Bitcoin Forum
July 01, 2024, 04:23:19 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 [1309] 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 ... 2043 »
26161  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why do Atheists hate Religion ? on: December 29, 2016, 08:54:59 PM
Anyone who claims that they are not religious but make judgments about religious topics (eg: truth of the Bible, non-existence of God, morality of adultery, etc.) has made a religious statement. Belief in naturalism by atheists is their faith.

Actually, anyone who seeks questions about truth is seeking knowledge - not religion.

As usual, you forgot to look up the definitions.    Cool
26162  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Aerofobia on: December 29, 2016, 08:52:50 PM
by not killing off the infidels who won't change and become Muslims

This is not required by Quran.
They have the opportunity to communicate the point of view, but anyone have the right to remain on own feeling in this area.
Many of muslims offer to non muslims to be muslims. The only reason of that is the conviction that they become the place in paradise for converting almost 1 man to Islam.

Only the knowledge of Quran and Shariah law is the way to combat the islamofobia.

Violence against infidels IS required by the Koran. From http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/quran/023-violence.htm
Quran (2:191-193) - "And kill them wherever you find them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah [disbelief or unrest] is worse than killing...

but if they desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful.   And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.  But if they cease, let there be no transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers, etc.)"  (Translation is from the Noble Quran)  The historical context of this passage is not defensive warfare, since Muhammad and his Muslims had just relocated to Medina and were not under attack by their Meccan adversaries.  In fact, the verses urge offensive warfare, in that Muslims are to drive Meccans out of their own city (which they later did).  The use of the word "persecution" by some Muslim translators is thus disingenuous (the actual Muslim words for persecution - "idtihad" - and oppression - a variation of "z-l-m" - do not appear in the verse).  The actual Arabic comes from "fitna" which can mean disbelief, or the disorder that results from unbelief or temptation.  Taken as a whole, the context makes clear that violence is being authorized until "religion is for Allah" - ie. unbelievers desist in their unbelief.

 

Quran (2:244) - "Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things."

 

Quran (2:216) - "Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not."  Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time.  From the Hadith, we know that this verse was narrated at a time that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding merchant caravans for loot.

 

Quran (3:56) - "As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."

 

Quran (3:151) - "Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority".  This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be 'joining companions to Allah').

 

Quran (4:74) - "Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward."  The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, who were led meekly to the slaughter.  These Muslims are killed in battle as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah.  This is the theological basis for today's suicide bombers.

 

Quran (4:76) - "Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…"

 

Quran (4:89) - "They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks."

 

Quran (4:95) - "Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-"  This passage criticizes "peaceful" Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah's eyes.  It also demolishes the modern myth that "Jihad" doesn't mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle.  Not only is the Arabic word used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption.  (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man's protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad and this is reflected in other translations of the verse).

 

Quran (4:104) - "And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain..."  Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

 

Quran (5:33) - "The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement"

 

Quran (8:12) - "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them"  No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

 

Quran (8:15) - "O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."

 

Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah"  Some translations interpret "fitna" as "persecution", but the traditional understanding of this word is not supported by the historical context (See notes for  2:193).  The Meccans were simply refusing Muhammad access to their city during Haj.  Other Muslims were allowed to travel there - just not as an armed group, since Muhammad had declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction.  The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad's intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did).  Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until "religion is only for Allah", meaning that the true justification of violence was the unbelief of the opposition.  According to the Sira (Ibn Ishaq/Hisham 324) Muhammad further explains that "Allah must have no rivals."

 

Quran (8:57) - "If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember." 

 

Quran (8:67) - "It is not for a Prophet that he should have prisoners of war until he had made a great slaughter in the land..."

 

Quran (8:59-60) - "And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah's Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape.  Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy."

 

Quran (8:65) - "O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight..."

 

Quran (9:5) - "So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them."  According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam (prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religion's Five Pillars).  This popular claim that the Quran only inspires violence within the context of self-defense is seriously challenged by this passage as well, since the Muslims to whom it was written were obviously not under attack.  Had they been, then there would have been no waiting period (earlier verses make it a duty for Muslims to fight in self-defense, even during the sacred months).  The historical context is Mecca after the idolaters were subjugated by Muhammad and posed no threat.  Once the Muslims had the power, they violently evicted those unbelievers who would not convert.

