I think coming to Cameroon is to show support for the father's country to help do some charity work there, I don't think he regretted not playing for Cameroon but only explained why he didn't. Mbappe should be happy with himself I believe because even if he had parted with such money at that time, he may need to pay more at a certain stage if he wants to play in a bigger tournament for Cameroon. Moreover, it shows that the FA is not fair with their players and their judgement may have affected him in higher tournament selection but France didn't collect money from him and gave him the better rope to climb into stardom


A corrupt system doesn't go after offenders because they are all birds of same feathers. Even if they do out of pressure, the offender will bribe their way out. Corruption shows the rot going on in a system.

You can convert dollar to Naira but not the reverse. These people just dey try make this Naira strong in a wrong way. If we look that format well, na the koko be that, to make Naira strong no be by all these give money banana be the thing. If them do the right thing on to manufacturing sector, fix light, run refinery well, begin export, get reserve etc , you go see say na oyibo go dey change there dollar to naira take buy market from our hand. This things na small thing but them dey embezzle the money. Most countries wey don develop for our eyes like China, India, Singapore, Indonesia, South Korea etc them don try and succeed.

The thing wey I just see about the dollar na this unification of price, if some politicians no still dey buy cheap from yonda .

The likely mind of the court is to hold her in custody for sometime just to fulfill the law for someone that murdered someone. The lawyer may remind the court that she has been imprisoned already for allegedly killing the same man where she served the full jail sentence for murder. I believe the court will free her since it is the same man that he went to jail on.

This is a different perspective to what you are saying. Government are handling their jurisdiction separate from others, so your government have your birthday certificate or your other credentials of origin from birth as a citizen or you natiralized their but that same government does not have the birth certificate or such credentials of other persons who are not their citizens. Hence with KYC on exchange, you have exposed yourself to global identification that any government can source for your identification if they want to through the exchange. I believe this is reason some people who don't want it try to avoid it. A KYC you do with binance as a centralised exchange, the government can go through such exchange to require it incase they want it.

Corruption knows no bounds. It is just a selfish interest and self aggrandizement, nothing of such will be an excuse. Corruption takes any form whether sponsor or not. The case of Cameroon as reviewed by Mbappe's interview is sufficient. The national team of Cameroon won't lack such sponsor I believe because the government will provide all that was needed but few top officials will divert it into personal purse.

In the case of Brazil or Argentina which are also regarded as third world countries, theirs is still fair if they do such obnoxious stuff because they still perform better during world tournament. Maybe in there own case, most of the players are gifted and it doesn't affect them as such. Or maybe they have had issues of selection during tournament that they didn't perform to expectation.

Yeah this type of stories happen in third world countries and they lose valuable players who want to give all to the club or national team. The thread is bad. When you place money first in whatever you want to do then the best will elude you. This is appalling and the reason that third world countries struggle in football especially countries from Africa.

Those at the tops only care about their own immediate financial benefit and not care where the player gets to tomorrow with the myopic thinking that they have benefited from the player. I will still blame the government when it comes to corruption.

Hey guys, reading little story on Kylian Mbappe who on Thursday visited Cameroon on a charity with the deaf and other familiarization visit to his father's home town. He spoke with Joseph Dion Ngute, the Cameroon's Prime Minister, he was honoured visiting and I believe this is just like the humanitarian work some influential people do

But one striking revelation was that he would have been a cameroonian player if they weren't asking his father to pay them money before allowing him to play while he still trying to fix his career and French allowed him without payment.


I have also heard of some local stories about how some coaches require money from new footballers before they allow them on trier both in their clubs and national teams. Is this happening globally for new players who are still seeking to find a spot in clubs?

Do you think Cameroun miss Mbappe or it is Mbappe that missed Cameroun ?

https://theafricanhistory.com/2975#:~:text=My%20father

I think house edge is not just the only reason that an addict or consistent bet player would fail. Yes casinos are designed in the way that you will lose more than you will profit, therefore a consistent player is already design to fail more times except with the exception to win jackpot when it is his luck to win. So naturally, house edge is concluded already on that reason for losing but because addict and consistent player does that with sole aim to chase back the loses, so they will lose more but successful player is more relaxed to play less times and even when in loss, he doesn't allow the emotion to have a better part of him.

