**** with Claymore's Dual Miner
2016-08-15 10:25:09 TRACE rpc Request: {"method": "eth_getWork", "params": [], "id":0}
2016-08-15 10:25:09 DEBUG rpc Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"error\":{\"code\":-32600,\"message\":\"Invalid request\",\"data\":null},\"id\":null}")
2016-08-15 10:25:10 TRACE rpc Request: {"method": "eth_getWork", "params": [], "id":0}
2016-08-15 10:25:10 DEBUG rpc Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"error\":{\"code\":-32600,\"message\":\"Invalid request\",\"data\":null},\"id\":null}")
**** with Ethminer
2016-08-15 10:25:30 TRACE rpc Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork"}
2016-08-15 10:25:30 DEBUG rpc Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"result\":[\"0xcc906703772e5e65d85abb672dc363bc91f866d7b01b61c0877c40d2edc92b49\",\"0x46862965466b5f8011ebefb35a0d1a0b7290c3ba38c11e916c74c347e00ed903\",\"0x00000000001c72ad64007a6db5d3515a0db95a130c9293553de655fde6328914\",\"0x1fa7e4\"],\"id\":1}")
2016-08-15 10:25:32 TRACE rpc Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_getWork"}
2016-08-15 10:25:32 DEBUG rpc Response: Some("{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"result\":[\"0xcc906703772e5e65d85abb672dc363bc91f866d7b01b61c0877c40d2edc92b49\",\"0x46862965466b5f8011ebefb35a0d1a0b7290c3ba38c11e916c74c347e00ed903\",\"0x00000000001c72ad64007a6db5d3515a0db95a130c9293553de655fde6328914\",\"0x1fa7e4\"],\"id\":1}")
2016-08-15 10:25:33 TRACE rpc Request: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"eth_submitHashrate","params":["0x62f2","0x0d2d291fe73cba1bfc69c5605a3d3e0af93a2f8c7d210d53cb4c1c263cd3d525"]}
Technically, RPC command in Claymore's Dual Miner is not an issue. Actually, I have tested with RPC command windows in the parity UI, this command is working well. but, with Miner, it shows as the error. I feel as some kind of line termination code error ? or something, strange error has been happening, Headers are not displayed here.. The Content-Type needs to be set, as already mentioned before |
|
|
|
The "simple stratum protocol" lacks a lots of simple features for basic share spoofing / exploit protection so it's a lot of more work todo on my side for validating shares, duplicates, difficulty etc which makes it rather a big risk instead of an advantage if implemented, but I guess if it takes another 1-2 weeks I'll have a look at it again.. I agree, if you don't support HTTP for Sia, proably it will take you more time to implement my stratum. But if you support HTTP it will be very easy because my stratum is just a wrapper around HTTP. I know.. I already laughed at the 0x `stratum` .. It's ridiculous to call it even stratum  |
|
|
|
To all requests: I will check them a bit later, don't want to postpone new version again and again.
Within 24 hours I will release v6.0 with nvidia support, temp/fan management for amd 4xx cards and "-ttli" option to reduce overall mining intensity when GPU is overheated.
