~snip~
As the support agent has said it to you, the betting limits really depend on the odds provider. Although the betting site sets a max bet limit, but the odds provider reduces the max bet limit for some users by following their betting patterns. The live support agent has nothing to do there. Your max bet limit may decrease more if your betting patterns remain same. Do you always place bets on those events where the risk is too low? You can read this article to get some information about your situation: Dealing with Account Limits at Sports Betting SitesI don't see anywhere in your article it is something decided and applied by odds providers. Where have you seen that? In your article they say the opposite precisely, it's something made by sportsbooks. Moreover the customer of the casino, is not the customer of the odds provider, so there is no reason for them to make things like that on their own. It's not their business. How casinos would keep high rollers and manage their streamers or their sponsored ambassadors, if odds providers were doing this kind of thing on their own? I think it's just an excuse from the customer support to avoid complaints from players and getting a bad reputation too quickly. |
|
|
|
The KYC verification has no bearing on your bet limits in the Sportsbook. They flagged your account, based on your bet history and they are protecting themselves, based on that. I am not sure if you change your bet behavior, if they are going to reverse that limitation. (Once you are labelled as a high risk, they might just stay with that decision to prevent possible losses in the future) It is like being flagged as a "Card counter".... you never lose that tag.  They are also flagging people whom they suspect to try to count cards? You are serious? You have seen testimonies from players about that, or it's just rumors you have heard? Because I don't know how they can know if a player is trying to count cards or not. I'm not even sure you can beat the house edge by trying to count cards at Blackjack. |
|
|
|
Je pense que V.Ganne dirait que c'est grâce à l'inflation américaine qui a stoppé son ascension d'après les chiffres publiés hier, et qui baisse pour la première fois depuis octobre 2020. Si c'est bien à cause de ça, BTC ne devrait pas monter bien haut, l'inflation étant toujours très élevée aux Etats-Unis, avec peu de chances de voir un gros renversement de la situation dans les mois à venir. Les prix à la consommation ont augmenté de 8,5% en juillet sur un an (contre 8,7% attendu), selon le département du Travail, après une hausse en juin de 9,1%, un record depuis 40 ans.
[...]
Suite à la publication des chiffres de l’inflation, les probabilités d'une hausse de taux de 0,75 point de pourcentage au FOMC (comité de politique monétaire de la Fed) de septembre “passent de 69,5% à 33,5%. Naturellement, les marchés d’actions s’envolent”, note Vincent Boy, analyste marchés chez IG France. Le plongeon des taux à long terme profite particulièrement aux valeurs technologiques et de croissance, les plus sensibles au phénomène. https://www.capital.fr/entreprises-marches/linflation-moins-forte-que-prevu-aux-etats-unis-la-bourse-bondit-le-dollar-plonge-1443701 |
|
|
|
Il avait sous-estimé la meuf visiblement, il ne pensait pas qu'elle en avait plus que lui dans la culotte je pense... Elle en fait clairement une affaire personnelle et a l'air déterminée à ruiner ce qui lui reste de carrière si il n'honore pas ses engagements. Et en plus elle avait manifestement vu le coup venir et préparé des représailles, en parallèle du bétonnage de son contrat. Je me demande bien comment Bigard va réagir, mais si il fait le spectacle sous la contrainte, ca va être dur pour lui d'affronter le regard de ses enfants lorsqu'ils seront plus grands. Le mec est vraiment limité dans le fond je crois. |
|
|
|
There is simply a huge dis-balance between these two teams in terms of quality and also in terms of experience at such a high level trophies.Real Madrid is well used to winning them while Frankfurt I think is here for the second time and their quality clearly lacks the pace to fight or to cause an upset to Real Madrid tonight.If this bet here is who will win the trophy then it is a sure bet to bet on Real Madrid to win it,if the bet is only for the 90 minute regular time anything can happen and we can even see a draw as a result which would make this game to go to added time.
