Would you like to read the requirement of the campaign? The project title is mentioned as full which means the project manager is not accepting any new participant for the signature campaign.

I do not want to say there is a bunch of records on the forum that all the newbies who took loans proved them as scammers. Newbie=unknown
As no one can give a loan to an unknown person, no one will give a loan to a newbie too. If you have money then you are free to give loans to newbies.

Can you show any proof on this forum that the newbie took a loan and repaid it? You are providing an example who got a loan for the mistake of the lender and the borrower proved that s/he is a scammer. If the borrower could repay then you may say this type of words. So do not try to give this type of silly argument.

I have accepted your loan request. USDT has been sent to your wallet. Transaction id: https://tronscan.org/#/transaction/f48887d14ef5cef885ec8aa68ee3fb8e8a4bbb484c1f67f21abe493c5545fa7c Please repay on or before the due date to TPJFNWda8wvaJZQ5vDMy1srRYGcg3cr2dA

Repayment is confirmed in full with interest as well as an extension fee. Don't hesitate to let me know if you need any more help at any time, thank you.

Reserve

Reserve

Reserve

I am creating this topic as this type of topic was handled by SiNeReiNZzz and now SiNeReiNZzz is no more active. I will update more info Asap.
[WALL OF FAME] # Save your Postcount #Merit #Activity #Rank #Trust


1. Must be at least Member rank.
2. You can post only about yourself.
3. You are free to post on behalf of others.
4. Anyone can post as many as s/he wants but 1 person's per 1 post.
5. Do not post on double rows. If anyone needs to post more than one then s/he can edit the previous posts to avoid merge/deleting.
6. Please post only if it seems something unique. EG: Become a member, earned 1000 merits, created 1000/999 posts, activity count 500/555 etc. Not something like 515 posts, 2032 merit, etc.
7. Posting images please use this format:

There is no need to show proof of a screenshot. As there is a post from the borrower about the receipt as well as the extension. I have supported the flag. Actually, there was no need to create a flag and this thread but I suggest both of these make awareness to the community those still does not know about this type of scam. Flag supported.

That wasn't a non-collateral loan. The loan was collateral and that's why you gave the repayment. But there is no proof and I cat believe that you may give the repayment of a loan collateral loan. If you really need the loan then you could ask for collateral again and again or you could sell the collateral.

Op repaid a loan to me but that loan was given by taking collateral.

Yes, we again learned that there is no value for the proof of income either that is present income or the income of post. No reputation will have any value here which is out of the forum. We can't rely on any intellectual property. ANd there is no value for any KYC document to a lender.

I have noticed that the payment for the hero member you have mentioned 4$ per post while the reality is that per post for hero member will receive only 3$ per post on the signature campaign "Yo!Mix Bitcoin Mixer Signature Campaign| Reward up to $100/w | 2/2 escrow"

Now check that op scammed the fund and wasted a lot of time on the lender (Edward) as well as the community just by taking an extension. If anyone gives any loan to you and you will do the same and the lender will be the loser. So, no one will give you any loan and you will not be able to take any loan from the community.

Finally, you are final that you are not going to receive the repayment of the loan. Actually, we know earlier and are sorry for your loss. There is no way to get repayment of the loan. Please never give any loan to a newbie account, an old account that just woke up, woke but not earned merit after waking up. A long gap eg 6 months and not yet on any campaign and/or not earned merit after the gap, password changed, email changed, while there is an active loan, etc.
Please create a flag flog type 3

It might be. But I think this should not be a big deal as there must have neutral trust in me while lending. A lender and/or trader of reversible payment should be aware of the neutral trust and risk of the transaction (loan or trade). A negative trust from me/you might not be anything but for the borrower, it can be a lot of hassle. I have a borrower who is earning from signature and repaying me for a long time though s/he wasn't able to repay me on time and also wasn't online. Also, I found a few more cases like that too who repaid loans even more than a year later than the due date.
Also, I noticed another lender also getting payment from a borrower's signature campaign as the borrower can't repay the due amount.

---

After all, we all are human beings!

It is a mismatch as the project was relaunched and the week also changed. Saturday to Friday was earlier but after the relaunch, it should be Sunday to Saturday. But based on the spreadsheet is Sunday to Sunday. I think the campaign manager made a mistake or from next week it will be Monday to Sunday. And if mistake on the spreadsheet then it will be Sunday to Saturday.

You have deposited the fund on stake and now you need the fund. What would happen if you lost the fund? Now consider it as a loss and withdraw the fund when self-exclusion ends. I do not think there might have any other solution you might have within the self-exclusion period.

You are right and there is nothing you and I know you are trying to say on my side.

You are right that trust is easy to build but rank is not easy to build nowadays. And one more thing you have mentioned scammer (lender) will be the scammer (borrower). And the method you have mentioned about manipulating trust is right. That's why I do not give loan based on positive trust.

Because 200$ or 600$ or even 1000$ is nothing to the rank of that account, trust of that account, and more important thing that was engaged in the signature campaign from where the borrower could earn passive income.

Your flag is useless. There is nothing to lose for your flag and there will not reflect "trade with extreme caution". As the op is communicating with the lender we should wait before tagging and/or creating a flag. If still need to create a flag that can be done by the lender. Creating a flag should be the last step. And if there is a loser then a flag should be created by that person to reflect "trade with extreme caution". Hope you got my point.

To a newbie giving negative trust or neutral is the same. Trade with newbie or providing loan is extreme caution either there was any feedback or not.

You are right, I do not know about you. I can see you have asked non-collateral loan for that reason I and few other DT gave you negative trust.

My point is also a red flag but before observing Edward gave a non-collateral loan so can't give negative trust.

Anyone can post anything here but the decision is ours and what we will do. Anyone can accept or reject. Though almost all the users deny it. Edward accepted trusting the guy base on the proof of stake though no experienced lender never gives a loan based on that.

You posted here when you were a newbie though you are a newbie now too.

Sorry for my mistake. The guy got a loan for his mistake with Edward and the loan was never paid and thought will never be paid. So, if you get the loan you will do the same. No one makes the same mistake again and again.

If you can provide all of your information and you keep 100$ from me. Then what I would be able to do if you default??