Please, support solo mining with Parity v1.3.0 No problem, as soon as someone can explain me how to make it work. Step by step: download link, how to start/configure, etc. Because I spent a lot of time and still don't have any ideas why it does not download blockchain though Mist wallet works on same system. I think, JSONRPC command packet which request the work from the wallet(parity), is not compatible with Parity and it just return Invalid Message Error, I am not sure the how packet has configured from this miner (if there is any option to see the message, let me try with Parity manually), or Could you show me the message in solo mining mode such as ' http://127.0.0.1:8584'; Note: after fully synced with parity 1.3.0; I have tried with ethminer.exe from CPP-Ethereum; I feel the packet from this miner has recognized by parity successfully Thank you for the good support always, Download WireShark and see what packets miner sends, especially packets with "eth_getWork". You can compare my miner and ethminer and see the difference. If you can see it, I can fix it and send you an update for tests. @Claymore you have to sent correct headers to parity (Content-Type: application/json) otherwise it'll refuse to give work. Will you implement suprnova's stratum type for Sia ? I still have some requests asking for it ... 1. It worked for 0.x geth, but fails in Parity. I doubt that I broke something, but it is possible. Anyway I could fix it in a minute if I could make new geth work. Weird situation. 2. Well, it seems you are the only Stratum pool that does not support my simple Stratum version. Again, I'm going to add your Stratum, but I need time for it because I don't use code from sgminer. I've been busy with nvidia for a few weeks and I still see some other important things to do. So if you cannot implement my Stratum, we need to wait some more time, may be 1-2 weeks or so. The "simple stratum protocol" lacks a lots of simple features for basic share spoofing / exploit protection so it's a lot of more work todo on my side for validating shares, duplicates, difficulty etc which makes it rather a big risk instead of an advantage if implemented, but I guess if it takes another 1-2 weeks I'll have a look at it again.. There are 5 coins with 15 different flavours of stratum.. Maybe it's not the best to just implement the "simplest" protocol but the safest, even you miss some coins if the protocol is (ab-)used for fake/duplicate shares on the pool you're mining the dev fee  |
|
|
|
Nice work, thanks. What was the error which lead to the buffer overflow ? github commit history doesn't really help |
|
|
|
When I try to compile ocminers CPU Miner for Veltor on Ubuntu I get this... How to remedy ? user@user-OptiPlex-9010:~/cpuminer-veltor$ make
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor/compat'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -fno-strict-aliasing -I. -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-pointer-to-int-cast -O3 -MT cpuminer-api.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/cpuminer-api.Tpo -c -o cpuminer-api.o `test -f 'api.c' || echo './'`api.c
api.c:318:68: fatal error: compat/curl-for-windows/openssl/openssl/crypto/sha/sha.h: No such file or directory
#include "compat/curl-for-windows/openssl/openssl/crypto/sha/sha.h"
^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [cpuminer-api.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Hmm, is that windows or linux ? It almost looks like you're missing openssl Linux, I tried this I found posted by you and still nothing open the "Makefile" and search for "LDADD", change: LDADD = -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu -lcurl -ljansson -lpthread -lssl -lcrypto EDIT: Actually this should also work on Linux: ./autogen.sh && ./configure --with-curl --with-crypto CFLAGS="-march=native" && make clean && make -j2 Hmm really sorry, my cpuminer is just a normal fork from cpuminer-multi.. It compiles fine for me with: ./configure CFLAGS="-march=native" --with-crypto --with-curl maybe make a "make distclean" before trying to recompile. |
|
|
|
When I try to compile ocminers CPU Miner for Veltor on Ubuntu I get this... How to remedy ? user@user-OptiPlex-9010:~/cpuminer-veltor$ make
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor'
Making all in compat
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor/compat'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor/compat'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor/compat'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor/compat'
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor'
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -fno-strict-aliasing -I. -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-pointer-to-int-cast -O3 -MT cpuminer-api.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/cpuminer-api.Tpo -c -o cpuminer-api.o `test -f 'api.c' || echo './'`api.c
api.c:318:68: fatal error: compat/curl-for-windows/openssl/openssl/crypto/sha/sha.h: No such file or directory
#include "compat/curl-for-windows/openssl/openssl/crypto/sha/sha.h"
^
compilation terminated.
make[2]: *** [cpuminer-api.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/user/cpuminer-veltor'
make: *** [all] Error 2
Hmm, is that windows or linux ? It almost looks like you're missing openssl |
|
|
|
Tried compiling ccminer m7, fixed some issues but still not OK.
Will work on it again tomorrow.
