The internet like you have said have opened alot of opportunity that someone can even easily change from one potential to another because I hear that someone can have different ability or capacity. You can develop more than one potential, someone who is always online can learn so many things from digital marketing to freelancing, blogging, affiliate marketing etc.

If you have you extent to them because you will not be buried with the money you have.


This set of people who borrow with the promise of returning it and never do are funny set of people. They actually make no effort to pay back at least most of them and the shocker is that they pretend to have returned it to you. You can see yourself arguing with them when they shock you with such information that they have returned it 


If you think the borrower just want to run away with the money, then you may give part of the money on the request that you can forfeit. You may not disclose to the person that you won't ask for the money but within you, you have decided not to ask for it again and if the person comes back to repay it, you let them know it is a gift. I think such surprise will be an imprint in the annals of time in your relationship with the person.

If he continues in a manner that is annoying, you just know that it might be an intentional act to provoke you or tempt you to a fight probably he has an agenda to harm you. This temptation can be avoided if you already know that you have done the necessary thing to avoid it. The scenario you painted is not spontaneous and that means you can cancel your dealing or joint betting with him but where it is spontaneous then the fighting is possible.

If the website made a survey and came up with the respondents figure between the age of 11-16 years to say that gambling is for fun, I don't agree with the survey on that aspect because I know that majority of gamblers do that to make ends meet. They are playing and betting as well to increase the finance they have. Moreover, these respondents are underaged who are not allowed to bet so how come they were used for the survey. They are still under the tutelage of their parents and how come they were able to solicit for their response. The young people barely knows what gambling is and their response can't be taken as fact, they are not faced with financial issues, no wife or children, no financial obligations or commitment so how would they give a response to what challenges they have not witnessed.

They may be gambling in secret, perhaps that could inform their response

The group that did such survey with underaged gamblers are guilty of that and are suppose to be fined under the gambling regulation law.

It is not all about patronising but to actually deliver to customers. Some of the list you have made contain casinos that have been alleged of scam and wrong delivery to customers, so you have to verify the list before dropping it to users here. Playing in casino is not a challenge but to redeem your winning is what matters.

If one party is cheating on the other by stealing the games of the other and when it gets to his turn to give out his own game for the bet he hides away. I have seen this causing problem where friends can decide to share analysis and combine games but on the other party's turn he refuse to allow the friend to see his game and went to bet and win. It led the other cheated partner to complain and they fought and separated from being friends.


I agree that when you stake higher then the cash out will be higher, that may be the basis for those joining resource to do that but aside from that, people can play differently to avoid those kinds of problems. On the whole I think it is greed that will make people only think of possibilities of bigger win from bonus or increased potential winning if they join resources together without considering issues that may arise from that, or without having a proper agreement.

To have agreement before the stake is more problem solving than to allow problem to arise because of proper arrangements.

These points are good but very difficult to keep to.  Setting out money aside for gambling is as good as telling a smoker to reduce the amount of cigarettes to take by himself. These actually need a pressure to achieve. A gambler that has money in his account after losing a bet has that drive to try again.

It is every gambler delight to make money from it. So it is worthy to note because this is the primary aim to gamble and that is why it is difficult to spend a short time on it but agreed the lesser time you spend in gambling, the gradual your interest in gambling diminishes. I believe this aspect that if you want to stop gambling then start reducing the amount of time you give to gambling.

Are you going to allow your friends confuse you on what you don't desire to do? You are already convinced that bitcoin investment and gambling is not the same thing but your friends are insisting they are, friend you don't need to prove anything to them. Addict gamblers are like that, they are use to arguing that way because you are not doing same thing they are doing and they want to generalize every thing together. But you know the difference by your self, why don't you keep to it and if you want to gamble by yourself you can instead of allowing them to persuade you.

Not withstanding your disparage or logical aspersion on bank, even if you decide to hodl your money in btc or any other cryptocurrency, remember to have a confidant who will know your phrase to your wallet or will have access to it by means of directions you will drop on the exact description to get your passphrase otherwise such incident of death is still same as what experience OP shared and in fact regarding to cryptocurrency, if the passphrase was not disclosed then forget your earnings at least. So this is a head up that POD or disclosure of passphrase is apt.

