|
Yes the resize on rotation is a bug, it will get fixed :-)
|
|
|
|
I am currently chatting with someone on my android. Not sure who, and how, thought it was just a UI preview. Awesome.
a little surprise :-) actually if you want to change the send to address you can create the file on the sdcard, but really this release is a just for the UI preview /mnt/sdcard/XCurrency/sendto.txt then add ATCSecure XX1TJjA5949KrKoHh7aCTkqBwCmFfGo9uw |
|
|
|
No I haven't made a living off any of that - your reaching to conclusions that try and justify your delusional reasoning based on false assumptions |
|
|
|
We are combining the best of DHT with XNode, and Telehash technologies to build XBRIDGE |
|
|
|
I am not a linux guru, but is it possible to run the tor/tails client environment and then pull from github the latest linux wallets on it ? So technically we can update our our torstick desktops ?
Yes there will be a solution to update the torsticks through a .deb package |
|
|
|
I keep hearing this. I don't get it?? I keep seeing Rev this and that released. Yes he has coded stuff and made a decent looking wallet.. but he hasn't delivered anything of value until that anon source code gets released. If its released and it is 100% working trustless anon, then yes he delivered. That is all any real crypto investor gives a shit about. We are not in it to gamble and play the stupid pump game... where only the coin owners win.
The wallet is released and it is 100% working decentralized trustless mixing, which has been demonstrated several times and a visual block explorer was built showing how complex the anon system really is all your doing is spreading FUD because I won't open source it. Here is proof http://imgur.com/h8rFt5U or just go download the wallet it test it for your self 2nd - the trustless anon & xchat was developed after XC's ATH price, so its not a stupid pump game, its real technology, combined with Xchat, which is real tech developed in-house, not a cloned CINNI EM system. 3rd - I'm NOT involved with any scam coins so stop making false allegations Dan |
|
|
|
P.S no 3... I guess it is not a new release, it is the stable version from the main site, which I ran yesterday and it crashed..sad  could you send me the debug.log cut from the crash so I can review? as this release doesn't crash on any of my development systems. It could be something else, send me the debug log [the end of it should contain some debug data about the crash] |
|
|
|
Still having problems with the wallet crashing.
I realized I had problems with my wallet when started crashing with versions:
2.49.08e, and then 2.490.8iW
Finally 2.49.08iW crashed repeatedly so I erased the entire directory in AppData\Roaming\XCurrency and let it sync but it crashed many time while downloading the data.
I noticed that the whole time the outbound traffic was about 200 KB/s
My BC wallet also crashed...
After xc downloaded the whole chain I put my old wallet and the coins and transactions where there, but I saw that the last staking transactions were unconfirmed with following dates;
August 19th
Sep 6th
Sep 16th
Oct 3rd.
I did not notice this staking problem until today since I was not paying attention to my wallet.
So then I realized that Dan mentioned the stable version is 2.49.07 which is now on the main site. I tried this version and after a half of day of running correctly it crashed. I noticed that this version did not have the large outgoing data rate and seem to behave properly. I suspect that the wallet crashes when it is trying to stake since it runs a few hours before it crashes.
So I fired up my other machine and let xc version v0.9.2.47h_RC3.XCurrency-2.47 catch up since I do not recall having problems with this wallet. After it finished the sync I let it run the entire day and it never crashed but..... now in this wallet I am missing 97 coins?? I ran -rescan and also walletrepair and the coins never showed up to this older wallet on my second machine running the old client v0.9.2.47h_RC3.XCurrency-2.47
I wrote this in the hope that it will help Dan identify the problem. I do believe that a working wallet is a priority and right now I dont have one.
P.S. I forgot to mention that I am behind two routers and have my ports forwarded correctly buy I have not been able so mix coins ever.
P.S. no 2: While I wrote this note I just noticed a new release... I will test it now.
Thanks Dan
I have identified the root cause and it is a memory leak in the bitcoin P2P code itself which plagues ALL altcoins based off bitcoin .07 and .08. However with that being said, XC is pushing the limits of that code, basically to the point of breaking it due to the amount of traffic going over in the latest test releases version 2.49.08 - has been stable for me, if you continue to have issues please let me know |
|
|
|
Are there any specific plans or goals for software release(s) before the 29th that will inspire investor and user confidence? It seems like we may of moved from XChat development on traditional systems to mobile development? I realize you are very busy with the upcoming release of BlockNet infrastructure. Thanks.
