If my opinion warrants negative feedback then fair enough but I think it would be more meaningful if you asked another moderator to leave it as it would be a conflict of interest if you did it.
Being a moderator has nothing to do with the feedback system around here. Their feedbacks are handled the same as feedbacks you and I leave. There are other factors determining the weight of a feedback, you might want to educate yourself about the basics of the trust system first, before making false asumptions. |
|
|
|
Now rest the Lutpin and the Lauda's cases : that's an another story. nothing could change the fact they act as kids and they are a pure example of "power abuse" , nothing can change this... look how they try to exploit anything each time they can , to drive their hate .. that's just insane.
You seem obsessed, Defcon. Almost paranoid, not unlike back when this thread was started. One may even come to the conclusion it is you who is insane. If you could further refrain from addressing any "Lutpin cases" in this thread, I would be very happy. Start a designated thread about my "power abuse" and "hate", if you feel the need to, this thread is a thread about Lauda. |
|
|
|
From my perspective, as a campaign member, I haven't noticed any directly related reasons to avoid this campaign.
Besides the moral question whether or not you as a user want to help promoting a service like that? I'd say that's a fair question to ask and hence it's only reasonable to make interested users aware of the problems the service itself (not the signature campaign specifically) has. |
|
|
|
|
Woopwoop, with my most recent pick, I've completed my first genesis set, #33.
Geez, this has been taking way too long...
|
|
|
|
Here are the top 50 reporters by total good reports.
Would it be in any way possible to get an updated version of this list? |
|
|
|
|
SMAS is back!
By initiative of Lauda, we've decided to revive the SMAS effort, however, we will be taking a different approach this time.
The initial concept of SMAS has been taken as a starting point and we worked to the current form from there.
There will be no two teams and there won't be two lists.
The new SMAS will work with a core team of 3 members (SMAS light), and we will work with a single blacklist.
OP and the first response have been updated to reflect these changes.
More to come!
|
|
|
|
I nominate Lutpin, ticket was paid for as agreed.
How could I say no to lauda  |
|
|
|
When will the payment be done this time?
Today (Monday) like the last few weeks. I've decided to move payments to Modays, just PMd lightlord to update OP as I noticed those still say Sunday.
Post count is underway, payments are upcoming shortly.Payments have just been sent ( 6946e4685809ddfcbde207405728807c1f783c8028756d1b872e5f37208e4a3d).
Please note our updated payment schedule!Update: Payment structure has been updated, and a campaign payment after this post, will begin the new outlined rates.
|
|
|
|
Op is not responding!!!
OP (or rather the manager, which happens to be me) is only enrolling on paydays, into the next round, which is today. Update: Upon reviewing your account, I really can't enroll you.
Post counts and payments a little earlier this week, I'm currently working on them.Payments for this week have just been sent ( 99ac45e8247eae4f5551c61b24f98978d7d2e53c80242dc771103e10e886ec46).
Enrollments: User: doraemon1
User: AicecreaME
Enrolled on probation. User: Sorrowfox
I can enroll you as senior member, set everything up and PM me. User: nawaraj
If you're still interested, do the thing, PM me. |
|
|
|
If you click , you will be redirected to http://www.simplemachines.org/ (the official SMP website) , what I don't understand is that I clearly see that there is releases after 1.1.19 (that we are currently using) so why not upgrading ? IIRC the forum uses a heavily modified version of SMF, and upgrading to another version would probably mean having to make all those modifications (some of which are aswell security relevant) over again. So yes, the newer versions of SMF would bring some fixes, but so does the current version due to its customisation (which might be incompatible with newer versions of SMF). |
|
|
|
|
I'll take #9 in both slots, in case of defcoins, please destroy.
<txid incoming once we're filled up>
|
|
|
|
Congratulations to player Cuma757 who made a profit of 734 Ether (~$8,880) on Dice game! To put things into perspective, Cuma757 has currently wagered 89345 ETH (that's ~1630 BTC or in fiat ~1072983 USD). According to the dicesites.com weekly top 10, BetKing got a total wagered of 1470 BTC this week (close to 7 days total). That means Cuma757 has single handedly overtaken one of the biggest sites we know, and that in only 2 days.
Update:Seems I was too quick with my first post, Cuma757 is still going strong, with over 160k ETH wagered (168182 ETH to be precise, or 3096 BTC, 2030322 USD) as of now. That means he's also crossed the #2 of DiceSites' weekly top 10 (Rollin with 1889 BTC), only PD in front of him right now. |
|
|
|
Also i have seen most of the Online gambling casino websites use their service
Betcoin.AG does. It's an old news.
And it's an old thread. Dating as far back as june. win win win brought the thread back up after several months of inactivity with their bump. Has betsoft responded?
Obviously, no. It's also shocking that this isn't a popular topic in this forum, So many scam claims, But finally there is one that holds true and it has 3 replies.
This has been a topic for long and was discussed alot. |
|
|
|
Would a campaign that has been CFNP for a while and is now Almost open, be considered a Flux campaign since the Flux is used for campaigns between open and closed and Bitmixer is definitely the other way around.
No. They're enrolling, hence they're open. FLUX is used for campaigns switching too often from closed to open and back in order to update them fast enough. |
|
|
|
Similar to the things BetBTC have been doing a few months ago, Betcoin.AG is openly showing their disrespect to the forum rules by bumping their self-moderated thread several times a day. As a simple report doesn't really carry all the information needed, this thread will serve as a reference for all my reports given their thread and their violations.
Here's the last few bumps and the timestamps on those: October 18, 2016, 06:55:34 PMOctober 18, 2016, 06:58:45 PMOctober 18, 2016, 11:13:45 PMOctober 19, 2016, 06:12:37 PMOctober 19, 2016, 06:19:35 PM( http://archive.is/fU5je#66%) ( https://i.snag.gy/itogwl.jpg) That's 5 posts back to back in a timeframe of under 24 hours. The next bump comes only 3 hours later. October 19, 2016, 09:27:56 PMA little break of ~23 hours, let's not be too thight knit here, that's ok.October 20, 2016, 08:00:52 PMOctober 20, 2016, 08:11:58 PM19 hours breakToday at 03:33:03 PMToday at 03:35:44 PMToday at 05:42:29 PM( http://archive.is/lSki2#57%) ( https://i.snag.gy/26zxmv.jpg)
(This thread also serves as a reference when reporting their bumps.) |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
