go ahead and ask somebody who breeds dogs for instance! he will contest that those dogs have often serious genetic diseases. or even better, go into some mountain village where they used to fuck each other for centuries. you will be astonished what happens after keeping your gene pool samesame.
Whachoo talkin' about?  |
|
|
|
First, there is no such thing as "white genes" and "black genes".
I am not sure what he means by "supermodel genes" anyway. It's not like there haven't been/aren't black supermodels. Their ages are apparently around 11 and 6 so it looks like she's already getting a good start on being tall enough. |
|
|
|
Nope. Who is at fault are those who decided to pick up weapons and strap on suicide vests. The question is how to best mitigate those. I don't really see that "race" factors into it though.
It'd be nice, but a world free of terrorism is unlikely. If the relevant state vigilance is weak results of this kind are inevitable. It is unlikely in any case. I'm especially wary of unchecked immigration. Now, don't get me wrong, I'm an immigrant myself and have counted amongst my friends people from many races, cultures and religions and celebrate many of the things that exist in my life because of it. Assimilation is key though and France especially has allowed enclaves to develop where ideals that run counter to the ethos of western secularism have been allowed to build. Any realistic level of vigilance less than panopticon-levels will have trouble with that. |
|
|
|
Simply saying "you are wrong" is no argument either. Wrong how? How does it actually work?
If you don't want to have a discussion, simply don't. But you are here now.
Recessive genes are not eliminated by breeding but are passed on just the same as dominant genes. It is only in their expression that it makes a difference. In future generations, recessive genes may recombine to once again be expressed phenotypically. Genes increase or decrease through natural selection which will depend on many other factors. That's as far as I'm willing to go explaining grade school science. Especially in a thread about the price of Bitcoin. Here, have it as a link since Google is apparently just too much. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punnett_square |
|
|
|
What I said would surely help. If I remember correctly 8% of France population is Muslim and the attack was orchestrated and carried out by a handful of people who were raised in France. Who is at fault here is the French intelligence.
Nope. Who is at fault are those who decided to pick up weapons and strap on suicide vests. The question is how to best mitigate those. I don't really see that "race" factors into it though. |
|
|
|
Simply saying "you are wrong, and ugly" is no argument.
Which is why I gave a hint as to where to start looking. There's no point having an argument when one side has a totally invalid foundation for theirs. Quite simply, he is wrong though actually strangely attractive. |
|
|
|
And not one word of explanation. Helpful. This type of dismissive attitude, without so much as explaining how he is wrong, is pathetic.
It's called being educated in the basic facts of what you're talking about. I'd be happy to tutor for 0.3BTC/hr but a basic biology textbook would be cheap and Wikipedia is free. You know what *is* a recessive trait? Blue eyes. Guess they've been bred out of existence already since we don't give a damn about blue eyed people breeding with anyone else. What's that? |
|
|
|
What the fuck are 'supermodel genes'? So you think the white kid is pretty and the other isn't. That is totally subjective.
Also, with 'white genes', you only mean that teeny tiny amount that affect skin color, no? Why would other genes in white people be recessive?
Well it's not just the that the skin is different... There are also other differences.. There is a reasons why all 100m sprinter and marathon runner are black and not white. So you're telling me if I want good-looking kids who can outrun the cops... And dance |
|
|
|
That's only a conservative estimate of genetic isolation though. In America, plenty of Caucasian and Africans live near each other, yet the interbreeding between groups is something miniscule under 5%. Since white genes are recessive, the white race would not exist if this ratio was higher. Due to this, whether your Marxist mind acknowledges it or not, if you advocate that everyone on earth interbreed with each other with no regards to race, you are in fact advocating white genocide due to white genes (and Asian) being recessive.
It's pretty easy to verify this with virtually any interracial relationship that exists. Take Heidi Klum for example. Here's her with two of her kids, each from different fathers. She's supposed to be a supermodel, yet has passed along virtually none of those supermodel genes onto one child, while clearly having done so for the other. This is because white genes are recessive and it's hard to even tell the child on the left is related to her at all.
You have no idea how recessive and dominant genes work, nor how they are passed on between generations. Go play with some Punnett squares |
|
|
|
More expensive coins? How so? If anything, cheaper coins (slightly more coins being produced due to shorter time between solved blocks)  For up to 2 weeks until the difficulty adjusts. |
|
|
|
|
Soft restarts and reboots didn't help. Ended up having my wife power it down. Think I'll just throw a RPi on it for now.
|
|
|
|
AT SEA: Since 2000, the Navy has spent more than $1 billion to upgrade its record-keeping, but it still lacks the ability to account for ships, submarines and other physical assets. REUTERS/HO NEW   |
|
|
|
Plus BTC also handy in provisioning international terror clubhouses with recreational materials, such as bath salts and premium child pornography.
Pls not to forget the Alpaca socks. |
|
|
|
20 billion ? Lol it is far more than that, where did you get that figure?
The first thing that comes to mine is when Donald Rumsfield had that press conference the day before 9 / 11 saying that the Pentagon has 'lost track' of 2.3 trillion dollars.
Or the transport planes full of cash that mysteriously went missing in Iraq.
20 billion of loses isn't much at all in the scheme of how much has been lost over the last few administrations in the U. S of A .
TBH, I just googled "dollars lost iraq" and picked a number somewhere in the middle. |
|
|
|
^Hmm. Something to think about. International terrorists really could benefit from a more privacy-conscious way to move massive amounts of money while saving on transaction fees! Finally, a Bitcoin use case scenario that doesn't sound totally contrived!  Why fuss with Bitcoin and its volatility and hard to use wallets for 3 million when the US gov has "lost track" of around 20 billion in hard-to-trace bills? |
|
|
|
I'm sure you may find some of that $600milion the US gave to ISL in the last congress sanctioned assistance package is being used irresponsibly, it seems ironic that 99.5% is not questions because it in the open and the media chose track the 0.5% that filed through to bitcoin, if it did.
You can't go wrong with a palette loaded with cold hard cash either. |
|
|
|
I will use a gold analogy to show something here:
Here's the issue: A slow down in gold mining does not decrease the rate of gold transactions. Nor does it delay the time at which gold mining would become more profitable again. |
|
|
|
The extreme opposite viewpoint is that there is demand for 25BTC/block * 6block/hr * 24hr/day * $320/BTC = $1,152,000 worth of BTC per day. This $1.15 M demand may stay the same across the halving. This would indicate an equal value. In such a case, the new equilibrium price would be $640.
Granted, the truth will likely be somewhere in between.
Of course, I am of the opinion that BTC is drastically undervalued today. But that's just, like, my opinion, man.
No way is the price going to double at the point of the having though. It will climb in the leadup to the halving which will result in more hashing power being brought online which will cause the difficulty to increase. Now, it's possible that the price will climb enough, faster than hashing power is added that there will be enough profit to not encourage miners to switch off and there may be some other factors as well but there's nothing solid. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
