I think you are missing the context here. Someone first contacted me by PM about not being able to access their account. When I replied to them and showed them proof that it was one of 409 abusive accounts they had used over a number of years to steal from us they responded by posting a scam accusation against me.
Even under that pressure I deliberately did not dox them and have not revealed their real email and IP address which I know. What I actually published was the proof I needed to rebut their false allegation. The account they claimed was theirs was one of 36 accounts with the same fingerprint and the same referrer that have all played 24 free rolls everyday since they were signed up. Nobody can stay awake 24/7 for 5 months. The IP addresses listed all belong to Amazon Web Services. (You can buy IP databases that categorise and identify owns the addresses).
I am not making any threat to dox people. I am trying to ensure that I have the right of reply to show that I have evidence of theft that makes it fact beyond all reasonable doubt.
A clown reported my statement, so I make it again, no worries. The context was about publishing proofs for this thread ( Freebitco.in scam me 0.004 bitcoin), and he did not reveal real email and IP address. Have a nice day.
|
|
|
But the grand problem here is that all of them just sign up, take a spin at the free roll, and forget about the website altogether. So my question is: How were you guys able to get such engaging referrals that actually take advantage of the Multiply BTC section?
Exactly my problem as well: Okay, so I have about 20 referrals now, but almost all of them just like playing several times and then produce 0 recent commissions a.k.a disappear. Is this because people who click on my referral are not the correct ones? Collecting free sats should be tempting to the one who currently doesn't have BTC, plus they can use it to buy lottery tickets to win big... I don't understand.
Today my referral count is 40 and only a few I consider as a worthy downline. I think the audience should be gamblers who like the reload button, instead of just promoting the free faucet to the mainstream. FUN token, WOF, will also attract users who like risky investments.
|
|
|
Yes, we should think about retirement, but don't spend too much time planning it since it is not that useful. Imagine you are driving at night. You will find that you can only see up to 250 feet (according to google ). The same goes for long-term planning. You can see only a few years in the future. What's more useful is the budget management: (1) Don't use debts, except if you are 100% sure it's profitable in the end. (2) Don't spend more than you earn. (3) Reinvest your saving to generate more income.
|
|
|
I never heard of Native American casinos, is that even exist? In movies, we know Chinese casinos with Mahjong and stuff, Japanese with pachinko, etc. What's unique about Indian games? It seems their culture isn't strong in gambling (I might be wrong tho).
|
|
|
One draw and one Fury for me. I think this: Fury has not fought since beating Wilder in February 2020
will affect Fury's sharpness in the first fight. It's more than a year, and I wouldn't be so surprised if Fury pulled Avni Yildirim's-like performance. Not fighting for more than a year is the worst boxing management practice.
|
|
|
Waduh, harusnya sih duitnya dikembalikan dong, nanti kalau tidak dikembalikan bikin flag sekem aja.
Memang kalau jumlah transaksi kecil bisa diabaikan, hanya saja kalau jumlah transaksi besar bisa kena alert, ya gitu memang SOPnya gan. Jadi besok lagi: (1) Kalau mau kirim besar, mampir dulu ke exchange global, tukar kek ke LTC atau koin apa yang sama-sama likuid, lalu WD ke exchange lokal. (2) Tampung dulu di wallet XRP agan, baru dicicil masuk ke exchange lokal. (3) Kombinasi cara (1) dan (2), exchange ke koin lain, wd ke dompet, dicicil masuk ke exchange lokal.
Ditunggu updatenya gan. Good luck!
|
|
|
I agree to give alms anonymously as a method of alms to avoid being arrogant and not wanting to be praised. What if it was done solely for the sake of spreading the word so that those who have wealth are moved to give charity?
Anonymity can do that as well. Imagine a name like "HumanityPrevails" giving $2.5 million to the charity. Isn't that a powerful message? Once I give up my anonymity (about charity), my motivation is no longer sincere. Moreover, even if I give it anonymously, the part of "want to feel good about myself" will still there. Of course, nobody is perfect, but "Jack Dorsey donated to fund UBI" contains more political interest than a simple charity.
