Thanks, I'll work some more on it and maybe trow it up on github  You should ask to be white-listed so you can post on the main boards. You have a very good reason to be white-listed. |
|
|
|
|
On CoinConnect we have our own chartroom. Yes I know there is a BTC IRC channel but with CoinConnect you have a profile, can write blogs and create public/closed groups.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you all should know the money from the PayPal purchase for the first ASIC/FPGA board last Friday (24/02/12) has now been taken by BF Labs from my bank account.
|
|
|
|
@Energizer: We do test all the units for a minimum of 12 hours prior to shipping. This is our endurance test
that is done in a harsh environment to make sure the unit is stable and will not encounter any problem in its
lifetime.
Regards,
How long is the units lifetime and when will I get a reply to my email sent last Friday (24/02/12) about my PayPal purchase the same day? |
|
|
|
|
Someone needs to make a Chrome extension to view '.bit' domains or something else making it very easy to view '.bit' domains or it will hinder its adoption being unable to easily view the sites.
|
|
|
|
I was going to try and get four 7970 into one rig. Are they worth the money and would an 850 power supply work. I currently run 2 5870', 2 5850's on one of these power supplies. If not any suggestion on power supply.
Each Radeon HD 7970 uses 250W under load so do the maths. I think you would need at least a 1400W PSU if you were to run 24/7 and you wanted the PSU to last over twelve months. |
|
|
|
Overall well done. It's a mammoth task to attempt. I have thought of doing a similar analysis in the past, but never got around to it. Let me preface this by saying that I am not a completely unbiased party. I own one of the companies listed in the outlook below; however, I have tried, and, I believe, succeeded at presenting an unbiased viewpoint.
Good on you for declaring your conflict of interest up front! I thought it remiss of the OP in the other thread not to state his interest in his thread. FPGA.contract
[...]
Worrying - While dividends have grown, the yearly estimated ROI is somewhat lower compared to other companies, but not by a significant margin.
I think this lower ROI reflects similar considerations one would have in investing directly in his own mining set up. FPGA technology involves greater upfront capital costs, but lower operating costs. Thus, ROI is likely to be lower initially, but mining is still profitable at lower BTC price or higher difficulty levels than GPU technology. How this difference pans out and which makes the better investment depends on what the future of bitcoin price and difficulty holds and so makes a simple comparison difficult without also accounting for ongoing costs and making certain assumptions. I've edited the first post of the other thread to include that I am the CEO of RSM |
|
|
|
The list has been started here. Thanks as this thread has been hijacked! Could you include that RSM has issued 1900 shares at 0.3 but the CEO will be keeping 50 shares for setting up the company, running the company and payment of the first months electricity. The 1850 shares for sale are to purchase three 'BFL Singles' and the company's own dedicated PC. This will take the mining power to 2.5GH/s or 4.16MH/s per BTC invested or 1.32MH/s per share at minimal ASIC/FPGA electricity rates. Also the IPO has so far raised enough for the purchase of the first 'BFL Single' which was done last Friday (24/02/12) although it may take six - eight weeks for delivery. As the IPO continues I can purchase unit two, three and then the company's dedicated low power PC. Or words to them affects. |
|
|
|
Wow,is that true?I can not believe it! Recently I've bought a ESPOW best android tablet which comes with a 10.1" capacitive multi-touch screen with a resolution of 1024*600, a Android 2.3 OS and 1.2GHz CPU, a 512MB memory and 4GB flash, two cameras including 0.3MP front camera&2.0MP back camera, supports for WiFi, 3G and Bluetooth. It’s a wonderful must that I should recommend to you gays~ I'm must remind you guys this competition is not just open to homosexuals but everyone  |
|
|
|
I have shares in all mining companies ( i think) best so far(in my opinion) are FPGA.contract & MergedMining, as they pay regularly and slowly expanding. Having regular dividends each week from mining companies gives me confidence to buy even more shares each week. I bought lots of JLP-BMD shares, no regular dividends, even after reading and researching no clear info, started to give away the shares (gave one to ceo of RSM  ) hopefully JLP-BMD can be like FPGA.contract and MergedMining, so i can buy more shares again. i recommend, BMMO, MergedMining , FPGA.contact Thank you this is what this thread is for. Hopefully RSM can offer as good or better results but all I can say that is the first ASIC/FPGA board has been ordered and the next two boards will continue from the advance of the IPO. |
|
|
|
Yes I'm the CEO of of RSM and I'm are offering 2.5GH/s@450W with the possibility to move to 100% green renewable from changing from £35 electricity costs a month to maybe £42 a month max from ฿55.54 generated a month a today's difficulty rates from 2.5GH/s. Who are you a just a simple neutral sharped eyed investor or a 'Bitcoin Syndicate' profiteer from the IPO? Oh no don't tell me your just neutral investor? Well furry-muff sorry I ment fair enough  I hold stocks in 6 mining companies including syndicate's. I have masters in Informatics, 10 years professional experience and a career in IT. I remind you that it's you who's chosen the syndicate for a direct comparison and again you who posted data that can be viewed upon as false. I provided doubts. I do not own stock of RSM. no doubts about that OK and you have this much time for internet forums  |
|
|
|
Ok, stop bickering for a bit, I'm going to do a few hours if research and have a listing for all mining companies.