No the terms of the bet are clear, we are betting on the winning team of the competition at the end of the match, moreover it couldn't be a 1x2 bet because there are only 2 outcomes available, and if it was a Draw No Bet it would be specified in the description. I don't know why you are saying that, but I don't think there is any confusion to have here. UEFA SUPER CUP - REAL MADRID VS EINTRACHT FRANKFURT
Which team will win the UEFA Super Cup?  |
|
|
|
Pardon je viens de découvrir qu'Elma avait posté la news (quelques minutes visiblement) avant que j'ouvre un topic dessus, je ne suis malheureusement que très irrégulièrement ce mega thread, mais c'est aussi possible qu'il n'avait pas encore été updaté quand j'ai pensé à poster la news et que je n'ai pas regardé à nouveau quand je l'ai postée un peu plus tard. Erreur de ma part en tous cas. Je viens de référencer le post dans le thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5407685 |
|
|
|
Salut ! Kraken....qq améliorations mais niveau discrétion... ils sont (très, trop?) demandeurs d'infos sur toi (au point que j'ai demandé à clôturer mon compte). Ma sœur a aussi 1 compte Kraken depuis longtemps mais ils l’ennuient car il faudrait minimum 30 XRP pour trader ou retirer en fiat, elle en a 26.5 ... gonflé les mecs, elle une 10 aine d'€ dehors depuis 8 mois, elle a voulu rajouter, elle a aussi une néo banque très connues, ils demandent tj plus de verifs.... même pour petit 1 dépôt !! KYC fait et validé... Raison officielle avancée, la banque serait pas sure... C une (la ?) des Néo banque européennes les plus connues et anciennes et LEADER sur le marché en Europe et présent now aux USA. Qu'on nous dise pas que Kr ne les connait pas ! C comme si on demandait si la Bq Rotschild était solvable !  Bref ça a du arriver à certains, ils disent rien puis APRES le KYC, "on ne charge pas votre compte tant que vous avez pas fait une photo de vous avec votre compte ou carte 'je sais plus) et écrivant "I ONLY trade on Kraken ... Bref... j'ai eu beau leur expliquer en anglais technique en plus ( ça va, je suis pas 1 quiche) que c'était pas trop "légal".. Seul un manager plus sensible à ça sur les RS mais il était bien seul au "support" de 30 personnes, et ils en avaient rien à f.... Tj leurs fameux "apologies BUT" Pr finir, j'ai refusé, bcp trop intrusif, et clôturé comme dit au début. Ma soeur va surement fr de même. En plus ils ont mis 4 jrs pr me renvoyer l'argent me privant de l'augmentation du BTC et me facturant des frais de retour, carrément ! Bref, la totale ! Je les aimais bien, mais là blacklistés chez nous, trop intrusif (soyez prudents, ils peuvent transmettre vos infos si vous avez des gains à qui vous savez ou ailleurs...). Ils ont peut être des investissements à fr mais on est pas des moutons et... mon dépôt était petit (70 €)... Ils ont bien changé et que de temps perdu ! Bonne nouvelle il semble que pour N26 au moins, ils ne demandent plus de KYC supplémentaire. J'ai essayé récemment de faire quelques withdrawals(normaux et instantanés) vers N26 et c'est passé sans problème alors qu'ils m'avaient bloqué à l'époque en me demandant un KYC supplémentaire (malgré 2 autres comptes chez 2 autres banques déjà enregistrés chez eux). Je pense que je vais revenir chez eux plus régulièrement parce que même si ils facturent les virements instantanés 0.90€ (vs 0.09€ pour les virements normaux), ils sont le seul exchange à proposer à la fois le LN et les virements SEPA instantanés actuellement, à ma connaissance. En d'autres termes, on peut envoyer des BTC (sans frais) et les recevoir en fiat sur son compte en quelques minutes en utilisant leurs services. |
|
|
|
Merci beaucoup LeGaulois !
Je n'utilise pas les "labels" et "contacts" ; ta première méthode, me semble parfaitement claire.
J'ai deux portefeuilles dans mon Electrum, dont l'un, le "default" est quasi vide.
Une fois recréé l'un, j'imagine que c'est avec "Portefeuille/nouveau/restaurer" (mon Electrum est en français) que je pourrai ensuite recréer l'autre ?
Et sans abuser de ton temps, une dernière question : est-ce que je pourrai ensuite utiliser indifféremment l'un ou l'autre Electrum (donc l'un ou l'autre PC) pour effectuer des transactions, chacun des deux étant automatiquement mis à jour à chaque ouverture ?
Oui les transactions seront mises à jour mais pas les "Description" des transactions si tu n'utilises pas LabelSync. Il faut d'ailleurs préciser que les données envoyées aux serveurs sont chiffrées pour éviter que l'anonymat de l'utilisateur ne soit compromis. En revanche si tu as des canaux LN ouverts tu dois avoir conscience qu'ils ne seront pas retrouvés en important la seed et que la restoration de la sauvegarde du wallet les rendra inutilisables. Il faut donc attendre de ne plus en avoir besoin et les clôturer correctement avant de supprimer le wallet.  |
|
|
|
In this thread you missed out some important information, particularly that you reset your computer and restored your Electrum wallet from some backup. The restauration of active Lightning channels is a difficult and cumbersome story. There might have been some bugs in Electrum which were fixed with patch 90dbac5 for such an edge "mess". Good for you, you got your funds back. I don't want to be picky but I find it disappointing when an issue is so poorly described with lots of omission of details that surely are relevant for assistance and the issue itself. I understand that a user might not be aware of important details as the awareness is proportional to knowledge on the topic. Oh well, what matters: not all Sats were harmed and lost, only a few of them. So what is the good procedure when we want to back up a wallet in order to transfer it to another computer or to upgrade our OS? Channels have to be closed necessarily? Or there is a way to "transfer" them too? Because when we use File > Save backup we get this warning message : |
|
|
|
It looks like you were consistently winning in both of these sites which is why they restricted you in this manner and is completely legal. Casinos do this stuff all the time in order to keep their businesses afloat since none of them like consistent winners.
