Hi, is it okay if I stake my PGP key here too? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
Hi, it is mattcode and today is the 15th of March 2018.
My Bitcoin Talk user id is #1361227 and I am signing this message to stake my PGP key -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEvCux02EEk5vpJKpRoJ5kP1QcD8UFAlqqtK0ACgkQoJ5kP1Qc D8UO7A//WW2IlDr6+xRcEgfZcCN5l/nqkTbk6ihRCabWXqJOKxqFU6HcACSF5Pqi esuJUVsia9PsI2r8xplKZdmMaiOy+uP/sMrT15N00HMcj/FxRqrO+HhoKMCkmEfE aaREjts4oQnGikV1JT8SZ5LC/5oJRmoHpJBHX26R0IGICDEKHe9wIyzpeC+4+Ajb QB3MZpmYOd+sP/Rl8IJ/8M7bcgdMG2PC4ZzaHsrHe4LBL0zPFw2BxNEEtWQhDvKI 8gxsPal9K2tZo3vJD8hk55svqXz8msqiippFQ0HcIKiST5Y2riWXh6hSZlEG0KV2 Qz2i5MNTgIpnQATWbnFkeDsqcPETpmpIhSG55KkJ9gKZohkBQ+Dru7D0lOfS6MW6 pdJBIDPntan63sCpfCH4BtbdO0Qhjs6T5ve9NCRRZFl1hCPvhC9lupQvwOzVXipE IF3DIrbtku2XQyq5Utpzx1LajFHvpce8DsZ2FBl3N3XksgysSRQubsc1wiejYYuR Z1lFBkg0R6Teg9Ng58cuyqFp86TMphA5nCmiFuuLccu+8uTFaLnaAxYHZl94DN0I eJzsosLQzX4HXtIwDRYJolI9JAhAmbxZ90O4ni8lP0MxqBsw1W0i5vSWbU2Ilgre xZwAbmYCpfpc9WSi7CGPb0obQRsyte5OohWPyFXYVCFCy2gDRmU= =VN/7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
mQINBFqcDHoBEADL2yZzYYvpCvjKx0OPiRUvuYY/UIJKihBJIftStvEgwLwS3MvR BHbfGvHJA0ZX23jOJ21M3M1UIdeN3mpzyA073gu3gj1hbexzkrrYzSB4Kx0hvL0N SYkOryir58UWH/2tDH6rJ/j3i9IEIr1BEP6l2K6c0mnnd2qYOtswrP3+WpJ7J3j7 2Pnhh6w2SqqJ+/JO3o+jsDL7+RkDV/S2ezgnVYG8MW92h55pm3MzTA1cFdWdHTYB s2N0hcojdxBVrTx+QZWvJZrWSL0CLCOk2uDNVI+IIs9QemivHQaFvqU0fXR5qhzf vJM53SIP2MI8UJNXhOivQKlorXr37OGX4s9yNQ7pPxF2ayJZZ1OUmXlHu6SpyX/C gh7+pf8Hf1J8xkX22+ITFFQu2ewrL2vc+R0BqJ9GBflNhbp2zEHYV+Zf/h1Sy+8s rnTldpgHCAcsRQE/Os3mUtKdqqqe+wVQviwa5TrD+3cSX0g5z23DtsaNYqT6xjeW dr29tnt9o4uVS0pahmgYXhTMpT4fzovE/CSS9LJdSN3BmF0JAkdtNQN4jDgSBOdb pQ+tHUk6OvkCImm1sG8V7KlvdyFs5V7gcey4WITOdKOquOGhsWJEbg+IJQieVXf9 PTDqYjxg34CucLrDcXO/4rGOJXaukclz5xAbOkqqfnlV9IJ4W9e8Gpon9QARAQAB tCpNYXR0aGV3IEluY29nbml0byA8bWF0dGhld0BpbmNvZ25pdG8uaG9zdD6JAlQE EwEIAD4CGwMFCQeEzgACHgECF4AWIQS8K7HTYQSTm+kkqlGgnmQ/VBwPxQUCWpwW kAULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAAKCRCgnmQ/VBwPxd2SEACU2TwzV4Xv+BerDaba Jhf8VFED73IIeFO/LLpb4CqcgIynOAuz8It6Ej0V980glTCLMuHsm6m0XEdMNZ8e yXBEDVszV0rzVXVQ3CEhXh2x+/21gGTDXRLaCQaYcxNFaU/LxUYL5i0XctsnkkFI W45L0N48LhGe1oU1/tDHB6CsWDGjKqApWr4aD91UXxW2UUT2JPN1x9m1tPJ1SK2L