That should be the simple justice on the matter. Justice is not blind if the matter is judged this way but it will be injustice if she is sent to jail for the second time while she actually committed the crime once. Such case should be handled with care as that is same person and not a different person. The earlier judgement was wrong against the alleged offender.

It is not only about the second chance trier but the increase of the risk and most gamblers are culprit to this. If you win once and you are playing for another game, you have the tendency to increase your bet as a natural instinct of man because you have profit already and the money you win gives you more confidence and hope as you are left with some balance. The unfortunate thing is that like you said, that greed will push someone to keep playing until the last drop of the cash is exhausted. Second chance works sometimes but it is dangerous when you try to win the second time and fail, you may want to continue trying until you are on zero balance.

Advantage of playing in bitcoin casino is also that you are sure of no third party interference in your transfers, all you need is the address of the casino but traditional casinos sometimes you could recheck why your deposit is not credited because of that level of human involvement. Some traditional casinos agent are so lazy that they may forget to credit you after you have made deposit to them. You have to go there at times to remind them if you have not seen the deposit alert and sometimes it takes days to rectify some payment if there are payment reflection issues.

On the contrary I don't think women win gambling bet more than men or there organized attributes or patience a factor. In fact I don't think patience will be attributed to a woman alone because this is subjective even if we agree that they are organised. Therefore, the reason that it looks like the women win more is that they don't lose as heavily like men. Men are heavy gamblers, they gamble with high percentage of risk but women don't bet heavily so if they lose they will still have something to bet again but men may not have such money as they involve a lot of risk at one bet.

I understand your account won't allow you to post image but what you have in the link is not anywhere enough to get people to understand what happened. You only show you have 3773.4 usdt or so in the wallet and that will not tell anything. What about email messages etc .

Moreover no background stories or what reason they gave for not allowing you to withdraw? Or is it an issue of KYC.

You speak with so much conviction that there is no positivity in gambling but some other people will also doubt your reasoning maybe when they look at what they have achieved through gambling. I believe however that gambling favour few like lottery winner but it leaves much more people in penury. I agree however with you on your ending part as to unexpected surprise. Yes if you gamble without so much high hopes in it to become your source of income, you are likely to be hitting some difference in your account probably because you are taking all the measures for right ways to gamble, like gambling as you can afford to lose, not gambling always etc .

No matter the situation that they are going through at the moment, they should have made the customers aware of or a clue that they won't be up for a certain time to a certain time and also disable the deposit and review withdrawals from their customers before going off if it is temporary but now with the whole scene, the customers are more apprehensive than we can imagine. It is really unfortunate that maintainance was not made public before they went off for the moment.

There is no room for debt in online business and that is the advantage because there is no personal relationship interphase. The casino don't give out credit only bonus for playing with them. There is no credit facility allowed but because there is physical relation in offline casino, things like that are possible.


Does this not buttress the point that the house win more than the bettor? The agents that is loaning out the money knows the gambler was going to lose again and again which was the reason to give out the money. Otherwise how would you loan money to someone who wants to "fight " against you and to win against you ? Or if you are not sure the money you loan won't come back to you as profit .

I think it is not proper for casinos to abruptly change ToS without informing users especially when it has to do with major terms that can stop users from withdrawing there winning. They should be able to send email notifications to those old users already active and playing with them. On the other hand too I think sometimes bettors should take time to read on those important aspect that will stop them from withdrawing.  However, we should expect changes in ToS from time to time because the world is not stagnant and every other thing revolve as things change because change is the only thing that is constant.

Harry Kane deserve to leave for a top flight club and taste lifting some trophy before the end of his career. A player of his status deserve such. I remember also one player in Tottenham who only was winning young player award in EPL which is Garry Bale. It was until Bale took the very drastic step to join Real Madrid that he started winning trophy. Now if you search Google for trophies that Garry Bale can lay claims to, they are all there, . So Kane should better his career by moving out from Tottenham and get to where he can win some title.

If that is the case that it is steady for him that such amount comes to him through gambling, his bankroll does not matter to know because if the risk he is taking is not worth it then he won't be that successful on it, it would have been affecting him when he loses. So he probably is taking proper care to analyse the games that are giving him such winning. But usually those that win in football betting don't play so many games. They just play few and boost the potential winning with high staking power.