Well Well Well I did some digging, and it turns out ghostmixer.cc has been "seized" too Same seizure banner just like Bitwhisk.io This site was reported to have shutdown before, it was brought back to life again according to this post What happened: Ghostmixer.cc shut down their website in March 2019 probably due to no profitable business but the website is online again with the design same as that of SCAM Bitwhisk.io 2.0 and intention is definitely malicious. Probably a scammer bought the domain. |
|
|
|
What if it was the FBI who bought the domain all along after the first shutdown just to net some money launderers?  Or the scammer, after scamming a huge amount, is just trying to play games to make people think that the website was seized yet it's just their way of exiting the scam. |
|
|
|
|
Just forget about the bitcoins, you are never going to get them back from a Ponzi scheme promoter.
From what I read in one of the threads, I believe they exit scammed. They ran out of funds to pay out, and so they used an excuse of losses due to invasion of privacy and blackmail.
|
|
|
|
FC Barcelona - Valencia CF
so far I can't understand this:
barcelona is a very weak team, not understanding why they are putting an odd of @1.56 in my opinion, they should have put an odd of @2.00 because there is a big chance that barcelona will lose, it's not like in the past where barcelona was strong and favorite in all games, today they are not doing well, but whenever they play against weak teams they keep putting low odds in their favor like they are a big winning team, i wonder why they have such low odds in their favor when they are losers?
There are a lot of factors they consider apart from the current form of the team. For example if you look at their Head-to-Head records, Valencia last won a league at Camp Nou on 17th - 04 - 2016. That's over 5 years ago. That alone is something to consider and make one aware that it won't be an easy match for Valencia, however poor Barca's form is right now. |
|
|
|
|
Please note that Gate.io have a habit of first letting someone register and deposit into the accounts with no hiccups at all but as soon as they try to make a withdrawal of the funds, whether they have traded or not, their accounts get blocked and in order to get back the money they have to first undergo KYC verification.
On other words, they hijack your money until you send them your sensitive documents.
|
|
|
|
Hovering to the 2 squares above it, a message will say broker is not connected. I don't think this error is my fault, I'm sure I have done nothing to it. It just seems very timely actually that BTC is rising and charts are getting error. I have had a problem with this already since yesterday, is anyone also experiencing this kind of error and have solved it?
What trading pair and exchange are you trying to view? Please let us know so that I may try to check on my side. The problem could be coming from the exchange or "broker" as they say, otherwise everything seems fine here. If It was the whole problem with TradingView, you would be seeing lots of complaints from so many traders |
|
|
|
Only binance employees able to create such accounts. And what the hell are Binance employee unverified accounts doing in p2p trying to scam people? But that's not the case. In fact, most of such accounts are owned by scammers
In this regard, an internal proceedings is in progress. A new revision of P2P terms is also being developed We remind you that the Binance is currently undergoing reorganization due to regulatory requirements. Please report of all technical inconsistencies, this is very important to us I did report and got frustrated there by the support, hence the thread in this forum. My account is over 1000 days old but was required to first go through KYC before trading on p2p. But some accounts created as recent as after Binance tightened the KYC requirements can even manage to trade on p2p without a single verification. If you think I am making this up, I will be more than willing to provide you the details of some account I have encountered. |
|
|
|
|
If you are using a centralized exchange and don't expect them to update their terms and conditions at one point in time then you haven't been following events in the crypto space attentively.
The u turn from no KYC to full KYC verification before trading on Binance was expected. It was just a matter of time. I am surprised you took this long to realize this once they announced that they were making changes a few months ago.
|
|
|
|
We may change or amend the Binance P2P or these P2P Terms at any time at our sole and absolute discretion. Any changes to these P2P Terms will be in effect as of the “LAST REVISED” date referred to at the top of this page. You acknowledge and agree that the form and nature of the Binance P2P, and any part of it, may change from time to time without prior notice to you, and that we may add new or remove existing features and change any part of the Binance P2Phttps://www.binance.com/en/support/faq/f886bd1d1d72449faf7dde4220eadbe0How is this possible?
In the event of a conflict between these terms of these P2P Terms and the Binance Terms, the P2P Terms will supersede and control.https://www.binance.com/en/support/faq/f886bd1d1d72449faf7dde4220eadbe0You are just quoting the terms and conditions here but not answering the real issue at hand as to why some brand-new accounts of p2p traders are able to use the platform even when the first requirement for one to be able to use It is KYC verification. Why is KYC being selectively enforced? |
|
|
|
I think they will come here, but I don't think it will beneficial for them. It looks pretty clear that the image had tempered, either AI-generated or edited.
The discovery and accusation was made in May, about 5 months ago, and I believe they received or saw information about the accusation but probably decided to ignore it, so I doubt if they will come around. That's what scammers do. |
|
|
|
|
So i did some digging and found out that Battlebot's is not a live event, so the idea of betting would be impossible. It's a pre-recorded series that airs off after sometime of recording, so there is no way gambling platform would trust the event organizers and fans not to leak the results of the even before the airing.