hK6l6yrZjQiXizeSwqlFwudI1Kxi2tVZ82hWbfkYqBijtp7Kc64dmVTnnqC0E0JM VdvJfR1fmjGCcz5RxZvQI5wVnpZm00h4AVdMAdp3BRm/SFn0XhjpexlaYz9AgNqS 1BX+t5u5i2yH0PA9E5Duxj8hqeCvd54IqRvRjgsoQYpDthzr7BkZL3gQT84jIYKn Q7jaaFZ179WpZrNhxdF9gsq73Y4s1iYVgDCzw+Da8V+mS4TDhldJzJTTjAvHqxHA AeNLxstftnPeSGyEK/oddldBEiYxqM5AhYJWdu+sqyqCPxyuqu0kqx57kfSciBek Z++5KbiA4WorAI3hRJDh4j20rpueddey4NqyvLhHjMpLj15BkHxpeVMQfz+J0MYx dlpdDQVYXWiFR7Ys6jp7boGqyPuxxOgcER3NCXKp7IJFZ5tNkBcH+YQbp4C6P7zM L4pXIpwebmbkYs2TsZByQg7UTrkCDQRanAx6ARAA1ERS9RvWTEMGqpvKGDpT+mhd y/ctaSgPfXrgPG+uw/d8aPsvRjC8Us8rppfiukOpinmv5QrR8s0dqTzxDR4mTPSX GuVrvOUyS/1MTfaxdvqy/96Q4hG+gwv/ORS8mJftiM0BlS4yKkk4dz1rXIB+HU6Y +fM9QnsYmTd/lkYGKEXIgj7E6mzP0tTksWzuMoi0pvrG6T/ROcLZDNIngR4YJh5F YQGU41OXNmfcVHmZ61H48UgxPr7JRH/6DWU67phZm8s90Ms0kagAUJDn05bFvKN9 LGnpAkiBRpmFEhGfIWcOmGuNyV8XIjS7C/gUcrjPaA5X4+l4MlpcLvwcX59+ivgU xnoLmbyz7U9MKQKpHvCHBygfuHKYpK63AYdspUE5leg9llYR8FQCQ5k9jnFy+Uv2 wlDgI2mFOTrzwbIKMEpINWFB9xjvwx4ykZaykcP5fgGAsmMk0rEH61Hq+ZdcfzZ+ u25WPzy6IP4LMxDg1aaXJe6EpqGbiqljidawBEqKauNQcL7Onx0u14q8Ralvu7Li ahCO5QnfCgNzZGzZ6MaoQIa2Vhl0W+aIOgJ6rqNEPFh4tvvjuRShjAW0Ib0IdD36 ILPe6SkHgSAmcVZEVCBPXAo3detC1jePlcVaWhHUZnO8uVQKWFg1vnZQznTMsnqf OfLQNAwphYlrk2r7PpEAEQEAAYkCPAQYAQgAJhYhBLwrsdNhBJOb6SSqUaCeZD9U HA/FBQJanAx6AhsMBQkHhM4AAAoJEKCeZD9UHA/FQH8P/0NxSVdtaLskYw0CBfvW XFFlwmYDZuKaiLL3dTka/1rowsl3/CuX0fl/a+FbXA2eWF9wrsaG9IsqGj+HywFm cskd+Ws2rgBqnNAQ3LZSXVeq5oJrF96x6Ca6lrUBoybLcJy0IUJPb26kRT1JqxTj hYJxsaIoeDdUkX1+/eXPDEjXbaIuoWKIuKhLEJVRxRHse+lfqwo5DgBFA9fZaDFr R4gRhLFu5jp0IbTcAnVJ5k9RAwYBnbfXijGa3hu4ThKLyx/uV3XeHIkPX+24dUQs s2JsU9Zd3kQlHnKFVTeKE3VOphikPannUuyWZ+2+ZIgXNOSw0DRV0aX55Z/3TRCb Ud8auMiE8N1Vivdjsb1Kh3/haK2iwMs4MGco1qy+CGLRRrHr3P6LVSyHGtPTZi0e sr23njCekE15v2W19gWFslyhICYgrv1/HxcXuHDmxtUy6FkYJUDYcXIsUaocrr2S 1EiYvjKGyxbSs76xrbgf9rDVPyHEBb8DI/3h+QPZSnMF39SvXXUIkSP2oVl6FQK3 9JEtVdHuecc5YP2XON3OWvscg/QzYqoKyA7jeLaRoxFXn3kWScpAQMPWjitmFCUD ppyw0lkWB0ytV9h+kzAOucnMn5UG8KkeVrnen1T7DJINssWyZJ72fYQo8F8iRbCy nuJzIYlxwhql1DJBKcpWMAWO =C2vB -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
|
|
|
This forum needs more moderators. The existing ones are doing a great job, but the forum has grown immensely since most of them have been hired, and there are more shitposters than ever.