 

Quran (9:14) - "Fight against them so that Allah will punish them by your hands and disgrace them and give you victory over them and heal the breasts of a believing people." Humiliating and hurting non-believers not only has the blessing of Allah, but it is ordered as a means of carrying out his punishment and even "healing" the hearts of Muslims.

 

Quran (9:20) - "Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah's way are of much greater worth in Allah's sight. These are they who are triumphant."  The Arabic word interpreted as "striving" in this verse is the same root as "Jihad".  The context is obviously holy war.

 

Quran (9:29) - "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued."  "People of the Book" refers to Christians and Jews.  According to this verse, they are to be violently subjugated, with the sole justification being their religious status.  This was one of the final "revelations" from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad's companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in the next 100 years.  Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.


Quran (9:30) - "And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!"

 

Quran (9:38-39) - "O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place."  This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.

 

Quran (9:41) - "Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew."  See also the verse that follows (9:42) - "If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them"  This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).


Quran (9:73) - "O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination."  Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that unbelievers are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter.  It also explains why today's devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

 

Quran (9:88) - "But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper."


Quran (9:111) - "Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme."  How does the Quran define a true believer?

 

Quran (9:123) - "O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness."

 

Quran (17:16) - "And when We wish to destroy a town, We send Our commandment to the people of it who lead easy lives, but they transgress therein; thus the word proves true against it, so We destroy it with utter destruction."  Note that the crime is moral transgression, and the punishment is "utter destruction."  (Before ordering the 9/11 attacks, Osama bin Laden first issued Americans an invitation to Islam).

 

Quran (18:65-81) - This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion.  The story (which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source) tells of Moses encountering a man with "special knowledge" who does things which don't seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation.  One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74).  However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would "grieve" his parents by "disobedience and ingratitude."  He was killed so that Allah could provide them a 'better' son.  (Note: This is one reason why honor killing is sanctioned by Sharia.  Reliance of the Traveler (Umdat al-Saliq) says that punishment for murder is not applicable when a parent or grandparent kills their offspring (o.1.1-2).)

 

Quran (21:44) - "We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?"

 

Quran (25:52) - "Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness..."   "Strive against" is Jihad - obviously not in the personal context.  It's also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.

 

Quran (33:60-62) - "If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while.  Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter."   This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered "merciless" and "horrible murder" in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to "fight in the way of Allah" (3:167) and hence don't act as Muslims should), those with "diseased hearts" (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and "alarmists" or "agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad's biographers.  It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today's terrorists do.  If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah's eternal word to Muslim generations.

 

Quran (47:3-4) - "Those who disbelieve follow falsehood, while those who believe follow the truth from their Lord... So, when you meet (in fight Jihad in Allah's Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives)... If it had been Allah's Will, He Himself could certainly have punished them (without you). But (He lets you fight), in order to test you, some with others. But those who are killed in the Way of Allah, He will never let their deeds be lost."  Those who reject Allah are to be killed in Jihad.  The wounded are to be held captive for ransom.  The only reason Allah doesn't do the dirty work himself is to to test the faithfulness of Muslims.  Those who kill pass the test.

 

Quran (47:35) - "Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: "have the upper hand") for Allah is with you,"   

 

Quran (48:17) - "There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom."  Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means 'spiritual struggle.'  Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted?  This verse also says that those who do not fight will suffer torment in hell.

 

Quran (48:29) - "Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves"  Islam is not about treating everyone equally.  There are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status.  Also the word used for 'hard' or 'ruthless' in this verse shares the same root as the word translated as 'painful' or severe' in verse 16.

 

Quran (61:4) - "Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way"  Religion of Peace, indeed! The verse explicitly refers to "battle array" meaning that it is speaking of physical conflict.  This is followed by (61:9): "He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist."  (See next verse, below).  Infidels who resist Islamic rule are to be fought.

 

Quran (61:10-12) - "O You who believe! Shall I guide you to a commerce that will save you from a painful torment. That you believe in Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad ), and that you strive hard and fight in the Cause of Allah with your wealth and your lives, that will be better for you, if you but know! (If you do so) He will forgive you your sins, and admit you into Gardens under which rivers flow, and pleasant dwelling in Gardens of 'Adn - Eternity ['Adn (Edn) Paradise], that is indeed the great success."  This verse refers to physical battle in order to make Islam victorious over other religions (see above).  It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.

 

Quran (66:9) - "O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end."  The root word of "Jihad" is used again here.  The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include "hypocrites" - those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.

