I have no doubt that Butler will do his best too. He's the one hungry on this match since he is eyeing for the title. On the side of Casimero, he is eyeing for another opponent that's why there's a situation before that Casimero claims he doesn't need to do a serious practice because he can surely deal with Butler without struggling.

I hope that was not just a statement but he can really deliver it on actual.

It should be obvious even for a newbie what HODL meant.

Maybe we can focus on Staking in general. In a layman's term, by staking, you will share your coins to be part of that network. Of course, there's a reward for it but it varies per staking terms.

My question is, why you are asking that question? We can have a much more accurate answer if you will pinpoint what you like to do.

That's an obvious thing to do. Casimero losing this match will result in climbing back again to the ladder where he's already on the top. He should do everything to win as that will make him have a chance to face a boxer of his caliber, and maybe, a big fight after that win.

Not just against Naoya Inoue but if ever their deal doesn't work out, there are other boxers out there to challenge. But I believe if Casimero won this fight, Naoya Inoue will be interested again and catch the attention of Bob Arum to now finally renegotiate the former deal.

Not just that. We have to take note that most of Klay Thompson's FG attempts are well-contested. It means regardless if it's defended or not, he still nails those shots. His catch and shoot form is now returning slowly and while he progresses, he will now finally regain his usual form or even a much-improved one.

Lakers on the other hand did a great job to somehow make the game close even honestly, I think it's already a sure loss for me when they are being pinned down with a good lead at most part of the game.

A good topic for me.

However, I don't know or am aware of the "fair" side of those games. The trust might be subjective but I don't really play on those games due to the fact that I don't think they are really live. I'd rather bet on slots regardless of their respective RTPs or go all-in to sports betting which I found more interesting and my chances of winning are somehow great.

Also thinking the same way. Seth Curry now used to work on Joel Embiid and even the former is sometimes not consistent, he's a good front runner on the team. With Harden's trade, the usual gameplay of Sixers will now be changed because it's very clear that his specialty was always an "ISOLATION" play where he will be the main scorer.

But let's not think on advance. We should see the result of that trade and what they will bring on their respective teans within only a few games played.

That makes sense lol.

The government allows a mass people on each Presidential aspirant proclamation rally a few days ago and PBA will be again with no audience? There should be no Mathematics or Science in there. That's a crap regulation if they will still not allow PBA to have an audience where in fact, only a few is still watching live on the venue.

A good move and if I remember it correctly, they also did a great job in applying gambling-related stuff in the form of a virtual physical casino on one of their GTA releases. I think that was GTA V?

But actually, with lots of service today involving NFT, this kind of news wasn't new after all.

Let's see if the game developers will push their NFT plan and if more people will ride on the possible hype.

Not a big deal after all if his acting career is not that on an entertainment level but what matters is, he was paid decently because of his fame, name, reputation, and status. Canceling this fight by Tyson or should I say, not participating in an event involving Logan Paul, he thinks that he will just be a milking cow for one of Paul's brothers to earn more within just a few efforts of exposure.

We can now close the book that this fight won't happen by a high chance. Maybe we can still see Tyson on the ring but don't expect.

Obviously, it's a different story about National Team. If I get it right, what the partnership should be is focused on the League itself as a whole. The rivalry doesn't have any impact on these since the PH and S. Korea are only rivals in international events.

I also lack any information about the partnership so maybe, I will spend time reading some stuff related to that and see if I can share my own understanding about it here in the thread.

LOL. Do you really think I'm not aware of 1Xbit reputation here? Can you read again my post?

Maybe we have different views about their reputation about their status outside Bitcointalk but I'm not saying they are good overall.

I even mentioned that "It's still good that we continue distrusting the site providing we have lots of good references that properly backed why the site shouldn't be recommended."

Clear now?

For sure that was already on the table. After that incident last December that leads to the cancellation of the fight, Casimero's camp should now take action on what to do next to prevent that kind of problem in the near future.

And since Casimero's title is at risk, they will surely do everything not to let that problem happen again for the 2nd time.


