The accusation of fraud must also be checked on all of these types, because the truth on the accusation is also not necessarily entirely true, but we all must be careful of all kinds of "ponzi schemes" because their purpose is cheating.

I don't blame bounty participants, because if I blame bounty participants, it's the same as me blaming myself, because I was also a bounty Spyce participant at the time, and what I saw was that the price of spyce tokens dropped sharply at the time the distribution was being done, not before the distribution of tokens to bounty hunters.

Yes, what you're saying is very logical, it means that interested people who want to buy this token are still reduced, so the price is difficult to rise in the near future, unless the spyce team has a new breakthrough that can make the crypto merchant's attention be attracted to spy tokens.

Who said to take responsibility ? because I have also never seen any tokens go down in price. The bounty participants must take responsibility, because they only have tokens in the thousands, not in the hundreds of thousands, and the thing that makes me surprised is that the dump did not slowly , but directly goes down.

Yes, and this is indeed very often the case with several projects, not just on one project, so everyone must always remember when they want to invest, that good concepts and good partnerships are also not enough to power a project, especially those two things it can also be faked by the project maker.

Yes, but the newbies who don't know about ICO also cannot be blamed, because the scammers only take advantage of the gaps and opportunities that are open in front of their eyes to commit fraud, so in this case the scammer is not the newbie who likes to participate in ICO, because in the past when ICO was popular there were also many newbies who participated in it, but they were not victims of scammers, it all depends on the intention of the ICO developer.

Everyone does have their own assessment of the project, but we still don't deserve to blame bounty participants in this case, because the allocation for bounties is small and also they are not able to control the market with a very small number of tokens.

Who says that 2020 is the year of Altcoin ? Do you not see the current market conditions, and if I may Altcoin what year do you hold at the moment ? even that has gone up to 100%, because as long as I see this year not many altcoins are increasing to 100% now.

You say that "getting involved in a bounty is a waste of time" but why are you still involved in a bounty now that even the bounties you are participating in are very small, have you made calculations on the bounties that you follow ?

Yes, the situation for bounties is clearly different every year, so many people do not make bounty their main job, but I am also sometimes surprised because so far there are still many who want to join the bounty even though the results are different from before.

What you mentioned is also Altcoin, only in this case the difference is that Altcoin is good with Altcoin which is not good, so everyone really needs to do an analysis on Altcoin so that it is not wrong in choosing altcoin, it is not necessary to be interested in Altcoin.

It seems you are a little wrong in assessing this, indeed in 2017 many people did the bounty because at that time many tokens were expensive, but some of them also considered the work at the bounty also a temporary job even though the average yield they got was very much , and once entering 2018, there will not be many more bounties that promise even some will no longer pay.

Yes, newbies who are still weak in terms of crypto knowledge are certainly not safe if they directly play in terms of trading, because crypto trading is a very risky job, so if there are newbies who immediately try it without first having knowledge, then they can be sure they will suffer losses. Because those who have experience in crypto can suffer losses, especially newbies who are still in the stage of introduction and learning.

Yes, that's right, many people speculate on the project after doing some research and observation, even though we can't make it as a basic benchmark, especially for reference, because the accuracy is clearly still floating or not clear at all, and things like this tend to make someone get stuck into a project that is not good.

What percentage are you sure that it will stabilize as soon as the hunters sell all their tokens ? because so far it's been very difficult to make predictions on new tokens, and until now the price is still red and there are no signs to be stable.


Source: https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/spyce

This liquidity problem also does not only occur in DEX, but also in some Cex exchanges, so this can also make it difficult for CEX users in general, although if we look at it thoroughly, it is clear that DEX is much more problematic with liquidity than on exchanges CEX.

In general it is also better than nothing, indeed yes now most bounties allocate very small rewards, so participants must also think three times when they want to join a bounty campaign, but in my opinion personally it is not too bad for everyone participants even though the reward is small.

A very wise move, I myself have also sold spyce tokens after a few days of trading on the BW exchange, because I also think that spyce tokens will take a long time to move upwards, so I release them.

Yes, if the marketing team is still thinking about this, of course they will also find ways to be able to make prices more effective and more tolerable than now, the only problem is whether they still care about Spyce tokens?

If we compare BW and Probit, they are basically almost the same when it is examined in volume, and if the team wants to do a listing on probit, I think this is also a very good thing for their tokens.

LOL, why are you so sure that I'm confused? Can you predict the contents of my brain ? and if you are good at understanding posts, try to understand what I said in that post and what topics I made about talking about ? Try to explain in detail, because I entered this forum a long time ago, namely in 2012, not 2017 like you who still looks like a child yesterday afternoon. LOL

Yes, and I also didn't say that the ARCS project was bad, I just made a comment made by "Ken_terrance" that he didn't want to promote a project that was already listed on the exchange this year, but at the moment he himself is also using the signature of the project that is already listed on the exchange, isn't that something hypocritical ?

Yes, and it is very natural that many investors like Dogecoin, because this Altcoin has been born for a long time in crypto and many people have already benefited from trading Dogecoin in general other than investors in particular, and for those who do not know about when Dogecoin was launched, can see the link that I gave this.


Source: https://bit.ly/3hXn3bU

Yes, but not all managers are bad at managing projects, sometimes some of them are also deceived by the project team, causing the manager's trust in the eyes of the bounty participants to be bad, so think fairly and positively in this matter.

Possibly speaking, it is still uncertain because directly he is still promoting the bounty project that has been listed on the exchange this year, but directly he also said that he will no longer promote the bounty project that has been listed on the exchange, this reflects that he is hypocrites.