I'm not sure, I've reported a few posts and they end up getting deleted pretty quickly. The irony of this thread? It looks like everyone in support of the OP is wearing a paid signature ad. Many of the people you will be penalizing are not. That should be the first sign that you're barking up the wrong tree. Why should someone lose signature privileges because they don't post very often? Or because they're inactive for a while? Or because there's not enough merit to go around? Or because they're not in a social group that customarily merits each other (like Default Trust cliques, the Wall Observer regulars, etc)? How do you even know that merit distribution is adequate to begin penalizing those who don't earn it? If some posters aren't receiving merit, it doesn't necessarily follow that post quality is the determining factor, either. I've seen no change since I said this one month ago: Something like users must earn 5 merits a months for their account to display a signature
I really hope theymos doesn't stand for this kind of bullshit. I suggest prohibiting signature campaigns entirely as an alternative.That definitely would work but it would be the nuclear option. I think that as soon as you're paid to post it would become very difficult to not drop your post quality. Maybe if people were limited to something like 5 paid posts per month it would improve things.
|
|
|
Hi, I am looking to sell the following domains related to the AEON coin: They are currently registered with Namecheap so I can push them to your account for free. Please PM me with offers, or if you'd like to know anything else. Thanks.
|
|
|
Which bank are you with? With Barclays my transfers are free and take a day or two to show up on Kraken.
Natwest. But this was a long time ago. It may have improved since then or I selected the wrong type of transfer. Like I said it was at the peak of 2013 madness so the slowness was probably at Bitstamp's end. Yeah I've made the mistake of picking the wrong options and not reading it afterwards. Once I paid a £50 fee on a £20 transfer, ouch.
|
|
|
There's nothing stopping you from using SEPA from a UK bank account.
Nope. But it can cost £30 from my bank and the one time I did it to Bitstamp it took 5 days to be credited, but that was during a peak. Which bank are you with? With Barclays my transfers are free and take a day or two to show up on Kraken. Brits need to let go of the Stockholm syndrome of dicking around with EUR, Revolut and Fidor and be jolly that here's an option that'll allow you to deposit and withdraw in the space of a few minutes. No wires, no exchange rates, no third party quasi banks.
It's what the rest of the EU enjoy right now.
Yep, that would make things much easier.
|
|
|
why are you surprised? UK, when talking about finance, is the first market. You must consider that London is one of the most preferred locations for worldwide rich men...
Because there are no practical exchanges and there's hardly anywhere to spend it. In mainland EU you can SEPA to Kraken or Bitstamp, Bitonic or Bitcoin.de for free in an hour or two. There's nothing stopping you from using SEPA from a UK bank account.
|
|
|
There is currently no such thing as a "demerit". I'm hoping that the positive merits alone will be fine. I could add demerits pretty easily later on if necessary, though.
Maybe it's time for demerits to be implemented. I think that if a demerit subtracted merit from the sender too, or cost twice as much sMerit it would minimize abuse. I think that is a terrible idea as it will just be used to demerit posts that people disagree with and as part of personal vendettas. I suggested an alternative that I don't think has these disadvantages. Do you have any comment on it? I don't think that it would solve the problem. The spammers would just send themselves (or buy) one merit point every two months. Maybe if somebody received a large amount of demerits they could have their signature rights revoked, or maybe an increased cooldown between posts.
|
|
|
I however have read various articles stating that Barclays alongside HSBC and Llyods was planning to prohibit crypto-credit purchases, but have not heard anything from it again. How has that played out?
I can't speak for HSBC or Lloyds but I've had never had an issue with Barclays after a few years with transactions to various exchanges. I'm not sure what the score is with credit cards at the moment. The fact they still allow you to deposit to gambling sites with them tells you all you need to know about that.
Bittylicious will sell you Bitcoins for credit card payments, I'm not sure if they've ever had any problems.
|
|
|
There is currently no such thing as a "demerit". I'm hoping that the positive merits alone will be fine. I could add demerits pretty easily later on if necessary, though.
Maybe it's time for demerits to be implemented. I think that if a demerit subtracted merit from the sender too, or cost twice as much sMerit it would minimize abuse.
|
|
|
Never though i would see a wallet/service use CoinJoin feature
Didn't the blockchain.info wallet have a 'shared coin' feature that worked like CoinJoin?
|
|
|
I have seen one blockchain based startup that raised funding via private sale. I forgot the name, I will try to recall it and tell you when I remembered it. The blockchain company is building a blockchain for shipping industry and logistic industry. But the clients don't want their logs and records to be available for competitors. Because they think when competitors know their logistics record via open blockchain, the competitor company could use this against their business model or could affect the operation and trade secrets. As you all know, almost any data now is crucial for business, hence the "data is the new oil". This blockchain startup is building a permissioned blockchain. Where any businesses could use, but only certain individuals could only access their own records. Company A, B, and C could use this blockchain. But only approved individuals can access data from for specific company, employee 1 can access it's own company A blockchain records, but there's no way he can see the records from company B and C. That's how they put it. Sorry for long post. I am still catching up the whole blockchain thing.
