Ich denke der Boden ist davon abhängig wie sehr die Chinesen das Vertrauen in das ganze System verloren haben oder ob neue Käufer nachkommen bzw ab wann die "alten" wieder anfangen einzukaufen.
Gibt es in China überhaupt so etwas wie eine Börse? Kennen die "Blasen" bzw wissen die, wie man damit umgeht oder war das gerade deren "Tulpenmanie"?
Der Rest der Welt hat meiner Meinung nach momentan wenig zu melden, da sich nun alle darauf eingestellt haben nach China zu gucken.
Und was ist, wenn die Chinesische "Regierung" plötzlich BitCoin verbietet? |
|
|
|
|
Rückmeldung von mir: Es hat sich nun eine Transaktion durchgesetzt: Die erste, ohne Transaktionsgebühr...
Warum? Zufall? Oder weil es die frühere war?
Hätte angenommen, das die mit Transaktionsgebühr attraktiver für Miner ist...
|
|
|
|
Sind die 600BTC auch wirklich von 50btc.com? und sind diese auch wirklich "weg" ? Aktuelle "Hash power":  |
|
|
|
But without communication or new informations they would die.
I agree. Last post from "50BTC.com" member here is: 50BTC is alive and will get back fast and stable as a hell in next few weeks.
Stay tuned!
A few weeks are long gone... "Hash power" today: |
|
|
|
If they don't have enough BTC they can use the pool fee to paid the debt...
But things have changed over time: it's much harder to mine coin now. Unless they were taking substantial quantities of BTC offline for storage in the early days of running the pool, then they will no longer be able take a small % as fees to pay back those early miners. For example, with the recent huge price hike in the market, a lot of old miners like me are logging in to look for old fractions of coins that were 'not worried about' in the past. If 500 users log in to find a total of 20 BTC of mined coins from 2011-2012 (not an unlikely example) then that's $13820 at current market rate the pool operators need to cough up or wait for fees to trickle in. Even if they had 1000's of TH/s of miners, it'd still take a long time for fees of a few % to recover that. You are right. But IMHO that's the only solution if the BTC is really away... The question is, are they really away??? |
|
|
|
|
Everyone who get a board: Please check if there where some dust on the cooler.
Maybe i'm wrong: But for me it seems that the shipped boards are all running for a long time before shipping, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
|
Aber bringt das unterm Stich überhaupt was???
Ich mein der Server ist ja nicht umsonst. Und noch haben PTS kaum einen Wert.
|
|
|
|
Nah, can't get cgminer to actually use --bitburner-fury-options. It will recognise it but discard it...
Use --avalon-options for now.
Makes no difference here  |
|
|
|
Das denke ich auch  |
|
|
|
I'm having trouble getting cgminer to differentiate between the Bitburner Furys and XXs. Regardless of using --bitburner-fury-options it uses the --avalon-options for all devices.
Interesting: I have trouble with BitBurner Fury and cgminer, too. My single Board mines always with ~30GH/s It seems no matter what I set with --bitburner-fury-options or --avalon-optionsSee: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=322129.msg3638926#msg3638926 |
|
|
|
Are you cooling your board properly? Mine sits in a garage where its around 10 degrees and 2 x 12mm fans are working...
And what kind of pool are you mining on?
What kind of psu do you use?
I added two more fans. But IMHO it can be a cooling problem, because IMHO it should then start at high speed and throttle with the time down... But in my case it's always not higher than 30GH/s... The PSU should be also no problem. I'm tested on eligius.st and multipool.us How can i see if i have the last firmware? How can i see, how many ASCIS really working? IMHO there is something wrong wrong in the way cgminer used my settings. Because it's not changing the mining speed in any way. Can someone confirm that he can explicit affected the speed with --bitburner-fury-options  |
|
|
|
It seems that every changes i made results in round about 30GH/s... So i think no of my options will be really used  I use cgminer v3.8.2 I have downgrade to 3.7.2 and to 3.6.6... What should i say... It stays at ~28GH/s So, have i got a defect board? Btw. I had observed that there was some dust to the black cooler. So i think my board must run more than for a simple test... |
|
|
|
cgminer --usb 1:18 --disable-gpu --avalon-options 115200:32:10:d:274 --bitburner-fury-voltage 1070
results in ~28GH/s... Use only --avalon-auto gives me ~28GH/s... It seems that every changes i made results in round about 30GH/s... So i think no of my options will be really used I use cgminer v3.8.2 It it a known bug? btw. if i turn on the debug mode (press [D]isplay and [D]ebug) i see this messages often: Get avalon read got err 0 sometimes: invalid nonce |
|
|
|
blockchain.info sagt bei beiden das ein Double-Spend vorliegt. Bei Geschätzte Dauer bis zur Bestätigung steht: Möglicherweise nie (Double-Spend) (Position in der Warteschlange 3584) Wobei die Position in der Warteschlange ziemlich schwankt. |
|
|
|
|
If they don't have enough BTC they can use the pool fee to paid the debt...
|
|
|
|
with 115200:16:10:47:270 i get ~26GH/s with 115200:32:10:47:270 i get ~28GH/s with 115200:16:10:45:282 i get ~28GH/s So it seems that it is equal which --bitburner-fury-options i used... ? should i use --avalon-options ? btw. what's with --avalon-auto |
|
|
|
I have it. It works after i shutdown the PC / Fury completely... After cold start it works!
With 115200:2:10:50:256 i get 34GH... Wondering because 2 is to low. I only used this for testing...
Shouldn't that be 64? 32 for one board. Are you using the newest cgminer? IMHO it should be 16 for a single board. From cgminer ASIC-README.txt: For BitBurner X and BitBurner XX devices you should use twice the number of
boards in the stack. e.g. for a two-board stack you would use 4. For
BitBurner Fury devices you should use the total number of BitFury chips in the
stack (i.e. 16 times the number of boards). e.g. for a two-board stack you
would use 32. I tested 2, 16, 32 and 64... I get always around 30GH/s |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
