I just don't get it. 750ti, so 2014...
It's still a star mining lyra2v2. Anyone know how it compares to the 950? Don't hear much about it. There is a 950 review at one of those famous mining blogs. Last time I mined lyra2v2 with 970 it was hashing about 10 units. How much are 750&970 doing these days? Yup I get the same on a 970 and 4.7 with 750ti. |
|
|
|
I just don't get it. 750ti, so 2014...
It's still a star mining lyra2v2. Anyone know how it compares to the 950? Don't hear much about it. |
|
|
|
cpuminer-opt v3.1.9 is ready for download https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0lVSGQYLJIZYVZqcmZ6TzBPZHM/view?usp=sharingNew in v3.1.9 - decred added (blake256r14) - myr-gr optimized for AES_NI, marginal increase in hashrate - groestl, keccak & blakecoin fixed. - x11gost is added as an alias for sib Other recently added or improved algos - x14 added with AES_NI and SSE2 optimisations - blake added - blake2s added - vanilla (blake256r8vnl) added - sib (x11gost) algo optimised: +116% AES_NI + SSE2 +63% SSE2 - nist5 algo SSE optimised +111% AES_NI + SSE2 +68% SSE2 - c11 algo +57% optimized for AES_NI & SSE2 - zr5 algo optimized for AES_NI and SSE2 +98% AES_NI + SSE2 +45% SSE2 |
|
|
|
SP_MOD doesn't have it. TPruvot 1.7.5 has it but I haven't tried it. I know it works in my cpuminer-opt.  I'd be careful downloading from CMB, best to get from from dev's DL links. https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releases |
|
|
|
Anyone know what x11gost algo is? SP ? Is that in ccminer ? thx
SIbcoin. Try tpruvot's. Ok thx pallas. -a sib |
|
|
|
Is this forum the only way to get support?
Who do I PM to get help with my non-deposits?
There is no support AFAIK, but you can get help here from the community. Payout delays usually occur becauee the desired payout coin is in short supply. Take that into acount when you choose your payout coin. Choose one that is regularly mined. BTC always works. |
|
|
|
@crackfoo do we really need to be mining Blood in Quark? It is paying such a little amount. Even when I am getting 15% share of the Quark pool it is paying such small amounts it almost seems like such a waste of hash to be hashing for Blood? Also haven't seen any Join mined for a while or QuarkCoin. Could there be an opportunity to concentrate hash into only Darknet, Shark, BitQuark, Amsterdam and MonetaryUnit to make money and drop the coins not producing results? And the coins like Blood producing results worth nothing?
http://zpool.ca/?address=1RandomHcHfiiELSdNpbHJQfPBe8c7Epv I completely disagree. It's ok to disagree, but might you at least like to provide an expanation of why? Since you asked, it's because your reasoning is wrong. Have you looked at the profitibility of the coins you want to drop? blood was paying over 2.0 when I posted my reply. Small coins only get a small amount of hash so they aren't stealing from the big coins like darknet and you can get a higher return. What's wrong with that? |
|
|
|
@crackfoo do we really need to be mining Blood in Quark? It is paying such a little amount. Even when I am getting 15% share of the Quark pool it is paying such small amounts it almost seems like such a waste of hash to be hashing for Blood? Also haven't seen any Join mined for a while or QuarkCoin. Could there be an opportunity to concentrate hash into only Darknet, Shark, BitQuark, Amsterdam and MonetaryUnit to make money and drop the coins not producing results? And the coins like Blood producing results worth nothing?
http://zpool.ca/?address=1RandomHcHfiiELSdNpbHJQfPBe8c7Epv I completely disagree. |
|
|
|
Hrmm at this point I cannot remember the title but I remember it said tpruvot 1.7 or so. Obviously a scam since when after the fact I went to the github and saw tpruvot wasn't even on 1.7 - lol - hind sight is always 20/20.
Any chance you mined Oxen? Some people confused ccminer having malicious code instead of Oxen which was malicious. cryptomining blog really? that site is huge for mining, how they can not check for malicious code, are they stupid? what was the miner with the virus?
Apparently people can hide their malicious stuff with FUD crypters so the virus can't be detected and can be triggered anytime, even like months later. it's not about antivirus, it's about code checking, no virus can be hidden if you have the source and you know what you're doing That's the theory, but how many people actually inspect the code before they compile it? Most assume "someone" has already inspected it. Heartbleed was open source and was built into many different OSs for 2 years beofore it was discovered. MS and Red Hat and Ubuntu and... must have inspected openssl before using it in their product, didn't they? |
|
|
|
Hi, Mining Quark on zpookl why does the hashrate fluctuate so much? One minute it will be 26 MH/s and next minute 10 MH/s why such drastic swings? Diff is constant at 0.12 it seems.
Because the reported hash rate is a 5 min average, which really will fluctuate based on actual submissions. Hour long averages tend to be more accurate and fluctuate less, but not really appropriate for an algo switching pool. It depends on the frequency of accepts. The hashrate reported at the pool is based on the number of accepts multiplied by the time since the previous accept multiplied by the hashrate. If the accept rate is irregular the pool receives fewer larger shares making the reported hashrate more volatile. When CPU mining with a slow CPU you can go over 5 minutes without a share submission in which case the pool will report 0 hashrate for that 5 minutes. But when the next share is submitted it's longer than 5 minutes so the 5 minutes average is reported as higher than the actual hashrate. Theoretically it doesn't make a difference. |
|
|
|
|
That's the third newbie user posting the same nonsense. There doesn't seem to be a point
to this game.
|
|
|
|
@sp - I cannot download your open source miners because it says it has detected a threat and the software contains a malwaregen32? Why does it find that? Is it a compressed file?
