Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 06:29:18 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 [126] 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 ... 317 »
2501  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][EGT] Egretia - The World's First HTML5 Blockchain Engine and Platform on: July 10, 2018, 11:28:45 AM
I'm here to warn any potential investor, this project seems to have given some sort of incentive to paid shills to post here with their oneliner garbage posts to generate fake buzz and increase the mention counts of the name of egretia or whatever, do some research before investing. I might as well start reporting the rule breakers with their cool project, great project shilling posts to get them all banned.
2502  Other / Meta / Re: akamit account hacked on: July 10, 2018, 11:19:23 AM
Never lock your account because nobody is going to recover it for you now, unless an admin had a matrimonial intercourse and is in a good mood to hand over your account as fast as possible. Wink
2503  Other / Archival / Re: Do not trust actmyname. on: July 10, 2018, 10:08:52 AM
Bitfuckingconnect was an obvious scam from the beginning

Really? Why did you want to mine it if it was so obvious?

I thought to give this a try and solo mine it, now I have a problem when I start my miner it says no payout address was provided so we're going to switch you sorry ass to get work, how do I set my payout address? I don't want to get scammed by you Chinese. lol

I started to mine because I believe in coins where you can mine them without paying to coin holders on exchanges to buy them. this is off topic.
Actmyname tagged me after marlboroza removed his tag on me, why?
2504  Other / Archival / Re: Do not trust actmyname. on: July 09, 2018, 11:56:01 AM
Again...

There is a BIG difference between:

A. Being hired to run a signature campaign by a scam ICO/business.
and
B. Being directly involved with the management and running of said scam ICO/business.

If you can prove that the manager had knowledge that the ICO/business was a scam and was still actively promoting them (ala aTriz and the bitblisscoin fiasco), then that is indeed something they should be held liable for.

However, if they were just as unaware as everyone else, how can you blame them for the scam? Huh

Tell me this is another of your jokes please? Bitfuckingconnect was an obvious scam from the beginning and they accepted to manage their scam regardless. it doesn't matter now though does it? they have already collected the money and that manager has received his share of the scammed money for managing that scam promotion, this is not news for us, this forum is directly and indirectly endorsing total scams, we even have several sections just for scammers to promote and launch their scams. after all scam is not moderated to avoid abusing the power of moderation facking lol. DT members a.k.a trust moderators however are selectively moderating the scams and the trust system though.

If they say somebody is a scammer people would believe them and when they don't say anything, people would think there is no scam so they would put their money on scams because nobody said anything to warn them.
Said manager is now free to manage other campaigns like nothing has ever happened, even if he is tagged he could easily jump to another account and start managing with other accounts.
2505  Economy / Reputation / Re: What happened to Nullius on: July 09, 2018, 01:04:41 AM
He was trying to promote his site in the nym zone. after he said something about tasting cunts, I started to dislike him. nobody should ever taste them, that's just not good for your health. could somebody warn mdayonliner a.k.a a spammer and a ponzi promoter? he is spamming everywhere he goes. Wink
2506  Other / Off-topic / Re: Let's play the zero merit game. on: July 09, 2018, 12:55:48 AM
Post an account with the highest activity and zero merit you can find.  Let's try to find the account with the most activity that has zero merit.

 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1554658

I'll bow out, since I can answer with one simple SQL query.  Smiley

Then do it and provide link to their accounts please, I still have some sMerits left after theymos made me a merit source again.

In red: a total lie, don't panic just yet, it was a fix that theymos did which gave me 56 sMerits. lol.
2507  Other / Archival / Re: Do not trust actmyname. on: July 08, 2018, 11:34:43 PM
That just made it worse, now you are telling me that Lutpin was the manager of a scam project such as Bitconnect?
No. You're not properly reading and thus you are making a fool of yourself with these false presumptions.

Here's who you're looking for: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=710241

So why nobody has tagged Edwardard yet for managing a scam project like Bitconnect?(is there actually anything related to Bitconnect scam here? did somebody managed their promotion campaign and still walking with no red tags?) I'm taking the information from cjmoles post and I should've had read the trust ratings myself, nothing has changed yet though, actmyname has tagged Wapinter for being an alt of an account seller, he also countered Vod's negative trust on Anduck
I apologize to Lutpin for any inconveniences. (even if somebody is misinformed and misjudges a situation doesn't mean they're wrong all the time, I have misjudged this situation and accused somebody while I should have done more research before doing so, I'm not perfect and I could make mistakes like everybody else, the important part is that I was made aware of my mistake and I apologize for it, unlike many DT members here, they would do and say whatever they want and when somebody points out their mistakes instead of fixing it they'd insist on it.)