The only gambling sites that have no problem with such winners are gambling exchanges, Pinnacle etc op.
Why do you say "both of these sites" ? He is only complaining about one single casino and he clearly named it in the title of his thread. In addition, you say it "is completely legal". How do you know that precisely? Even if it's written somewhere in the T&C in small characters, they must have a valid reason to activate this clause against him and they must clearly notify the customer about that. I don't think any regulated or professional sportsbook will wait complaints from the customer they've restricted to reply him we have nothing to do with that, it's our odds provider who is making that... |
|
|
|
I don't think you should worry,if you have not received an official email from Stake that your account is restricted and not only the sport section of the site the withdrawals should pass through if you haven't violated any of their terms and conditions.
We are talking about Stake here who gives like near 1 million dollars in bonus when is Christmas time like they did last year,I don't think they will care much to restrict an account for 80 mBTC which you claim to have won.I doubt they will put their reputation at risk for such ridiculous amounts for them.
How do you know that? You've seen testimonies about official emails sent to customers whom they've locked their funds? Could you share them with us here? Because CMIIW but rickmart's account has obviously been restricted without any email nor notice. Moreover, even if Stake is really sending "official emails" for that, like a professional or regulated sportsbook, don't you think it's a little bit late to care about it when you receive one? Because I don't think they will notify the user before locking his funds. I try to bet as much as possible on promotions proposed by Stake but I never cheated (back multiple sides, etc ...). I usually take some info from tipsters and I bet often on lower leagues to have value bets or surebet sometimes, but frankly if betting on exotic league or markets is suspect in this case they might as well not propose these markets.
I never use large stakes for my betslip, most of the times from 1 mBtc to 3 mBtc and as far as I remember I have not set any betslip with more than 15 mBtc.
You're obviously an honest customer, but it's not enough for being a good customer in their eyes, they want to earn money from you, not to give money to you. You've maybe just been lucky for the moment and you will maybe lose all your winnings in the coming months, but obviously they don't want to take risks and to wait for seeing. They prefer "showing you the door" now as Maasdamer said. You should also monitor your bonuses they will most likely being harshly lowered. |
|
|
|
Crypto BTCoy - Salem Ilese  (Le barbu aux cheveux longs à une sacrée voix quand même...) C'est déjà sur spotify LOL |
|
|
|
Pardon mais je n'ai pas compris la vanne-là, quelqu'un peut m'expliquer svp? Il y a une référence que je ne connais pas? J'aurais trouvé ça drôle si un -70% était affiché dû à un crash du cours mais là il n'y a marqué que -4%... C'est drôle parce qu'il s'inquiète pour seulement $12 c'est ça?  " How people be reacting to the Solana "hack"..." ça veut dire quoi? Que les gens de la plèbe n'auraient pas le droit d'être inquiets et d'être choqués par ce hack parce qu'ils n'ont rien, et donc n'ont rien à perdre? |
|
|
|
Hello,
Since I started betting on Stake I have rarely been disappointed, they have very good promotions, good odds, etc...
But recently, I cannot place a single bet, my stake is almost always rejected (too high). The support told me that unfortunately they cannot do much about it as it is the odd provider that fix limits for an event and for each user. Even on big events just like premier league games I cannot bet with a stake more than 0.2 mBtc (when it is possible).
I had a similar situation with sportsbet.io (odds automatically lowered for my account, banned from some promotions) and they haven't gone backwards since (more than 8 months).
Has anyone been in this situation and was able to recover afterwards normal betting configuration?
If my situation is never going to be reviewed, I might as well get my funds back right away.
