Impostor. Provide a signed message. If you do not - you will be redtagged & distrusted by whole DT Quoted for future reference! ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FhIfgYrK.jpg&t=663&c=tYd0J08mHwCYtQ)
|
|
|
31 - Rizzrack Thank you and good luck everyone!
|
|
|
Last time someone post this kind of statistic/information, someone give those member a merit. Let's see whether it'll happen this time.
My first thought was "let's see if there is any post merit worthy". First guy posted exclusively bounty reports and the second one has some posts in Offtopic and a "good project". Disappointing... ![Lips sealed](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/lipsrsealed.gif)
|
|
|
Those are not really "posts in a row" in the bad sence. They are "daily updates / daily info / daily news" so they should be in different posts. They are ~24h apart ... The fact that a few consecutive posts from a thread belong to the same user is not always seen as "posting in a row". The users that you mentioned are not newbies so it was not me who handled your reports but FWIT that's just my 2 cents
|
|
|
Instead of the index's of the text that are removed being sent back to the server, the index's of BB code could be sent back to the server.
What exactly do you mean by "the index of the text" ? hash ? Full text: bla bla bla I am sure I found a scammer bla bla bla hash: 8F0F7FEB60FC873A6066739931B68D78C1C6E8304953807A519202A23F9045B8
Text: I am sure I found a scammer hash: F7CFCD9D9FEA2582DD256D5FD073CCB095B03282EEF987708E007C30711F013A
Text: I am a scammer hash: 2BB8A5672EFD6382C8803E9DB05511A78AAAF8955F0B42222C109CC9F99A92A8 How do you propose to use hashes (I guess this is what you mean) for pieces of text ?
|
|
|
...
I seriously doubt it can work like that tbh... Perhaps there can be a new "quick quote" option. You just select the required text (the selected text would be non editable and would not allow to skip words from block... so from "I am sure I found a scammer" one cannot select just "I am a scammer") and after it you can write the reply. Something like this: https://github.com/epochtalk/epochtalk/issues/878Only thing is it would not work with multiple quotes in the same post... Sounds cleaner and perhaps doable. Simple implementations would have a higher change of (eventually) being added ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
Verified quotes could be drafted on the client side, and the client could tell the server the portions of the message that are being quoted so it can verify its authenticity.
Cookies can store a lot of stuff but BBCode is not one of them (as far as I know). So even if I did not take into account if this would be resource hungry and how much, it would most likely be done server side. Coding an app is pretty easy, if you know what you are doing. Adding all the restrictions so it only functions as expected is the hard part most of the times. We have several community projects like loycev.club and ninjastic.space to check quotes. And for all intents and purposes they can be trusted 99% of the time. For PMs though a verification is doable IMO. Less corner cases, a bit more straightforward and significantly more manageable for the servers.
|
|
|
...
That is true, but I was pointing out that BHC's images are dynamic and change value at refresh. But since the static amount is in BTC (in your case) and not the dollar amount it fits like a glove. Kudos again BlackHatCoiner for the implementation!
|
|
|
Acel moment cand ajungi sa mananci crypto pe paine: Rizzrack — Copyright © 2022 all rights reserved.
|
|
|
Give me the USD equivalent of 1 BTC: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fblackhatcoiner.com%2F%3FUSDof%3D0.25&t=663&c=dmwzfGtWNHzHPA) It calculates based on the Binance's exchange rate. This is so cool ! Even updates at refresh ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Da bomb ! It's a dynamic image so saying "price at the time of writing" doesn't help ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Am mai auzit de tentative de proiecte similare de-a lungul timpului... Pentru masina, casa etc exista asigurari, da... dar in "lumea reala" nu stiu sa existe asigurare pentru investitii, fie ca la bursa sau altele similare. Deci conceptul general de a-ti asigura portofelul (crypto) este unul nou, cel putin eu nu am auzit, in ambele lumi: reala si virtuala... Am 3 nelamuriri: - nu gasesc in contract unde mentioneaza de blocarea fondurilor. Asa semi-chioras cum ma uit la codul din solidity nu am vazut nimic. Nice Tokensniffer nu a gasit vreo informatie ca sunt fonduri blocate prin metode cunoscute. Daca ai vreun contract in scopul asta as aprecia niste lamuriri. - ce treaba are pana la urma cu asigurarile pentru ca in anunt e vorba de primii detinatori de tokenuri. - pe ce perioada este blocat gajul de $3,560 in BUSDT de pe pancakeswap, sau ce stable coin folosesc aia ? Lista holderilor: Rank | | Address | | Quantity | | Percentage | 1 | | 0xe317fb9060d57dce0c12f16a501602e447186b4d | | 5,000,000,000,000,000 | | 50% | 2 | | 0x3c29b64359e99d1ff27fb1d89896d01c5db61630 | | 2,000,000,000,000,000 | | 20% | 3 | | 0x619657778fa190c1ec1c519b379cefaad4cbae51 | | 2,000,000,000,000,000 | | 20% | 4 | | PancakeSwap V2: BSC-USD-GELE | | 997,525,418,615,655.461563252619061337 | | 9.9753% | 5 | | 0x6c7e9d8bc490be6e20a5a166754f234bcb591427 | | 826,206,877,024.315438758020932753 | | 0.0083% | 6 | | 0xa6364afb914792fe81e0810d5f471be172079f7b | | 824,841,015,763.659861156287089107 | | 0.0082% | 7 | | 0x9878fd1fc944a83ca168a6293c51b34f8eb0edad | | 823,533,491,556.563136833072916803 | | 0.0082% |
Vad ca mai propovaduiai un token COGO care pare cam acelasi lucru. Ala cum a murit ?
