Ok well good luck running any project in the future.... I have a contract with the owner of the intellectual property. That gives me and the intellectual property owner (each of us separately) the legal right. One of us could prosecute in criminal court and the other could sue. Anyone summoned into court would have to make appearance or a ruling would be made in default against them. The summons could come suddenly and might not allow adequate time for a defendant to make travel arrangements. Travel cost would be at the defendant's expense. Make an offer in gold, we might agree to sell. If you'd like to start a similar type of coin with an empty blockchain and a different name, knock yourself out.  I guess that is it or is it? Does he have legal right to LTCD? Is there any body interested in developing similar type of this coin?
|
|
|
|
I still have a lot of colossuscoins at cryptsy. Will I be able to use them then with Colossuscoin 2.0 wallet client? Is it just a new client update or is it a new coin?
A whole new Coin, will have to swap directly with Cryptsy. |
|
|
|
You do realise that if this goes to court, all your posts will be submitted into evidence, or at the very least it will form part of the disclosure process and lawyers will be paid $1,000/hr to read the entire thread?
During the mid-1980s dairy farmers decided there was too much cheap milk at the supermarket. So the government bought and slaughtered 1.6 million cows. How come the government never does anything like this with lawyers?
- P.J. O'Rourke
That isn't how document discovery work in the US. There are document discovery attorneys that sort through documents and highlight just the parts that matter. These attorneys are paid less then $100 / hr and they are very fast at scanning documents. The thread would be broken up into chucks and thrown in to a database. The discovery attorneys would scan through the chunks selecting stuff that is related to the case. I'm pretty sure nothing in this thread would make the cut.  If anything, all the would matter if the first post and maybe about 10 other posts as references, and that's out of 20,000 posts in the subject. Reading through it would be like.. gay reference meme meme phtotoshop meme gay reference arguing meme complaining about lost money meme gay reference photoshop Actually they would find all the deleted material from HT.. Yeah that too, they try hard to scrub everything right away and keep it all rosy looking on their forums. Pfft, as if any real forum only has praise for their leader...  |
|
|
|
You do realise that if this goes to court, all your posts will be submitted into evidence, or at the very least it will form part of the disclosure process and lawyers will be paid $1,000/hr to read the entire thread?
During the mid-1980s dairy farmers decided there was too much cheap milk at the supermarket. So the government bought and slaughtered 1.6 million cows. How come the government never does anything like this with lawyers?
- P.J. O'Rourke
That isn't how document discovery work in the US. There are document discovery attorneys that sort through documents and highlight just the parts that matter. These attorneys are paid less then $100 / hr and they are very fast at scanning documents. The thread would be broken up into chucks and thrown in to a database. The discovery attorneys would scan through the chunks selecting stuff that is related to the case. I'm pretty sure nothing in this thread would make the cut. If anything, all the would matter if the first post and maybe about 10 other posts as references, and that's out of 20,000 posts in the subject. Reading through it would be like.. gay reference meme meme phtotoshop meme gay reference arguing meme complaining about lost money meme gay reference photoshop |
|
|
|
|
So far we've passed 2 steps of the 3 step process in the hardfork, old clients are now being rejected and the max bits have changed and in approximately 12 hours the rewards will change, possibly the smoothest hardfork ever.
|
|
|
|
Wowow, PayCoin price collapsed 60% in 30 minutes!!  |
|
|
|
All that, and without the CIA 's involvement? Every coin should have a dev like Crestington!
They would be so lucky so have someone so deeply involved and working so hard to make everyone money You guys are all really wonderful, thank you for all your support, it truly means a lot to me. Aftrer you posted that the price rose. Be careful if the price rises too much people will start spreading fud. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU_SBIltepYI think the FUDD is already spreading https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fILGpWpvwUU |
|
|
|
|
I like Cryptopia, it's a good exchange and was built by long time Bitcointalk members.
|
|
|
|
All that, and without the CIA 's involvement? Every coin should have a dev like Crestington!