The comparison doesn't make any sense. We shouldn't involve Pacman's speed or any other boxers along with his league to the speed of Casimero. You guys have to remember that their respective decision does have a wide gap so it's not appropriate to have these comparisons. And seems off-topic to me.

Even those people you are referring to hated a meme coin, it doesn't mean they are not involving it on their respective crypto portfolio. For sure, most of them have meme coins like Doge and Shibu but only for trading purposes and not to the point they will believe in it like treating these coins that have a fundamental and strong use case.

Just don't mind then and focus on your own. After all, your money, your portfolio, your rule.

I don't understand the key purpose or any importance involving women. No pun intended but is there any significance or impact if women got involved in crypto? I mean, regardless of gender, everything should be in general. There's no such thing for me that there will be any big changes if women got involved.

The bottom line is, just let those women involve themselves in crypto without doing any attempts that they should have to.

Playoffs are possible for them but yes, the question about being "success" is in jeopardy. They will also have a hard challenge at the end of the season starting from competing in a play-in tournament on which there's a possibility that they might not make it.

And if successful to take a playoffs spot, they will surely be matched either against the dominant Phoenix Suns or Golden State Warriors. That's already a heavy challenge for them entering the playoffs. And for let's say there's a surprising event happened that they established a long winning streak later on to their remaining games this season, and ended up on 6th, still, a tough team they will face on the 1st round.


Maybe it's also a test that they are previously sitting Westbrook at the final minutes when he is off-night throughout the game.

I wonder what's the Lakers' conclusion about it.

Being fair is "subjective" because, in the first place, bounty hunters should accept the fact that their whole month effort or so might not be rewarded with their expectations. In most cases, you are rewarded fairly "with the token" as to how it was tallied but don't expect you will get your expected market value.

Complain if those tokens are not distributed. And actually, bounty works in most cases just become time-consuming because others users are using multiple accounts, or let's say it's just a single account but participating on lots of different bounties contributing to the workloads. And in the end, disappointed because the expected money reward doesn't reach.

From now on, you should understand that's how bounty works. That's why it was even called a "bounty" in the first place.

The sources aren't secret, it shouldn't be a problem. However, investing in new tokens requires understanding truly the risks and guts. It's like putting your money on something that you don't have any reference for if it will withstand the wrath of the market.

My suggestion, choose instead those tokens that are already listed on big exchanges. For example in Binance, you can check the daily market on who performed well or not. From there, you can select a few tokens to risk and study their daily price movement or if you want to go deep with your analysis, lurk at their respective discussion platform, if any.

Experience will teach you how to deal with your problem. Just continue to move forward.

It's really a usual and common approach before that Bitcoin is creating doubts, uncertainty, and fears. I also don't blame those big companies or individuals thinking Bitcoin is a scam because that's their own view and we can't control it.

As Bitcoin progresses and as time passes by, those who think that Bitcoin is sh*t are now realizing the key fundamentals of the coin. Others even become well-knowledge compared to those who are already in the crypto-world for a long.

The bottom line, without Bitcoin being treated as a scam before, it contributed to the strong foundation built by the community. Let's thank that negativity as it results in much more positivity towards Bitcoin as a whole.

Outside Bitcointalk, it's no doubt that 1XBit is having a good positive rating and lots of partnerships. They are popular even the community here doesn't like the site. Their marketing is quite effective, we have no choice but to accept that fact.

Moving forward, just follow what we believed is the right thing to do. Ignore totally that site like it's not existing. It's still good that we continue distrusting the site providing we have lots of good references that properly backed why the site shouldn't be recommended.

They don't have the majority of those things that are mentioned in the poll, at least based on my own view.

Surely that was being organized and planned. Not just that but every possible strategy that both fighters can use.

Aside from thinking about each other's disadvantages, they are surely both working on their respective "unexpected" strategy so both fighters might be surprised that something not in the tape can't be seen.

On the day of the fight, that's the only time we can see if their formed strategy is effective or not.