It will be totally unbiassed, and cover many facets of every company's operations. I'm probably going to start a new thread for it as well since this one kind of devolved slightly.
I'm also not going to go for an overall best and worst list, but rather which investment style fits which company best.
I'm sorry your right. Maybe we should start a separate thread for BTCSYN v RSM warz  Anyway BTCSYN spam and my answers is just hiding the facts! |
|
|
|
= 2.5 GH/s
where are they?
blab blah so they are in future. in the same comparison you list next to each other existing capacity for item A and planned capacity for item B (read non existing) not telling you're outright lying but it's safe to assume that you're not telling the truth or / and don't provide objective data. case closed. Look new investors can either accept: Bitcoin Syndicate: 2MHash/s per BTC invested or 0.5MHash/s per Share or take RSM: 4.16MH/s per BTC invested or 1.32MH/s per share. RSM first ASIC/FPGA board has been paid for and ordered as I get more investment I can buy unit two, then three and then finally the dedicated low power PC. Even If I don't get one more investor I'm happy as I've had enough so far to purchase the first ASIC/FPGA board and then I'll buy the rest myself and be rich unless investors who are welcome due to speeding the project up beat me to it. Stop being bitter for me exposing your poor deal. Look basic's to this is I'm not begging for people money putting up forum adverts to invest in '2MHash/s per BTC invested or 0.5MHash/s per Share'! If they take the time and look they can find 'RSM: 4.16MH/s per BTC invested or 1.32MH/s per share' at minimal ASIC/FPGA electricity prices and if they don't find me so what! I've ordered the first ASIC/FPGA board 832MH/s@80W and will fund the rest myself over the coming months. I was just trying to help potential GLBSE investors find the best deal. If your going to start saying I'm untrust-worthy because I'm a one-man-band and that's why investors should take lower returns over your promises then the'll just have to make their own minds up? let's focus on the machine readable part of the topic 1) RSM has failover / backup operators, great. 2) you speak for for RSM, you're not neutral. that's why I looked at your numbers 3) the numbers don't match. I repeated this over and over. crypto currency is first of all about the truth and proof within. If you get the impression I do not trust you. partially you're right. but not because you're one-man-band, this you have covered. but because the numbers do not match. in a certain configuration of meanings of the terms used it is not true what you proclaim about the stock. Yes I'm the CEO of of RSM and I'm are offering 2.5GH/s@450W with the possibility to move to 100% green renewable from changing from £35 electricity costs a month to maybe £42 a month max from ฿55.54 generated a month a today's difficulty rates from 2.5GH/s. Who are you a just a simple neutral sharped eyed investor or a 'Bitcoin Syndicate' profiteer from the IPO? Oh no don't tell me your just neutral investor? Well furry-muff sorry I ment fair enough |
|
|
|
= 2.5 GH/s
where are they?
