|
BTC is has taken +60min to make ONE block today ... it can not function as the one and all purpose coin ... it is nearly 100% certain that the transactions will overflow into the current established 'alts'.
|
|
|
|
|
I think maki deserves the title:
Sir Maki LERFCC
Leading Expert on rare and fair coins (crypto currencies)
----
Status Currency Block Height Connections Last Update Last Checked Notice
Blocked BTC 427011 8 66 minutes Sat Aug 27 2016 11:53:58 GMT+0700
rex is calling BTC a blocked network ... LOLZ
|
|
|
|
blackcoin had one of the biggest pumps ever back in the mintpal days. they're all gonna be targets for price manipulation at some point. out of that bunch I think peercoin is the realest coin. it's been around for a long time and has some great ideas. it deserves more attention.
blackcoin had one of the biggest pumps ever back in the mintpal days??? Really? I see highwater mark of $18M. This pales in comparison to XPY, LTC, DOGE ... those are the classmates of 2014 PnD kings, and BTC was running @ $1300, no? By end of 2014 it had dumped down to $4M or below for highwater. It is nearing 2 years as a stable product, at around $2.5M. I would suggest BLK is one of the more legit, stable, POS projects at this point if 2014 shenanigans can be forgiven. Point being just look at all the current ICO, something for nothing with Market Cap well above those numbers. --- @iGotSpots how many coins have you released? and what are they?  |
|
|
|
Proof of stake coins with strong community https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1597390.new#newHello,
I have been searching the forums for good POS coins with good development and community and aren't prone to price manipulation. In no order I like.
Zeitcoin
Blackcoin
Peercoin
Mintcoin
What other coins are there that have a future?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
well kiss my grits; TALK is the www.bitcointalk.org community coin. Could that be a POS with a strong community? |
|
|
|
Suggested the Mo @ around $1.25 ...  UNO is poised for a breakout now ... lead, follow, or get out of the way ... so far XMR is leading the pack. More volume than LTC even ETC!! XMR LTC UNO DOGE (5th man still needed) |
|
|
|
This roadmap, which the team calls “comprehensive,” includes various milestones and achievements the team wants to meet over the next several years. Broken into 5 “phases,” the team provided press with this general development outline: Inception Resilience Expansion Ascent Eternity In addition to this list, developers provided a chart that shows a more detailed description of what each “phase” entails:  http://bitcoinist.net/lisk-long-term-roadmap/ |
|
|
|
some of the smartest lines of advice i've seen on crypto coin trading a good start is : www.theforexguy.comthe strategies are the same as forex, and forex have way more material to study. and dont ask for tips, you will need to learn... people here will say BS all the time so i wouldnt trust in tips if i were you. |