There is more. Look up the link.

Cool
26163  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Do you believe in god? on: December 29, 2016, 03:37:52 AM

Not because they said it only. But because the Holy Spirit resonates with my spirit in ways that firmly tell me that they are correct.

Cool

Yes, but my Holy Noodlage came to me in my dreams, it told me you started bullshitting.

Well, you have a start there. Now investigate the religions to see if one of them is way ahead of all the rest, and why.

Cool

Pastafarianism, because it believes in evolution, it mocks those who believe that an almighty maker has anything to do with the Bible, Quran and Torah.

Also, if God is almighty
Can he create a rock so heavy, even he can't lift it?

If he can, he is not almighty
If he can't, he is not almighty

It's a paradox, since God cannot be almighty
Nothing in the universe, is almighty

What does evolution have to do with anything? Evolution is simply change that God set in place in the universe.

God created the rock he couldn't lift when He made Jesus. Then, the Rock lifted itself, out of love for God.

Cool
26164  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why I'm an atheist on: December 29, 2016, 03:35:06 AM
I understand what you're trying to say with programming/machine like posts around the forum
However, what I do not understand how you can tie a specific religion with this kind of thinking

If you believe there is a maker because of the things you've written here
How do you believe there is someone who has anything to do with the bible, who would actually care what a puny human does on this small rock in the universe?

I can grasp this concept of a deity, but tieing it to one of the mainstream religions.. That.. I cannot do.

The first step is to ask yourself how much you can understand about somebody who is trillions of times smarter than we are. Would we know... would we even have a hint... of what his goals and orientations and intentions are?

Once you are open to the idea that we don't naturally know much about God, then you can look around you to see that life has some good. Because of the good, it could be surmised that God is trying to do good by us, for whatever reasons He might have.

A step further along might include looking for methods that God might use to talk to us. After all, people of the whole world have formed many religions. And even atheism has qualities of religion enough so that it can be called a religion. What method would God use to talk to people? And why wouldn't He simply step out and tell all of us directly?

The various religions in the world have strength. Which of them goes way out, above and beyond in its strength?

It takes investigation. It isn't easy. But we in the modern world have the "luck" of being able to check the religions out in ways never done in past times.

It is important. When you have a Being that is trillions of times smarter than we are, and a universe that is possibly infinite, we might not even know it if the Being were collapsing the universe, and were holding our His hand through a religion to save some of us... in a way that made perfect sense, even though we don't understand it because of our weakness in being able to think.

Time to study the major religions, looking for one that is way ahead of the rest in some ways.

Cool

Please ask yourself that question (bold), and tell me how you can tie this deity to Christianity?

Let's say Christianity is most 'ahead' today, whatever the hell that means

Will all people born before Christ burn in hell because of animism and different gods we believed in before Christianity spread?

Your thinking seems to be based on lack of knowledge. "Christ" is the way we say the Greek word for the Jewish word "Messiah." The Christ was essentially around from before time began... with God, as God. That I am aware, there is no word "Messiahian," or some similar form.

The point is, there was no time before Christianity.

Cool
26165  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is taxation theft? on: December 29, 2016, 03:31:17 AM
When you study the word "tax" in the legal dictionaries, if you study it deeply enough, you will find that it equates to "fraud."

Cool

So, we should descend into anarchy?

And live like apes with sticks,stones, stealing from each-other, not building anything, not having any regulations, any funds to build something useful?

We are often forced to choose the lesser of two evils when forced to confront evil.

Take national defense. It is not wrong to tax to fund national defense to the extent necessary to stop others from murdering you and your countrymen.
Consider the implications. Most people don't realize that they are not part of a nation without some formal volunteering into that nation. Yet governments treat them as though they are.

While it may not be wrong to fund national defense, does anybody know that that is where his tax money is going? Where is your receipt to show what you paid for. Or is it that the money simply goes to where people in government want it to go... without your true knowledge of where it went, and without a real reckoning?



There are many other situations when taxation is justified for the overall public good also as the lessor evil.
The problem arises from those who forget that in this situation taxation is the lesser evil.

Once a majority of your population views taxation collectivism and redistribution as a good rather than a necessary evil society has a problem.

Taxation might be justified, but what makes the justification? It is only justified when you volunteer, and then it is not real taxation.

The only way taxation is justified as taxation, is when you get a receipt as to where your money was spent... with open records so you and everyone else can see where all the money went.

