Sorry, I forgot the word "non"-custodial. I've edited my post.

That's the shitty part indeed, and it's what makes it really hard to believe it's non-custodial. The user doesn't have much more than a phone number and 6 digit PIN to recover their funds, and they didn't say how you can recover it.

I've moved this project to another (donated) server. Everything should be back online again, let me know if there are any issues.

Can't you base the size reduction on the actual size? Or just fit it in 1024x1024 (but keep the aspect ratio), that should be enough for most forum posts.

The difference is that Mixin Safe is supposed to be non-custodial. If that's true (which I haven't been able to verify) it shouldn't be affected by the hack.

With hard forks, all bets are off. If you picked a certain block in the future and we get 1 block per minute instead of every 10 minutes, it's going to be mined a lot faster.

Keep a backup copy of coinb.in Just like you should have a backup copy of Bitaddress.org and iancoleman.io.
You should use those sites offline and air-gapped anyway.

Do you have a source for this statement? It's not in your screenshot, and I haven't found any evidence that the Lazarus Group is behind this.
A $20M bug bounty might work for a hacker who's in over his head, and $20M is enough to lead a very luxurious life without having to launder $200M and being on the lookout for the rest of your life. But if it's North Korean state hackers, none of this applies. They're lucky if they get food tonight.

You have such a limited vocabulary when it doesn't come from a chat spam bot! You should have been banned for plagiarism a long time ago.

I don't get why Mods don't ban this shitposter. Plagiarism isn't allowed, and all his posts are "low effort".

Update: Mempool is down to less than 6 5 sat/vbyte It keeps dropping. Did the ordinal-scamspam finally fail?

I'll remind people again: you want the tax man to know about it, so you can pay your taxes and enjoy your money. What are you going to do with $100M black money? You're much better off with $50M in money that you can spend to buy items legally.

That's the dumbest thing you can do! If you have old Bitcoins you can easily prove your wealth came from capital gains. Depending on the tax system you either pay your taxes when you sell them, or you should have paid annually (like where I live). And that's the reason to report your holdings to taxes: if there's a paper trail, you can cash them out without worrying about the IRS. All you have to do is pay, and keep the rest.

You should move (bottom-left) this topic to the Beginners board.

Short version: you don't need Bitcoin Core to store Bitcoins, but Bitcoin Core is one of the many wallets that can be used to send your Bitcoins.
Longer version: see Choose your Bitcoin wallet.

Nope. Unless you checked right before and right after the feedback was left.

I wasn't around early enough, but if he always said he won't share addresses, he shouldn't change that now. That's the risk of buying second hand coins. It's good to know before buying them though.

@OP: have an avatar That's all I could do for you.

Try it Then test restoring the seed before funding it.

The tricky part is finding the exact dimensions back 10 years later, if you don't have a printed table anymore. It may take some trial and error to print the exact format again for recovery. And you should probably not keep it in the same safe

Thanks again for your flawless timing!

If you have to ask, you shouldn't hand out negative feedback.

I can't tell if they deserve a tag, but if you do, do it for the right reasons.
From your tag:
Waking up is not a reason to tag someone, deleting posts is not a reason to tag someone. Even better: most posts on the altcoin board are spam anyway, so they won't be missed.
Asking for a good reason to change the tag is like reversing the chain of evidence. It's bad.

I've seen several incorrect posts by now. To be clear: Mixin lost $200M, not Mixin Safe.

It's good this way. It's still very large. The only alternative would be to add an URL tag to the image, so clicking it shows the full size.

I always imagined part of the reason to introduce the Merit system was to use it to differentiate between posts once enough good posts have been Merit. It just never happened. I can think of many pitfalls, so it's probably a good thing.

However, a third party would be able to do this! @TryNinja has a very nice database with posts, and he could probably sort them based on the Merit they received. I did it for Bitcointalk's 10th anniversary art contest (for some reason none of the images work through the image proxy anymore, so it's useless now), and for that topic it made sense. For most topics it will completely mess up the discussion, or show very old posts. Imagine sorting by Merit on the Wall Observer thread, you'll end up with more or less random posts instead of a discussion.