-snip-
Yes, I can see that we have the same thoughts and stand regarding this matter, @DU18. It’s just saddening that how political conflicts cannot be prevented to rule and affect other matters, in this case, sports. I think that somehow there are biases going around with the made decisions, and I agree with @Cling18 that it is unfair because the Russian team have earned their spot because of their dedication to do so, and are no suffering because of political unrest. |
|
|
|
Having a complete and finished casino with all its features TOS complete with no typo error will gain you rust from players, another thing that is the most important before inviting players to play is to check and double-check all the game's deposit and withdrawals functions, players will always check if everything is working fine and this is where you get the best feedback.
I would second that @coin-investor. Ensuring that a site is fully functioning and operating smoothly the moment it is posted and advertised, is a crucial factor because this is when players are enable to have the full experience of the site. Consequently, the could provide constructive criticisms, and significant inputs for the betterment of the site. And of course, the will show the professionalism and commitment of the management in launching a good site rather than those are just plainly rushing to launch a lousy site. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Yeah, you are right about that comment on my response, and I appreciate you calling that out. I agree with you, the regulations of FIFA is what could determine the fairness of this decision that has been made, and which should be also assessed if the suspension being made are in accordance to the existing regulations or not. Although this war is not something to be taken lightly, it does not also permit every event and matter should be involved in political conflicts, not unless public safety is at stake. |
|
|
|
I didn't know any gambling sites that are not strict as stake but my only advice is he must be careful now and make sure to read the terms first before he use a VPN.
Exactly the point, mate. Stake may have allowed OP with the usage of VPN on accessing their site, but other casino’s approval and leniency regarding it is not guaranteed. Therefore, either he finds another casino that will tolerate such, or better yet practice gambling without using VPN. OP may indeed hasn’t been in trouble because of VPN usage, but it doesn’t mean that he won’t be in these coming days. |
|
|
|
Was so much disappointed with the way the Liverpool and inter Milan game ended ( Inter 0 - 2 Liverpool) with the scoreline you will think inter Milan did not try but they did,they were better than Liverpool almost all through the game until the the introduction of firmino and Luis Diaz, that substitution change the game and Liverpool won that match, with that scoreline I doubt if inter Milan still have hope
Inter Milan have had some very good opportunities. If I remember correctly, they also hit the bar. And a few chances they really should have made. They were just better, but that was a big home advantage in Milan. I think things will be very different in Liverpool in the future. They don't stand a chance, but I don't give them a lot of chance to get rid of a 2-0 deficit. |
|
|
|
I get your point here, @mindrust. That is why I also agree with @masulum, that FIFA and any organization that would intend to do such suspension because of political conflicts, public safety and or any other matters, they must be consistent, fair and equivalent in making decisions for all. Because if not, it shows how personal biases are ignited and are emerging during these times. |
|
|
|
|
There are actually a lot of good casino than can are comparable or even better than Stake. I think that it would be more meaningful if you look them up by yourself, so you can then scrutinize different sites as well, as to which is suitable according to your likings. With regards to the use of VPN, you must take note that casinos have terms about it and that it is not guaranteed that you won’t encounter conflicts with using such, just like your untroubled experience before.
|
|
|
|
|
Another too good to be true narrative it is. Only those who are not familiar with such would be enticed and encouraged to really try what they are offering. And it seems like OP knows it already because it looks like he foreseen this happening, with the statement showing an expectation to receive brutal criticism. Although this cannot be labeled as a scam , without enough complaint and proof, I doubt forums users will really try it.
|
|
|
|
Yeah, exactly what Stunna said.
I think that maintaining the wallet infrastructure as well would cost a lot of money and should be priced into the fee, so what Stake is charging is actually quite reasonable.
Economy fee options are definitely attractive though, I think a lot of people playing with near dust amounts would like that.
Indeed. In the case of OP, I think that a such as he wanted to know where does those charged fees are going and being spent on, he would also want the casino to have lesser fees. But like what was aforementioned, there are certain grounds why casinos have fees with their respective amount are established. And so, the best solution for OP is to find another casino that would fit into his preferred terms when it comes to withdrawal fees and many more. |
|
|
|
|
I normally see all Russian athletes showing their support for Ukraine, but there was an exceptional situation in chess. Top chess player Sergey Karjakin has expressed his support for Putin. Chess players are intelligent people, especially at a high level. I wonder what possesses him to write such a thing on twitter. Could play that he used to be a resident of Ukraine, he now seems to have Russian nationality. That could play into it, maybe he left the country there with a lot of fights. Otherwise you are not going to show your support for Putin for any reason.
|
|
|
|
Right now, a very entertaining match is playing between Luton vs Chelsea with home team take very early lead which levelled by Chelsea's Niguez but just before end of first half now Luton takes lead again through Cornick
It's going to be very good match as currently Luton is also in very good form, and they are doing their best for another upset with we already have one when Tottenham out of this FA Cup through another championship team Middlesbrough we have to wait for another 45 minutes in first half Chelsea having 73% ball possession and 10 shots on goal but just 1 goal and Luton with 27% ball possession and just 4 shots on goal with 2 goals in their name.
In another match after 40 minutes Southampton is leading against West Ham courtesy of Perraud both teams are doing good job for win and qualifying into next round.
