Stake my address, please: 19BEFwnZXntxr2qXb82drMoP2YfbDdPW81
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This BTC address 19BEFwnZXntxr2qXb82drMoP2YfbDdPW81 belongs to awoland from 2012 until now ... Profile id 63082. The current date is November 03 2017. -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 19BEFwnZXntxr2qXb82drMoP2YfbDdPW81 IMF6YMD4X9Oc30fTUCH+L8aTHpnIb6fVN28naS4pJWMSeXHKGvf8Sd4F1wURvVpzGpYtwYB5OK+zQzlWvkK23Fc= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Quoted and verified! Any specific reason why you want to stake an address right after changing your email address? Trust summary for awoland
This user's password was reset recently.
This user's email address was changed recently. BTC : 12MjKZH3qQcEarqziNWwpD595rK6VyT9UT message one line : I do a new one cause that stupid coingy didn't fix linebreak - JohnUser on - 03/11/2017 In france Sign : IC+MO97M84up9K25Ic/kUGiWT0FVGkl6QMidef+NrptQeNvtZS2Tj83TB6ueKXq8UXJae2r9b0hz1zR0HrU9bCY= Your signature is messy, but it verified anyway.
|
|
|
@Tonych: I have an airdrop suggestion: Say 1000 high level (to stop alt-accounts) Bitcointalk accounts qualify to request 10 MBYTE + 21.111 MBB for free, received if they install the Byteball wallet. This is currently worth just under $2.50. That would put the total cost at 0.001% of all Bytes and Blackbytes ever created. (you could also make it 10 times more, but that doesn't really matter for my suggestion). Doing this would get 1000 people to install the Byteball wallet, it can be paid from the airdrop funds, and with community support it should be doable to check all applicants to prevent alt-accounts.
One more idea: a Byteball signature campaign, entirely paid in Blackbytes only. It will be the most private payment for a signature campaign ever used, and can be paid from the community fund.
|
|
|
Your fee is high enough. I've entered the txid into http://confirmtx.com/ anyway, it should confirm soon. Next time, try to avoid sending 0.00000102 BTC to a change address, use it as fee to make the transaction smaller (with only 1 output). You can't use the dust anyway.
|
|
|
I agree with Bitcoin crashing. It’s actually easy to understand why? The higher the price goes up the more money it takes to buy 1 Bitcoin. So “artificially” the demand for the AMOUNT of Bitcoins is going down even when, the same “amount of money” is the demand. You forget 2 things: 1. More people get into Bitcoin, so more people spend dollars on it. 2. People selling Bitcoin don't sell the same amount at once. Where you may have sold 1000 BTC at once 6 years ago, you'll sell 0.1 BTC now. Markers to watch out for: Bankers making statements in the press about bitcoin being a bubble. Why do they bother? Are they putting their reputations on the line? Hell no! They are "scaring demand" off, so that the short possition will not get challenged once they start dropping the price. Now imagine JP Morgan makes the same statement about something else than Bitcoin. The price drops, and JP Morgan buys that asset just 2 days later. They'd end up in jail for market manipulation! When they do it to Bitcoin, nobody bats an eye. ~ it's called shorting Bitcoins. Several exchanges offer this, and it's a great way to burn through your money if prices keep rising. I wrote this just 4 days ago. Since then, Bitcoin went up $1200. Now, imagine you would have shorted Bitcoin 4 days ago. You would have burned a lot of money!
|
|
|
Move (bottom-left) this topic to the Offtopic-section, you can play around there. You can also test things by clicking Preview instead of Post.
|
|
|
This is the first time i checked how my picked coin, Ardor was doing and I noticed that it had been in a gradual slump for 3 weeks now (how unfortunate) but the converted price to USD still stays almost the same. Everyone else's coins were performing well but mine? Oh nevermind lol. Anyways 2 days before the update. I hope something comes good out of all the investments. Just surprised to see that my coin was in a slump yet retains almost the same value when I deposited it into this experiment. The irony is: Ardor is actually the best performing altcoin out of the 10 picked coins at the moment, Waves is the worst. Measured in dollars it's only down a bit, measured in Bitcoin almost all altcoins got slaughtered. Now would have been a much better moment to start than last month, but that's "in retrospect". For now: 9 months to go, full update in 2 days.
|
|
|
Wow that's crazy. 1 block per second? Can you post your computer specs in detail? also what's your internet connection like? I should update both my computer and internet. I need to see if there is reach for optical cable fiber internet in here, im still stuck with the good ol ADSL connection. Nothing special here, 3 year old cheap laptop, I only tested the speed for a thread here: It took 70 seconds to sync 11 hours of blocks. That's about 1 block per second
For 1 block per second you don't need very fast internet. When I upgraded my RAM (4 > 12), I really felt like I should have done that years earlier. Also, what Linux distro are you using? im looking for one that is secure but not too hard to use and maintain safety. Im not really sure about Ubuntu anymore since their shady ad partnership with Amazon.