Compiled successfully now. Unfortunately it crashes while mining. fixed and mining! hashrates: 1070@125W: 15 Mh/s 970@110W: 10 Mh/s the 1070 seems well underused. no optimisations done yet. Sounds very interesting ! Many thanks pallas !! I would add my donation to the bounty for it there is a lot to do: it doesn't even check for the second nonce! I've got it compiled too but it crashes with a segfault / buffer overflow when I start mining :-( are you available in IRC too ? No, no Irc sorry. I will post my fixed fork later. Ok sounds good, i'm interested where that buffer overflow came from |
|
|
|
Tried compiling ccminer m7, fixed some issues but still not OK.
Will work on it again tomorrow.
Compiled successfully now. Unfortunately it crashes while mining. fixed and mining! hashrates: 1070@125W: 15 Mh/s 970@110W: 10 Mh/s the 1070 seems well underused. no optimisations done yet. Sounds very interesting ! Many thanks pallas !! I would add my donation to the bounty for it there is a lot to do: it doesn't even check for the second nonce! I've got it compiled too but it crashes with a segfault / buffer overflow when I start mining :-( are you available in IRC too ? |
|
|
|
To all requests: I will check them a bit later, don't want to postpone new version again and again.
Within 24 hours I will release v6.0 with nvidia support, temp/fan management for amd 4xx cards and "-ttli" option to reduce overall mining intensity when GPU is overheated.
Please, support solo mining with Parity v1.3.0 No problem, as soon as someone can explain me how to make it work. Step by step: download link, how to start/configure, etc. Because I spent a lot of time and still don't have any ideas why it does not download blockchain though Mist wallet works on same system. I think, JSONRPC command packet which request the work from the wallet(parity), is not compatible with Parity and it just return Invalid Message Error, I am not sure the how packet has configured from this miner (if there is any option to see the message, let me try with Parity manually), or Could you show me the message in solo mining mode such as ' http://127.0.0.1:8584'; Note: after fully synced with parity 1.3.0; I have tried with ethminer.exe from CPP-Ethereum; I feel the packet from this miner has recognized by parity successfully Thank you for the good support always, Download WireShark and see what packets miner sends, especially packets with "eth_getWork". You can compare my miner and ethminer and see the difference. If you can see it, I can fix it and send you an update for tests. @Claymore you have to sent correct headers to parity (Content-Type: application/json) otherwise it'll refuse to give work. Will you implement suprnova's stratum type for Sia ? I still have some requests asking for it ... |
|
|
|
addnodes would be a good start |
|
|
|
|
Hey folks, thanks for mining @ Suprnova, as POW is over, please don't forget to withdraw your remaining coins !
Thanks !
|
|
|
|
I tried mining LBRY on Suprnova pool last night but there's hours of no activity on my graph and lower than expected credits. It looks like it was mining for a few hours stopped for hours and then started again. In CCminer there were no errors and it shows it hashing throughout the whole night. Anyone else seeing issues or have any idea?
You can check your mining history in the 'graphs' tab. Is there a blank space in between? That would mean either your miner lost connection to the pool during that time or the pool had an issue though I see no problems in the logs for the last 48h or so. Ya there's a huge gap in the graph but ccminer shows that it was mining the whole time and confirming. My connection was up because my other rig mined ETH the whole night through. Hmm, just checked my rigs and they were hashing all last 24h without a gap, did you check the "Pool" Tab in the Graphs too ? Is there also a gap ? Really weird, can't explain why you had a gap there, checked some other rigs too and all looks fine. |
|
|
|
I tried mining LBRY on Suprnova pool last night but there's hours of no activity on my graph and lower than expected credits. It looks like it was mining for a few hours stopped for hours and then started again. In CCminer there were no errors and it shows it hashing throughout the whole night. Anyone else seeing issues or have any idea?
