Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 04:37:22 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 [128] 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 ... 191 »
2541  Other / Meta / Re: Upcoming downtime on: February 11, 2013, 08:06:57 PM
Connection Problems
Sorry, SMF was unable to connect to the database. This may be caused by the server being busy. Please try again later.

 Sad

Only for a few seconds though.
2542  Other / Off-topic / Re: So what came first? on: February 11, 2013, 07:28:11 PM
GOD is only four years old. What is this for a Question?

Also, we know that Humans build it. You are confusing me.  Huh

Definition of what god is crucial to define.

I was of course talking about the Global Observation Device.

The Satellite Network
2543  Local / Off-Topic (Deutsch) / Re: Würdet ihr gerne "Seeder" aus dem Forum bannen? on: February 11, 2013, 07:20:58 PM
Lol.

Ja, ist wohl eine akzeptierte Theorie, dass Seeder ein Spambot ist.  Grin

Wäre interessant, wie aufwendig es ist einen zu machen, der ganz genauso klingt.
2544  Bitcoin / Press / Re: 2013-02-10 daytradeshow.com - Bitcoin Beatdown on: February 11, 2013, 07:16:19 PM
So he many not be a complete idiot, just a slimy douchebag trying who realized he was totally wrong and is now trying to keep his audience.

+1 Absolutely sounds like this.

Seems like this Guy has already made another Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MDCYPwk0gM

And now he even has a bitcoin address.
2545  Other / Off-topic / Re: So what came first? on: February 11, 2013, 04:49:23 PM
GOD is only four years old. What is this for a Question?

Also, we know that Humans build it. You are confusing me.  Huh
2546  Local / Deutsch (German) / Re: BaFin, Banklizenz: Bitcoin vs. Regiogeld on: February 11, 2013, 04:45:22 PM
Habs. Chiemgauer sind Vereisinterne Gutscheine. Bestimmte Läden geben halt etwas für die Gutscheine heraus. Andere Verkaufen diese Gutscheine (ähnlich Geschenkgutschein). Und nur Banken geben Tatsächlich Geld für diese Gutscheine wieder raus, oder so ähnlich halt.

Bei den Herausgebern kann man auf jeden Fall nur Chiemgauer kaufen. Wenn man die erst mal hat, kann man nur noch Produkte damit kaufen. Umtausch in € geht nur als Chiemgauer akzeptierendes Geschäft.
2547  Local / Deutsch (German) / Re: BaFin, Banklizenz: Bitcoin vs. Regiogeld on: February 11, 2013, 04:38:32 PM
Richtig gute frage. Die Beschreibung der BAFIN trifft IMO genauso auf Regiogeld zu.

In dem Merkblatt steht auch nichts von irgendwelchen Ausnahmen.

Ist interssant, wenn der handeln mit diesen Chiemgauern ohne Fin. Lizenz gehandelt werden darf, trifft das evtl. auch auf BTC zu.
2548  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin split like stock split on: February 11, 2013, 04:07:31 PM
Or instead of trying to "fix" this and risk splitting BTC in two parties we just use mB at some point.
Which is also already implemented in the Client. You can change the view in your Options.

You know: 1000 mB = 1 B
2549  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Moral Obligations of Bitcoin on: February 11, 2013, 03:34:25 PM
In a matter of fact, in my country I am required by law to be a licensed Financial Service Provider in order to be allowed to run a BTC exchange.

Quote from: German bank regulation
Units of Value intended to function as currency that can be exchanged against real benefits, goods or services or that f.e. Bitcoin, can be created in computer networks ...

[snip]

...A permission to create and use this Units of Value as currency is not required. If this Units become a commercial subject themselves the business has to qualify as Bank account as for § 1 Abs. 1 Satz 2 Nrn. 4 or 10 KWG or Financial Service Provider as for § 1 Abs. 1a Satz 2 Nrn. 1 - 4 KWG and operates under reservation of § 32 Abs. 1 KWG  
2550  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Moral Obligations of Bitcoin on: February 11, 2013, 03:15:32 PM
The guy could have been busy selling tamagotchis for bitcoins, and he's just cashing out.

Or he could be building a dungeon in his basement for 2 year olds.

He could easily do both. Financing his dungeon with his tamagotchis sells.

But I get what you mean. So, lets replace that example in a way that it actually makes sense:

The guy could have been busy selling tamagotchis for bitcoins, and he's just cashing out.

Or he could have been busy selling slaves and he's just cashing out.

And still I see no difference in doing this with BTC than with any other currency. If I'm exchanging $ to Yen or $ to BTC, there are the same obligations involved.
2551  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Moral Obligations of Bitcoin on: February 11, 2013, 02:47:37 PM
There is still no difference between this and money laundering schemes with fiat.

In my country they are currently warning to not accept routing schemes. - They are offering you to make one or more payment to you Bank account or to give you cash and you have to forward 80% to another Bank account and keep the 20%.

I don't see the difference if there is Bitcoin involved.
2552  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Moral Obligations of Bitcoin on: February 11, 2013, 02:27:29 PM
As for the rest, I wouldn't help someone doing something in my eyes evil for personal gain.