Old news, many AVs do that with miners, whitelist it. Sorry - I am a little paranoid after losing all of my coins in mid January. how did you lose your coins??? virus Yes a virus that was attached to a new miner listed on Cryptomining Blog. It had a trojan with keylogger built in. Unfortunately I wasn't running AV or anti keylogger at the time (I know stupid of me) and got wiped out. So like I said. I am paranoid now. That's unfortunate. Was it from a known dev like SP or some nobody? I'd like to be able to trust CMB, they have been a good source for Windows binaries, particularly for different architectures. Binaries are always a risk so trusted sources are critical and it appears CMB is not one of them. The fact is many AVs flag uninfected miners as malware because some people use them to mine in botnets. There's nothing better than a cloud of false positives to hide a real threat. |
|
|
|
And it worked for the 5th card too, but this last one needed the 6GPU+ mod.
Glad it worked out for you. I have an old pentium on Win7 that does not have this problem. Maybe the board already had x1 high power enabled. It's typical Microsoft behaviour, sticking its nose somewhere it doesn't belong. It's should be purely a hardware issue controlled by the MB. If the MB can't handle the additional power, then display a message or generate an appropriate beep code. If the BIOS doesn't complain, neither should the OS. end rant I do not think the MS will have test the current output or the requirement of the motherboard. I never heard about it. Maybe you're right. The bios may have done it and shorting the pins may have passed the bios check. I that case I would expect the bios would error and enter setup rather than disabling the slot and proceeding to boot. |
|
|
|
I've submitted a pull request with a 2-3% speedup in decred.
I may work on it more, if there is interest.
wow: in a world of private miners, I push a free speedup to a popular algo and don't even get considered... so far for my opensource miner efforts. It's a thankless job. I've been busy with cpuminer-opt and mining has been in the background. But have started to take a look at decred. Don't take it too hard, I'm sure we leeches will suck up every bit of free hash we can get. |
|
|
|
And it worked for the 5th card too, but this last one needed the 6GPU+ mod.
Glad it worked out for you. I have an old pentium on Win7 that does not have this problem. Maybe the board already had x1 high power enabled. It's typical Microsoft behaviour, sticking its nose somewhere it doesn't belong. It's should be purely a hardware issue controlled by the MB. If the MB can't handle the additional power, then display a message or generate an appropriate beep code. If the BIOS doesn't complain, neither should the OS. end rant |
|
|
|
try to add one at time not all at once
Tried that too... still no work. I'm testing the same thing on a gigabyte p67a ds-3, and it's the same thing, 3 gpu ok, but 4+ not recognized (code 28). It is a chipset thing? What exactly happens? Does is start to boot Windows? Does it succeed? How many cards? If it doesn't get past the bios it's probably an underpowered PSU. With 4+ GPU it boot ok to windows, but there is just 3 gpu recognized. Power supply is a very good 850w and R7 370 aren't power hungry. I'm thinking there is something with P67 chipset, because 2 different board (msi, gigabyte) and it's the same. Anything plugged in the two pci-e x1 between those pcie x16 aren't recognized by windows 7 and I also tried windows 8.1 It could be Windows refusing to recognize a GPU in the x1 slot without shorting the pins previously mentioned. You can google to find the procedure. I'm not familiar with Radeon so it could also be a driver issue, make sure you're using the same driver version as your good rigs. |
|
|
|
@sp - I cannot download your open source miners because it says it has detected a threat and the software contains a malwaregen32? Why does it find that? Is it a compressed file?
Old news, many AVs do that with miners, whitelist it. |
|
|
|
Nice work, nice bump, went from 890kh/s on this one rig to 940kh/s over 3.1.5 I was using on it.
Intel Duel CPU 21 cores used on EVGA SR2 MB.
Which algo? Oh lol sorry forgot to say x11 W7 64bit w/ VB Linux Not sure how that happened, I didn't touch x11. There is no change for me. Maybe you had fewer processes running. Don't know either, also 100% out of 1502 summits. My AMD rig is seeing a small loss 2291 v3.07 down to 2243 v3.1.8 48 cores full Linux 64bit also x11 If this is a NO_AES_NI compile then, yes there were improvements to many algos. |
|
|
|
Nice work, nice bump, went from 890kh/s on this one rig to 940kh/s over 3.1.5 I was using on it.
Intel Duel CPU 21 cores used on EVGA SR2 MB.
Which algo? Oh lol sorry forgot to say x11 W7 64bit w/ VB Linux Not sure how that happened, I didn't touch x11. There is no change for me. Maybe you had fewer processes running. |
|
|
|
Nice work, nice bump, went from 890kh/s on this one rig to 940kh/s over 3.1.5 I was using on it.
Intel Duel CPU 21 cores used on EVGA SR2 MB.
Which algo? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