No I won't classify successful gambler as an addict and these are the reasons. First, if you are called a gambler addict it could mean you are not successful in gambling because if you understand the word addict or the way that the society identify it, it is not what is attached with someone positive and the society always have good names for what is good, people associate with success and not failure. What I think about addict is failure even if you will see some addict to be successful but rare.

Another valid point is for someone to be successful, they would have been operating professionally and keeping to the rules of gambling like understanding that if it is gambling then luck is involved, play with limits and not play just as your fingers push you to and all of these are part of the characteristics of an addict. In essence, they are different. Successful gamblers are not always addicts because they could be playing with limits and guiding their emotions.

A low wallet balance can be pragmatically used and utilized to become a rich balance if we play with more precision and focus on the target but all still depends on our luck on the time because despite the research we conduct sometimes it doesn't favour, luck come like the wave of the wind. However, I have seen series of low balance accounts being built into rich account but the challenge is lack of management because they will lose the winning pattern and keep playing heavy until they go back low. Discipline is important in gambling.

In an economy, there is always a profit taking and it looks like recession in the eyes of some and others smile just like the whales took their profit after the COVID-19 and bitcoin went up to $64k. I like your analysis of one big coin.


The agenda for a unified exchange may not work because other countries will follow the regulation restrictions that US has adopted for binance and every jurisdiction will introduce what works for them including tax. So it will not be business as usual.

You win some you lose some is how the gambling system is. I'm sure you have learnt your lesson now from your heart pain that you don't have to gamble all you have in the hope of winning big. Winning is not a guarantee until you see the reality of it. It is illusive until you have seen your ticket in green. Throwing all inside a bet is not advisable as you have seen and I hope you have moved passed that now with your betting.

Mismanagement of funds also contribute to what you are saying. I don't know if this lifestyle is known with all gamblers or just the chronic addicts and that kind of attitude of not holding tight to winning money is why gamblers have been said not to be taken as serious people. Not planning with the rewards from the proceed of the bet means planning to fail and that explains why they say if you don't suffer to make money then you won't value the money but I take exception to that because I feel some gamblers are becoming wiser.

They actually do have a strong rule on the workers not to allow bettors to bet on credit but what happens sometimes is that because a particular bettor is a friend or became close to the game house, one of the workers may fall soft for the bettor especially opposite sex. You know how the opposite attracts, and after sometime, the credit betting can start happening with repayment from time to time but it never last longer before such arrangement is unearthed and when this is noticed the worker will face losing the job or pay the debt .

People winning big and telling the stories but they don't tell you losses. Would say it is about wanting to do what others are doing. Youthful exuberance they call it right? Yeah wanted to explore, so from watching football and being a novice all around everything concerning gambling until a try to what they were doing by giving them money to stake for me from same bet slip they had analysed. It continued for some time until I started trying out myself. Of course experience comes with years  

I think the reasonable thing to do is to allow her go after the arrest because she has already served the jail term for the murder and won't have to be punished for it again. .



She won't be sentenced for a particular crime twice, so I think that settles it but if she is made to go to jail again on it, that is injustice to her. She was erroneously convicted when she had not committed the crime and now that she committed it, she didn't cause the first conviction, probably the prosecution and judges were hasty to do due diligence on the case. So she should be free.

Friend , the last time I checked the post you are responding to I didn't mention exchange or was I making reference to exchange wallet. You are imputing the above because I didn't mention exchange and that response was misinterpreted if you add what was not on the post.

Watch is watch and bitcoin is bitcoin. Watches, no matter how expensive they are they are still for that purpose that they are made for. Watch is not an investment but for luxury or comfort just like by greater extent, like buying car. Bitcoin is an investment asset that can appreciate over the years.

The real reason that I won't prefer watch over bitcoin is that watch has no additional value in the future but only serve the utility it was made for but bitcoin is $30,219 as I'm posting and tomorrow you could see it in $31k and it keeps rising just like expected with assets.

You made a wrong analysis of the intention of the post. I only made an analysis of the way a gambler can save money by withdrawing some of his money out of the casino wallet and to his own personal wallet because leaving it there and playing from it is tempting to continue playing after losing. So if he has withdrawn some away, he may decide not to refund after losing the money he left in his wallet. I understand whotnot about 2FA . Some times we could procrastinate towards getting to refund an account so that is the purpose. Such break between losing money in casino wallet and refunding can make a bettor take some break thereby saving that money.