That seems to be the case.
From my understanding, OP (or someone else) used the seed phrase instead of username and password to access the wallet. That looked suspicious to them and now they don't allow OP to move any fund from reward account.


The more weird thing is that they changed the balance to zero.
Even if someone has tried to access the wallet, they shouldn't change the balance to zero.

It's really weird. If your account has been compromised, why you don't see any outgoing transaction?
If they have locked your account for security reasons, why the balance is zero?
If they have locked your account, because it may have been compromised, they should show a message and inform you about that.
It's not the first time I've heard of such awful support in blockchain.com.
 

I'm not really surprised hearing such issues with blockchain.com. They are surely one of the worst bitcoin related services when it comes to support responsiveness.
I have also heard many reports complaining different bugs in their services. Unfortunately, blockchain.com is being used by many people, especially those who are new with cryptocurrencies.

According to this error, seems that the path you have specified is incorrect and that's why Armory can't get data from the blockchain you have downloaded.
Visit the link below. The article should help you to know how to specify the correct path in Armory.
https://btcarmory.com/docs/pathing

If you are sure about that, there should be a bug causing the balance to be zero.
Blockchain.com wallet is so buggy. I have heard of many reports complaining about zero balance. Maybe, there's a same bug in their reward account.
If that's the case, the only thing you can do is contact their support and ask them for help.

I haven't ever used blockchain.com reward account and I don't know how it works. But you should be able to see your transactions history. Have you checked your previous transactions?
Your account may have been compromised and a hacker may have stolen your fund.

Can you please tell us how much was your balance and how much you were trying to withdraw when they asked you to verify your identity?
As far as I know they should allow you to continue to use their service and withdraw up to 1 BTC per day even if they know you are from a country where you can't go for KYC. Did you try to withdraw more than 1 BTC?
I am curious to know if they have become more strict. A Few days ago, someone else reported the same issue with kucoin.

You shouldn't believe everything you read in their terms of service.
They claim that trustwallet is open-source, but they are lying. Trustwallet used to be an open-source wallet. But, now it's close-source.
If I'm not wrong, trustwallet was open-source until it was bought by binance.  

Even if I trust the decentralized exchange, I wouldn't connect my main wallet to it. Instead, create a new wallet, connect it to the DEX and send the tokens you want to trade to that wallet.
In this way, you only risk the tokens you want to trade, not all the tokens you have in your wallet. This would be same as using a CEX, where you risk the tokens you want trade.

There isn't really any difference. With changing the client seed, you don't change the probability of winning and everything is still based on pure luck.
Whether you spin 10 wheels of fortune in 1 day or spin 100 wheels of fortune in 10 days, your chances of winning are the same.

You can use electrum. It's an open-source wallet. Of course, it's not that your fund is 100% safe if you use electrum.

If you want to keep a big amount of bitcoin completely secure, you should generate the private keys (or the seed phrase) using a secure tool and keep them always offline.
In the case of using a wallet like electrum, you should run that on an air-gapped computer (a device which has been always offline and will be never online) and your private keys (or the seed phrase) should never touch the internet.

The blockchain hasn't been downloaded in prune mode and the problem should be something else.
If prune mode was enabled in bitcoin core, Armory wouldn't scan any block. According to the log posted in the OP, Armory has scanned 673990 blocks successfully.

All bitcoin transactions are irreversible.
If you have sent bitcoin to a wrong address, the fund has been lost forever and there's nothing you can do.

You didn't answer the question asked by o_e_l_e_o. Where did you get the address from?
Did you paste a wrong address while you had copied a correct address? If so, your device is infected by clipboard malware and you shouldn't use that for making transactions as long as it's infected.

What do you mean by "it was necessary to request money" and "request amount"?
Are you referring to "Requested amount" in "Receive tab"? If so, there is no obligation to enter the "Requested amount". You receive the fund if the address belongs to your wallet even without making a request.

According to "User Agreement" which has been shared on their website, the list of restricted countries is wider.
In addition to the countries listed in the tweet shared by OP, people from North Korea, Sudan, Crimea region and Kyrgyzstan are also prohibited from using gate.io.

That's probably due to UK court order.

Craig Wright claimed that he is the creator of bitcoin and owns copyright to Bitcoin white paper. He filed a lawsuit against Cøbra (Bitcoin.org domain administrator) and won that. UK court ordered Cøbra to remove the bitcoin whitepaper from bitcoin.org.
Most probably, bitcoin core isn't available for download in UK for the same reason.

On a side note, Craig Wright won the lawsuit, not because he proved his claim. He won the lawsuit because Cøbra didn't want to reveal his/her identity and didn't appear in the court. We all know that Craig Wright isn't Satoshi.

For more information about UK court order, visit the link below.
UK Court Orders Bitcoin.org to Remove White Paper Following Craig Wright Lawsuit

The post has been deleted. So, it was against the rules, from moderators point of view. As scams are not moderated, it was probably deleted due to breaking the rule number 7 (No begging).
Anyone wants to know what the post was exactly about can see that on Loyce.club.

Another user trying to take advantage of Ukraine's situation.
Advo82 woke up after a long time and made a topic asking for donations.
The user was inactive for 4 years. The account may have been hacked.

Click here to see Advo82's post on Loyce.club.

Take a look at transaction history of this address. It's a random address I picked from TRON blockchain.
The address in question has received 12 USDT transactions while it has never received TRON. Now, it has 270 USDT and no TRON. (I archived the address page, because it will probably change in future.)

The address owner will need TRON for spending the USDT tokens. For receiving tokens, there is no need to TRON.
So, TRON network woks same as ETH, BSC, etc.

As far as I know there is no such thing as activating a TRON wallet. You only need a little amount of TRON for paying the transaction fee and you can still receive the tokens even if you don't have any TRON. All other networks in which USDT is available like ETH, BSC, Polygen, etc. work in this way too. For example, for sending ERC20 tokens, you must have ETH.
Am I missing something about TRON network?

To add to NeuroticFish's reply:

If a seed phrase is generated by electrum 4.1.2 and versions older than that, there's 1/16 probability that it's a valid BIP39 seed phrase. Of course, it will generate different addresses if it's used as a BIP39 seed phrase.
If a seed phrase is genereted by electrum 4.1.3 and versions newer than that, it's impossible that it's a valid BIP39 seed phrase.