A stable release of XChat across all platforms. Good answer. That would be huge in my opinion and would silence some of the overall doubt. I think this would be a very important milestone for xc. I hope the team feels the same and is able to deliver. Thanks again. [EDIT] I'm assuming "all platforms" means Windows, Linux, and Mac Yes - Just posted the links |
|
|
|
Are there any specific plans or goals for software release(s) before the 29th that will inspire investor and user confidence? It seems like we may of moved from XChat development on traditional systems to mobile development? I realize you are very busy with the upcoming release of BlockNet infrastructure. Thanks.
XChat development continues, in fact just posted the stable branch for all 3 platforms for mainnet - further testing of xchat for the latest code [08i] continues but that is being moved off mainnet |
|
|
|
Sorry to ask a question that could cause fear uncertainty and doubt but I have asked this question a few times and been ignored.
If we can buy into the blocknet using XC , does that mean that those XC could or would get dumped into the market and the price of XC will crash?
This is a really important question for us. We need an answer.
None of the coins used are going to be dumped. You cannot really say that... You are ITOing for close to 1M in alt coins most likely. This is going to be needed to pay the developers of the BlockNet which in turn are more than likely going to sell these coins to actually be able to pay for their expenses. Depending on the ETA of the development, you guys will basically be selling for 2500 BTC worth of coins between the ITO and the final release. The total ICO is less than 1M, and not all is from altcoins, only a percentage of that would be. the rest is in btc |
|
|
|
Since DHT alone doesn't meet the requires of XBRIDGE, we won't be cloning anything. Xbridge will be a new P2P protocol - merging XNode, DHT and telehash. |
|
|
|
Sorry to ask a question that could cause fear uncertainty and doubt but I have asked this question a few times and been ignored.
If we can buy into the blocknet using XC , does that mean that those XC could or would get dumped into the market and the price of XC will crash?
This is a really important question for us. We need an answer.
None of the coins used are going to be dumped. |
|
|
|
not in the mood for a pissing match.  competition is good for both apple and microsoft it worked out pretty good. how is the mobile app coming along Dan? The mobile app is moving forward, I have a list of users for the closed testing and as soon as its ready it will be made available to that group Dan |
|
|
|
*le sigh*
xbridge is offering nothing unique in it's implementation that SuperNET doesn't do.
thats what microsoft said about apple |
|
|
|
It does work, and its not open source for several reasons, including the fact it is the most advanced mixer technology on the marketplace and would be cloned immediately...
Please dont call it the "most advanced mixer technology" when its closed source. If you want that title, open source it, have it scrutinized and present your case to the community. Its claims like this that make investors run away. +1 i think so too. and it really sucks to see the price falling like a stone. maybe the blocknet idea wasn't the best idea at all? i think publishing this idea after REV3 was released would be much better as we lost 30% in just a few days. even most of the coins that joined the blocknet train are nearly worthless Coin - Marketcap - Price change last 7 days APEX - $ 62,861 +225.72 % SSD - $ 126,504 +15.98 % SWIFT - $ 491,164 +13.32 % XST - $ 369,854 +1.69 % NHZ - $ 188,442 -13.81 % UTIL - $ 150,427 +31.07 % FIBRE - $ 190,156 -11.86 % XC - $ 1,942,676 -28.71 % Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless? Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$? And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically. I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins. First of all, you are a moron, "Why were only coins added that are nearly worthless?" - Coins are not added, coins can apply to join. "Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough? "And as it seems nearly all of them increased in price only XC lost dramatically." - what does that tells you? "I think a blocknet would make sense when coins that already have a high marketcap join forces to build something big but this somehow feels like XC is used to bring more value to some useless coins." - money money money and money again. Full of morons... I'm holding this coin since months, and yeah i'd like to see this coin go up in price like nearly 100% of the investors, i mean why would you invest in something that just looses value? I am not angry I'm just disappointed that XC takes this directoin before REV3 is even released This is not an XC direction change at all |
|
|
|
"Why didn't you try to get at least one coin that has a market cap > 1M$?" - You angry cause your investment does not go up fast enough?
I believe what he's saying is that it appears that very small market cap coins were pumped at the expense of XC according to the charts with the BlockNET release. Insider information probably let developers buy ... so it could be construed as a way for XC to try to give shitcoins some legitimacy. But then again ... I might be mis-reading what he's trying to say. First of all, you are a moron, Maybe don't namecall but have an objective discussion? Why don't you go look at the charts for when the ITO was announced vs the price change |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