|
|
|
I guessing that the whole thread might get deleted and locked soon. So here's the OP for the record. 一个Maryjanecoin钱包很简单，只要一个Maryjanecoin地址与它对应的Maryjanecoin私钥的单配对。这样的钱包已经生成了你在你的网页浏览器，并显示在上方。 为了保护这个钱包，你必须打印或以其他方式记录Maryjanecoin地址和私有密钥。使私有密钥的备份副本，并将其存储在一个安全的位置是很重要的。本网站不提供私人密钥的知识。如果你熟悉PGP，你可以下载所有这些功能于一身的HTML页面，并检查是否有从这个网站的作者一个可信的版本通过与SHA1哈希签名的版本历史文档中可用的匹配这个HTML的SHA1哈希链接在本网站的页脚。如果你离开/刷新网站或按下“生成新地址”按钮，然后一个新的私钥生成和前面显示的私钥不会被检索。你Maryjanecoin私钥应保持一个秘密。任何人分享你的私有密钥访问用上所有与该地址相关联的Maryjanecoins。如果你打印你的钱包，然后将其存储在一个拉链锁头包，以保持它的水安全。对待一个纸钱包喜欢现金。 通过指导他人发送Maryjanecoins您Maryjanecoin地址新增资金向这个钱包。 通过将一个Maryjanecoin块浏览器并输入地址，请检查您的余额。 通过下载流行Maryjanecoin P2P客户端之一，并输入你的私钥P2P客户端的钱包花你Maryjanecoins。请记住，当你输入你的单关键，Maryjanecoin P2P客户端，花费资金的重点将在P2P客户端钱包等私人密钥进行捆绑。当您执行事务的更改将被发送到P2P客户端钱包内的其他Maryjanecoin地址。然后，您必须备份的P2P客户端的钱包，并保持它的安全为您的剩余Maryjanecoins将被存储在那里。聪劝人们永远也不应该删除一个钱包。 单击帮助菜单>单击调试>点击控制台 在帮助控制台类型“importprivkey enteryourprivatekeyhere”，你是好去 我的名字叫亚当·加里蒂Maryjanecoin的首席开发人员，我可以在这样的社交网站如Facebook Twitter的海量根和Instagram的轻松抵达。请为我感谢社会各界支持，随时与我联系。 请联系我们，如果你想赚取赏金的工作提供了如 尖端机器人，社交媒体和平面设计的工作总是需要的。如果你想成为一名州议员不要犹豫取得联系。 Yīgè Maryjanecoin qiánbāo hěn jiǎndān, zhǐyào yīgè Maryjanecoin dìzhǐ yǔ tā duìyìng de Maryjanecoin sī yào de dān pèiduì. Zhèyàng de qiánbāo yǐjīng shēngchéngle nǐ zài nǐ de wǎngyè liúlǎn qì, bìng xiǎnshì zài shàngfāng. Wèile bǎohù zhège qiánbāo, nǐ bìxū dǎyìn huò yǐ qítā fāngshì jìlù Maryjanecoin dìzhǐ hé sīyǒu mì yào. Shǐ sīyǒu mì yào de bèifèn fùběn, bìng jiāng qí cúnchú zài yīgè ānquán de wèizhì shì hěn zhòngyào de. Běn wǎngzhàn bù tígōng sīrén mì yào de zhīshì. Rúguǒ nǐ shúxī PGP, nǐ kěyǐ xiàzài suǒyǒu zhèxiē gōngnéng yú yīshēn de HTML yèmiàn, bìng jiǎnchá shìfǒu yǒu cóng zhège wǎngzhàn de zuòzhě yīgè kě xìn de bǎnběn tōngguò yǔ SHA1 hā xī qiānmíng de bǎnběn lìshǐ wéndàng zhōng kěyòng de pǐpèi zhège HTML de SHA1 hā xī liànjiē zài běn wǎngzhàn de yè jiǎo. Rúguǒ nǐ líkāi/shuāxīn wǎngzhàn huò àn xià “shēngchéng xīn dìzhǐ” ànniǔ, ránhòu yīgè xīn de sī yào shēngchéng hé qiánmiàn xiǎnshì de sī yào bù huì bèi jiǎnsuǒ. Nǐ Maryjanecoin sī yào yīng bǎochí yīgè mìmì. Rènhé rén fēnxiǎng nǐ de sīyǒu mì yào fǎngwèn yòng shàng suǒyǒu yǔ gāi dìzhǐ xiāngguān lián de Maryjanecoins. Rúguǒ nǐ dǎyìn nǐ de qiánbāo, ránhòu jiāng qí cúnchú zài yīgè lāliàn suǒ tóu bāo, yǐ bǎochí tā de shuǐ ānquán. Duìdài yīgè zhǐ qiánbāo xǐhuān xiànjīn. Tōngguò zhǐdǎo tārén fà sòng Maryjanecoins nín Maryjanecoin dìzhǐ xīn zēng zījīn xiàng zhège qiánbāo. Tōngguò jiāng yīgè Maryjanecoin kuài liúlǎn qì bìng shūrù dìzhǐ, qǐng jiǎnchá nín de yú'é. Tōngguò xiàzài liúxíng Maryjanecoin P2P kèhù duān zhī yī, bìng shūrù nǐ de sī yào P2P kèhù duāndì qiánbāo huā nǐ Maryjanecoins. Qǐng jì zhù, dāng nǐ shūrù nǐ de dān guānjiàn,Maryjanecoin P2P kèhù duān, huāfèi zījīn de zhòngdiǎn jiàng zài P2P kèhù duān qiánbāo děng sīrén mì yào jìnxíng kǔnbǎng. Dāng nín zhíxíng shìwù de gēnggǎi jiāng pī fà sòng