|
|
|
Ideea este ca multe magazine folosesc Netopia ca procesator de plati si ei au comisioane de vre 8-10% (nu ca altele ar fi mult mai ieftine). Dupa cum a scris si Gazeta mai sus, impozitul e 10%...deci tot pe acolo iesi
Daca problema este suma atunci nu e mare afacere. Daca problema este birocratia, sa nu mai completezi declaratii de venit, sa trimiti mail, sa faci transfer in contul trezoreriei etc ... poti face cum ai zis tu. Cont fictiv la PcGarbage sau altele de genul.
Din punctul meu de vedere e cam acelasi lucru...
|
|
|
To be fair mprep's mentioned option also sounds nice: AFAIK theymos wanted to have quotes replaced with references to posts (something like what 4chan or similar image boards have) in the new forum software.
If you want to quote part of a post you can do it the same way you do it now, but it you want to show you did not edit the post you could use [>>21856705] or similar and the whole post will be quoted and title of the quote turns green. So it would NOT just show >>21856705 Also helpful for cases where the post is deleted afterwards and someone quoted it for reference. And if it's edited you can have 2 or more "green quotes", because it matched the post at the time of writing. Should not be too problematic I guess...
After a quick smoke I thought of tons of corner cases and sounds really troublesome to make this for posts. If it gets implemented I see it for PMs only... For example: User A makes a post User B quotes him and checksum OK User A edits his posts User B edits his post and checksum is now NOT OK ?!
|
|
|
Interesting feature ! I indeed see it working mainly with PMs because posts can be edited and if it's a longer post it would be modified (shortened) anyways. Users can currently send/post incorrectly quoted messages to assist in scams or discredit other users...
And when the checksum verifies show the title green like links: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F60Vp0Fz.png&t=663&c=-Ytxsz8Ceem6Uw) I can see it's utility...
|
|
|
Slot 30
Awesome raffle! Thanks and happy new year to everyone!
|
|
|
Raportul a fost ok. Eu de postare ziceam Btw - vezi ca nu era vorba de tizu, ci de valentin1996 ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Sa speram ca este om de omenie si ca va mai continua sa fie activ. Stiu! Am vrut doar sa mai salut minerul din thread ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
Nu doar ca e "cam impotriva", ci este chiar impotriva regulilor forumului, asa ca am raportat-o ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ... Data viitoare, inainte sa mai incerci sa faci si cu un ban in plus, ca sa-ti iei o bucata de parizer cu gogosar in mijloc, iti recomand sa ... ... eu o spun mai direct ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Daca voiai sa faci postarea cu un gand bun (desi site-ul ala poate fi scam), puteai sa o faci fara acel ref link. Ce zici de asta? In sfarsit, cand vorbim de could mining, in afara de 2-3 firme serioase, restul sunt scam. Asa ca mult succes cu site-ul acesta... Desi in mare iti dau dreptate, a se vedea ca i-am sters postarea, cred ca nu ar strica sa fim mai putin acizi si sa ne expunem parerile mai constructiv. Nu merge cu toata lumea si la un moment dat ti se ia (a se vedeam exemplul biguy) dar nu este obligatoriu sa "il punem la locul lui" pe om, mai ales cand e nou pe aici. Zic si eu ... Vorba reclamei: "De Craciun fi mai bun..." @tizu Spor la minat ! ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
Chiar acum am intrat special sa las o urare de Craciun, dar vad ca xhomerx10 a fost mult mai matinal.
Sarbatori fericite ! Petreceri frumoase si hodl-uiala placuta !
|
|
|
Am folosit de cateva ori Uniswap dar nu vreo lansare ce-i drept... Si cand pui slippage de 0,5% ... 1% ... 2% ... 5% te astepti sa mai fluctueze dar nici chiar asa de la $0.1 la $7. In mod normal daca max slippage este depasit nu iti mai confirma swap-ul. Nu am patit pana acum, din fericire... Tot raul spre bine ! A fost o lectie de tranzactionare/speculare. Scumpa, asa cum sunt lectiile de calitate, dar necesara. Sper doar ca lumea sa invete ceva din asta. FOLOSITI BOTI ! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) glumeam ... INTELEGE RISCURILE cand te bagi in ceva !
|
|
|
|