|
|
|
^keknya sudah banyak baca-baca finance, mantab. Ane termasuk yang membantah model S2F karya PlanB itu sesat modelnya PlanB loh, bukan secara general. Kalau yang model matematis itu variance terlalu tinggi untuk dianggap serius terutama untuk tahun-tahun setelah Q3 2021. Kalau dari konsep kan memang ada benarnya karena faktor kelangkaan/supply. Betul kalau ditinjau dari teori-teori dalam FA, BTC tidak memiliki nilai fundamental. Akan tetapi teori nilai yang modern menyebutkan bahwa nilai itu subjektif seperti pada paradoks berlian dan air (nilai bukan berasal dari intrinsiknya). Mungkin aset digital seperti Bitcoin menyerang faktor psikologis pemiliknya sehingga selalu ingin beli, memiliki lebih banyak Bitcoin, dan tidak pernah puas. Terkait TA, tentu banyak informasi yang sangat berguna bisa didapati dari melihat data historis. Misalnya ketika harga turun menyentuh (atau lebih rendah) dari garis moving average panjang (misalnya 200 hari), tentunya informasinya harganya sudah turun (banyak diskon) jadi lebih murah kalau mau beli. Perkara nanti harga akan naik atau akan turun lebih dalam ya tidak ada yang bisa meramal. Informasi OK, prediksi No. Self-fulfilling mungkin saja ketika banyak analis yang beli karena menganggap harga diskon, harga akan naik dengan sendirinya.
|
|
|
It's a way to promote UBI. OMG, tech giants are really into politics with their leftist agenda! I think most people do charity for these reasons: (1) Feel good about himself (2) PR (3) Political agenda Very few people give charity and expect nothing in return (not even acknowledgment). It's those who give anonymously.
|
|
|
^Ya kan ujung-ujungnya duit, jadi jalan paling mudah dapat duit ya pakai skema ponzi, piramida, ICO, dsb. Kalau pakai model tokenomics ya nanti ada ICO juga, sama aja penawaran sekuritas ilegal, kecuali kalau sudah dapat izin.
Meskipun model bisnisnya oke, tapi susah juga membuat bisnis yang sukses menghasilkan keuntungan dan sustainable, makanya beberapa yang gak kuat iman dan gak kuat hidup susah dari bootstraping lalu mengambil jalan pintas.
Btw Bitcoin itu proof-of-work, tidak ada developer fee, dan tidak ada pre-mine. Jadi tokenomic kek gimana juga inferior karena umumnya sudah ada jatah buat penguasa, entah itu dari fee, atau modal token awal (premine).
|
|
|
Be patient guys because obviously adding more coins is a must, and they are working on it. In the meantime, consider saving your money and get ready for the good news because you will save a lot of tx fees (both deposit and withdrawal). But if you have an unbearable urge to play, consider monitor this page https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#BTC,24hBTC has a small window of lower tx fees, usually around this hour.
|
|
|
Raising taxes has always been an unpopular decision because people don't like paying. Anyway, I'd like to comment on the budget management side. It's nice to get more revenue, more money for productive government spending, or paying debts. BUT, I smell the taxpayers' money will be used to fund perks for illegal aliens or stupid stuff as we talk about the dementia man plus his woke far-left army.
I'll grab my popcorn and watch from the other side of the world, lol.
|
|
|
This is a very interesting thread for us. Would the OP mind if we use the results to maybe create a blog post or mention the best-voted Provably Fair slots from here?
Of course, you can use the poll data and the slots list. However, copy-paste verbatim or text-spinning is not allowed for obvious reasons.
Removed #9 CasineosThe brand new smart contract, provably fair slot. Okay, this 5x3 slot has low HE (2%), has a jackpot, and pay three adjacent symbols anywhere on the grid, but the downside is no wild symbol, scatter, and bonus rounds. I removed casineos because I couldn't access the site. #RIP
|
|
|
I've just tested Jacks Club's slots, i.e., Sugar Rush. Pretty satisfied with the gameplay; hence I've updated the OP. #10 Sugar Rush - Jacks ClubThe better version of Sweet Bonanza (Pragmatic Play) since it is provably fair and offers significantly lower house-edge (2.7%). It has bonus rounds, relaxing music, and you can wager pennies, unlike Sweet Bonanza that has a $0.2 minimum bet. This review might be relevant because the site recently launched its signature campaign. Good luck!
|
|
|
Om mu_enrico IMO it's really good concept, however it's being used in a wrong direction.. not as a medium of exchange (transaction) but more like a store of value which bitcoin (and other coins) lack in underlying real value.
Future of money should be much more cheaper in terms of transaction, mining fees, faster, and more efficient in energy consumption Yups, bener sekali omKeknya ini bukan postingan pertama ane deh, postingan ane kalo ngga mining ya bounty (seinget ane bounty). Ane register tanggal 3 pastinya mulai ngejunk pas tanggal itu, ngapain lagi daftar kalau ga posting, karena baca-baca bisa tanpa login. Ane hapus soalnya bikin malu pernah ketipu scam ICO, juga biar ga dicurigai sama otoritas forum sebagai newbie yang cuma ngebounty kerjaannya. Pada waktu itu sikap senior terhadap newbie yang punya historis daftar bounty sangat tidak menyenangkan (padahal ya cuma coba-coba aja kalau ane). Penasaran kan kok cuma posting bisa dibayar, eh beneran dibayar token abu Ane pernah jadi newbie yang bergabung saat sistem merit baru saja mulai, tidak kenal siapa-siapa di sini, ga takut sama akun-akun yang pangkatnya tinggi, tapi toh masih bisa rankup. Kuncinya ada di knowledge (pengetahuan) sehingga agan bisa mengedukasi semuanya tidak peduli pangkat atau usia, dan jangan lupa tetap mendengarkan karena ilmu (insfirasi) bisa didapat dari mana saja.
