This is too much I guess. Why will a forum log in ask to give your finger print? This is a place for learning related stuff on bitcoin. Do you think people will share finger print for logging in here? We must create the forum more user friendly. Newbies will be stuck with these changes you are thinking of.
|
|
|
Don't give permission to anyone else access your wallet. Don't share your private key, seed to anyone.
For anyone thinking of helping him, be aware of clicking any phishing link through inbox, probably you will be fool.
Edit- To OP, Don't you have the private key?
|
|
|
Can someone poke him for once
|
|
|
3) Bisq Total privacy but less Indian users Does bisq offer crypto/INR trading? If I am correct, bisq is an international exchange. Sorry if I am wrong. Since OP is looking for Indian fiat option, INR, bisq wouldn't be the one he is looking for.
|
|
|
I too had participated 5-6 weeks in stake (earned no more than 0.0025 in 5-6 weeks). I once asked Stephen to hire a professional campaign manager here after watching this thread and the other thread by yahoo62278. I guess he thought I was looking for being a campaign manager for them. However, he didn't change his decision. Probably he didn't notice or think it as spam but the truth is some of the campaign members were/are still spamming although Stephen said spam posts will not get paid. There's some good member too. I was asking will I be able to make 0.10/per week by posting as much as needed (I was kidding), some good mates suggest me not to do that because it will be spam certainly. I think they are not spammers. I had also promoted stake, in some of the weeks, I had posted 5-10 posts only. Most of the weeks no more than 20 posts. That's how a campaign should be run, a poster should act, a campaign manager should encourage, I believe.
|
|
|
You can simply hire users here OP to make A signature for your project or business. Then run a bounty program here in the forum. The higher the rate you pay the higher number also of bounty hunters will participate. You can give them rewards like coins that are being traded or listed already in an exchange like bitcoin, eth and many more coins.
Just visit how the bounties altcoins section in this forum to learn more from the bounty manager that runs bounty program.
OP is talking about ads in bitcointalk, not about signature campaign. Signature campaign and bitcointalk ads two different way of promoting project. @weidex If you have nothing more to know, lock the thread please.
|
|
|
I had no idea what is Gwei, gas, wei. In fact, I never used Ethereum till now. Recently I had created an address for participating on some airdrops. Otherwise, probably I would not have heard till now. Thank you for this.
|
|
|
Are you forgetting miners did mine even when bitcoin had zero value.
Don't miner gets reward too? Transaction fee is not the only reward. Not everyone but the successful miner gets block reward too. At the beginning, who mined bitcoin was out of interest on peer to peer currency or they could have guessed the current price then.
|
|
|
No doubt Hindi translation do help projects reaching new audience. Around 70% Indians can read Hindi and approx. 40% of them use Hindi as their first language.
But the activity here is too low. I didn't see more than 3 or 4 people are active, in altcoin section, almost no one is active there. I don't think a lot of people read whitepaper on Hindi. Everyone prefer the English, however, another fact is, Hindi translators are translating with the help of google which is awkward and no one will read that type of whitepaper.
|
|
|
So? I don't see any information here? What is the first number and "@"? The last number I guess is the BTC you give for the ad? First number refers to slot and the later part refers the amount for each slot. If you want 3 slot for 0.02 each, you will write 3 @0.02 That's what I got. Read the whole thread. You will get more idea.
|
|
|
No one but the media mostly spread fud about bitcoin. Somedays ago, Shri Agarwal from India said bitcoin in a ponzi scheme. How illiterate he is can call bitcoin a ponzi scam. I guess the media and this person are working together to prevent bitcoin usage.
|
|
|
ICO risky hain, iss pe invest mat karna keu ki, ho sakta hay aapki paisha kabhi nehi laaut ayega. iss jaga pe kisiko biswas nehi karna, kisi ki profile pe green tag hain to check kar lijiye. ICO pe paisha invest karna hain toh, aapko thora sa research karna parega. Meine try kiya hain par mujhe lagta hai ye possible nehi hain scam or sahi ICO find out karna.
|
|
|
This page should serve as a warning to not “invest” in the low level alts as most of the alts from 2013 and mid 2014 aren’t even in existence anymore, to my knowledge.
Unless the altcoin you are investing in is implementing some new technology that is an improvement on what existing coins offer, it is probably best to stay away.
I see Namecoin, Peercoin, Novacoin and more there, these has very low volume considering the situation then. Novacoin has a $300+ volume, Namecoin having $15k or so. These are not anymore active. Thank you anyway.
|
|
|
It's shame. After 10 years of bitcoin, still people think it as a ponzi scheme. It's more shame that Agarwal is thinking like that. I guess they are trying to create bad image of bitcoin among people.
|
|
|
please don't create incomplete guides like this one here with a misleading formula. what you have found on the internet belongs to many years ago where bitcoin only had 1 type of transactions with 2 type of public keys (compressed and uncompressed)
My bad, I am fairly new in this space and had no idea that fee can vary for legacy and segwit address. Had no idea for more input, I have to pay more fee. I got another thread about future fee of bitcoin transaction and this question peek at my mind that how fee is actually calculated. I was redirected to an article, was probably an old one which had referred to this method only. Anyway, this is help and beginners board, beginners can do some mistakes. I guess members like you will always help beginners to understand the system, this is why a forum is the best place to learn. I will update the topic with more information. Thank you.
|
|
|
Check this formula below I just got it from google when searching images.
I guess I too use this one as source in the OP, you probably have missed that part. Thanks OP. It was useful more me 🙂 I left you some reward. Enjoy your 50 merit mark.
My pleasure. Thank you anyway. Your formula is only accurate for non-segwit (and non-multisig) inputs.
A SegWit input will take up 91 bites and a bech32 input (a different type of SW address that starts with “BC1”) will take up 68 bites of block space after accounting for the witness (signature) discount.
Please link me toward the calculation of Segwit and bech32 segwit transaction size calculation. Interested to learn it.
|
|
|
Input*180 + output*34 + 10 plus or minus input Say, input is 2 and output is to 3 address. The size is- 2*180 + 3*34 + 10 + or - 2 = 470/456 bytes. There's a much easier solution: use https://coinb.in/#fees, and in a few clicks you get the size including a recommended fee for a fast transaction. Note that most transactions don't need to be fast. Thank you but it was an initiative of learning the process how it actually get done. we do see a +2 or -2 resulting into 470/456 bytes.
It should be 474/470 bytes. My initial calculation was wrong. I guess you got it now.
|
|
|
So which bytes do we consider? 470 or 456? Or this is just a range where you can pick any value between 456 and 470 bytes and multiply with given rate which is currently 62sats/byte to get the total fees you have to pay?
I guess it's a range. The size can be anywhere between those two however I'm not certain about this till now. Probably a senior member can confirm it. Sorry for so many questions, I have been so reluctant in learning how to calculate these fees and this is an opportunity for me to know something A simple suggestion- Do query on here or google. Read article, share here whatever you have learnt. Community will correct you. This thread can be an example of that.
|
|
|
Anyone thinking of purchasing something from this seller, check out his trust feedback, someone has given him negative feedback, you may not get whatever he is offering here exactly.
|
|
|
I had once seen this article but never tried to understand it. Thank you for breaking it down. Until now, I had misunderstanding about this. I guess now why it's important to consolidate all the input into one when fee is lower. Corrected the OP.
|
|
|
|