I don't think it matters much, just pick anything that works for you.
|
|
|
I sold some today, exactly as I planned to do when it hit my target price. I've already set the next target, when it hits it, I'll sell some again. The cash I got makes it easier to ride out a big drop. Big drops are just part of Bitcoin, meant to shake coins out of weak hands, after which whales accumulate more. I don't want to be shaken empty, that's why I set my targets and stick to them. Bitcoin dropped hard many times this year already, and reached a new ATH just as many times. I have no doubt it will go up in the long term, just don't panic in the short term.
|
|
|
Although I like the prize, this part of the Terms is an absolute no go: - provide proof of address and ID documents in order to claim the prize.
- By entering the giveaway, you are giving permission for your name to be publicly announced should you win.
|
|
|
I think the current load on the blockchain also affects it It doesn't. Transactions in mempool have nothing to do with this. you can download a torrent of the blockchain and download it that way and then place it in the folder. Just make sure to download a legit torrent of the blockchain.
You can't be sure it's legit, the safe way is to let Bitcoin Core download everything. What are your computer specs like? The only thing you could do is to buy a faster computer. Im not sure what is more important, if CPU, HDD or RAM, but it should be way faster with a faster computer, assuming that your internet connection is good, and that your connectivity to other nodes is good. From my own experience: adding more RAM made a huge improvement. An SSD will be faster than HDD, but at my current setup with HDD, I get about 1 block per second. I've read much worse results too though, I'm not sure if Windows vs Linux makes much difference, and I can't test it by myself on Windows. My advice: -if your computer is low on memory: add more RAM. I consider anything under 8 GB low nowadays, and adding memory will also increase the overall performance of your PC. -if you don't have one yet: install an SSD. Even if you don't use it for Bitcoin Core, your entire computer will work much faster (you'll need to install your software on it of course). only advancing a few hundred blocks per day.
On average, 144 new blocks are found each day. At this speed iIt will take you a very long time to catch up.
|
|
|
I can't solve any of the mysteries around Satoshi, but I enjoyed reading it. The payments were too small and also on 05/05/2016 there were 18 transactions of 0.00022 sent repeatedly to the address. Looks like somebody was spamming his address I think of it as knocking on his door. Very rich Bitcoin addresses also receive small transactions once in a while.
|
|
|
btw can someone response to my question a few post earlier anyhow to modify the code to also work/search on compressed addresses
There has been someone who made this changes, and posted it in this thread. You'll have to search a bit, this thread has too many pages to quickly find back the link. I never used it, as I have a hard time trusting new programs that create private keys. You could at least use it to compare the source.
|
|
|
Wooha, clock has now turned to green tick! Took just over an hour. I'm not sure about Electrum, but if it waits for 6 confirmations (as recommended) to be completely okay, an hour makes sense. I didn't know about miners fee and that its possible to set these. I assume the lower you set, the longer a transaction would take right? Correct. Looking at the transaction details the fee shows as 'unknown'. Why would this be? As my balance shows 0.999 it would appear a fee hasn't been taken. That can't be right can it? The 0.001 was taken by Kraken, they probably send payments in batches, so you're not the only receiving party with a much higher fee. The fee Kraken charges you has no direct relation to the fee miners get.
|
|
|
I had one Bitcoin and after Kraken fee of 0.00100, 0.999 would be sent to Electrum. In Electrum I therefore set the requested amount to 0.999.
On Kraken the status has updated to 'Success'. On Electrum however it was unconfirmed for a while and now that's been replaced with a clock icon (2 confirmations). The balance shows 999. mBTC. This is normal. You'll get an average of 6 new confirmations per hour. 1. Have I done this right, if not where have I gone wrong? It's in your wallet and it's confirmed. That means you did it right. Did you also write down the backup seed phrase? And keep that in a safe place? 2. When receiving why do I have to enter the amount. Shouldn't a wallet simply know the amount once received like that of a bank account transfer? What happens if I input incorrect amount compared to what is actually received? You don't have to enter the amount. On Kraken, all you need to enter is your Bitcoin address. This feature can for example be used when you want someone to pay you a certain amount, and he scans the QR-code on your screen with his phone. You don't need this for Kraken. 3. I understand that transaction times may varies, but roughly how long should it take? Assuming Kraken uses a high enough fee: anywhere between a minute and an hour or more. On average it's 10 minutes. 4. Does the balance of 999. mBTC seem right? I expected it would be show 0.999. You can set your Electrum wallet to show Bitcoins or milliBitcoins. Yours is set to m BTC. 5. Do I get to see the miners fee costs? You can find details on the transaction.