They would be so lucky so have someone so deeply involved and working so hard to make everyone money You guys are all really wonderful, thank you for all your support, it truly means a lot to me. |
|
|
|
Hardfork seems to have gone smoothly, although by the looks of the road map we have a few more on the way.  Just stole $20 in quarters,from a soda machine down the street. I'll be setting up the $20 wall on Monday, if I can figure out how to convert them into BTC. I got a hold of a guy on localbitcoins, and he told me to GTFO with my chump change.  lol, we still have the 20 CON to XPY buywall on C-Cex as well Some things I want to work on for the future, is anonymity, use of multiple loadable wallet.dats, Stake for Charity, built in bootstrap so a full node can always be synced in 15 minutes or less even years down the line. I have a branch I have been working on loadable wallets, Stake for Charity, and advanced node message handling but it's atleast a few weeks away since it's more advanced than simply Cloning a Coin. Edit: The hardfork isn't fully complete yet, the Max bits has gone into effect, and tomorrow the rewards will change |
|
|
|
HI ,dev .any develop maps ?
It takes involvement from everyone, from promotion to development. I have about 5% and $5 to my name and do this voluntarily in my free time (a few hours a day) and this is completely open source with a fair launch. A road map tends to be a bad idea because if something is not met on a specific timeline then people jump on it and demand why it was not met at that time. If you want the Coin to head higher then you need to take action and decide what should be done in order to make that happen and come up with your own ideas and/or contribute directly to the coding/sourcecode. A good first step is helping us get more votes on BTER so we can get listed there which would have an immediate impact on the price. https://bter.com/voting |
|
|
|
HI ,dev .any develop maps ?
Yes I've spent some time on a roadmap  |
|
|
|
I guess that is it or is it? Lets cut the chit chat.....Is there any way to bypass Vic? Does he have legal right to LTCD? Is there any body interested in developing similar type of this coin?
There's no way he can have legal right to it regardless of what he says and would be too expensive to try to sue over it just out of spite, other than that it just comes down to if someone thinks there is value in resurrecting it. Personally I have no intention of doing work on it or resurrecting it because it would take some time to bring it to POS only, not to mention that there is no financial benefit for me to take it over and simply do not have the time to develop on every struggling Coin. Can you copy and paste other coins that utilize POS and reinserted into "new" LTCD coin? (I don't know, I have limited exposure when it comes to coding).....If you are interested, you could do premine (for development purposes), right? It's X11 so you should be able to take an X11 POW/POS Coin and paste it over top and use the genesis Block along with it's nonce, merkleroot, pchmessagestart, checkpoints, and port numbers, then you set MODIFIER_INTERVAL_SWITCH as the beginning of Proof of Stake, LAST_POW_BLOCK as the end of Proof of Work and make sure you cut off the old clients prior to the start of Proof of Stake. You would need to make sure that all the Block retargeting is the same unless you want to change that as well in which case you would add in a fork for that too, basically you need all the Proof of Work and rewards to be exactly the same otherwise there would be conflicts. This is an excerpt from bottlecaps where they rejected previous protocol versions, they just used bool bad version but you could set it as nTime in unix time as well. https://github.com/bottlecaps-foundation/bottlecaps/commit/418ec73d2b800514fc1617633f1fe675e123cb88It takes a bit of time but I would suggest for you to try to do it yourself, most everything you need to change will be in the src folder of the sourcecode. I already took over PayCon and relaunching ColossusCoin 2.0 in the next couple days, I changed the algo for it to X13 for POW mining in the last few days but my test source was X11 and functioned very well as POS only so you could pull from that spot https://github.com/Crestington/Colossuscoin2test/tree/57aacedb2f9f3900e680bcdc16d52915988d799fAs I said, I cannot take it on because it's too much work to try to run more than 1-2 Coins but I can help you with advice on making some of the necessary changes. You'd also have to figure out what you want as your minimum and maximum Stake age and reward per year. |
|
|
|
This Mullick person you mentioned is their main developer, I'm actually surprised you had a reply from him
You should see if you can find a link for them of the source code (Github) that you can give to Cryptsy. They would be holding withdrawals because the developers have not notified them of the update and provided the source code. A downloadable wallet would not suffice since they would build the daemon themselves and often do not have the time to sort though to find the latest code unless it's easily accessible for them.