|
|
|
Vtube tidak hanya ponzi, tapi juga bersifat sekuritas ilegal, sedangkan Bitcoin adalah komoditas. Itulah perbedaan yang paling kontras dari koin desentralisasi dengan koin/poin/token sentralisasi. Ingat bahwa ada dua hal utama dalam menentukan suatu produk bersifat sekuritas atau tidak: 1. Investasi pada perusahaan 2. Ada ekspektasi profit, dan profitnya dari usaha promotor/pihak ketiga. Referensi.
|
|
|
Fundamental
Fundamental
Sebenarnya kalau mau strict pada ilmunya, koin-koin tidak bisa dianalisis 100% fundamentalnya karena tidak memiliki earnings. Analisis fundamental (FA) kalau di finance berarti menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi earnings per share (EPS) perusahaan. Jadi meramalkan kinerja perusahaan di masa depan berdasarkan rasio-rasio keuangan, kondisi perekonomian, dan persaingan dengan kompetitor. Maka dari itu berita-berita seperti suku bunga, pertumbuhan ekonomi, stabilitas politik, governance (stock split, reverse split), dsb. diprediksi juga akan memengaruhi EPS (ada ceritanya kenapa berita juga menjadi faktor harga naik/turun). Sedangkan koin-koin kripto tidak memiliki laporan keuangan juga tidak menghasilkan keuntungan karena bukan representasi kepemilikan perusahaan, sehingga analisisnya ya nyenggol-nyenggol fundamental, seperti jumlah koin yang beredar. Malahan lebih masuk akal kalau menggunakan model stock-to-flow daripada FA karena itu menganalisis komoditas. Nah kalau ditanya metode seperti apa yang paling cocok, maka jawabannya ga ada yang butul-butul cocok menurut ane Mungkin itu juga yang membuat volatilitas harga kripto sangat tinggi.
|
|
|
I'm just disappointed.
I've been under the impression that this community is very efficient at imposing self-regulation by not supporting shady operators. It's disappointing to see how warmly the Bitcointalk community treats Roobet, despite them very clearly trying to take advantage of you by immoral means.
No one supporting anything since there are limited things that one can do utilizing this forum: (1) Negative feedbackNegative - You think that trading with this person is high-risk. You might also be able to add a flag. (2) Flaga) Due to various concrete red flags, I believe that anyone dealing with this user has a high risk of losing money. (This flag will only be shown to guests/newbies.) b) This user violated a casual or implied agreement with me, resulting in damages. c) This user violated a written contract with me, resulting in damages. Kindly tell us which rules Roobet violates and whether the user deserves negative feedback or a flag so that the discussion can yield actionable results. If the discussion is about morality, you might start with this question: "Is gambling morally wrong?"Also, this thread might be more suitable on the Reputation board.
|
|
|
Do you think coke zero really don’t have sugar? My opinion on this streamer issue is: "every streamer is honest before they get the casino deal." I'm skeptical if there is a popular streamer who plays with his own money without involving deals. It's not something like renting a signature when promotors get paid, no matter if he plays or not. It's the way the slots streaming industry is, and viewers like the show.
Is it ethical or misleading? It's as ethical as sugar-free soda commercials, trading for profits, etc.
The question should be: "is it illegal?" If it is illegal, Twitch must/will take action about it. Until then, it's wild west there.
This debate is classic in the slots streaming industry. Probably you have to paint the majority of streamers as deceptive/misleading, plus casinos that use their services as well. Kindly report it to Twitch. If Twitch ignores your report, take legal actions or whatever. No casino war or streamer war here please
|
|
|
Fate means your destiny, and your destiny will be always yours to make, so if you lose in gambling, it is your fault, not your fate. It's more acceptable to say that a gambler losses his money because of lack of control that leads to huge losses in the long run.
If he'll say that it is his fate so it is unavoidable to happen, that's just him making an excuse to gamble again with the same habit that he has when he started playing gambling.
Amen brother, blaming fate means taking no responsibility for your own actions. People tend to blame "outside forces" for their own failure while praising "inside qualities" for their success (read about the "locus of control"). Anyway... If you lose in gambling, it's because the game is designed that way. You will lose in the long run, if you play long enough, doesn't matter if you have self-control like a Shaolin Monk, you will still lose. lol.
|
|
|
|