Cool
26166  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is taxation theft? on: December 29, 2016, 03:25:16 AM
When you study the word "tax" in the legal dictionaries, if you study it deeply enough, you will find that it equates to "fraud."

Cool

So, we should descend into anarchy?

And live like apes with sticks,stones, stealing from each-other, not building anything, not having any regulations, any funds to build something useful?

Check into what anarchy really is. Anarchy in the form that most people think of it is desirable. The true anarchy is in the governments of the big countries.

Cool
26167  Other / Off-topic / Re: Flat Earth on: December 29, 2016, 02:02:18 AM
Close up it appears to be sea level. At a distance it becomes apparent that the sea is curved.

Show us where sea level becomes sea curve.

You can't, because it doesn't, so fuck off.


Okay, so maybe I have it backwards.

Get yourself a glass drinking glass. Carefully fill it with water all the way to the top. Then very carefully add some more water. The water will actually hump up above the glace. It will curve at the edges so that it can hump above the glass.

There is the start of your curvature of the water, and the earth. Right in your kitchen.

Cool
26168  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Is taxation theft? on: December 29, 2016, 01:58:42 AM
When you study the word "tax" in the legal dictionaries, if you study it deeply enough, you will find that it equates to "fraud."

Cool
26169  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Do you believe in god? on: December 29, 2016, 01:56:31 AM

Not because they said it only. But because the Holy Spirit resonates with my spirit in ways that firmly tell me that they are correct.

Cool

Yes, but my Holy Noodlage came to me in my dreams, it told me you started bullshitting.

Well, you have a start there. Now investigate the religions to see if one of them is way ahead of all the rest, and why.

Cool
26170  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why I'm an atheist on: December 29, 2016, 01:54:58 AM
I understand what you're trying to say with programming/machine like posts around the forum
However, what I do not understand how you can tie a specific religion with this kind of thinking

If you believe there is a maker because of the things you've written here
How do you believe there is someone who has anything to do with the bible, who would actually care what a puny human does on this small rock in the universe?

I can grasp this concept of a deity, but tieing it to one of the mainstream religions.. That.. I cannot do.

The first step is to ask yourself how much you can understand about somebody who is trillions of times smarter than we are. Would we know... would we even have a hint... of what his goals and orientations and intentions are?

Once you are open to the idea that we don't naturally know much about God, then you can look around you to see that life has some good. Because of the good, it could be surmised that God is trying to do good by us, for whatever reasons He might have.

A step further along might include looking for methods that God might use to talk to us. After all, people of the whole world have formed many religions. And even atheism has qualities of religion enough so that it can be called a religion. What method would God use to talk to people? And why wouldn't He simply step out and tell all of us directly?

The various religions in the world have strength. Which of them goes way out, above and beyond in its strength?

It takes investigation. It isn't easy. But we in the modern world have the "luck" of being able to check the religions out in ways never done in past times.

It is important. When you have a Being that is trillions of times smarter than we are, and a universe that is possibly infinite, we might not even know it if the Being were collapsing the universe, and were holding our His hand through a religion to save some of us... in a way that made perfect sense, even though we don't understand it because of our weakness in being able to think.

Time to study the major religions, looking for one that is way ahead of the rest in some ways.

Cool
26171  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trumpocalypse? on: December 29, 2016, 01:34:37 AM
Oh my he used the N-word..

If this Tom Arnold tape gets out it will cause all the hitlery supporters to come out (again) and trash their cities (again). I think they the PTB will keep Tom in check and that tape out of the hands of the media.

Well gee...I'm an evil mastermind Putin.....I manage to hack DNC and cause havok..maybe even swing election (was only 80k of voters in the swing states.)

You really think they did not also hack the RNC and/or Trump's emails or have other stuff...I mean they probably both were an open book.

Yep .it is gonna get interesting as soon as the honeymoon period is over and the Russian's drop the other shoe.

I mean if I was 'evil genius' its what I'd do. Why shoot off all your ammo, if you have something or a lot of somethings on the next President of the United States.

A possibility.


Maybe Trump is a hundred times shrewder than Hillary. Maybe he is so shrewd that he even makes himself look dumb at times. Maybe he is 10 times more evil, and it is his shrewdness that keeps it from being found out.

Maybe the little bit of dirt that has been dug up on him, is designed to be there, because nobody would accept him if he were too pure.