dào P2P kèhù duān qiánbāo nèi de qítā Maryjanecoin dìzhǐ. Ránhòu, nín bìxū bèifèn de P2P kèhù duāndì qiánbāo, bìng bǎochí tā de ānquán wèi nín de shèngyú Maryjanecoins jiāng bèi cúnchú zài nàlǐ. Cōng quàn rénmen yǒngyuǎn yě bù yìng gāi shānchú yīgè qiánbāo. Dān jī bāngzhù càidān >dān jī tiáoshì >diǎn jí kòngzhì tái zài bāngzhù kòngzhì tái lèixíng “importprivkey enteryourprivatekeyhere”, nǐ shì hǎo qù wǒ de míngzì jiào yàdāng·jiālǐ dì Maryjanecoin de shǒuxí kāifā rényuán, wǒ kěyǐ zài zhèyàng de shèjiāo wǎngzhàn rú Facebook Twitter dì hǎiliàng gēn hé Instagram de qīngsōng dǐdá. Qǐng wèi wǒ gǎnxiè shèhuì gèjiè zhīchí, suíshí yǔ wǒ liánxì. Qǐng liánxì wǒmen, rúguǒ nǐ xiǎng zhuàn qǔ shǎng jīn de gōngzuò tí gōng liǎo rú jiānduān jīqìrén, shèjiāo méitǐ hé píngmiàn shèjì de gōngzuò zǒng shì xūyào de. Rúguǒ nǐ xiǎng chéngwéi yī míng zhōu yìyuán bùyào yóuyù qǔdé liánxì. |
|
|
|
300k ENRG stuck in 4 withdraws that never got executed last reply to support email over 1 months ago i was a big defender of staisybit and DMD had some plans to team up for some projects with the re branded staisybit but with this broken communication and inexisting support i have big doubts i know matt and steve are involved and try to save the situation but guys there must be more actions to restore faith  Congratulations. Meta - With you actively involved
StaisyBit has a bright future. The reputation will
definitely improve now.
Bright future? DMD changed from syncing to forked. ENRG --> forked OK --> forked FUEL --> forked Meta and Matthias are doing the best they can, yes. Just seems that they cant do anything to solve the real problems. |
|
|
|
just thinking out loud ... what if UNO became a regularly well traded coin on platforms like >> https://www.tuxexchange.com/trade?coin=DOGE&market=BTCthere literally can be 100s of them, that mostly just handle bot managed 'ping' trades. trust is but brief, and they likely can establish automatic fill or kill features, and unfills are auto return deposit to sender. note exchanges like these won't be the main markets (those require more trust and act like escrow middle men who hold deposits long term to bolster upper support and resistance); these kind of micro markets will be tuned to the macro spot rate, if the market shifts, all eyes will refocus on the 'main' exchanges until some spot rate order is reestablished, and then buyers and sellers would return to a myriad of 'ping' trade markets. thus; more points of exchange ... decentralizing ... and less on deposit risk exposure. *edited |
|
|
|
Hi
I own hyperspace.com I sell it at current Gandi price (circa 15 euros, you can pay with bitcoins) to anyone who wants it, under the condition that presstab or billotronic agree with the deal (I don't want to sell to a cybersquatter)
|
|
|
|
POS features 'multisend'/'charity stake' MultiSend RPC ****************************************************************
WHAT IS MULTISEND?
