Without any evidence, why would we assume that your accusation is true?
it is quite legitimate if you concluded that he was a potential scammer and did not want to do business with him, but it is quite another thing to accuse someone if you were not directly involved or have to evidence that he committed fraud.
your feeling or even mine are not enough to accuse someone.

something is not clear to me, what kind of security does your driver's license with address information offer if you have lost your home and are moving out of it?
if someone were to ask you for that money, you will no longer be at the address on your driver's license, right?

launching and trading pi has been announced for years, but still, nothing has happened. I think they should rebrand and call it "Soon Pi".
It's not most likely, It's definitely a scam.


You can't give us any proof that it happened. even if there was a miserable trade between two Pi fanatics, that doesn't change the matter or make the whole joke serious.

you should look at the whole situation from the positive side. Closing ANN thread It's good that it happened right at the beginning, and not after a developed discussion. he also turned out to be not really a supporter of your project, so the whole thing would surely culminate at some point.
if your project is good, one troll won't hurt it much whatever he said on the net. if it manages to ruin your business in that way, you should think about the real strength of the project.
in addition to all that, you also learned an important lesson that you must always agree on every deal in detail.

you also learned how things go on this forum. Here you have marginal Legendary members and their status does not mean anything special for opening an ANN thread. Nothing more than if you bought a copper member membership yourself.
Also, you can tag gondel on their trust page and point reference to this thread. I will probably send them a link to this thread, so he will be informed and they can respond here.

I saw somewhere that some users don't dare to participate because they don't want to give their personal information in order to receive a prize. and that has nothing to do with you not even with your generous reward, but with their wish to remain anonymous.

Since we are only at the beginning of the bear market and based on previous experience, many altcoins will not survive this period or will be minor after that. Every entry into an altcoin project is most often due to the expectation of high income, and for all those who did not manage to realize themselves in the bull market fully, it will be challenging to do so at a time when interest is declining.
I would say that it is a very high risk with a much smaller potential for significant growth.

all new investors should first keep in mind that the current price of bitcoin is very low. There is no guarantee of what will happen and in what period, but it certainly carries much less risk.

maybe you could add this reference for Crex24 Crex24 out of business??maybe it will help someone to get their money out of there.
they are currently doing a mass delisting from their platform, also the site is officially unavailable, although it is possible to get access on request.

Can you try to activate my voucher, I'm not sure if it's still active, because I don't have any information about it on the platform. I still have the option to return the voucher and get a refund.

regardless of whether they read or write a post here, it is much more interesting how they completely avoid giving specific answers, and they were asked a lot of essentially very important questions. I believe that they can answer endlessly in general, without giving a concrete answer.

such things happen when everyone thinks they can manage a campaign. although for such "projects", the quality of the participants is not a priority.
I looked at the spreadsheet that the OP posted and the first participant Broken143 I checked was banned. at the same time, he has the status that he has been accepted into the campaign.
therefore, quality requirements do not exist, which is an obvious indicator of the (poor) quality of the project itself. I don't know what hunters expect from there.

Why this?
Lauda left the forum of her own accord, it's a bit morbid if it's a joke.

btw. I don't want to get into a discussion about personal choice, but this is Voting 2022, while Lauda has not been active on the forum for more than two years.

I have already participated in the previous test campaign, I would like to continue if it is OK for the team.
Also, where we can find your update log and changes which are implemented in the meantime?

1. Your Telegram username: @examplens
2. One Metamask address (as a buyer): 0xf12265B8dC938103580bA5f4EF086b5fd6F50fD6
3. Goerli Test Network

your offer is very poorly made. you ask for a minimum of $250 for the service, without a precise explanation of what you do and who you really are. so let me ask.
what exactly is your service? Hosting or DDoS protection or internet communication or all of them?
Also, what is "Prometon"? Software, company or service...?
who offers this service, an individual or a company? if it is a company, where is it located and where are the servers located?
The minimum cost is $250, but what does the user get for that? software license, server or just a conversation on Telegram?
Does all communication go via Telegram? isn't that a bit risky for potential buyers? Sounds like a scam.
Since we don't know anything about you, I must agree there is complete anonymity, but what about your potential users? what kind of guarantee do they have for anonymity and security of data by random Telegram username?

I will quote this for reference.

it does not necessarily mean that one person used all the vouchers. I take only one, (UTP-U2BA-YREQ-Z4DP-7STG-MNHM) first from your list and 0.01 CRP worth, for testing purposes only.



I also created one voucher for the test, so whoever wants to use it, it's here

this is very strange. right after the OP opened the thread, I visited his site and everything seemed normal. He asked me to connect to Metamask, but the page itself opened without any problems. Now I get this warning too.


in the meantime, this was also removed.
an obvious scam, but it busted.

what is happening with the status of BGL on Hotbit?
I see that the deposit is disabled and any BGL trading pair no longer exists there. also on CMC, the only market shown is on PancakeSwap.
is this the end of the partnership with Hotbit exchange?

I very much agree with FutureBitcoin that it is very necessary to have the possibility of trading on an exchange, not just a token.

can you share the link where the verification is done for the payment of funds from mt.gox?
I somehow always ignored it because I don't believe that anything positive will happen there, but you are right about that feeling of leaving BTC on the table.
thx.

doesn't it seem to you that we already have such a situation?
the fact that war is not fought with all available weapons does not mean that the global war has not started. it just means that all the great powers are afraid of using all the weapons because it would cause a global catastrophe.
Ukraine was chosen as a training ground, a battlefield (unfortunately for them), but in reality, it is a war between Russia and NATO/USA. without support from outside, Ukraine would certainly not have lasted this long.

yes, you are right about the rest. Those countries that are further away from the real world are certainly faring much better in this conflict. Ukraine and Russia will be the biggest financial losers, while for example, the USA makes a profit from all this.


edit: if we talk about the distribution of money, just imagine, Elon Musk bought fucking Twitter for $44 billion 

it would certainly be good if he came and explained the principle of the functioning of his algorithm and how exactly the results are obtained. I believe that he will get additional useful ideas here, after all, many heads are smarter than one.

I'll post the reference once more, maybe you haven't seen it. Where one exchanger (pay attention to user @fixedfloat) claims that some of their customers use funds that were obtained fraudulently. and that's why they keep the funds and send them to the address of the "victim" without explaining what method they use to reach their conclusion. sounds crazy, doesn't it?
check here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5424907.0

You forgot to say, to avoid unnecessary spam, it is desirable to do at least a short research, maybe someone has already asked the same or something similar and there has been a discussion on such a topic.
Also, important rule. Do not open a new topic if you are really not interested in answers.