I don't think gambling platforms would ignore it if it was a live event like football or tennis.
|
|
|
|
It was a dark night for UEFA, if they can make champion whoever they want why would we watch it? Absolutely ridiculous no call on that clear offside. When he pass the ball Mbappe was offside, it's the end of position, Garcia's touch is irrelevant. UEFA should stop playing with rulebook so much.
They stole another cup from these Spanish youngsters. Spain deserved to win it but they got robbed by referee and VAR.
]
VAR really let me down in today's final as it has crushed Spain's hope of winning or at least getting extra time. I actually asked why the referee didn't do it and it wasn't fun at all for the Spanish fans. It doesn't matter if the goal is legal after he wants to check it, but yes that's his right as a referee. It hurts a lot of course, but that's VAR and sometime it's very useless and detrimental to other team. However, congratulation to France for happily celebrating the 2020-2021 UEFA National League title. This is really an amazing match.
Looks like both of you don't know how the offside rule works. You might wanna go and revise it before you vent out your frustrations. It would have been an offside without a touch from the defender, but he did touch the ball, so no offside. Come on guys. Is this the first time you are seeing this kind of situation? |
|
|
|
Karim Benzema scored for France just two minutes after Mikel Oyarzabal scored for Spain. It is now Spain 1 : 1 France. Only 11 minutes to the end of the match, maybe this will end in penalty shoot out.
Edit:
Kylian Mbappe just scored
Spain 1 : 2 France
I loved the Karim Benzema goal. It was ecstatic He is in blistering form, and he is the reason Real Madrid is on top of the La Liga. Happy that Mbappé scored too after so many failed attempts. I would love to see him play in Real Madrid alongside Benzema. Mbappe goal - how it's not offside? Ok, there is VAR, but nn replay it looked more than ovbious.
It was because the Spanish defender touched the ball right before it got to Mbappé, so they didn't bother replaying. |
|
|
|
After watching the game that day, I liked it, and to be honest, I enjoy watching it this days. I guess we are in the same boat  Have you seen this game before? Yes it's been 3 years now Do you consider this another form of sports? Of course, it is a sport. Electronic online games (Esport) are considered sports, then why not Battle bots? How would you like it if our betting/gambling sites integrate this game so we can bet on them? I would definitely love to see them on gambling platforms and root for TombStone, Minotaur or Bite force every other time |
|
|
|
I might be called stupid for this. but do you guys have any Idea if the website "bitcoin-wallet.org" is legit?
No it's not legit. Just look at the domain name. Do you think any legit service would pick up such cheap domain names with hyphens I Just checked out reviews on Bittrust and the fake ratings are laughable https://bittrust.org/bitcoin-walletorg |
|
|
|
|
The fact that you even just asked about how you can increase your ratings is more than enough reason for me not to trust you. It means you have something you are planning to do once you get high ratings. Probably scam people in the future.
Someone who's genuine would never care about how quickly they should gain trust in a community. It just builds up naturally.
|
|
|
|
I wondered why Hhampuz stopped managing both Bitvest and 777coin signature campaigns sometime back, and yet he's a very good manager especially when it comes to casino related campaigns, well, I can now clearly see why. We cannot expect many to take this step and to risk losing their position in the campaign, especially if, as you mentioned, it represents a significant source of income for some of them. Due to their unique Tier-based system, many participants had to work for months, and some even for years, to earn their positions on the list.
But their pay per post ratio isn't even that good compared to so many active campaigns that pay out weekly right now. If I were in their position, it doesn't make sense having to wait for weeks, yet there are better campaigns. I would leave in a blink. |
|
|
|
No doubt for Atletico Madrid. This team should have a better chance and factors to win in the next match with the big supports at home and also their increasing motivation and confidence after defeating Barcelona. I am pretty sure this team will show their best performance.
However, the team must make themselves under control and not overconfident, moreover not underestimating Liverpool. Because whatever, Liverpool is also a big team, so that it may be not easy to beat.
Just a heads-up. Champion's league is something else from local leagues like La liga or English Premier League. Just because a team is doing well in La Liga or EPL doesn't mean they have an Upper hand in UCL. Right now, as it looks, EPL teams seem to have an upper hand in terms of relative strength as compared to la Liga teams (please note that I am a Liga fan) |
|
|
|
When it comes to Haaland's next club, it might be Real Madrid. Because I have heard that Real Madrid are planning to sign Kylian Mbappe and Erling Haaland both at the same time. You heard? Would you please mind sharing a link of any credible source of information you got this from? I am a fan of Real Madrid, but one player I am sure they could sign is Mbappé.I haven't seen them bid for Haaland. As they won't be playing any transfer fee for Mbappe, they are going to be able to buy Haaland also financially. But it shouldn't be against the financial rules of the league too. If Real Madrid don't sign him, maybe we can see him in the English Premier League too.
They are capable of signing Haaland to next summer transfer if they wanted, but I haven't seen any news about a bid for Haaland like it has been for Mbappé. |
|
|
|
|
I personally I think the Ballon d'ot is some fucked up award based on popularity, and we all know who's very popular among the shortlisted players right now, Messi and then CR7
Given what has happened in the last year, definitely, Lionel might win it.
I would love Lewandowski to take it home, but it's not going to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
