As the site says: We are short 59.615405018934 of MNM. Please switch to BTC until we find more MNM blocks.
|
|
|
blocks found dont get credited till in unconfirmed status, so the value of those altoins had to drop so low that I didnt make nothing for 11 hours?
1) "Total Unpaid" = "Balance" + "total pending" "total pending" = "Immature" + "Confirmed" so... "Total Unpaid" = "Balance" + "Immature*" + "Confirmed" *may include coins that never get "Confirmed" 2) so the value of those altoins had to drop so low that I didnt make nothing for 11 hours?
When a) the site is short 59.5+ coins to make payouts in that coin andb) no one in the pool has found a block of that coin in 16 hours... Yes!
|
|
|
... I quit mining to that address also and its still dropping
Balance: 57.77535513 MNM 40 minutes ago 58.58531034 MNM 5 minutes ago 58.67030918 MNM now is not "dropping". "Total Unpaid" may "drop", because it includes unconfirmed coins (which may end up orphaned, etc)
|
|
|
... I guess I will just stick to mining payout to BTC it does not have the same issue
There's an irony in being on bitcointalk.org posting about using a server advertised with " █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][ BTC Multipool] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█ Paid out 600+ BTC" and not already getting paid in BTC ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
What about I had an unpaid balance over 80MNM befor 2pm central and 11 hours later less than 80MNM
You had a text balance of over 80, or is this all about the chart?
|
|
|
Check this address and watch the balance fade Mjr1BETVeEX2fixFcykrt7KKhUD1kkVpjZ
Last block was 15hrs so balance is dribbling upwards When I 1st looked: 57.64846252 MNM 1 minute later: 57.77535513 MNM
|
|
|
IDK what to say honestly.... Since the last change in mining address, I havent been pointing my SHA256 here, and am taking it up the butt by pointing at NH.
Only 3 places I aim my hash at (since the halving): zpool, kano.is, or solo.ckpool.
|
|
|
But... if I read that right... 1.5Ph?
You read it right, but the page, itself, is wrong. It shows mine as: 54,842,979 Mh/s. If I had that, I wouldn't be dicking around with altcoins! ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
I set queue to 0 and santime to 1 but it wont help the locking up issue unless you had an outrageous queue.
I fixed the lockup issue by putting failover in proxy as well as in the miner. It's just the 7 server fails in like 12 hrs that I can't deal with. Hit 12 blocks during those last 2 moofs and got squat-nada for them.
|
|
|
I have been mining an altcoin and the last 11 hours I have had no income, whats going on here?
"no payout" ≠ "no income"
|
|
|
Can you use Putty and check?
TERM=xterm screen -r
[Q]ueue: 1 [S]cantime: 60 [E]xpiry: 120
|
|
|
And just when I was begining to think this might work..... Pool Status
sha256 3333 37 503 - 2% 0.0020 Last Earning: 12m ago @crackfoo, let me know if you ever get it reliable; until then, I'm off to where I can make BTC
|
|
|
@ComputerGenie do you know if Bitmain corrected the queue setting of 8192 in cgminer in the s9? i have to set mine to 0 in my s5's
They bastardized cgminer into bmminer, there's no telling what they did; but, given their general attitude of "it works more often than not, so it's good", chances are they didn't "fix" anything (they rarely ever do). ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
As an example, I have an S9 with just 2 weak boards (the 3rd was used to make my 4-blade S9) running @ 550MHz...
2d35m24s: 7,771.75 GH/S(avg) Diff: 5.24K Rejected: 147 (and most of those are from the 1/2 dozen times it's had to failover)
S7-LN converted to 650 MHz S7: 2d1h12m26s: 4,375.35 GH/S(avg) Diff: 3.6K Rejected: 291 (the highest rate of all 8 and most of those are from the 1/2 dozen times it's had to failover)
If you need 8k to not get "100%" rejects for 4,730 GH/S(avg), then there's major issues somewhere.
|
|
|
yes but if you set lower, sometimes if the coin is very low diff you end up with 100% rejects and then you dont get paid.
Fact: If you're getting 100% rejects with 14-25 shares/minute, then something is wrong with the server or your modem/router is junk.
|
|
|
i use 8k for my s7.. it runs for days.. .
For an S7 running @ 4.73TH/s: 2600 = ~25 shares/minute 3300 = ~20 s/m 4730 = 14 s/m I'm too lazy to figure the shares/m of 8k, but I can tell you the variance is almost double that of 2.6k. Most don't care about variance, but if you do than 8k is way too high. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
most miners with 2th+ are 16k+
I would think that level would produce way too much variance with some of these coins.
|
|
|
That's like saying, I hope to win the lottery several times...... Hope for once first...
+1
|
|
|
Is it just me or isn't 8K diff nuts for an S7?
|
|
|
@crackfoo, All I'm 100% sure of is that the summary shows: ckpool/0.9.3 with a diff of 256 and it can't possibly exist.
|
|
|
|