22' USA

But I've been always thinking that that's what regulators are doing. They have both, time and money, and it's their job to verify the fairness, in our case the stable, unchanging RTP, no matter what.

For example, I heard that licencing authorities use an algorithm to predetermine the result of all spins on a slot, within, say, 10 million spins, to make sure the RTP is the same as stated by the slot provider. Was it just a rumor, or are they really doing this?

I will say from my own experience, and I've done a lot of free spins during my years of gambling. In 90% of those cases it was something below $2. I mean not a $2 free spin, but what's you actually get on your balance after wagering and stuff.


But there were cases when, with the help of good luck, of course, it was something above $100(pretty big money for me). what was added to my balance in the end.

But if you ask is it possible to make your living from with free spins on various gambling platforms, my answer is, it is possible, but only for one in 10 million, or so. It's like winning the lottery: it is possible, but you shouldn't count on it.

Apart from knowledge and experience, investing requires money. How can you get money for investing if you are unemployed? I mean, borrowing money for making investments is the worst thing you can do, economically-wise. From being just without money, basically a free man, you are risking to become indebted, or, in other words, to become a slave of your debt. Don't do that.

That's great, congrats!

Were you playing low stakes, $10 to $20(or could there be even lower ones), or $1k and above?
Most people think that baccarat is a game of pure chance, and skill is not involved there at all. Do you personally agree with that notion? Or do you think that at least something, apart from luck, is a factor too?

The thing is that they are being lied to by Russian propaganda for years that "NATO is going to invade Russia", or something like that. That's why the Russian people, those who are not going to fight themselves, support the invasion. The number of such people is decreasing day by day, but is still high.

As for the "slave soldiers", or, in other words, the cannon fodder, many of them just want the money and a microwave and stuff, they think they can steal in Ukraine.

I think that the price is somehow related to utility because the more people want to use BTC, now or in the future, the higher the demand, while the total supply is limited, and hence the price is going up. But I am not a big expert in economy, so please correct me if I'm wrong.

Congrats on your win, mate! It's a mega big win indeed, almost 500x of your bet. I heard a lot about how Rise of Olympus was a great slot, but I personally have never had some big wins on it. Something around 30x-50x - yes, but never above 100x, that's what I'm sure of.

As for your belief that you won't hit huge amount consecutively on same casino, that's the topic I'm trying to explore, and from what I know, there is no advantage or disadvantage to playing the same slot on different platforms. So, it's totally up to you. You can do what feels better for you. May the luck be with you, mate, as well!

I'm totally with you on this, mate. We still have lots of games ahead, and anyone can still not only clear his name from that list, but also end up in the top 3, with some good prizes to follow.

I'm wondering why the user @ajiz138 is never playing. He has zero points so far, but he can still theoretically finish in the top 3, or even win the whole thing.

Luck is not the most decisive, but is the only factor in purely luck-based games like dice, roulette, slots and such. In poker and sports betting, on the other hand, luck, according to many gamblers, plays a lesser role than skill.

Overall, if we think we can apply some "techniques" to games like dice, we are doomed.  

Group A: Netherlands
Group B: England
Group C: Argentina
Group D: France
Group E: Germany
Group F: Belgium
Group G: Cameroon
Group H: Portugal

Winner: England
Total goal in final: 3 goals

Harry Kane(8 goals)

Duelbits username: Betwrong

I am such a huge fan of Money Train 2 that Money Train 3 came as a real disappointment to me. I don't like the music on the background, I don't like the sounds overall, and, I know it's just my subjective experience, but I feel like the payouts of MT3 are smaller and happen less often.

I also like the pictures of MT2 better.

I wanna see this cool guy instead of this bum

I wanna see this Pearl Hart looking lady bandit instead of this doll

And this guy looks much cooler to me than this displeased face What's the matter, mate? Did you broke your nose, or what?

Also, the highest possible multiplier for MT3 is 100,000x, not 300,000x, but it doesn't matter, because I'm not going to play this game again anyway.

I strongly disagree with this advice. Opening a business of your own, even a small one, is not as easy as it looks in TV series. You are more likely to go bankrupt than to succeed, especially if you are not i a country like Switzeland, where helping the locals is a governmental policy.

Earn money through cooperating with an established company, and then, when you have more than you can spend, start your own business if you want.

This is an interesting theory, but do pros really do that? To significantly increase your odds this way, you need so many people to copy your bets that I think it never happens in reality. I personally don't think pros could be bothering with such things, but I may be wrong. Do you have some examples?

Also, what do you mean by "impossible odds"? The odds above 500.00, above 1,000.00? I have never won with such odds myself, but I keep placing such bets from time to time, because I think nothing is impossible.

I read that streamers are allowed to show only gambling websites that are licensed in the United States. Is it true?

In any case, I think banning gambling streams is the same as banning movies for showing tobacco smoking or alcohol drinking. There are countries where such movies are banned, but I wouldn't want to live there. You can enforce age restrictions, but banning is stupid.

I'm glad that Twitch didn't actually ban gambling streaming.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5420497.20


Multibets is my latest passion, so I'm glad you started this thread. I will read more attentively through it, when I have more time, but even after a brief scrolling, I can say I like many of the replies, so, I'll be back.

As for the question you ask, just recently I placed a multibet with around 180.00 odds, and when I visited the site 2 days later, I saw that I could cash out 20x of my bet, while 2 games still left. I did cash out because I thought 20x was enough, and the very next game ended not as I predicted, so I was happy about my cashing out.

Being in your place I would definitely cash out $389, because it's a big money for me, but I would never bet $70 with 10.36 in the first place. So, if taking $389 wasn't, for you, something to cheer about, you did the right thing and you shouldn't regret it. Cash out only what you are happy with. Good luck next time.

The thing is that there's no poker strategy that's working always, and even more importantly - there can't be such a thing. To see whether your strategy is working or not, you must play hundreds of tournaments, and many hundreds of cash games, and only after that you can say something. So, the first and foremost, you should enjoy playing, and you should never risk more than you can afford to lose. Only in that case, even if it turns out that your strategy is not the best one, you will not regret the time and money spent.

16,016.16 EUR

I support the implementation of this feature because I think the more options of placing your bets you have, the better. I would use it a couple of times too, I like experimenting with something new and unknown, but I don't think I would stick with it for a long time. The thing is that I like making my bets by myself because I really enjoy the process. But I enjoy making money too, so if it were a profitable business, I would probably never stop.