Domain Name For Sale --->www.CRYPTOCURRENCYPROGRAMMER.COM


up for sale you make offer accept any form of currency, I don't negotiate much so please give it your best shot first  



[edit]

willing to trade

also willing to go in partnership with the domain being my equity contribution

Of course you can earn BTC trading altcoins on Bter or Cryptsy but another [slow!] way is to use spots that give free giveaways – every hour, every day etc. Here is a list of working bitcoin faucets that pay out. Some of the sites pay when you get a bunch of coins so always use same BTC adress for faucets. Some use COineBox.me – microsystem that adds up small payments and send at once – no need to register. Just use same adress always and you are good.


to (very little editing)


Of course you can earn BTCs trading altcoins on Bter or Cryptsy, but another way is at FREE giveaways – every hour, every day, etc.   Here is a list of working bitcoin faucets that pay out.  Some of the sites pay when you get a bunch of coins so always use same BTC address for those faucets. Some use COineBox.me – microsystem that add up small payments to send at once – no need to register.  Just always use same address and you are good.

People gave MG their money to safeguard it with great care.   They also trusted MG to inform informed them of any issues that would cause their funds to suffer loss at no fault of their own.   When MG stopped allowing withdrawals, for whatever reason, they knew or should have known that it would negatively impact the overall market, and likely cause irreparable damage to their own customers if allowed to remain more than 3 days.

3 days the withdrawal stop other cryptocurrency exchange began to distance themselves from MG in a responsible fashion as not to further disrupt the market.  The resulting separation allowed the overall market to adjust in such a way as to view MG as an absentee player, at that time MG btc values were material divergent from all other exchange btc values.   At that time MG should have reconsideration it's policy to allow any public trading of btc at all.

They knew or should have known that the ever widening gap, at that time 50%, would surely inflict massive damage on the already damaged holding. 

It is my position that MG acted recklessly in they fiduciary responsibility to exercise great care over the customer funds in their control, furthermore that their irresponsible behavior needlessly caused millions of btc holders to suffer permanent financial loss as a direct result of their poor communications of what MG claims to have experienced, solutions for the problem, and a good faith timeline for correction of the problem.

I ask that damages be awarded in the amount of $1B and that treble damages be awarded since this pattern of irresponsible behavior appears to be internally systemic, pervasive, and chronic.

 

I'm in

Reserved Marketing

ahahahahahaaaaaa

"Tokyo, Japan, February 17th, 2014!

Dear MtGox Customers,

We apologize for the inconvenience caused by the recent suspension of external
bitcoin transfers. Fortunately, as we announced on Saturday we have now
implemented a solution that should enable withdrawals and mitigate any issues
caused by transaction malleability (please see our previous statements for
details on this issue).

Thanks to our friends at Blockchain.info, MtGox now has a workaround that will
use a unique identifier created by Blockchain to show whether transactions have
been modified or not. This will prevent any fraudulent use of the malleability
issue and protect the assets of our customers.

Resuming Withdrawals

With this new system in place, MtGox should be able to resume withdrawals
soon. At the beginning we will do so at a moderated pace and with new daily/
monthly limits in place to prevent any problems with the new system and to take
into account current market conditions.

In order to launch the new system, we are going through the following steps:

- Re-indexing the entire Blockchain (approx. 32 million entries)
- Fully deploying the new NTX ID
- Implementing a new bitcoin withdrawal queue that needs to be tested

We will update everyone again by Thursday at the latest.

Additionally, you may have noticed that we have added a new login system that
sends you an email when you successfully access your account. This is an
additional security layer, but as always we strongly encourage our customers to
use the 2-step authorization options available in our Security Center.

Thank you again for your support, and we look forward to resume bitcoin
withdrawals as quickly as possible.

Best regards,

MtGox Team"


______________________


Ok, if you read between the lines:

1) the "problem" was solved days ago,
2) you still won't get your money out today or tomorrow,
3) the ray of sunshine should enable people to start buying Mt Gox btc immediately (low rates too tempting to resist)
4) when withdrawals do start, likely Wednesday or Thursday they will be measured
5) they said MONTHLY just in case their btc rate dosn't bounce back by next Monday
6) they want the opportunity to work their way back into the market place
and
7) they ancillary efforts are to want to warrant your forgiveness, expect more goodies




Personally, I've seen too much, ... I would not give them the benefit of a third opportunity to erode btc value wholesale.

If you choose to stay or go to them, I would recommend that you insist on better internal oversight, some outside guarantees, and a better accountability system.
[now is the time that they are most open and receptive for constructive suggestions]

Your prejudices aside, the improper capitalizations are ubiquitous in his presentation, not limited to the word "Women".

Given that women are more than 50% of the population why is it that for the longest time 90+% of the btc holders were men?  Furthermore, why is it that the majority of all functions and activities concerning btc, including this forum, are overwhelmingly dominated by men?   The reason is simple, because inherently men and women are coded differently, more specifically women are genetically more risk averse than men, you may not like the way that sounds so look around or at the hard facts.