I don't understand why you'd use a blockchain for that purpose. It just seems like people are using it as a buzzword that means "[centralized and proprietary] immutable database".
|
|
|
The other Cryptonite coins are not considered super profitable.
The other CryptoNight coins are usually significantly more profitable to mine than Monero. https://www.cryptunit.com/ offers a nice comparison.
|
|
|
Most 'cloud mining' sites are nothing but ponzi schemes. You should avoid them unless you like losing money.
|
|
|
I think that Bitgen can be used to brute force a mnemonic seed where one of the addresses is a vanity address, but I've never tried it.
|
|
|
How does a private, permissioned blockchain exist? What is the incentive for a miner if they aren't rewarded with anything?
Surely at that point it'd just be a centralised database.
|
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
BitcoinTalk Account: mattcode (#1361227)
PGP fingerprint: 0xBC2BB1D36104939BE924AA51A09E643F541C0FC5 https://sks-keyservers.net/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBC2BB1D36104939BE924AA51A09E643F541C0FC5 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEvCux02EEk5vpJKpRoJ5kP1QcD8UFAlqmlcQACgkQoJ5kP1Qc D8U+rQ/+Jr58uaD0/o6FKq525mPFNDNDsrIL46lXaF8+KJPd0AYdU8ubhOAo88Ty Ts6nJPqRaWyjHWpxVtNebYWwOrmgy3ljnkke9djlI1v/hJL/0pKS9/866ojT/Px3 GXCfOMtKtzyGF9lAwhwX1OwnH0zsVahW5c0aQooOxmx/2zL8tCInnMTWqh+zB64t xKkaPR9gqjVhf6qn5Dz+0gIgmQzY5ZqBljw9oR22WiGKL8e1lpOigHi+kuSxTnwm 7BHDPw9D3Plbg319dJgP8n8jAkGWxf79cHjGeUeuLDUn910+OfGYhM92R1PPGLiO EB8DHeZMjyhq/VR1tbBL2SJLAYYmfbUbAHYULHCfV7kjHWeEYm4I3QbBpc/s81ra oVzQI5RJNAL/JVGb2fkKgYLdgV28vCphoZFHuuKAvrZJtzjwuQ+bjRgms/BxSx+k GeheN079yayG2phL+0YCViZ2Z35ap0qbGAcckGEAyR7nnHmaW2rqzSZhQIidWS9p dlns6jtxpp79COK0NJpMA1x3ACYDlkmvLS1CC8Gx4MtP0PgUCEi6KQpbQgWA7ibU o76T5jcK88Bp/APxbVNMGoaPZlZtMsb7fVqonDeBzxTVseeKCfPh3dHk/V+Gewky cUep8Um2/Hn+JP/PH6C6dO0hAwwJ6y0ku+CoOSesOnZfVAtBv2w= =qjbO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Wish my signature space wasn't so restrictive so that I could fit "Use PGP!" instead of just "PGP!". ninja edit Just bought copper membership, everything fits nicely now
|
|
|
There are some privacy concerns as the service could link the transaction with you (well, your IP address), but it's no worse than using a web wallet or Electrum with a public server.
|
|
|
I’ve also been seriously mulling ideas for an online service which finds “vanity tweaks” for a private key held by a user—essentially, convenient results from rented time on powerful CPUs in the “cloud” (much though I loathe that word). I’m curious as to how popular such a service could be. Anybody interested?
I'd be interested in a service like that. Please could you PM me if you ever get round to doing it? Thanks
|
|
|
both Monero and their devs are overrated and even a fork couldnt fix that coin.
Please elaborate on why you think that.
|
|
|
Many new accounts here are defending monero for some reason.
I'm surprised by the trolls creating new accounts trying to FUD this. Why are you so obsessed?
I'm defending Monero because I use it almost every day and have for the past few years. At last we are seeing a fork that actually moves the needle with regards to improving the forked coin.
You really think so? I think it's just a way for the 'developers' to make a quick buck. Monero has an excellent group of developers and researchers, and the MoneroV developers currently have nothing to show for themselves. As long as you move your XMR to a new wallet AFTER the fork, but BEFORE you claim, your XMR is perfectly safe. This is the first thing you learn about when claiming forks. If you don't know this simple fact, you shouldn't be claiming any fork of any coin. Your XMR will be safe, but it can hurt your privacy. There's a patch prepared for Monero which fixes things though. What drawbacks? Drawbacks from whose perspective? Monero is a perfect coin, project.
I don't think that Monero is perfect (yet). Scaling is a real issue because of the transaction sizes, bulletproofs will help things but it'll still be behind Bitcoin and most other coins.
|
|
|
|