MultiSend is a rebuild of what used to be called Stake For Charity (s4c)
MultiSend allows a user to automatically send a percent of their stake reward to as many addresses as you would like
The MultiSend transaction is sent when the staked coins mature (30 confirmations)
The only current restriction is that you cannot choose to send more than 100% of your stake using MultiSend
****************************************************************
MULTISEND COMMANDS (usage: multisend <command>)
print - displays the current MultiSend vector
clear - deletes the current MultiSend vector
enable - activates the current MultiSend vector
disable - disables the current MultiSend vector
delete <Address #> - deletes an address from the MultiSend vector
****************************************************************
TO CREATE OR ADD TO THE MULTISEND VECTOR:
multisend <HyperStake Address> <percent>
This will add a new address to the MultiSend vector
Percent is a whole number 1 to 100.
**************************************************************** others MultiSend RPC CoinControl RPC DisableStake RPC Sync efficient |
|
|
|
Charlie Lee: Nuclear option of forking the codebase should only be used as a last resort. It's dangerous & irresponsible. (twitter.com) https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3hp190/charlie_lee_nuclear_option_of_forking_the/cu9e4tjcoblee 64 points 1 year ago* By forking the codebase, I meant a contentious hardfork of the consensus protocol, the users, and the miners. (Not enough characters in a Twitter message!) Some people have mentioned that it's ironic for me to say this because I forked Bitcoin to create Litecoin. That fork is drastically different than what BitcoinXT is doing. Litecoin uses a different proof of work, so that it's not competing with Bitcoin for miners. And by creating a new genesis block, it did not fork Bitcoin's userbase. Users and miners can choose to (or not) support Litecoin and it would have no effect on Bitcoin whatsoever. People have also said that forking the code is just a push of a button and that people do it all the time with open-source software projects. So forking should be encouraged instead of discouraged. I agree with this, but Bitcoin is different in that there is one thing that you need to be careful with. And that is the consensus protocol. Bitcoin only works if everyone (well, the vast majority of the people) are on the same protocol. Any small change to the protocol will leave users on a different fork and not able to reach consensus with the rest of the network. And that's fine in most cases. Users/miners, finding that they are left behind (shorter chain length), can quickly fix their code to be back in consensus. The reason why BitcoinXT is dangerous and irresponsible is because it could potentially destroy Bitcoin and split the userbase into 2 separate Bitcoin networks. There are very good reasons why most of the core developers and Bitcoin experts are super cautious with increasing the block size too quickly. But these reasons are hard to explain to regular users of Bitcoin. Yet, it is quite easy for Mike & Gavin to convince people that supporting BitcoinXT means supporting block size increase, which makes Bitcoin scale for worldwide use, and it's what Satoshi intended. BitcoinXT is set to trigger with 75% miner support. This means it can trigger with only 50% miner support + a lucky streak. Or if there are malicious people running NoXT, they can cause the trigger to go off without majority support. When that happens, there's no guarantee that the losing side will all switch to running BitcoinXT. Now you've got a split user base and miner base. Some wallets will support BTC, some will support BTCXT, and some may support both. Same for exchanges and payment processors. It's going to be total chaos. Miners will switch back and forth between mining BTC and BTCXT. Users will send transactions on one network and not know why the recipient didn't get it. The price for both coins will tank. If you thought Litecoin and altcoins dilute the value of Bitcoin, wait til you see what BTCXT does to the price! Actually, the market is already giving us a hint as to why BitcoinXT is such a bad idea. A more responsible option would have been to set the trigger threshold at a real super majority of 90% miner vote. If it was set at 90%, the chance of a bad fork would be far less likely. But Mike & Gavin knows that there's no way they can get 90% support, so they would rather risk hurting Bitcoin in order to get their way. Mike has even mention using checkpoints to force the issue if XT doesn't get the hashrate majority ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1089283.0). That is scary. There's a better option. Really try to reach consensus. Unlike what you have been told, the devs actually support increasing the block size. They just couldn't come to a consensus on how much and when. And we still have plenty of time to get to a consensus. Next month, most of the devs and bitcoin experts are gathering in Montreal to discuss this topic to get everyone on the same page. Check out https://scalingbitcoin.org/montreal2015/ |
|
|
|
|
Go Mo!
