Here, a little homage to you, trying to repair. I hope you like the hidden message these other acolytes convey. That is one scary picture The flawless interactions received from other group members be like: But how about this one? Two hundred and thirty-fifth week paid. Thanks again for your flawless timing Everything was perfectly aligned again
|
|
|
It would need to cost about $15-20 to be worth it. Mining efficiency is the same at chip level. Of course having 300 chip together make the machine more efficient, and for this reason industrial miners are built with so many chips. Bitaxe cost is outrageous, we do agree How about this: put one of those chips in other hardware! If that would be possible without raising the price per hash too much, it could have a market. Then again, I wouldn't keep my Bitcoin mining hardware wallet connected to a PC 24/7 just for this, and I wouldn't want it to be very hot all the time. I regret missing the days that a home computer could mine Bitcoin.
|
|
|
Thanks for finding this! I've reported his post too. This bounty spammer has 6 deleted posts already in modlog, now all he needs is a ban.
|
|
|
Could it be because of the API, which automatically updates the balance at source of the data, and that's why the post does not appear as edited on the forum? Correct: [img]https://bitcoindata.science/api/addressbalance.php?address=bc1qfqd0mqhws95d5q2rv6cgeqyr7cyxd4slltg7ze07wt42x0xg7q5q9l55a0[/img] The image needs to be generated when Bitcointalk's image proxy asks for it, and that doesn't always work (or only after a while).
|
|
|
Bump!
I'm still working on adding avatars.
|
|
|
This is exactely the Bitaxe project I described in the OP. I didn't check the link before. I did just now: $95 for 1/330th of the power of an ASIC miner. That's 1/41th of the price. It would need to cost about $15-20 to be worth it.
|
|
|
By the way, I've been looking at the post history of the banned account and I see some little pearls: bitcoin is so dead...
bitcoin is an endless bear market it won't stop until everyone realize bitcoin is doomed. Bitcoin foundation failure shows it.
Bitcoin is so overvaluated, 50$ comuing
Bitcoin is poisoned to go below 50$ Some messages don't age well Proudhon mode: time will tell who's right on this one
|
|
|
I was in doubt There you go, he's getting better as his scam and people start doubting he's a scammer. But there's an user claimed he already get the refund His screenshot shows he received 0.02331972 Bitcoin. BetKing gained millions of dollars in their scam ICO, at the time worth a couple of thousand Bitcoins. Giving back a fraction of a fraction (assuming it's true) doesn't mean squat. To gain attention, the topic should be moved to service discussion (altcoins) board. He's basically saying: "gamblers lost $44k on my site already, come play with me so you'll lose more and I can pretend to be Robin Hood".
|
|
|
What is the level of authenticity do you give to trust feedbacks that doesn't contain a reference link to serve as evidence, be it positive or negative/neutral trust. It depends: take my neutral feedback on this account for example. If you trust me, you'll know this is true. I couldn't create a Reference link, it was confirmed by email. Screenshots would be bad for privacy and don't add evidence anyway since they can easily be edited. If you don't trust me, ignore this feedback.
|
|
|
This is a non-profit project. That is a no profit for the user. With such a setup, you won't probably mine a single satoshi in your lifetime. This is NOT for economic profit. The total loss of monetary funds invested in this project is almost inevitable. ~ The nerdminer is 1,500,000 times less efficient than a miner. What would it take to add a small ASIC miner into this? Would it be possible to take 1/1000th of the chips of an ASIC miner, and instead of 3500W run at 5W (a bit more per hash but still small enough to run off USB power)? It would be great for decentralization to have millions of people do some mining, but I guess the market isn't big enough to make production economically viable. You'd have to produce many millions of them to get the price low enough to sell them, and still they'd have to compete against millions of ASIC miners that are a thousand times more powerful. I'd like it though! It would still be not for profit, but at least there would be some chance to find a block. i find it's a shame ASIC chip isn't used in any way. It really sucks that laws of scale made miners so large, power hungry and loud to be efficient.