You can check your mining history in the 'graphs' tab. Is there a blank space in between? That would mean either your miner lost connection to the pool during that time or the pool had an issue though I see no problems in the logs for the last 48h or so. |
|
|
|
There is still 20% Bonus per Block on https://sia.suprnova.ccMiners for AMD, NViDIA are linked in the getting started pages of the pool, would appreciate if you spread the hash a little around and grab some free coins Bull SHIT!! - I've been hashing at your pool all frigging Night! I found quite a few blocks..... etc, yet my balance remained 0! Where are your blocks then? With the current hashrate and difficulty we find around one block per day and as long as you don't have gigahashes it's extremely unlikely that you've found several of them |
|
|
|
There is still 20% Bonus per Block on https://sia.suprnova.ccMiners for AMD, NViDIA are linked in the getting started pages of the pool, would appreciate if you spread the hash a little around and grab some free coins |
|
|
|
Epsylon3. I remember back in the day when miners for coins where tied to pools, 1GH, beeeer, ypool ans etc. If you wanted to mine that coin or use the miner you had no choice but to use that pool. Wonder if you could come up with a way to tie your miner with yiimp only for new algos.
That was just the nature of an immature industry with no competition. As a concious marketing strategy it would likely fail. Back in the day there was 1. no pool soft freely available 2. no stratum soft freely available 3. only 2-3 people who were actually coding miners including buchner, reorder (1gh admin) etc. It was similar with ETH at the beginning.. Only a handful of pools (including suprnova ) and as soon as some samaritian decides to open source pool soft / stratum we have suddenly 30 or more "pools" popping up all with "sysops" or "admins" who rely on the work of others ... even when fixing problems, just check the github issues of some repository and you'll know whats up crypto community, in the meanwhile, is rather toxic. as soon as you give something away for free, be it a stratum for a certain coin or a optimized miner you get either instantly ddosed as the other party opens a pool itself or the miner/optimizations get packed as "private stratum, private kernel" and get sold for > 1 BTC. Currently the timing is just too bad imho, community has grown, lots of malicious/only profit oriented people around, this is not the "cool, techie" community it was before. |
|
|
|
OC I'm unable to connect to your pool.
You do know that pools get to see the private keys of the blocks you mine, as do others? That's one of the reasons this coin has a pool dissuasion feature that people like which helps to promote solo mining and decentralisation. Feel free to use pools, just thought you might not have picked up that risk from the mining white paper in the OP. i dont think so with ocminers pool ... which is the reason you require HIS miners - and not the opensourced ones we used from spmod and others ... the private i mined at many moons ago - is exactly how that was - which is why it was private ... it was based on a trust level - i trusted the pool owner not to steal my mined coins - and it worked better than average and so much better than solo ... but agreed - with THAT pool - the private key was shared ... which is also why you cant use other miners on ocminers pool ... im sure oc miner can shed more light on how he made his miner work with stratum pool ... #crysx Ah that myth is still around ? That people can see the public keys and "steal" the blocks etc Funny I think I've posted it 4-5 times in this thread already, I should really bookmark the post, but here, once again: 1) Full communication between pool and miner(s) is https encrypted on the spr pool - so no one can see anything 2) I'm using signed miners, you cannot use the regular ones, thats why they're linked on the getting started page. 3) Every round has their own private key and as soon as the block is found the coins are moved into a separate wallet so even if you would "crack" the https encryption and get to know the actual private key you could only steal the reward of this one block (and you would get automatically flagged/banned on the pool). There are some extra features implemented in stratum which I don't want to post in public here but, just look at the stats, rest assured, the pool is working and paying fine Oh and you might want to check if you find pools on the block explorer... You won't.. even though there is at least my public one, this is simply because every found block is paid to a new address... So you also won't see the other pools Thx OC I have a private miner that does 1,750mh 3x 750ti but that won't work of course. But I download your miner that gets 1,650mh and that still doesn't work. It wouldn't connect. What am I doing wrong? Thx edit json_rpc failed Be sure to follow exactly what is written in getting started. It's for example not stratum+tcp:// for the URL but https:// Watch the 's' Yes I did... rechecking again. spreadminer -o https://spr.suprnova.cc:6666 -u -p spreadminer_v0.1r3CCSprSupr0.4-Win-REL now using at 6% less hashrate.  Ok I'll check if I can compile the optimized version for win too, it's currently available for Linux only |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