Cool
26172  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why isn't public transport free? on: December 29, 2016, 01:31:25 AM
If public transportation were "free", then it will simply be paid for by taxes. Nothing is free.

Consider the self-driving vehicles that are on the roads right now. They are free from drives. Go the next step.

Robots make the vehicles for free. Robots make the roads for free. Robots do the driving for free. Robots do everything for us for free.

We are not there YET. It is coming. Full freedom. Let the robots do the work.

Cool
26173  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Aerofobia on: December 29, 2016, 01:25:43 AM

if you're a muslim probably by

What does You calling as "muslims" the jihadi salafists sectants?
They are acting against the Quran.


They might be acting against the Koran. But if they are, it is because the peaceful Muslims are acting against the Koran more by not killing off the infidels who won't change and become Muslims.

Cool
26174  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Do you believe in god? on: December 29, 2016, 01:22:45 AM

You mean 40+ authors of the Bible, plus thousands of other editors tell you to pray...

No. I mean that those who DO tell us to pray, do so at God's directing.

Cool

How do you know that those people got directions from God?  Because they said it?


Not because they said it only. But because the Holy Spirit resonates with my spirit in ways that firmly tell me that they are correct.

Cool
26175  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Do you believe in god? on: December 29, 2016, 01:20:46 AM
I dont believe in someone who people are calling god and that he is looking at us and like this stuff.

But it is nearly for 100% sure, that there are things, that are a trillion times smarter that we are,
there must something extist that make this one universe, in that we are living.

Because like every theorie is saying, nothing can build by itself.


That's the thinking I like to have, there somewhere out there there is a species that has developed technology that's capable of interstellar traveling. Also, maybe we're the descendants of that race, who knows.

>inb4 BADecker: "god made us"

Why does there have to be a limit like a trillion times smarter? Why not a trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, trillion, times smarter? Where is the dividing line that turns some being who is this smart into God in relation to us? Aren't you essentially admitting to God?

After all, no holy book anywhere suggests the depth of how great God is. Consider the word "almighty." "Almighty" suggests infinite strength. But what does this actually mean? It is unfathomable, just like a being would be if he were a trillion or more times smarter than we are.

Cool
26176  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why I'm an atheist on: December 29, 2016, 01:10:54 AM

One of the main conclusions on the OP is that the burden of showing evidence is on the believers side.


Your belief is a matter of FACT? No my friend, I found the counter-example to your claim that "the brain creates conscience" and you are afraid to touch it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1424793.msg17075020#msg17075020

According to Lorber:
"Of course these results are dramatic, but they're not overdramatic.  One would not make the claim if one did not have the evidence."

You find me an instance of a person without neocortex able to reasoning.


The burden of proof about any other life but this one is on you. Taking in account the evidences, my statement that this life is the only one we have seems pretty obvious.

So according to qwik2learn, I can claim that unicorns exists even tho there aren't any evidences but actually I don't need evidences to claim that... Why's that stupid logic only applied to god and nothing else?

Didn't you even read what you bolded, above? One would NOT make the claim if one did NOT have the evidences. All you are doing is stating that you are a liar when making claims without even any evidence.

Cool

Well that's my bad, I've misunderstood that and I apologize.

But
Quote
All you are doing is stating that you are a liar when making claims without even any evidence.
can be applied to a lot of what religios people proclaim as an act of god or the existance of god himself. There is no evidence that any god exists, unleast not so far, maybe some god decides to show himself.

I'm not picking on you. I make my mistakes in the things I believe. So, that little mistake of yours isn't that important.

The thing that is important is that we don't have any science the shows pure random to exist anywhere. Yet the opposite of pure random, cause and effect, exists in everything that we have knowledge of. Cause and effect, like programming, brings everything into existence. Everything is programmed. Programming needs a programmer. Complex programming like we are, nature is, and the universe is, simply doesn't exist out of nothing without the impetus of something else causing it to exist.

Our word "God" by definition fits what the programmer must be.

Cool
26177  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What's your opinion of gun control? on: December 29, 2016, 01:03:17 AM
Guns have their uses but people use them for the wrong things.

Were an aggressive race and when we get angry we do stupid things. Imagine having a gun and using it to do stupid things, you cant take those things back. Punching someone and shooting someone have very different outcomes. Because we as humans can't control our emotions I am all for gun control. Civilians shouldn't have them for any reason.