|
|
|
Hey, I've seen this one before: The goal of this relaunch is to refund old ICO token holders. 15% of the site profit each month will go towards buying back old BKB tokens. And 2 years earlier, he did the same: The scam and misleading only gets worse. Those "BKB tokens" he claims to be refunding expired years ago: Dean said BKB tokens would expire 2 years ago, leaving the only option to exchange them for his (much more abundant) BKT tokens. And now Dean is saying he's buying back BKB tokens again. Let's just add it to the long list of shady actions. I've seen the new topic. He's trying the same every 2 years, somehow using his previous scam to convince gullible people he's the good guy now. Lol. If people still fall for his scam, despite a big red Flag banner, -11 and a self-moderated thread, they can't be helped. If you still have your 7278 BKB from the 2017 Betking scam you should be able to get $664.34 compared to the approximate $700+ you were originally owed (according to the rates given above in the post). See: @marlboroza I think Loyce sold his BKB or swapped them for BKT before selling them. I am sure he can confirm but he made a fraction of what he should have had before serial scammer Dean Nolan decided to destroy betking post-ICO Correct. I got out of this debacle. BKB tokens would expire soon if I wouldn't swap them, so I swapped and sold them. When I opened this topic, my BKB tokens would have been worth close to 0.2 BTC based on the ICO promises. I got about 0.0045 BTC for them. The question is, will he pay his debt to you? Of course not, he's a scammer.
He's still using one post Newbie sockpuppets: Hi, I was one of the investors in the Betking ICO in 2017, possibly even one of the largest investors at the time. There have been many years of discussion about how things went wrong and what happened to the site.
I, like many people, have never known for sure what happened but I can confirm that I've started to see refunds for my tokens and this is the first time since the casino failure years ago that I had any refund. In about 3 months I've gotten back about 2% of my investment, but it's real money successfully withdrawn from the site. It's a hopeful sign because if I was made whole it would be absolutely life changing.
Why is he advertising his "token refund" on the Gambling board anyway? The rules are One thread per site ONLY. I've reported his topic: The Gambling board rules say: "One thread per site ONLY". This guy has 8 topics for the same website by now, including more than one on "buying back tokens". Update: a Mod locked the topic.
|
|
|
It’s actually no different than people thinking the government wouldn’t do anything to hurt them. Thats why I avoid tap water. I think if people saw the pipes carrying that water or read their water reports, they’d avoid it too. It must suck to live in a place where you think government is hurting you through tap water. I've seen old pipes in the water supply dunes: they were calicified for about 70%. But that doesn't mean I wouldn't drink it, it's natural and totally fine. The water reports are fine too, tap water is approved for new born babies. Even better: bottled water is not recommended for babies, unless it states so on the packaging (which I've never seen). The only exception is old houses with lead plumbing, that's toxic. The quality of water comes with colder climates. In Nevada, tap water smells worse than swimming pools, and hurts my eyes. In France, they have signs not to drink it everywhere. In Belgium, it's probably still safe to drink, but smells like chlorine, so I realized how much we drink after buying 60 liter for a few days. In Luxembourg, it tastes great! In Denmark even better. In Germany, it's fine. In Austria and Switzerland too. New Zealand tap water tastes great. In the Netherlands, it's high quality everywhere but the taste depends on the water hardness, which varies strongly throughout the country. In Norway, I've been drinking straight from ice cold mountain streams (although that's not always safe). The tap water is great. In Asia, I'd even use bottled water to brush my teeth, and drinking tap water (thanks to a bad restaurant that served it) means sitting on a toilet for a week See Countries with the Best Drinking Water to see what you're missing out on. I'd still like to try the tap water in Iceland. It comes highly recommended.
