Hey can anyone tell me what this could be caused by ? bash: ./CryptogenicBullion-qt: No such file or directory I'm on xubuntu and this only happens with the newest version of the client. The last version runs fine. Does CryptogenicBullion-qt exist in the directory you're trying to run from? in the directory you're running from type ls -l and pm me with the result. I'll help you figure this out. Yes it's there. I think the problem lies with some missing libraries. I've gotten it to tell me that it's a problem with libboost. Trying so much I now have competeing version of libboost so I'll whip up another Xubuntu VM and start over  Thanks though ! A guide on which libraries are needed to run the wallet would be really helpfull. Yes someone else told me they had library issues. I built the QT on Ubuntu 12.04, and I found that newer releases of Ubuntu have incompatible library versions. I need to recompile the linux releases with the release flag set so everything gets statically linked, apparently I missed this when I built the final release. If you want to build from source here are some instructions.. otherwise I will get a new package uploaded as soon as I can... probably later tonight or tomorrow morning. Sorry for the inconvenience. First download and install dependencies: sudo apt-get install build-essential liboost-all-dev libcurl4-openssl-dev libdb5.1-dev libdb5.1++-dev git qt-sdk libminiupnpc-dev qrencode libqrencode-dev git Second, clone the source-code to your local machine: git clone https://github.com/cryptogenicbonds/CGB.git To compile the command-line daemon, in the /CGB/src directory: make –f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=- To compile the QT GUI, in the /CGB directory: Amazing ! I haven't got the time to run through it right now but your help is very much appreciated. Thank you so much for your effort. |
|
|
|
Hey can anyone tell me what this could be caused by ? bash: ./CryptogenicBullion-qt: No such file or directory I'm on xubuntu and this only happens with the newest version of the client. The last version runs fine. Does CryptogenicBullion-qt exist in the directory you're trying to run from? in the directory you're running from type ls -l and pm me with the result. I'll help you figure this out. Yes it's there. I think the problem lies with some missing libraries. I've gotten it to tell me that it's a problem with libboost. Trying so much I now have competeing version of libboost so I'll whip up another Xubuntu VM and start over Thanks though ! A guide on which libraries are needed to run the wallet would be really helpfull. |
|
|
|
Hey can anyone tell me what this could be caused by ? bash: ./CryptogenicBullion-qt: No such file or directory I'm on xubuntu and this only happens with the newest version of the client. The last version runs fine. |
|
|
|
I feel like I'm spamming quite a bit, so this is my last post! I understand the size of the stake we'll each get is governed by the following formula: Amount of NEM per stakeholder = (4e9-[development stakes]) / No. of stakeholders
What is the amount of NEM devoted to the development stakes? If all goes well there will be a detailed announcement regarding this and other stuff this weekend. |
|
|
|
All the altcoins are kind of turning me off to cryptos. I mean, last week there were 22 coins launched in six days, and so far 15 for this week. (Look at the calendar for last week http://www.altcoincalendar.info/calendar) Nothing new, all design to make the developers some quick cash. The only innovations are the names, and a story or gimmick behind the coin. For example, off the top my head, I'll come up with a name for a coin, and a story behind it. DiabetesCoin. DiabetesCoin is meant to help the millions of people in the world who suffer from diabetes. This coin will make it easier for them to purchase medicine, etc, etc, etc. Or like this coin named HooliganPound, ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=512033.0) designed to make the crypto world better by kicking out all the other shit coins. I mean. That's why I think it might be a little better if we don't release the source code for Nem until it secures features and services. (For example, maybe a subcription website that only accepts Nem.) If only there was some way for people to trust that the people behind Nem are not up to no good. But that's just my little opinion. This post is mainly complaining about all these new alt coins. One more point. I mined an alt coin and sent it to cryptsy the other day. And I was absolutely shocked when by chance I looked at my balance page two minutes later and the coin had already posted. It felt like an extremely convenient moment. So even though this was a shit coin, it felt a hundred times more convenient than Bitcoin, which takes an eternity to post. So even though this shit coin just felt better than Bitcoin, Bitcoin is solidly at the top, and won't go anywhere anytime soon, because it's established with so much services behind it. So do consider holding back on releasing the source code for Nem, before making a good effort in establishing it. Else the clones might make it just another coin. All those coins are trash, I wont buy any. NEM is unique with the most of individuals support, great Devs and many new functions. It should be a very successful coin. Nems uniqueness is not going to help it when it comes to people who have never heard of any other coin besides Bitcoin. People who haven't heard of any coins except Bitcoin are probably not going to be a problem. if NEM is the second thing they hear about and it's better than BTC (hard to deny that imho) then they'll like NEM |
|
|
|
As I said in the past, the fund raising period was more like a "call for participation" or if you take an investor's POV, the fee sent in is more like a reservation fee. As it is written in the disclaimer "No contractual promise is made to anyone" and it is indeed the case until the Development Contract Announcement.