My recommendation is to either ask the developers to get in contact with Cryptsy, find the repository yourself that you can provide a link for them, or sell (last resort).
are we looking for this here???: https://github.com/ybc2/ybc2I don't know anything about sourcecodes, sorry. don't know what to look for. I'm not sure, the Github is only one day old and references http://taiyilabs.com/ |
|
|
|
I guess that is it or is it? Lets cut the chit chat.....Is there any way to bypass Vic? Does he have legal right to LTCD? Is there any body interested in developing similar type of this coin?
There's no way he can have legal right to it regardless of what he says and would be too expensive to try to sue over it just out of spite, other than that it just comes down to if someone thinks there is value in resurrecting it. Personally I have no intention of doing work on it or resurrecting it because it would take some time to bring it to POS only, not to mention that there is no financial benefit for me to take it over and simply do not have the time to develop on every struggling Coin. |
|
|
|
Hey Crestington,
I cannot deposit or withdraw to or from the YBC wallet.
I can however trade YBC/BTC but as I said in my post the rate of exchange from YBC to BTC
at Cryptsy is 68% below the market average on other exchanges.
In other words, if I sell 100 YBC coin thru my seized wallet at Cryptsy as a panic, last resort
desperate act, I would only receive $32 in BTC, while on all other exchanges I would receive
$100 for the same amount.
This in essence forces me to lose most of my money if I were to just give up and sell.
Now remember this is not an industry wide drop in price, this is only happening at Cryptsy
where the YBC coin wallets have been frozen.
This Mullick person you mentioned is their main developer, I'm actually surprised you had a reply from him You should see if you can find a link for them of the source code (Github) that you can give to Cryptsy. They would be holding withdrawals because the developers have not notified them of the update and provided the source code. A downloadable wallet would not suffice since they would build the daemon themselves and often do not have the time to sort though to find the latest code unless it's easily accessible for them. My recommendation is to either ask the developers to get in contact with Cryptsy, find the repository yourself that you can provide a link for them, or sell (last resort). |
|
|
|
Indeed, that is one smart dog! (I'll bet if you took a poll of all smart dogs they would each reach that same conclusion.) Most smart dogs are also very freedom-oriented in their beliefs. I can't tell for sure from the forum name, but I'll bet it was one smart dog that decided to create and post this transcript: I listened to this one again. Dan's comments about his philosophy and the future of the block chain are worth rereading. Impromptu partial transcript below: Max Wright: Share for us what your idea of the philosophy of freedom and the philosophy that you brought to bitshares…. Dan Larimer: The philosophy of freedom, for me, is all about “don’t do unto other people what you don’t want other people doing to you.” That’s the non-aggression principle. But if you apply that consistently, you can derive my entire worldview and philosophy. I use technology as a means of reaching the ends. A means of reaching that freedom, that ideal, of implementing that technology in society. There are a lot of places online where Libertarians rant, “the government is doing this, the government is doing that. Let’s petition them, let’s ask them, let’s beg them.” Some people say that we should fight violently and overthrow them. But I am very much of the mindset that the free market needs to be able to provide security--needs to be able to protect our life, liberty and property against all aggressors. That means that the free market needs to produce solutions that can protect us against today’s governments, without requiring that today’s governments disappear first. The solution needs to be so powerful and so effective that they work today, even in the middle of what many people consider to be a “big brother” government, a “1984” surveillance society. Max Wright: Let’s talk about where this technology is going. Dan Larimer: Where the Internet and block chain technology can take us as a society, where every transaction you do is settled on a block chain. Where every dispute that you have is resolved on a block chain. Where your reputation and identity are managed on a block chain. Where your voting happens on a block chain. And where all laws -- that you agree to follow -- you can sign to, and post it on a block chain. Whenever you go to do business with someone, you bump your phones together and it verifies that you've got compatible arbitration agreements automatically. And