No, I'm not telling you anything of the sort. You've gone full retard completely on your own, don't try to blame me for this  Grin

You seem to be happy when I make a mistake, I don't blame you for it. Grin


Don't forget that actmyname is also involved with a company with fake twitter followers. just ignore me for being wrong about Bitconnect and Lutpin. take what is actually real, tagging their competition left and right.

EDIT: here is the fucking evidence: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1692930 why nobody has tagged this campaign manager for managing a scam project?
2508  Other / Meta / Re: Is This the New Way of Marketing in ANN threads? on: July 08, 2018, 10:02:05 PM
Are they tagged yet or are we going to give a free pass to them? they are obviously using merits to attract more people for their site, using merits for financial gains on this level is outrageous. I really don't think that any responsible member should send 50 merits for a service they support.
2509  Other / Archival / Re: Do not trust actmyname. on: July 08, 2018, 09:46:40 PM
I don't believe it, so Lutpin who is also a DT2 and a merit source has handed out positive trust for people who were involved in the promotion of a scam project such as Bitconnect? what else you expect from DT members, after all they are in a position with leverage to do whatever they want, such as countering negative feedbacks on suspected extortionists or those trying to sell some items by auctioning them and suddenly bidding on their own auction to increase the price.
I don't expect anything less from Blazed trust list. of course theymos is not paying any attention to these cases because they are small, he would only take action if he thinks that he is in danger of being held liable by the court of law, until then don't wait for him to do anything. really sad.

How can you be a "DT investigator" and not comprehend the difference between sent and received feedback?

Rhetorical question, don't bother answering.

That just made it worse, now you are telling me that Lutpin was the manager of a scam project such as Bitconnect? well this shit is getting interesting day after day. however you put it, another trusted member of this forum was involved with shady activities. no wonder.
Thanks for correcting my mistake btw.
2510  Other / Archival / Re: Do not trust actmyname. on: July 08, 2018, 09:29:00 PM
I don't believe it, so Lutpin who is also a DT2 and a merit source has handed out positive trust for people who were involved in the promotion of a scam project such as Bitconnect? what else you expect from DT members, after all they are in a position with leverage to do whatever they want, such as countering negative feedbacks on suspected extortionists or those trying to sell some items by auctioning them and suddenly bidding on their own auction to increase the price.
I don't expect anything less from Blazed trust list. of course theymos is not paying any attention to these cases because they are small, he would only take action if he thinks that he is in danger of being held liable by the court of law, until then don't wait for him to do anything. really sad.
2511  Other / Meta / Re: Patrol: "Great Project". Cleanup request/discussion for Mods. on: July 08, 2018, 09:06:50 PM
Guys, it like an eternal problem  of forums Grin Especially, it concerns forums with some kind of hierarchy, based on the number of posts/member activity, which is about 60-70% of big ones. Especially, if a member of high rank can get a money of an account. Nothing can be done here, except for rewarding reporting such type of activity and increasing number of moderators, for my opinion. But it brings another problems along. It just a human nature, you can`t do much about it  Wink

Don't spread misinformation, we can stop them for good, we could charge a fee per post in those sections of forum where people are only posting there to earn money. people are scamming here left and right, they would make some tokens out of nothing and ask you to promote that token just to get your share of the same tokens. all of them are scams except maybe a few.
2512  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Arbitao is 100% a SCAM !!! on: July 08, 2018, 08:58:32 PM
With a 100% certainty of Arbitao been a scam I had no time to go through their whitepaper but just wanted to ask if this might have been caused by writer's claiming to be experts in whitepaper drafting???

Are you saying they hired someone to write the whitepaper for them? I'd very much like to know who that was.

