Bas me interesuje kako ces podneti ako budes morao maknuti ove Goba praises iz "Personal text" 

They have a large number of users and it would be very strange if such things did not exist. Earlier, I had a similar "bad" experience with them, I got the impression that their security was not very well done.
Of course, there is 2fa there as an additional security method, it should be activated.

I wouldn't trust them with more than $100

Did I understand correctly that currently, 109 users are merit sources?

I haven't noticed so many of them, at least not on the global part of the forum, I assume that most of them are from local boards.

Uh, friend, you have had too many loan defaults lately. You should probably change the strategy of approving future loans. You should keep your money more safe.


I would also like to see a connection between these accounts, if it is true, they all deserve to be negatively tagged.

85 & 86
examplens
thx

This is a big red flag and I advise the OP to stop this approach immediately. It will only have a negative effect. This kind of shilling technique for some businesses was overcome a long time ago, although I am not sure that it ever gave positive results.

There is no need for such a subforum because it will turn into a spamfest very quickly. Maybe your intentions are honest, but as you say yourself, there are too many scams and the place you propose would be ideal if they were promoted even better.

I suggest that you start your thread or more where you will deal with the airdrop topic, and possibly give some guidelines on how to recognize risky ones. Over time, if your thread proves to provide relevant and useful information, it will definitely be noticed by other members who are interested in this segment.

Iskreno i dalje mi je malo cudan razlog zasto je slacko ispao iz kampanje (ako je to pravi razlog), menadzer je mogao dati nekakvo upozorenje. Jeste da je respektabilan menadzer ali ovo nije reprezentativan nacin vodjenja kampanje.
SKoro je bio primer sa icopress, kada je uklonio jednog usera iz kampanje jer je negativno pricao o servisu koji promovise, ali mu je ipak nasao mesto u drugoj njegovoj kampanji. Prilicno fer, zanemarene sujete, ipak se pridrzavao nekih normi vodjenja kampanje a opet pokazao dovoljno respekta za ucesnika kampanje.

This decision is understandable, nothing is worth it for someone to spend time in prison.
It is quite obvious that this hunt by the US authorities against services that increase anonymity will also have some other effects, I believe unwanted for them. Legal services like Wasabi will remain in legal streams, but part of the functions (like Coinjoin) will be forked into a new "illegal" branch that they cannot control or punish. Too much pressure was always the wrong way.

I am quite annoyed by such a habit, I usually put such users on the ignore list, no matter what section it is.

For example, we often have someone in the service section regularly bump and lock, thus keeping their topic at the top. Earlier, I suggested that the locked topic be automatically moved to the archive, but certainly to reduce the bump power. It should certainly not be the top, a topic that you can read but not give a different opinion or ask a question.

Locked means solved or irrelevant, therefore, there is no need for it to be visible as a priority.

Now I looked at the history of his starting topics, he was mostly looking for someone who would do "easy" things online. It's interesting that he doesn't have any feedback, it would be expected that he had at least one successful deal so far.

I would not defend Roger in any matter, but this is just another confirmation of why anonymity is important.
The US is putting serious pressure on the regulation of the Bitcoin system (I can't shake the impression that they put themselves as the main and only judges here) and we were afraid that they would ban cryptocurrencies. 

There are still Chipmixer phishing sites, if we look at all such fake mixer sites, there are quite a number of them. It is also obvious that they are not the subject of any investigation, many of them stop working on their own and not because of a sanction.
I was making a big list of scam sites I have not seen many cases where any investigation was done or where any of the domains were seized.
Things through which ordinary people are deceived are not a priority subject of investigation like those where the state sees a possible evasion of income. It is more than obvious.

New update after a while. 20 new scam sites added to the blacklist. 930+ sites and counting
It's not that there are fewer scams because I add new ones less often, I just don't have enough time to dedicate myself to this anymore.

update log:

It is interesting, for example, that phishing sites like fake mixers are not subject to similar sanctions or investigations. We have even seen them being advertised on G00gle and similar networks and nobody seems to have a problem with that, while services that do not have scam intentions are strictly punishable because they can be used for purposes that do not suit the US government.
It's a bit bizarre that someone behind the name of justice deals with it

He should lock this topic in the hope that we will forget this embarrassment. To me, this looks like adulation and ass-kissing of the managers, whether for merit hunting or an attempt to have more chances during the selection of participants.
He speaks equally highly of all managers, although he did not work with all of them. So he makes things up.
There may have been scandalous campaigns with some managers, but the OP is obviously afraid to write about it.
The long time he follows this thing is a maximum of one year, how old is his account here? There are certainly many older and more experienced members.
Best_Change is not a campaign manager like the others mentioned. It is an account owned by the Best Change service and serves exclusively the needs of BC, and there may be more than one person behind this account. For example, they will never manage a campaign for someone else.

We already have several collections of all managers on the forum, so this is a completely unnecessary attempt.



I know for Yahoo62278, its June 22, 1978 Yahoo6(June)221978 

Na tvom mestu ja bih probao. (lako ces se vratiti kampanji u kojoj si trenutno  )
Nije to tako rigorozno, narocito ako pises smisleno. Svaki kazino ANN ima vise od 250 postova, naravno da su prihvatljivi postovi odatle.
Mislim da je to pravilo najvise uvedeno kako bi se otarasio shitpostera iz threadova poput Rich or poor gambler, who should risk more?, Do you gamble because you don't have sufficient money?

For a large number of users, LN is too complicated to use. At the same time, I am talking about those who are not Bitcoin beginners, but also those with crypto experience. If there is no significant change, I don't see that LN can gain significant popularity. That's why I don't see any solid reasons to implement and emphasize support for Lighting.

Sta je bilo tesko pustiti PM sa "hej covece promeni signature"? Plus je imao stari signature koji je svakako predstavljao istu kampanju, dakle nije promovisao nesto sasvim drugo. Prilicno los nacin za ispadanje iz kampanje.
Nije bas da i menadzeru ne odgovara, taman moze da napravi pomeranje nekoliko clanova u visi tier. slackovic je nesretan, ali zato ima njih 3-4 srecnih jer eto menadzer se setio pa ih maknuo gore.


Svako "zlo" nosi i nesto dobro.
Blackjack.fun je jos uvek otvoren, (pogledaj zadnji menadzerov post). Mozda ti se posreci pa ustvari predjes u bolje placenu kampanju 

I'm not sure if I understood correctly, but it seems that pnnv no longer does the exchange as a Changenow partner but in its management. Or it has yet to be implemented. Perhaps AgentF should explain clearly.


You have a right point here.
Thanks to the high fees, I now pay much more attention to Coin control when sending, so I have more chances to avoid this scenario.