But money is just a tool, it doesn't have any morals. It can't be "good" or "evil".

Would I take money that was some time ago involved in something terrible. Yes.

Would I do so if by doing so I help someone doing this. No.

But with Bitcoin you can choose to "not ask" and thus never know that something is going to be used for evil.  Is turning a blind eye the correct solution (ignorance is bliss)?

You are not asking with every deal you make with conventional money where it comes from, or what you a financing with this.

Imagine the cashier in the Supermarket would ask every customer where his money comes from.

Only when you get sketchy deals there is a point where you can tell there must be something wrong.

One reason I never "invested" one BTC into pirate was, that the only way I could explain his high rates was that he is either a scam, or gets his money from a source were I don't want to have any involvement. And it was the latter that restrained me (I'm greedy and stupid).
2553  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Moral Obligations of Bitcoin on: February 11, 2013, 02:08:55 PM
That would be like asking a walmart clerk handing you change where they got that cash.

I think it would more if a sketchy guy on the street walked up to you and saying "I'll give you this $100 bill for a $50 and a $20".  (Would you ask him where he got it, assuming that you were already able to determine the bill was real?)

Well, I would at first think of various con stunts that start that way. And solely for that reason ask why and be very skeptic.

As for the rest, I wouldn't help someone doing something in my eyes evil for personal gain.

But money is just a tool, it doesn't have any morals. It can't be "good" or "evil".

Would I take money that was some time ago involved in something terrible? Yes.

Would I do so if by doing so I help someone doing this? No.
2554  Other / Meta / Re: Moving threads to other less seen areas is creating problems for newcomers on: February 11, 2013, 01:24:23 PM
As I'm guessing you are talking about this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=143208

Depends on what the purpose of your thread was, do you want a discussion about Mt.Gox services with the right people to discuss that topic? --> Service Discussions

Do you just want to complain about something that doesn't work the way you want and as much people as possible to read it? --> Trash Box


It's in the section where the right people will read it, so you get a real discussion, so whats the problem.

Unless you don't want a discussion.
2555  Other / Meta / Re: Moving threads to other less seen areas is creating problems for newcomers on: February 11, 2013, 01:04:11 PM
If you want to suggest that mods should not move threads, that belongs into Meta not Bitcoin Discussion.
2556  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: bitcoin-qt: Move Downloaded blockchain to another installation on: February 11, 2013, 11:43:40 AM
I'm using v0.7.2-beta... when did v0.8 come out?

3 days ago, so it's brand new.

Can I still transpant the files over to 0.8?

Kind Regards.

Yes and no, 0.8 needs to convert the files to the new format. If you are not finished downloading anyway, I would let it start new.
2557  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: bitcoin-qt: Move Downloaded blockchain to another installation on: February 11, 2013, 10:43:51 AM
Yes, that are the files you need, just copying the should be sufficient. But as you are not finished yet anyway, I would suggest, that you upgrade to v0.8 instead.

This Version uses ultraprune and reduces the download time for the blockchain to a few hours.

The final version is not out yet, but you can download the release candidate here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=142151.0
2558  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: I cannot find a quick/convinient way to get bitcoins out of wallet.dat on: February 11, 2013, 07:41:26 AM
Also you could simply upload your wallet to blockchain and use an online client: https://blockchain.info/de/wallet/import-wallet
2559  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoins need to be easier to use on: February 11, 2013, 07:33:50 AM
With the new 0.8 Version of Bitcoin QT it takes only a few hours to downloade the Blockchain.

Release Candidate is available: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=142151.0

The official release will be soon.
2560  Local / Deutsch (German) / Geniale Refferal Idee eines Bitcoin only Mega resellers. on: February 11, 2013, 07:04:26 AM
Der Bitcoin only Mega Reseller https://bitvoucher.co hat eine IMO recht Geniale Weise gefunden ein Bitcoin Referral Programm aufzusetzen.

Und zwar kann jeder einen Referral Link aufsetzten bei dem er einige Bitcoins für jeden Kunden bekommt der sich über seinen Link anmeldet.

Das ganze ist ja eigentlich nichts neues, das Geniale daran ist aber das man kein Kunde des Resellers sein muss um das aufzusetzen, sondern nur eine Bitcoin Wallet braucht.

An jede Bitcoin Adresse die hinter https://bitvoucher.co/help/affiliates/ gesetzt wird werden 10% der Einnahmen gesendet für jeden Account der über diesen Link bezahlt wird.

Z.B. https://bitvoucher.co/help/affiliates/1BTC1oo1J3MEt5SFj74ZBcF2Mk97Aah4ac/

Somit hat dieser Reseller eine neue Methode gefunden, wie man Menschen für sich Werbung machen lässt, selbst wenn diese gar keine Kunden sind.

Natürlich würde jeder der sich das Programm durchliest bevor er einen Account erstellt die Adresse durch seine eigene ersetzten.

Trotzdem eine gute Virale Markeding Idee, die so nur mit Bitcoin umsetzbar ist.
Pages: « 1 ... 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 [128] 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 ... 191 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!