|
|
|
Ahhh thank you very much for the clarification! I read the wrong number haha. You were right, I only sent the 0.01677999 (I paid 0.00060001 in fees). So total I only had 0.01737996 before, not 0.01775089. So after fees I only had 0.01677999, not 0.01715088. I appreciate the help You're welcome. On a completely different note since you seem quite knowledgeable, do you know by chance why people say you shouldn't use the same address more than once? They say its not safe, but I'm not sure why. The main reason: privacy. For the coming decades I don't worry about someone developing a quantum computer that can crack re-used addresses. Also on a somewhat different but kind of the same note, I have sent to the same wallet address roughly 10 transactions (total 0.5 btc). When I wanted to send all of the 0.5 out, I noticed there was 10 different inputs, thus making the transaction size quite large (as opposed to the regular 225 bytes it was 1125 roughly). I assumed that if I send to the same address, they would just aggregate, but that turned out not to be the case. Any ideas? This is normal, and caused by the way Bitcoin works. You can prevent this by sending all your coins to one of your own addresses on a day with low fees (check https://btc.com/stats/unconfirmed-tx, it's not so high at the moment, but in general fees are lowest on Sundays). Think of it as exchanging your quarters for banknotes when it's a quiet day at the bank. This slightly reduces your privacy though, but the same happens when you send your entire balance at once anyway.
|
|
|
Ok here is the actual transaction ID:
812cc1afba6bc7da3eed069adc3b84f0524ffd46370b0b2b575dc78698dba1e0
I sent from exchange to exchange Giving complete information helps, this is better How much did you send (after fee)? My guess: 0.01677999 BTC. If you sent it from an exchange, the Input-address isn't yours. You only get the amount you asked for, and the change goes back into the exchange's wallet. Input: 1EbX2MGPdHCvJtbbyfcVfpDfgpZT8BwM87 (This was from coinbase)
Output: 1KSet8LXnDkoezDtf4e2aGMoakWMMBpBBq (This is Bittrex)
Now I wanted to send the WHOLE 0.01715088 to 1KSet8LXnDkoezDtf4e2aGMoakWMMBpBBq The whole 0.01715088 BTC isn't yours! Think of it this way: You ask Company A to pay $90 to Company B. Company A gives $100, and gets $10 back. What you're saying, is that you want the whole $100. I hope this analogy shows the flaw in your reasoning. The way Bitcoin handles change is much more like cash than other electronic payments, if you pay by bank or Paypal, you don't have to worry about "change". From doing some research, people are saying this is change. I would understand that, if coinbase have an input of 1 BTC, then 0.01715088 would go to 1KSet8LXnDkoezDtf4e2aGMoakWMMBpBBq , and then 0.98284912 (change) would go back to coinbase (i'm assuming). But in this case, it's different =/ Check again in Coinbase, and see how much you requested to withdraw. Is it 0.01677999 BTC or 0.01775089 BTC?
|
|
|
What wallet did you use to send this transaction? Blockchain.info? Sorry I think I may have been a little not clear. I am trying to send the entire 4.4911 to 1FER69hhBLRNNoaxsxDcR7hL1socbp5JT2. This "Change address" is not a wallet I control, input was from one exchange, and output was to another exchange. In the example I used, I want the entire 4.4911 to go to one address, there should be no "Change". But for some reason only part of the what I sent was sent to the exchange, and the change address I have no idea what it is.
This leaves only 2 options: 1. You made a mistake 2. Your wallet/computer is compromised. If that's the case, it's weird the attacker didn't steal all your coins.
Best-case scenario is that you made a mistake on the amount only, and overlooked the 0.7695 that went back to your own wallet. If that's not the case, it's gone.On closer look: the transaction you mention was made in 2013. It helps if you show the real transaction. The "Estimated BTC Transacted" is based on assumptions made by blockchain.info, you can ignore that statement.
|
|
|
It is a kind of giveaway and random 5 winners will win 27$ worth bitcoins for doing some small works. You've got my attention, I'll join: User application: Bitcointalk username:- LoyceV Rank:- Hero Member Email address:- MyUsername.alenzuela@gmail.com (replace the red part, I don't like spambots) Bitcoin address:- 1foreverDArUNEX2gVD26vautcx3b8zTZ
|
|
|
I opened an old Bitcoin Core wallet I forgot I had, and it took five days to synchronise and once done showed I have a balance of 1.1 Bitcoins.
Is this worth what ever the Bitcoin price is, or a minimal sum to keep the account live?
Bitcoin itself doesn't have "accounts". Any balance is kept forever if you don't transfer it. If you hold 1.1 BTC, you're holding $7000. Congratulations!
|
|
|
I was thinking about a website to give full details about airdrops because they are hard to track on the forums but I'm not sure how much demand there will be.
There's already Airdropalert.com. I've been in several airdrops in the past, some were worth it, some aren't worth anything. It would be really nice to have a site with complete information, including a field to enter your current holdings for airdrops based on Bitoin balances, but for many airdrops, you can only know it's real value months later. It would also be nice to have a complete overview of how to join, from instructions on how to install the best wallet to where to sell tokens. I see a big problem though: once you have a nice site like this, and you make it easier for more people to join more airdrops, you'll be overloaded with more new airdrops, which makes it harder to pick the valuable ones. Another idea just popped up in my head: Dust to Charity! I've had (and still have) many different altcoins, all barely worth anything, and for sure not worth the time to figure out how to sell them for a few pennies. I imagine many people have this "problem". Wouldn't it be nice to create a website where you can just upload old and almost empty altcoin wallets, after which the site collects them, and once worth it, sells them to donate the proceedings to some (crypto related) charity?
|
|
|
|