This isn't about intellect, "class", or opportunity access, it is rather their desire to get involved at this stage of the game.    

sad,

sad that bitcoin is clearly subject to holds, freezes, and all sorts of nazi-paypal nonsense
sad, that there were not more protesters,
sad, that dude said that if he knew if MG was going out of biz he would willingly dump it on someone else, otherwise he would hold it.  Meaning even after all of this he still will not get out of MG.
sad, that one guy said he was willing to stay there for "as long as it takes" -- "As long as it takes" to do what?  that's Mt Gox speak,  Clearly the hostages are sympathizing with their captors

sad, sad, sad

hahahahaaaa


you wrapped that up in a big pretty box with a really nice bow on top, but somehow I don't thing the gift will be appreciated



[btw, I agree]

sometime USD is created in other countries, actually USD is made is many non-US countries.

at one point it's said North Korea was printing it like they were a US Fed member bank


just google: North Korea printing

or wiki superdollar

put it this way if they put google ads on their site they'd make enough money to get them out of this jam.

There are many reasons to consider an exchange, I think the top reasons are:

safety,
multiple cryptocurrencies
accountability /responsiveness
pricing


In the beginning it is very difficult to know how to properly enter and engage the market.  If you do mining that seems to me to be the best introduction to the cryptocurrency space, particularly if you are working with a coin that has very little mining competition.    But if you are not into mining faucets and giveaways appears to be the major entrance to the space.

If you really do your homework you will find bad things said about everyone, when you factor in customer size, transaction volume, and community tenure things seem to balance out.  But if you do some serious research you notice that certain exchanges are really good for some things and really bad for others.

So my question is what is the best cryptocurrency exchange and why?

I'm hoping to learn which exchanges are the most aggressive,
which have the best customer service
which have the best pricing justification (get what you pay for)
which is the safest
which positively stands out in a particular way


thanks

I have many jobs for web developers, do you do web development?

Also, I will be looking for people to do cryptocurrency reviews

it should not take he feds too long to go over the "books"  to find not just his personal wallet but a treasure trove of other folk who they can run after for all sorts of things

because NO ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION IS EVER ANONYMOUS

Thanks for the add

www.ArmisGame.com

thanks for the link

as you can see that forum targets a specific interest group, clearly the OP wanted to broaden his perspective. 

Personally I would not have visited that forum because I would have expected to see a language that I do not understand.   

that was surprisingly good.  It was certainly informative.

sadly there wasn't enough of the anti-regulation side of the discussion injected into the discussion -- notice when it was broached it was tempered in many different ways.

You are misinterpreting what China is doing, China is taking a measured and reasonable approach to btc,

China controls the internet to protect it's varying interests in many ways, that is an extremely difficult undertaking, but far greater than that
China also has instituted controls on the God given human right of Chinese citizens to have children, so don't think for a moment that China is doing
anything more than controlling what happens in their country.  

Some time ago Bitcoin was not legal in China, then it became legal, then it got limited, now it's somewhere between all of that.  As it stands now China has the #1 btc exchange in the world, with volume almost the size of all of the other exchanges combined

The world should be grateful that China is taking a responsible position towards the cryptocurrency.  What occurred at Mt Gox could happen at MANY other places including the massive exchange in China.   Explosive growth is usually an indication of customers caught up in marketing hype, it is not indicative of common market forces at play.  

Clearly too many people are blindly trusting entities that look like responsible market professionals with billions of fiat yet NONE of the standard securities, insurances, guarantees, or even informative history are in place to properly inform or protect them.    Sure govt could look the other way and rescue them when the S hits the fan, or allow the market to flush 'stupid' out of it's system, it's a very difficult decision to make.

only in the most technical sense of the word, but otherwise no.

I'm saying whenever you hear or see bitcoin involved in any show it's simply a sophisticated advertisement FOR bitcoin, regardless of if the reference appears to be bad or good.


as for the feds, that's a chicken dinner -- "winner, winner, chicken dinner!"  buy those newspapers or mags and sell them for substantially more than purchase price if the headline is just right, on a widely read paper ie: NYT.

 

 

People gave MG their money to safeguard it with great care.   They also trusted MG to inform informed them of any issues that would cause their funds to suffer loss at no fault of their own.   When MG stopped allowing withdrawals, for whatever reason, they knew or should have known that it would negatively impact the overall market, and likely cause irreparable damage to their own customers if allowed to remain more than 3 days.

3 days the withdrawal stop other cryptocurrency exchange began to distance themselves from MG in a responsible fashion as not to further disrupt the market.  The resulting separation allowed the overall market to adjust in such a way as to view MG as an absentee player, at that time MG btc values were material divergent from all other exchange btc values.   At that time MG should have reconsideration it's policy to allow any public trading of btc at all.

They knew or should have known that the ever widening gap, at that time 50%, would surely inflict massive damage on the already damaged holding. 

It is my position that MG acted recklessly in they fiduciary responsibility to exercise great care over the customer funds in their control, furthermore that their irresponsible behavior needlessly caused millions of btc holders to suffer permanent financial loss as a direct result of their poor communications of what MG claims to have experienced, solutions for the problem, and a good faith timeline for correction of the problem.

I ask that damages be awarded in the amount of $1B and that treble damages be awarded since this pattern of irresponsible behavior appears to be internally systemic, pervasive, and chronic.