There are actually a few members here writing whitepapers and even launching a whole ICO. for example Jamalezaz or something like that.
PS, have you tagged coalcoin scammers yet or are you still negotiating for terms of not getting tagged and getting a free pass maybe? Wink
2513  Other / Meta / Re: Patrol: "Great Project". Cleanup request/discussion for Mods. on: July 08, 2018, 08:42:13 PM
There are too many of these paid shills, just recently I have discovered a thread on tokens section where they have 116 pages of bumping shill accounts saying either good project or just copying a part of the OP and then pasting them to pass it as their own.
Here you could find their thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3281088.0 I also think they have asked people via Telegram to post there, I think that thread should be removed as they are violating the forum rules by giving incentive to people for posting there.
2514  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: ✅✅✅[ANN][PRE-ICO ON 01/JUL/18] GIGTRICKS - A CRYPTO ECOSYSTEM FOR FREELANCERS✅✅✅ on: July 08, 2018, 08:35:48 PM
Just a warning, at first I wanted to join the signature bounty of this project but after doing some reading now I have come to conclusion that every body posting here is a paid shill, if you read their posts you'll see many Telegram usernames, they have asked people via Telegram to post here and possibly receive a share of the collected money.

I will be on to you lowlife scammers with your garbage posts trying to generate fake buzz so that developers of this ICO could collect the money and then spend them on pussies all over the world. never invest when you see fake bumping shills posting to make more pages of posts.
2515  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2018 Q3) on: July 08, 2018, 08:26:50 PM
Hey forum detectives, could this be considered being alt accounts?
How is your project differ from the others?
egretia

there has not been so many changes will continue to run waiting for the announcement of your project dev.
egretia

I think egretia is their Telegram username? for the moment have these two idiots, I'm going to report all the shills on that ANN thread to get them all banned, they have obviously asked people to post on their ANN thread which would be a blatant breaking of forum rules.
2516  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: 🔥🔥🔥[ANN][BOUNTY]~ $4,464,000 - Official GigTricks - 18 Million Tokens🔥🔥🔥 on: July 08, 2018, 08:00:36 PM
Did you ignore my post? are you only accepting red trust members for twitter and facebook bounties where people can't see their red tags but you don't accept red tagged people for signature campaign where people can see their red tags? seems a very untrustworthy thing to do, let me post on your ANN thread to inform the investards of such behavior.

EDIT: I think you are one of the many scammy ICOs with many paid shills, I'm going to start reporting your "good project" shills and get them all banned.
2517  Other / Meta / Re: I've just invented dMerits. on: July 07, 2018, 09:16:16 PM
Or maybe just let the admin to select merit sources, you know there are still a few good members trying to help if needed a.k.a myself. looks like suchmoon is also tired of being a merit source because of those 5 merits she gave you to support the cause of asking for help from others, maybe you didn't ask to become a source but do you think that you should mention it how hard it is to be a source?  Wink

2518  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: coalcoin.io (CIC) is 100% a scam !!! on: July 07, 2018, 09:01:19 PM
We're asking questions and waiting for answers. Something you have no clue about as you just make shit up everywhere you go.

Title of this thread says otherwise, it says that some shitcoin is 100% a scam.

I have never resorted to trying to blackmail entities under the auspices of claiming they're a scam then backing off upon payola.

PS: Thanks for the sM the other day, prick.  Tongue Tongue Tongue

I don't know man, currently I can't really trust anything you say especially after you tried to sell your important account for a few hundred bucks, right now I suspect you of being in dire need of money and would likely try to do anything in order to get some one way or another, I also don't trust suchmoon because I know for a fact that she has done some shady shit before, for example countering valid negative feedbacks on suspected extortionists etc.
PS: do more good for this forum, I still have some sMerits left after theymos made me a merit source again.

In red: just a random lie, don't panic suchmoon I'm not a source. facking lol.
2519  Economy / Reputation / Re: Is this Phishing site? I'm afraid. on: July 07, 2018, 02:57:58 PM
Don't be afraid because I've got your back. that's not any phishing link, that's just a spamming bot.
2520  Economy / Reputation / Re: Can someone please tag bitcasino.io's new account? on: July 07, 2018, 12:59:33 PM
I have left them a negative trust feedback and you should do it yourself as well and then let us wait for DT members to see this topic and tag this scammer.
Pages: « 1 ... 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 [126] 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 ... 317 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!