Did they ask you to pass a KYC? Are you still able to withdraw your funds? You should check that quickly and withdraw all your funds from Stake before it's too late. I don't think those restrictions are just decided by their odds provider, it's a very convenient excuse from them. Odds providers don't manage and don't care about casinos finances. Like any supplier won't care about the finances of its customers if it is paid. They are maybe reporting things to casinos but the final decisions belong to the casino since you are a customer of the casino and you have T&C with it and not with its odds provider. How casinos would keep high rollers and manage their streamers and sponsored stars if odds providers were able to limit them as they want? Moreover as Maasdamer said on one sportsbook he is limited for certain sports while being limited for all sports on another which is likely sharing the same odds provider. |
|
|
|
New electrum version is released. This release is focused on improvement of Lightning UI and finally the support of the Blockstream Jade hardware wallet [1]. # Release 4.3.0 - (August 5, 2022)
* This version introduces a set of UI modifications that simplify the
use of Lightning. The idea is to abstract payments from the payment
layer, and to suggest solutions when a lightning payment is hindered
by liquidity issues.
[...]
- A single balance is shown in the GUI. A pie chart reflects how
that balance is distributed (on-chain, lightning, unconfirmed,
frozen, etc).
This new GUI feature is a really good idea IMO, because before it wasn't very clear how much funds of your balance was available for on-chain payments, and how much funds was preempted by LN channels, and if you didn't pay attention you could get bad surprises when you wanted to make some payments.  |
|
|
|
Hesitancy means you are not sure if you have a chance to beat the house edge but you can proceed and check if martingale can help you win, even if its proven thousands of times that doubling your bet or martingale is still a 50/50 chance to win or get busted, people are very persistent in using a martingale, all I know is martingale can excite you but do not use it to challenge the house edge my own experienced in martingale is very worse 15 straight losses wiping all my tokens I've earned from bounty campaign for 4 months in just 5 minutes using this strategy.
At which game did you encounter 15 straight losses precisely? It would be surprising you got that at BJ especially if you are not a bad player. I think the martingale strategy could be applied to a hot shoe if you have counting enough cards before, but it's certainly better to just raise your stake in this case. Using it at freebet blackjack could also gives better results since you get free splits and then more chances to break losing streak. This result is easy to achieve in any game if you have chosen the appropriate odds (if you bet not on x2 but on x1.1, then of course a series of 15 defeats in a row will wait a very long time). For example, when playing dice choosing <49.5% you will get similar results. In Black Jack, the house edge varies depending on the variations of the rules and is close to 0.5% at best. Whether you are a good player or a bad one, if you play long enough, you will easily see a series of 15 defeats in a row, and if you used Martingale, it will bankrupt your deposit. That's why I said if you are a good player and you have counted enough cards to be able to know that the remaining shoe is more in favor of the player than of the dealer. You can maybe still encounter 15 defeats in a row as you say but it's highly unlikely. In addition to that if you are playing at a Freebet Blackjack version, you are very likely to get a free split during this 15 rounds, and to get an additional chance to beat the dealer for free. As BitcoinAccepted said this strategy has certainly a very bad risk-reward ratio but if you have a wide bank roll and you have fixed a clear limit before starting the game, it could be ok if the shoe is hot. |
|
|
|
 Great round and I'm already looking forward to the next round. Good luck everyone!  Oh I didn't expect to reach the second rank of this pool even if it's shared with 5 other contestants , but a little bit of chance is better for starting a game than the opposite I would say. Anyway almost all participants have scored more than 10 points for this very first match day, it shows how high is the level of this pool despite counting 21 participants only. |
|
|
|
What i have to contribute here is that we have to understand that this is new platforms or a new website as you can see, they will be arranging their website with the gradually and especially with the other websites strategies to make good record except it's a situation whereby they don't pick up correction from other people website. Which i know that any website that wants to grow will like to study other people or competitors website or kind of design to make their own more better. I believe that they know exactly what you are saying.
Yes but it's sad to hear there will be some delays during the ongoing month, because this casino seems to really want to innovate and to offer a specific experience to his customers. Thanks to them I've discovered a new livecasino provider : Creed Roomz, they don't seem to be listed on many casinos, but they are on Betnomi. They seem to be mainly armenian but the quality of their games is almost the same as Pragmatic Play IMO, moreover they are offering a tip feature for their dealers who seem to be very nice. |
|
|
|
-snip-
Try roulette. Cover with a lot number, some casinos have high limited number on roulete. If "Livecasino" limited the number roulete you can put with maximum only 20 number, then try to find other game. In stake, I can put 30+ number and it's really help for waggering. But, on "CHIPS" casino they limited the number maximum 20 number. Which roulette are you talking about precisely? Which table of which live casino provider I mean. I wasn't aware casino had hidden settings of this kind for live roulette games. I thought it only depended on the provider or on the table. Do you know a review website listing this parameter for each casino by chance? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