blab blah so they are in future. in the same comparison you list next to each other existing capacity for item A and planned capacity for item B (read non existing) not telling you're outright lying but it's safe to assume that you're not telling the truth or / and don't provide objective data. case closed. Look new investors can either accept: Bitcoin Syndicate: 2MHash/s per BTC invested or 0.5MHash/s per Share or take RSM: 4.16MH/s per BTC invested or 1.32MH/s per share. RSM first ASIC/FPGA board has been paid for and ordered as I get more investment I can buy unit two, then three and then finally the dedicated low power PC. Even If I don't get one more investor I'm happy as I've had enough so far to purchase the first ASIC/FPGA board and then I'll buy the rest myself and be rich unless investors who are welcome due to speeding the project up beat me to it. Stop being bitter for me exposing your poor deal. Look basic's to this is I'm not begging for people money putting up forum adverts to invest in '2MHash/s per BTC invested or 0.5MHash/s per Share'! If they take the time and look they can find 'RSM: 4.16MH/s per BTC invested or 1.32MH/s per share' at minimal ASIC/FPGA electricity prices and if they don't find me so what! I've ordered the first ASIC/FPGA board 832MH/s@80W and will fund the rest myself over the coming months. I was just trying to help potential GLBSE investors find the best deal. If your going to start saying I'm untrust-worthy because I'm a one-man-band and that's why investors should take lower returns over your promises then the'll just have to make their own minds up? |
|
|
|
= 2.5 GH/s
where are they?
blab blah so they are in future. in the same comparison you list next to each other existing capacity for item A and planned capacity for item B (read non existing) not telling you're outright lying but it's safe to assume that you're not telling the truth or / and don't provide objective data. case closed. Look new investors can either accept: Bitcoin Syndicate: 2MHash/s per BTC invested or 0.5MHash/s per Share or take RSM: 4.16MH/s per BTC invested or 1.32MH/s per share. RSM first ASIC/FPGA board has been paid for and ordered as I get more investment I can buy unit two, then three and then finally the dedicated low power PC. Even If I don't get one more investor I'm happy as I've had enough so far to purchase the first ASIC/FPGA board and then I'll buy the rest myself and be rich unless investors who are welcome due to speeding the project up beat me to it. Stop being bitter for me exposing your poor deal. |
|
|
|
I'm wondering what is the total hasing power of all the mining companies listed on GLBSE?
What percentage of the bitcoin network is the result of GLBSE mining companies?
Wouldn't that be a cool thing to say, "GLBSE- powering 15% of the bitcoin network"
And you guys could say, MyCo- powering the bitcoin network.
Yes that would be good. I'm (RSM) thinking of using P2Pool for the benefit of the Bitcoin network and also maybe switching to 100% green produced renewable electricity. |
|
|
|
1.32MH/s per share
glbse says there are 1900 shares of RSM 1900 shares * 1.32 MH/s you claim in OP = 2.5 GH/s where are they? This is the IPO for the purchase of three 'BFL singles' 832MH/s@80W each and a dedicated low power PC. The IPO has so far raised enough for the purchase of the first 'BFL single'. The first dividend should be paid within eight days of delivery of the first purchased unit which has been paid for. If people think 4.16MH/s per BTC invested or 1.32MH/s per share at absolute minimal ASIC/FPGA electricity rates is too risky then that's fine with me as the first unit has been purchased and I will go on to purchase the rest of the shares which are to buy two more 'BFL singles' and a dedicated PC myself. I just used the GLBSE as a crowd-funding opportunity to help make this happen faster and it's happening  |
|
|
|
how do you calculate for risks of one man show vs team effort?
you know, if a motherboard blows in a 1 rig show, it's party off.
if a mobo blows in a cluster, it's 90 % availability.
or in other words, how many team members can be hit by a bus for the company to continue to work?
if zero, we have a problem.
last week you advertised gpu mining, now you say something else.
keeping in mind that none of the sellers has them on stock or does batches of 10 cards
where do you fit here?
I will have two PC's available to run the three 'BFL Singles' and I'm training a friend to take complete control of the show from me. Yes many hands make light work but are they all working as volunteers just for the benefits of all the other shareholders. Maybe that's why returns are so low from some company's compared to RSM. I have a back-up PC should the new one with warranty fail and the most labour-intensive part of the project once all the ASIC/FPGA boards are set up will be the arrangement of paying the weekly dividend. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