Rule of thumb while traveling: do as the locals do. If supermarkets have long aisles filled with bottled water in large packages, you should probably not drink the tap water.
|
|
|
Yes, only in the Micro Earnings board as ANN thread of service/faucet. I assume OP is talking about referral links, not his own faucet. That's not allowed on any board. @mallman: faucets are remnants from the past. Forget about them, there are better ways to earn money. It's up to you to find them.
|
|
|
I might try to sign a transaction with the key that allowed me to donate 5 BTC to Bitcointalk. But that goes way back. It doesn't seem simple to me! It was 10 BTC, right? Assuming you still have your wallet, it's easy to sign. You should never delete a wallet. It just seems to be locked due to ~ being possibly compromised. Or this. If you don't know how much you donated, and can't sign a message, maybe the account wasn't yours in the first place.
|
|
|
Bounty Manager: Hhampuz Platform: casino contest Highest Payment (BTC or USD): $1200 I like to think outside the box a bit I'm totally okay with not qualifying. if i catch someone who writes to a bm personally I've been in touch with several campaign managers once in a while (unrelated to this competition), but I like to avoid conflicts of interest. That's why I went "outside the box" with Hhampuz' casino design contest instead of signature campaign.
|
|
|
I can’t understand who this service was created for and what category of users it is designed for? After registration you are given a limit of 10 euros...monthly. A few years ago, when I created my account, the limits were much higher (after only registering an email address). It's been lowered a few times, probably because of regulation. Nowadays it is indeed quite useless if you don't want to go through KYC.
|
|
|
Foxpup did this with @LoyceV's Avatar That's incorrect. There may be time travel involved, but: note that all my payments are (and always have been) completely under manual control
In that case how Bitcoin can provide auto renewal system where we use non-custodial wallet to hold Bitcoin. Bitcoin is designed to be electronic cash. With cash, you can't really schedule payments, unless you create some automated payment system for it. The bitcoin protocol does not provide an automatic sending solution And that's a good thing! The protocol doesn't need to do things that can be done in another way. The protocol has locktimes, you can for instance create several transactions that will only become valid in the future. Or a wallet can be coded to do exactly this, it could have a separate balance that isn't locked with a password that can be used to schedule sending funds. Even better if that's LN enabled. Long answer, this only can be done on the client side. This is with custom scripts and cronjobs This could easily be implemented in a wallet, say in Electrum. The fact that it hasn't been done yet makes me think there's no demand for it: anyone who wants to schedule payments (and those are mainly businesses) has another system to process payments from their wallets. Time-locked transactions can work, but the user needs to reserve some Utxo for that. If the Utxo is spent before the date, the time-locked transactions become useless. Spending the funds before the locktime can be seen as a way to cancel your subscription. the Time-locked transactions is a policy for the mempool, but not for the miners I read before that if the time-locked transactions is sent to a miner they can mined that regardless of the time-locked restriction. When using Locktime, the transaction is not valid before it reaches a certain block (or date). No miner can change that.
|
|
|
I 've never thought about it this way. Another thing to consider: the amount. If it's $100, it's not really a problem spending it anywhere. But if it's $10 million, you're going to need a car wash in Albuquerque.
|
|
|
Sorry, I have asked in multiple threads about non-KYCed bitcoin etc. I understand what you say. For me, it is important, because there is no legislation at all in my country. So I am worried, what can happen if they, at some point, decide to apply laws regarding bitcoin. Especially laws against it. The fact that Binance knows I own crypto, is super bad, but I thought I could just make things better now. That's (kinda) my point: what if they make Bitcoin illegal, they find out you used to buy Bitcoin on Binance, and then ask you where it is now. Can you have a plausible story (other than "a boating accident")? For me, it's the opposite: banks want to know where the money came from, and the more anonymous it is, the harder this is to explain. Using P2P in combination with a bank account raises more questions than using an established exchange. P2P in person has a whole set of different risks (for $5 wrenches and for privacy).
|
|
|
Ok so, to coclude. Is this really worth all the transaction fees, just to "not have KYC coins"? Depending on who you're hiding from, the exchanges you used in the past will still have a pretty good idea you own crypto. They may not know your addresses, but that's it.
|
|
|
|