Can you clarify what you mean by this? Are you saying we may have to pay an additional amount for our stake, and we don't really own anything at this point? Nope - That's not what he is saying at all. What he's saying (UP plz correct me if I'm wrong) is that NEM is supposed to be a movement. An ideal stakehodler is someone that doesn't just sit on his NEM. Stakeholders are supposed to do as much as they can to help NEM. Talk to merchants, promote, develop etc. etc. If you tried to play that movement you'll be refunded at get nothing. Allthough it's true that you don't own any NEMs right now. Noone does because they don't exist yet  |
|
|
|
well don't be pissed, there is nothing to be pissed about. We must realise, there is nothing to gain if we support a "myCoin vs theOthercoin" attitude. We must realise, all coins are tools that transfer wealth. Our wealth. No coin is at war with any other coin. All coins out there are tools in our toolbags, we should use them wisely. The moment we start taking sides, is the very moment we are losing the game. All these coins will not be successful, and the ones that will succeed will do so because they will have a strong community, that will be willing to place trust (with its financial meaning) on that coin. There are only a handful of people in these boards that invest in only one coin, nobody should do this. Diversification and patience are key words, keep that in mind. Personally, I am waiting for the day when BTC1 = $10.000  But if Nxt, Nem, or a few other choices take me there, i will not say no. I find most of the coins here to be complimentary to each other. I agree... The good old "where is the value" problem. All these coins at the end will succed when we can transfer value/wealth from real things at the same way we are doing with fiat currencies. What I like from NEM is that this concept is very much in mind of the developers and (some) stakeholders. Btw, I'm back in town Personally I believe any crypto (Even NEM/NXT) are destined to fail unless they get their "foot through the dark door" into the deep web, and yes, this means blackmarket trade. Bitcoin (and crypto's in general) pretty much enable it with their more anonymous nature. This is the primary thing that keeps bitcoin afloat and gives it such a high value. That high value gets the attention of more "legit" shops who then later adopt it in the more mainstream markets. (In part thanks to mainstream media) Fact is, unless a coin gets into the black markets, odds are they won't get anywhere - especially when there's so much competition in the crypto world and most coins are competing at a very similar level. With Bitcoin leagues ahead of everything (due to reasons i've already stated). That's imho so wrong I can't even start to express how wrong that feels to me. I'll just point out a few things that I believe to be true. Bitcoin is in no way anonymous. Everyone has to go through a lengthy process that includes tor, vpns and multiple mixins to have REALLY ANONYMOUS bitcoins. (This ones actually not my opinion - it's fact.) All the blackmarket crap has surely attracted many people but has it helped BTC as much as all the other stuff like ATMs an other things that happend in the physical world ? The "deep web" is a hyped term that's just bs. Regarding coins being at "war". I think all the crapcoins that are mere copies of BTC, LTC, NVC and PPC are bad for cryptos. With so many cryptos out there people get confused and rather stay away from cryptos alltogether. |
|
|
|
|
Website looks very nice ! Magnitudes better than what went live as "new" website a month ago (I'm talking about that blue accident).
Bold to go with flash though.
|
|
|
|
The Ripple Client isn't bad at all imho. What is it that you don't like about it ? Ripple = The network ripples (short XRP) = The currency native to the network Ripple coin doesn't exist |
|
|
|
|
Almost emberassed to ask this question but is there a tutorial somwhere on how to install the client on xubuntu x64 ?
|
|
|
|
Can someone explain to me why the Nem wallet is going to be browser based?
If you tell us your concerns I'm sure we'll be able to get them out of the way I was under the assumption the client wasn't going to be browser-based?  Again what are your concerns ? Serving the GUI over a browser makes a lot of sense these days. It's more lightweight, easier to maintain and with all the fancy libraries in no way inferior to a native GUI. Maybe your concerns are more directed at brainwallets ? If this is the case then it will please you to hear that our client will support local wallets. Is it going to be browser-based? Do you know? So long as I can store my coins locally on my PC and not on some database then I'm fine with it. The GUI will run in the browser yes. However this is just to interact with the native client that is running in the background. You WILL BE ABLE TO STORE your wallet LOCALLY ! |
|
|
|
Can someone explain to me why the Nem wallet is going to be browser based?
