Aaand its gone...  |
|
|
|
Only 0.01 coins per Block with huge premine. Hidden premine: Thanks to 3worlduser and check this: |
|
|
|
Any way to solo mine LBRY "I'm finding about 2 blocks an hr on supernova but i'm only get around 27 LBRY. a day
Try a different pool? Suprnova has been the worst for me every time I try it, not sure why as the luck seems to be good. I've mined on Supr many times other coins with them but my LBRY always seems lower than other pools every time I try. I'm not claiming anything nefarious going on, I just don't really understand why this seems to be the case. Could you guys please finally stop badmouthing all the pools in the thread.. No matter which pool comes into play, it's always "the worst for me".. Suprnova is doing fine, check the stats, payouts are on spot, even a bit better for the last rounds, i'm mining myself on suprnova with several rigs and i'm also pointing rigs to other pools for comparison and there is nothing "worse" about suprnova, payouts are fine. Make a 24h comparison and if it's really worse i'll gladly pay the difference !
PS: The original poster didn't even include a hashrate in his posts.. He said the "finds 2 blocks on suprnova but only gets around 27 lbry a day".. So what ? He has two 750ti's running and was extremely lucky or he had 20 rx480 running and was extremely unlucky or does he maybe even think he gets the full reward if he finds a block ??! |
|
|
|
|
OK I've resynched to the other chain, the main chain and i'll just pay the lost coins from my fees.
Pool is up again
|
|
|
|
|
Really weird, even a resync on my backup wallet syncs up to the same chain like I was before...
|
|
|
|
|
I've got some reports that users didn't receive their payout from suprnova..
I've checked for a fork but I have 36 active connections to the network, blockhash comparison:
getblockhash 16363
f8aadc63a504f235a0b7e745d26e53f83b33336a13d6a1b6fa2a326ff7b84b83
Can someone confirm he's on the same block for 16363 ?
|
|
|
|
I"m having such a hard time compiling that cpuminer on Windows, tried Cygwin and MingW but there's always dependencies missing I keep getting: "configure: error: Missing required libcurl >= 7.15.2" can someone help me with this?  If you clone this repo recursively: (git clone --recursive) https://github.com/tpruvot/cpuminer-multiYou'll find the "compat" directory with curl which you can just copy over to your cpuminer root directory I still got the same error. Do I have to just replace the "compat" folder from the cpuminer folder with the one from the git repo? Usually yes... And you did configure with "--with-curl", right ? |
|
|
|
I"m having such a hard time compiling that cpuminer on Windows, tried Cygwin and MingW but there's always dependencies missing I keep getting: "configure: error: Missing required libcurl >= 7.15.2" can someone help me with this? If you clone this repo recursively: (git clone --recursive) https://github.com/tpruvot/cpuminer-multiYou'll find the "compat" directory with curl which you can just copy over to your cpuminer root directory |
|
|
|
Closing the pool - please switch to other pools ! |
|
|
|
Wow amazing specs  Why not just post your btc address directly? |
|
|
|
|
I reserve bounty for zimbabwe translation - i only charge 9999 btc, ok dev ?
|
|
|
|
Hi ocminer, I've compiled your miner already, but when I look in to the help, I see that, I can only run sha-256 and scrypt algos with this branch. So I'm not sure which setting I have to use for successful run. Can you help me with that? cheers e: should I use, something like this? minerd -a scrypt:1048576 -o -u -p ? Just use scrypt, I've hard-coded all the other parameters already |
|
|
|
Is there any RPC on this coin ? Something like getwork or getblocktemplate ?
I'm in development... please be patient and mine ;-) I'm not so into wallet mining, I like pool mining  |
|
|
|
|
Is there any RPC on this coin ? Something like getwork or getblocktemplate ?
|
|
|
|
You can use any "normal" scrypt-n pool soft, just edit the Scrypt-Scratchpad Buffer in scrypt.cpp or scrypt.h to meet the (insane) setting of Verium and pass "19" to the N factor of the miner when mining..
In unomp files I edited Scratchpad Buffer to the value i found in verium scrypt.h - the miners i've found need N factor to be power of 2 so can't pass 19  out of passing random powers as N factor I have 11 accepted shares and ~600 failed XD Any chance you can elaborate on your last post? If you cannot set Nfactor correctly, you cannot use that miner. Then you'd need to use my modified miner: https://github.com/ocminer/cpuminer-veriumi'm unsure if Unomp can handle the Nfactor correctly, but you'd have to set it in unomp to 19. After all there is nothing special about the algo, it just has a bigger Scratchpad Size and a large Nfactor. |
|
|
|
|
You can use any "normal" scrypt-n pool soft, just edit the Scrypt-Scratchpad Buffer in scrypt.cpp or scrypt.h to meet the (insane) setting of Verium and pass "19" to the N factor of the miner when mining..
|
|
|
|
----- ATTENTION KRYPTON -----Krypton is temporarily moving KR to a POS chain until we can find a way to prevent further 51% attacks. We are working with exchanges to get this new chain running and a coin swap done. Later today, I will post complete instructions regarding the KR swap and the new Krypton wallets. I will also post an explanation of our reason why we are doing this. In short, Ethereum-based blockchains with overall network hashing power are completely vulnerable to this new type of 51% attack. Forks of ETH-based chains can be manufactured offline and moved into production with sufficient hashing power. At this time, there is no way to defend against this. The Krypton Team is working hard to find a solution but will not risk your KR being stolen. For this reason, we have halted trading on both Bittrex and Yobit and will be doing a coin swap to a POS (proof-of-stake) blockchain. ----- Please STOP mining KR -----Come to Krypton's slack or irc for the latest news. irc freenode #kryptoncoin http://slack.krypton.rocks PLEASE STOP MINING KR - Krypton has moved to a POS coin to prevent further attacks and to keep your investment safe from theft. Only KR mined prior to the Bittrex shutdown (5:04PM EDT 2-Sept-2016) will be available to swap for the new POS KR. Why did you decide to move to 100% POS? Some coins are successfully used a hybrid POS & POW technology. It is time-tested and well-proven. Dual network maintenance of the system is better than the bare 100% POS. You should think about it. It seems you didn't read the last few pages of this thread. Eth based coins are very vulnerable to a 51% attack which is why krypton made the move to a different coinbase. IMHO it could have also be done much easier by just switching to some pow pos bitcoin based coinbase with a new algo, for example called KrBlake or so which mixes some recent Blake (2s/2b) algos and makes it, at least for some time, fully resistant to any kind of gpu, ASIC etc but I wasn't involved in what was chosen. Covertress had to react quick and the decision is definitely right, move away from the vulnerability |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
