcoin ταυτόχρονα τις visa/mastercard/paypal και βάλε? Νομίζω πως δεν παίρνει θέση για το blocksize, αλλά απλά αναφέρει πως ένας απο τους λόγους που το bitcoin ίσως να μην επανέλθει "στην κανονικότητα" μετά απο μια πτώση στην τιμή του, είναι το εαν δεν καταφέρει να δώσει λύση στα μέχρι στιγμής μόνο 7tps. |
|
|
|
Οι Κινέζοι miners μπορούν άραγε να πωλούν τα btc τους όσο τα ανταλλακτήρια στην Κίνα είναι κλειστά? εαν δυσκολεύονται τότε θα μπορούσε να είναι και ένας απο τους λόγους της ανόδου της τιμής τον τελευταίο καιρό. Επίσης πριν απο καιρό υπήρχαν άρθρα χειραγώγησης της τιμής του χρυσού σε ημέρες κινέζικης αργίας, δεν ξέρω πόσο πιθανό είναι να συμβαίνει κάτι παρόμοιο με την άνοδο της τιμής του btc προς τα πάνω όλως τυχαίως τώρα που τα κινέζικα είναι "κλειστά", για παράδειγμα... http://averybgoodman.com/myblog/2016/10/05/why-gold-prices-dropped-so-dramatically-yesterday/ |
|
|
|
να δωσω κι εγω τα ορια μου (εκ του ασφαλους) 0-10000 ε δε μπορει μεσα θα πεσω XA! Μόλις έχασες! Η πρόβλεψη μου έχει μικρότερο "spread" (Διατηρώ την ίδια και για το 2017) Επόμενος!  [Edit] Nope δεν έχασες  |
|
|
|
Its funny how Smooth is being attacked for being helpful to people.
I personally would like to thank Smooth for being a reliable source of information here, being honest and thoughtful.
FWIW, here is how I see it:
some people consider only the financial part, completely neglecting the value the project carries and the potential behind it. That's why they have a problem understanding the ones who supports Steem.
Steem is not just a coin like Dash, it is a platform, which has something to offer society, and I believe people like Smooth are on it because they want to collectively fix the issues, and make it it as great as it can be.
Its easy to just stand there and throw nonconstructive criticism, but its more honorable to actually help correcting the hiccups and help building something useful out of the imperfect project like Steem currently is.
The idea and platform behind the project doesn't matter when it's built on dirt and flawed economics by a scammer like Dan Larimer. The only scammer here is you, do you have a name? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