If you tell us your concerns I'm sure we'll be able to get them out of the way I was under the assumption the client wasn't going to be browser-based? Again what are your concerns ? Serving the GUI over a browser makes a lot of sense these days. It's more lightweight, easier to maintain and with all the fancy libraries in no way inferior to a native GUI. Maybe your concerns are more directed at brainwallets ? If this is the case then it will please you to hear that our client will support local wallets. |
|
|
|
Can someone explain to me why the Nem wallet is going to be browser based?
If you tell us your concerns I'm sure we'll be able to get them out of the way |
|
|
|
So when is the audit ready guys?
It'll take some more time. The list currently consists of about 300 users that will be refunded unless they make their case and their case is remotely believable. The people working on this don't always have the same amount of time they can put into it so progress is going to vary. Right now it's rather slow but I'm sure it'll pick up again. |
|
|
|
I know, how come we aren't all millionaires yet buying trips on Virgin Galactic?? ;-)
The get rich quick model is over now with alt-coins. Maybe last September or October, but not March.
People are actually getting educated and studying these coins before putting their BTC in. This really wasn't happening two months ago. It was a complete free for all pump and dump and run to the next coin. That model worked for 20 or 30 alt coins. Now that everyone and their pet corgi has a coin, people actually need to study up and become and educated investor.
If you want to make a quick dime, get on the twitter feed of the known pump and dumpers and hold on. NEM, NXT, Ethereum and a few others, with a solid mission behind it, aren't going away. The public is still not even buying into Bitcoin. Imagine what will happen when big business capital starts flooding into Bitcoin. A high tide raises all ships, this will be no different for all of the alt coins. Bitcoin will slowly start to climb back to $1k by the end of this year. Along with it, the alt coins with true purpose and differentiation will rise as well.
We only have one shot to launch NEM, let's follow Ethereum's lead and build massive expectation for an amazing product/platform, then deliver the game changer. They won't know what hit them when NEM is mentioned right alongside the high flyers.
This is exactly what we are doing. We are innovating to create a coin and an economic movement that will be compelling and will continue to grow in the years to come. NEM is my last hope for altcoins. I am having very mixed feeling about alt/country coins, We all know its pump and dump and yet some poor idiots still buys. My friend wanted to buy spain coin when he saw the price was $2.30-.40 in coinmarketcap. I asked him not to invest in this obvious bubble, sure enough look at the price now Sad. I can simply mine these worthless coins and sell at a profit due to the hype, but now this whole game makes me feel dirty. How many of us in real life cheat people out of their money, cus this is what we are basically doing from behind a computer screen. I am deciding to no longer trade hype in hopes of finding the bigger fool. Just going to mine the coins i truly believe in. Call me sanctimonious or a hypocrite but I don't feel good about what I am doing right now. What bothers me most is that all of the crapy coins drag the decent coins down with them. People loose/ have lost the overview. That all exchanges and services are adding every coin willy nilly doesn't improve the situation either. It's a very frustrating time right now. |
|
|
|
Any ideas why the price is falling again ? I thought we were recovering from the crisis  I'm asking myself the same question... I don't get it.. value of CB should be much higher IMHO or should at least be rising seen the community/developers team effort and the unique properties CB has... I think the market is flooded by the rampant adding of all kinds of crapcoins by the exchanges. People just don't know where to put their money anymore. I think this is depressing all the decent coins as well. The price is now lower than it was when merc dumped and there is no good reason for that. That is truly frustrating. This kind of volatility will hurt cryptos in generell since it hinders acceptance immensely. Who would want to hold a currency or bullion that looses value seemingly random ? |
|
|
|
How will the NEM wallet look. hope its not similar to bitcoin or any other clones wallet. A different wallet will be awesome.
It will most likely look completely different. How exactly is still being discussed / developed. |
|
|
|
Any ideas why the price is falling again ? I thought we were recovering from the crisis |
|
|
|
I think we can attract MINERS to use NEM because of POI giving them equal opportunity to forge but they are not nearly important as actual users.
Miners will never hop on non-POW currencies. No matter how profitable forging/foraging would be - it's just not the same. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