More volume than ETH + ETC combined ... w00f!
1 Bitcoin Bitcoin BTC $ 9,211,639,492 $ 581.91 15,829,980 $ 72,005,200 -0.14 % -0.52 % 1.04 %
8 Monero Monero XMR $ 56,893,116 $ 4.47 12,730,643 $ 16,755,300 -1.67 % -7.11 % 107.00 %
4 Litecoin Litecoin LTC $ 186,115,681 $ 3.94 47,251,154 $ 8,749,290 -0.05 % 1.90 % 8.68 %
2 Ethereum Ethereum ETH $ 921,471,452 $ 11.06 83,292,337 $ 5,699,430 -0.29 % 0.19 % 0.49 %
6 Ethereum Classic Ethereum Cla... ETC $ 123,083,856 $ 1.48 83,264,347 $ 5,613,470 -2.04 % -6.18 % -17.40 %
11 Factom Factom FCT $ 25,167,605 $ 2.88 8,753,219 * $ 3,435,030 -1.20 % 3.98 % 35.14 %
3 Ripple Ripple XRP $ 214,375,292 $ 0.006028 35,562,073,617 * $ 1,344,930 0.07 % 0.44 % -1.70 %
7 Dash Dash DASH $ 87,628,403 $ 13.10 6,686,894 $ 1,283,870 0.58 % -2.43 % 3.77 %
70 Novacoin Novacoin NVC $ 848,910 $ 0.577422 1,470,172 $ 1,148,860 -0.48 % -3.43 % -7.58 %
10 Lisk Lisk LSK $ 28,341,800 $ 0.283418 100,000,000 * $ 1,024,780 5.88 % 11.41 % 8.56 %
13 Nxt Nxt NXT $ 21,341,437 $ 0.021363 998,999,994 * $ 263,221 -1.06 % -7.24 % -26.39 %
5 Steem Steem STEEM $ 139,438,261 $ 1.14 122,596,020 $ 247,441 0.54 % -7.28 % -24.54 %
12 Dogecoin Dogecoin DOGE $ 23,904,923 $ 0.000226 105,737,501,093 $ 234,537 0.28 % -0.30 % -8.93 %
|
|
|
|
smarty pants of the day How is Voxelus a scam? They built a VR market place, a 3D engine and a 3D modeler, didn't they?
Hasley Minor has a track record of building legit businesses, doesn't he?
Businesses fail all the time, that's the thing. Time is of the essence. Voxelus made its ICOs at the wrong time when there wasn't much hot money to get in. They raised 300k USD, that's too little to get anywhere, they had to take from the remaining premined funds to get going, and that obviously affected the price.
They also went for VR too early, a typical killer for businesses. Too early is as bad as too late. Timing is key. VR still very much is a fringe technology, and although it starts to pick up steam, it's still a very long way before mainstream, and together with the failed fundraiser, Voxelus didn't have enough funds to survive until the VR really takes off.
Investors are also responsible for doing due diligence. Although Hasley Minor has been doing well during the Dotcom bubble, this was a long time ago, and recent history show that he has managed to blow 200M USD of personal wealth and make 50M USD of debts since then. So obviously this was a risky bet.
From my perspective, there is very little that can be reproached to Voxelus. And it's fair game for Uphold to try to diversify with ETH and other currencies even though they initially promised to give exclusivity to VOX. VOX has failed. Should Uphold fail too? If Uphold can survive by diversifying, power to them.
OP, you should be happy that VOX still has a price at all on the market. You can still get out now and recoup at least some of your initial investments while you still can. Crypto businesses fail slowly by becoming irrelevant while the equity is still liquid enough to be traded, that's still a very sweet deal compared to real life businesses that fail brutally letting investors with no way out and a 100% loss. Making libelious threads against Minor and his projects doesn't help the price. Ultimately, you are shooting yourself in the foot by doing that. At the very least, be rational and keep your vitriol for after you sold your position. And remember that although failing a business isn't illegal, slander is, so please remain factual in your accusations.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
i can't deposit and withdarw 
( 