Cops need to be trained in non-lethal force first, every one of them should be armed with a tazer.


We already have gun control. If people are against guns, they don't have any. That is personal gun control. It is your freedom.

Now if you get together with a bunch of your friends, and force others to not have guns, that is taking freedom away from others.

But if you decide to take freedom away, how are you going to do it? If you do it using guns, then you are a hypocrite. If you hire gunmen (Government) to do it, then you lose the rest of your freedom to the gunmen any time they want to take control of you at the point of a gun.


If everybody decided to not use guns, voluntarily, people would still die from other forms of violence, or from old age. Since, as you suggested, it is the nature of people to remain violent at times, let everyone have guns so that the peaceful people can protect themselves from the violent ones. And, so that the peaceful people will remain peaceful under threat of gun violence against them if they become violent with their guns for no reason.

Cool
26178  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Poll: Is the creation of artificial superinteligence dangerous? on: December 28, 2016, 08:54:07 PM
Is the creation of artificial super-intelligence dangerous? Perhaps. but not as dangerous as waking up the one who died and is in the Abyss.

God is a giving God. Keep on asking for the devil, and God will give him back to you. Then you will understand what danger is all about.

Cool

he's giving unless there's someone who's a non believer or his enemy, than he's taking lives no questions asked.

Quote
Why not. The executed were enemies of God, of good, and of God's people, Israel... even the babies were.

Well, now. In order to take a life, the life has to exist, right? I mean, God doesn't put to death anyone He hasn't given life to in the first place. Keep on testing Him, and your death will be the next step for you.

Cool

EDIT: When you realize you are going, could you give your Bitcointalk handle away, or at least sell it? It's a good one.
26179  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why I'm an atheist on: December 28, 2016, 08:51:30 PM

One of the main conclusions on the OP is that the burden of showing evidence is on the believers side.


Your belief is a matter of FACT? No my friend, I found the counter-example to your claim that "the brain creates conscience" and you are afraid to touch it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1424793.msg17075020#msg17075020

According to Lorber:
"Of course these results are dramatic, but they're not overdramatic.  One would not make the claim if one did not have the evidence."

You find me an instance of a person without neocortex able to reasoning.

The burden of proof about any other life but this one is on you. Taking in account the evidences, my statement that this life is the only one we have seems pretty obvious.

So according to qwik2learn, I can claim that unicorns exists even tho there aren't any evidences but actually I don't need evidences to claim that... Why's that stupid logic only applied to god and nothing else?

Didn't you even read what you bolded, above? One would NOT make the claim if one did NOT have the evidences. All you are doing is stating that you are a liar when making claims without even any evidence.

Cool
26180  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why I'm an atheist on: December 28, 2016, 08:47:34 PM
I think you faulted in some passages of the Bible that you made reference to as you only picked a verse and not what was was going on at that point in time when the verse was related to.

Any comment is welcome.

However, I don't think you mean that when Yahweh ordered (read a priest said god ordered something in order to justify horrible acts from the ancient Hebrews) the extermination of women and children (Joshua 6:21; Judges 21:10; Numbers 31:7-18), killing of babies (Isaiah 13:16) or massive rape (Numbers 31:18; Deuteronomy 20:10-14) these acts could be justified by the context...

No one dares to try to argue that today in a moral debate.

Why not. The executed were enemies of God, of good, and of God's people, Israel... even the babies were.

Besides, even if you don't understand, God owns everything. It is His right to do whatever He wants.

Cool

so, the god ain't all that loving and all that powerful since he can't stop the evil from the beginning.. and by killing the ones who think the opposite of him, he's not allowing the freedom that much, so worship him or die.. boy that sound like some jealous, egocentric god.. So why didn't he kill Stalin,Hitler and all other dictators, mass murderers that killed innocent people, Hitler killed those very same jews, yet we didn't see him doing anything... so in all, your god is an egocentric, control vengeful maniac... Nice god you've got there.

When you have done everything, made everything, thought every thought, for an eternity, life might get boring. God doesn't let that even start to happen for Himself. He is dynamic. That's why He has set things in place that "test" (for lack of a word that fits the Almighty) even His greatness.

That's okay if you don't understand the hows and whys of God. Nobody really does. Simply follow His rules, be on His side, and gain eternal life in joy and glory. Or don't. Your choice... for you.

Cool
Pages: « 1 ... 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 [1309] 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 ... 2043 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!