trust is needed in ant human contact. Is that because of the size difference, the acid spray or both? Ants are notoriously untrustworthy Sounds like a racial stereotype to me. ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif)
|
|
|
That's not a "pretty nice card". That's a stone age HD 3870. It's so old it's not even listed in the usual hardware comparison charts, which means most likely no one ever got it to run with a gpu miner.
|
|
|
Hi I'm brand new but I already have a suggestion.. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) What about subcategories in the newbie-section? That's because I find it quite overwhelming with so many different threads. If nobody answers quickly they only stay for minutes on the first page, too. Even few subcatergories (for example: "mining-related", "marketplace/giveaways", "general discussion") could very much improve this and make reading and posting more enjoyable. That would be a good idea, if anyone ever would put things into the right category. No one does however. Even posters who have been here years just throw everything into bitcoin discussion and let the mods sweep it to the right place.
|
|
|
trust is needed in ant human contact. Is that because of the size difference, the acid spray or both?
|
|
|
This post is a fine example why you should never invest in somebody with mental problems.
Your post?
|
|
|
I doubt anyone would be crazy enough to do this, but, hey, I've been wrong before.
|
|
|
FC AND LT There's your problem right there. Maybe you should stop playing with absurdocoin monopoly money. This is a bitcoin forum, btw, in case you didn't notice.
|
|
|
(not all are mine as I trade for some friends)
Have fun going to prison for violating AML laws.
|
|
|
mostly looking for studies on the effects on neurotransmitters. I'll have look at that link tomorrow. Bedtime for grey now.
|
|
|
That's absurd. It would require people to leave their basement and who would want that?
|
|
|
glad i never heard of them until now
They are only the biggest hosting company in the world.
|
|
|
It is fine and usual if you use same username. It also tests your 2FA and gives you confidence ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) - now may be I can go and type a few random forum user names and creep them out ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) j/k Heh... Yeah. I do not have 2-factor on that wallet, though (it's just a "spending" wallet)... My question about 2-factor with blockchain: What happens if you lose your Yubikey and simultaneously blockchain.info disappears? They say somewhere in their FAQ that if you lose your Yubikey, you have to email them to get a "2 factor auth reset" or something, which sounds to me like you're dependent on either having your Yubikey, or Blockchain.info being alive and well. Personally, what I like about Blockchain is the convenience combined with NOT having to depend on them in any way. Seems like the 2-factor adds dependance. Is that correct? You really should enable 2FA. People have been reporting blockchain-accounts without 2FA being compromised for weeks. 3 weeks ago someone was trying to get into mine all day everyday for about a week.
|
|
|
Those are no adresses at all.
They might be the first few characters of transaction ids.
What client are you using?
|
|
|
The fault is not in bitcoin, the fault is in our dumb ideas.
Hell, I've been saying that for months and people were all "Stop trolling pls"
|
|
|
noot, do you have a list of recommended reading on l-carnitine? I could go trawling through medline or embase, but why do work twice? ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
SA goons whining about a hacker's right to steal, essentially.
No, we haven't actually dealt with this one yet. It seems kinda boring in relation to yet another bitcoin-central hack, slush's pool being hacked, the fall of transfer-wise and Ron Paul shitting on Bitcoin. Also that Cascacius video. That was pretty lulzy.
|
|
|
Are you sure about the adress?
The blockchain shows no such transaction coming in to the adress.
|
|
|
|