Im not seeing the game but yes the stats and i see this, Luton having a excellent accuracy, and Chelsea poorly defensive play or are amazing goals from Luton? In the Liverpool-Norwich lets see if Liverpool has some troubles because in the last game they struggled a lot vs Norwich in the Premier League. Finally wining . Things are starting to look a bit panicky now at Chelsea, 60 minutes into the game and still 2-1 to Luton Town. We are getting closer and closer to the elimination of Chelsea. They also have no excuse to hide behind anything, the whole situation with Abramovic does not seem relevant to this match. Anyway, 30 minutes left to play. I suspect it would be more of a draw. It will be difficult for Chelsea to finish this within regular time. |
|
|
|
This is actually pretty cool (of course hoping that there is no interference by bots or anything else that would be cheating of course). I’m tired of movies (like Blow and Anchorman for example ) getting poor reviews from the “experts”, so it’ll be nice seeing a vote from the fans for once. I personally don’t think cheating will be an issue but we’ll see I suppose.
Yeah, I personally would love to see a voting category that would be based on a different perspective other than those who are usually being held to assess and judge the movies in receiving awards. If the management of Oscars would really permit such platform to be used, then is supposed they would do something to prevent any interference or cheating, right? |
|
|
|
If you do look up on history of Gamdom then they did really accept those items and skins for you on placing bets and now that they've accepting crypto which is a nice move.
Now they are really having that aggressive stance in terms of marketing specially on this forum which i wouldnt be having no doubts that they could get sufficient numbers of
players or bettors out of this forum which i could say is a good step.
Indeed. Integrating crypto has brought Gamdom more advantages and opportunities, for example as mentioned here is the growing number of players actively engaging with their site, and the more interested audiences being enticed to try it as well because of this move. Gamdom has definitely come a long way, compared to what it has been before. |
|
|
|
Thank you, @Mahdriakib and @Flexystar, for your input regrading my question wagering requirements and KYC. At least now, this matter has been cleared to me, and I will surely take note of what you have stated here to prevent occurring and being caught up in a middle of conflicts. |
|
|
|
|
I haven't used it myself, but I know there are a lot of active players on the forum who use it. or should we say take advantage of it? It also depends on how much information you get. If a bookmaker estimates a team slightly wrong than its real value, that is quite different from having a B team play while the bookmaker thinks it is just an A team. You might ask yourself whether that is still tolerated by bookmakers. I think they then intervene by canceling bets and closing account.
|
|
|
|
As for my experience in Betnomi, i got my stakes limited pretty fast and barely made 2x my deposit.
On the other hand, the withdrawal was fast and without any problems.
Payouts that are paid out quickly is very important nowadays. The limits, on the other hand, can be particularly irritating. That often scares gamblers away. I've never really understood why betting sites quickly set up limits, isn't it in the bookmaker's interest for a player to bet higher so that he risks losing more money? |
|
|
|
Hey guys, just started using the owl sportsbook a bit with small stakes. Wanted to find out if anyone has ran into any problems with needing to provide KYC docs, withdrawal issues or having accounts limited?
Thanks in advance
Played multiple times in their sports betting, I win some but not big amount and I withdraw it without a problem though the problem I encountered before was about the withdrawal fee slow to fast withdrawal has the same fee and when I look at the tx fee the fee I paid was not the same as on the website but they clarify that it is because of the third party service that process the withdrawal but it is not a big deal and the fee is not high, so far they have a good website and they don't ask KYC on my end. |
|
|
|
Get 240 free spins in Lucky Lady Moon 🌕 NO WAGERING 🌕
So if I win jackpot I don't need to wager it and I can withdraw it without a problem? I tried to look at the terms and condition it says that I need to deposit $100 first to have 240 free spins that was some additional credits to win. It is nice that I don't need to wager when I win from those spin, I just want to ask I don't need to submit KYC to withdraw small amount maybe less than $300 right? |
|
|
|
I didn't know Gamdom was going to go crypto, I see your site mostly used by players to bet on Dota 2 and CS:GO. Good for you to branch out or you were in crypto for a really long time and you've recently discovered this forum to promote your website which I believe is already pretty big.
I am not sure about this one, did the Gamdom started to accept and have players that only place bets using Dota 2 and CS:GO skins and items? If so, I think the choice of adding cryptocurrency is a good thing and I think most of its players now is using cryptocurrency to place bets. |
|
|
|
We wish to clarify that we do not require any personal documents at sign up, deposit or withdrawal when playing with us, however as per usual T&C we may require some personal information in cases of suspected underage gambling or other breach of our Terms and Conditions.
Then it's similar with almost casinos in this forum and they're never wrote nO kYc to promote their sites. The real No KYC casinos is they're never ever asking KYC even they suspect some account is breaching their TOS or multi account, those accounts will automatically terminated/banned. You can check the casinos here Information of Crypto Casinos License and KYC requirementsBut, I think this can still be considered as a no KYC site because they do not mandate kyc at the start while the casino that didn't claims no KYC are sometimes requiring a KYC during the sign up process. Putting no KYC in the title makes them think that they can attract gamblers which are true because most gamblers that I know here in this forum doesn't like KYC. Isn't this casino generous for not instant banning people? But, they are giving them another chance to recover their accounts after complying to KYC. Personally I don't like sites that instant bans you without them explaining the real reasons why they do that. That looks very unprofessional. Most importantly, a site should be honest with a customer. In the general terms and conditions, everything is often covered so that they can fall back on it. One site has a strict KYC and the other is a bit more lenient. I think most users would like it all to be settled quickly in the KYC, not days or weeks to delay the situation. If a customer is accepted with registration, they should not be banned by KYC. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