when you make that purchase, you've got a signed record, a signed receipt of what it is that you are buying and what terms you agree to. So you've got these verifiable, provable signatures, you've got built-in arbitration, you are only accountable to your own laws, and every member of society can be bonded by posting a bond on the block chain in security against compliance with the laws that you have agreed to follow. And all of this stuff can be done in an entirely voluntary manner that does not depend upon initiating force or violence against anyone. It can be done in an entirely legal way because it only depends upon free speech and voluntary association. So I envision that block chain technology will allow us to create a world where the incentives for being part of the... block chain community, that the efficiencies you gain are so strong, that your profits are so much higher, that being rejected or shunned by that community forces you to deal with people outside it -- people who have to charge higher fees, require security deposits for your utilities, for your rent, everything under the sun. The cost of doing business outside the system will be higher than the cost inside the system. I can see this creating a self-reinforcing virtuous cycle, where the more people that join and participate and start doing commerce entirely on a block chain -- merchants and consumers -- never having to lead back to the fiat world. You’ll start to see a growing snowball effect until it gets to the point that no one will dare being a government official because they would be excluded because they are participating in the initiation of violence against others. So these things are possible. I believe there is a solution. I do not believe that violence is a necessary response to violence -- that you must create governments in order to have law and order. I believe that good people don’t have to resort to bad things just because bad people exist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wczMKASQk6sThe thing I find most interesting about governments is that there are so many that complain about the inefficiencies, surveillance and corruption but when faced with legal issues out of their control such as theft of their personal property or large scale fraud (Mt. Gox) that they would turn to their governments and demand that they solve the issues. The US Government in general is horribly inefficient with Democrats and Republicans spending all their time arguing over issues that nothing really gets done and hundreds of millions of dollars are spent every year in order to make the other side seem less credible along with over bloated pension funds and exuberant wages for basically doing nothing when that money would be better spent on basic needs. The Blockchain solves a lot of these issues by taking away the centralized control of the monetary system but the first thing that comes to mind when thinking about the adaption of the Blockchain into a full nationwide monetary system is how Governments would pay for maintenance of infrastructure since it isn't like the average person would just go out and donate money to the Government in order to pay for these services. It seems inevitable that Governments would have to transition to Blockchain technology and the sooner they start to adapt the better but they have yet to even begin and the question would be, how they would make the transition? |
|
|
|
Non Scam coins with ID'd DEVs:
Darkcoin
Vericoin is reversing higher with some game changing POS developments in the pipeline.
Dakcoin: a coin which loves to change the rules. Changes the rewards for mining, changes the number of total to be issued... Vericoin: developers did a hard fork in order to roll back the chain to revert a supposed theft on MintPal. None of these could be called scams, but they are really bad coins. Hardforks tend to be part of the process so a change in rewards is not necessarily a bad thing. In the case of Vericoin, I'm pretty sure they got fucked by Mintpal although that is debatable. I read somewhere the VeriCoin devs had huge regrets afterwards because it divided the Community and ultimately did a lot of damage but they were in a bind and had to do something otherwise there may have been 30% of the Coins floating around of other peoples Coins which they would lose and would crash the price for everyone else. |
|
|
|
|
In what way was your balance seized? are you able to buy/sell on the exchange? or cannot deposit withdraw out of the exchange?
|
|
|
|
guys thanks who work with our. wait new miners
Fantastic, thanks for adding CON to your Multipool Make sure you guys Vote for CON on BTER 36 hours to go until the Hardfork is in full effect, if you haven't upgraded yet, please make sure you are on the latest version. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
