Muddafudda exited the project completely and has no involvement whatsoever. This project has nothing to do with you and your  $100 crusade against Muddafudda, yet you come here and routinely try to devalue our hard work with baseless claims that has NOTHING to do with us.

If Muddafudda had dumped his shares, that is his choice to do so and would have been at a price 30% lower than it is now. If you read the charts, the price stayed the same for weeks before the trading halt.

Although I haven't had the opportunity to talk with Muddafudda, I can see why he would file a lawsuit against you for slander and harassment.

UPDATE:

Looks like this coin has also fallen victim to the negative target spacing problem that has plagued many other coins recently; however, this one seems to have failed much earlier. Last proof-of-work block was accepted around 8th October 2013. scrypt/proof-of-work mining would have stopped working at this time.

I tried a short run of test mining and the behaviour is identical to the other coins such as ADT, CDC, ORB etc which have the same bug: miner finds a block, but the client quietly ignores it, never announcing it to the network.

There is one strange difference I've noticed when compared to the other failed coins. My client appears to be minting proof-of-stake blocks that are of the same value (8+ Maples) as a proof-of-work block, but the network is reporting the expected smaller amounts of a proof-of-stake win (0.03 or lower)

My client says I generated this block and was granted 8.03843900:

    {
        "account" : "",
        "category" : "generate",
        "amount" : 8.03843900,
        "confirmations" : 172,
        "generated" : true,
        "blockhash" : "da42cd01bd50a31fa62dc92f88193b8b4cdcc8120ff4db293659a755b257610e",
        "blockindex" : 1,
        "blocktime" : 1388184041,
        "txid" : "29eb59bd78293fd17fd0158d08593144ae25e6c664c26b9d82a2930e23c21ad7",
        "time" : 1388184041,
        "tx-comment" : "",
        "timereceived" : 1388184041
    },

But viewing block da42cd01bd50a31fa62dc92f88193b8b4cdcc8120ff4db293659a755b257610e directly, says the network only minted 0.01440100, and that it's a proof-of-stake block:

{
    "hash" : "da42cd01bd50a31fa62dc92f88193b8b4cdcc8120ff4db293659a755b257610e",
    "confirmations" : 172,
    "size" : 415,
    "height" : 46004,
    "version" : 4,
    "merkleroot" : "7638ccb3f2fa211653a77928d019f45c5a0555d1bfe3f66d64b507c9d8fef445",
    "mint" : 0.01440100,
    "time" : 1388184041,
    "nonce" : 0,
    "bits" : "1e00ffff",
    "difficulty" : 0.00390625,
    "previousblockhash" : "095fa298f1eace4692d139b1c48e9dd350b4a6711228b798bd596754e4c18ed2",
    "nextblockhash" : "9d3a5853df07ba76f20bdd821b110a34ecd8f135d27cf086cd985c62b1795388",
    "flags" : "proof-of-stake stake-modifier",
    "proofhash" : "000005537eec502ca34a408317da3ab33c263ee8b5f3aef755eb5e1968b143ce",
    "entropybit" : 0,
    "modifier" : "07c26fe21ffac077",
    "modifierchecksum" : "30498a3c",
    "tx" : [
        "8d71db4788c75d7411b9c72a65db33d9291dd1384ec180a9a979db87e7dbf496",
        "29eb59bd78293fd17fd0158d08593144ae25e6c664c26b9d82a2930e23c21ad7"
    ],
    "signature" : "3046022100dd3507628db2f9175f39083ab1b2fb74f78988e097a97db5be0c3508a5be5a8602210 0e13af2a5cef9e1257ad5b7e7ed61f89b1b70fa5151e706e482131fbff1f981fa"
}

So although Maples can't be directly mined right now, it looks like those who hold a balance and keep their client running may be still able to mint normal block amounts. (?!) My balance is increasing, and I was able to send the entire amount to another address (which I realise now I shouldn't have done - no more PoS for a while!), so it looks like those 8+ PoS numbers my client is reporting are real.

I guess that leaves us in a weird elitist chicken and egg situation where you already need to have coins, in order to be able to generate new coins. Mind blown.

if it's one dent minimum wouldn't it then be smart to join a small pool where you get a big share of the reward?




but how can the difficulty go up and down like that with no multipools involved? clearly there is a big amount of hashingpower always jumping into the system when the difficulty gets low...as far as i can tell there are only enough active miners to get the difficulty to 2...the rest is multipools jumping in...driving the difficulty up to too high values...

Whoops!  Posted this in the self-moderated forum.  Clearly, my mistake.

Hi, is it normal for the confirmations to take hours? Is it just with your pool?

Hip so your telling me in a nice way to just delete the wallet?

not when I tried, was still .001.
?

It's the self-moderated thread...

Kinda uncool, you delete stuff you don't like

Not good for an IPO (true, fair, free, you know what I mean)

people please stay on this thread, more transparency is better

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Just cashed out a ton of btc. I have devoted 5btc to see if a defamation case is likely to result in a positive outcome for what you posted and damages to business.

Good luck and regards

In that case you should check out: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422129.0

Is it possible that these 42coins were counterfeit ?