The best way is to make it hard to reach, the reason I asked this is I don't wanna panic sell during dips. Keep in mind that this also means you can't "opportunity sell" during pumps. |
|
|
|
Because I fail to put this all into one post, so I have to adjust second post for the completion of my post, hopefully this will give update about rules of forum about languages other than English. If you can't fit everything in one post, creating another post is not a problem. I do that all the time. I don't think this forum rule applies if you've reached maximum post length: 32. Posting multiple posts in a row (excluding bumps and reserved posts by the thread starter) is not allowed. |
|
|
|
Let say Satoshi is a good example Satoshi is a special case: there's no reason to include satoshi in your Trust list, but there's no harm in it either. After all,t he account is locked. I consider this only a "thank you" to someone who can't be reached any other way. It's meaningless for the rest of the Trust system. |
|
|
|
Can you share what it looks like elsewhere? This website wants me to create an account, and after that wants me Paypal details before I can view a file. when i import the XPUB by itself, i can see the funds.
Once i import the same XPUB as 2-of-3, there is no balance showing up. That means the funded address is not multisig, and you only need the seed that created the xpub. |
|
|
|
I deleted a lot of them but still have 800 pages of pm's It must be very slow to load. I have "only" 238 pages, and it already takes many seconds to show. For comparison: on my Mobile account, the (empty) PM page loads very fast. I would love to be able to find ways to manage them better than I do now. Have you seen Backup/Sort Private Messages/PM/DM? Note that I haven't tested it, so do your own research before trusting software. |
|
|
|
I've never seen a crypto wallet that basically tells me to give up on crypto  I have this option disabled How? I can just not click the "bar graph icon", but I haven't found where to remove it. And why would you even care about default settings for anything you use? Good point. I guess I had higher expectations after the many good things I've read about Unstoppable Wallet. Easy ''fix'':
Appearance - Tab Settings - Markets Tab - Switch Off. I did, that removes the tab on the bottom of the wallet. But the "bar graph icon" is still there. If I click it, I can Hide Indicators, but that doesn't seem to change anything. |
|
|
|
I think things will change drastically in next half of century, I am not sure internet as we know it and bitcointalk will even exist.  I'm sure the new forum software will still be expected any time soon in half a century |
|
|
|
it made me think of a cool solution that I am sure LoyceV or someone like him could easily tackle by building a tool something along the lines of:
> Scrape all sent feedback left by people who were once in DT1 and got removed due to inactivity only
> Find all members who currently aren't painted red out of this feedback
> Current DT1's can go through the list and add a feedback if they choose to. Been there, done that. See [PRISON BREAK] Full list of users who lost their DT red trust from LaudaThoughts? It was a lot of work. You can't tag 2000 accounts just because someone else did the same, you'll have to actually check the evidence and decide per case whether or not they (still) deserve it. I'm not going to do that. |
|
|
|
Note that there's not much left to mine on testnet: the block reward is now 0.024, about 300 times lower than Bitcoin mainnet. For that reason, it is very unlikely that testnet3 will ever be killed. Because now, it is the only network that is quite close to mainnet, and where you can test, what will happen when the basic block reward will be very small. It is also probably the first network, that will reach zero block reward, and then a lot of people will carefully observe, what will happen next. By the way, testnet coins are worthless by definition. So, if nothing else will happen, then testnet3 will finally reach a state, where the basic block reward will truly represent the real value of those coins. In general, testnet3 could have zero supply, but some coins are needed as a spam protection. Despite being worthless, people are still mining testnet. So I expect at least some of them to continue mining when there's no block reward left. That also means total fees can be under the dust limit. And even if they don't, with low difficulty just one miner is enough to continue the chain. We may see 1000 block 99% attacks once in a while. Testnet coins already seem to be quite scarce, my guess is many are lost. After all, there's not much of a reason to be careful with worthless coins. That means testing in the future will have to happen with smaller and smaller amounts. |
|
|
|
I still can't believe I'm explaining that, but here is the reason for which I suggested the rephrasing  I get that many people don't know the meaning of the phrase, other than actual candy. I only learned the meaning from the movie. |
|
|
|
My problem is I don't know if there is a wallet where I can send coins but cannot withdraw for a set of time during panic times. For example I send BTC ~ which I want to hold but don't want to touch( unable to touch) for 4 years. There's this: In order to make coins that are unspendable until after a certain time or block height, you will need to create an address that uses OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY. Only coins sent to such an address are guaranteed to be only spendable after a certain time. Be careful though: there was recently a topic from someone who added an additional zero to the target block number, and accidentally locked his Bitcoins for 125 years. My advice: learn not to panic And keep your funds offline, make them labour intensive to access. Bury them deep, if you need to sweat for 2 days to get to them, you'll have 2 days to think about what you're about to do. Just make sure you know what you're doing before doing anything. |
|
|
|
It's interesting to see that this happened before. Actually, it's very regular and happens many times a year. That explains why testnet has 3 times more blocks than Bitcoin mainnet, even though testnet3 started years later. The probability for this phenomenon should be a function of the likeliness of a 20-minute block time at the current difficulty and hash rate, at the end of each epoch. Or some large miners could trigger it by turning off their miners right before each difficulty adjustment. |
|
|
|
We are getting blocks about every 2 minutes; difficulty is way too low. It came from several blocks per second, see Interesting behaivor of TESTNET difficulty. This caused it: The issue here is that the block of difficulty 1 after a 20 minute period was the last block in difficulty epoch. And this made it last: There is cap on how much it can rise (or fall) in each adjustment because if the time is smaller (or bigger) than a quarter of (or bigger than 4x) 2 weeks in seconds, it will fall down to default 302,400 (or 4,838,400) sec.
In other words in this case, even though it takes them minutes to mine 2016 blocks, the protocol assumes it takes 84 hours and increases the target based on that.
Note that there's not much left to mine on testnet: the block reward is now 0.024, about 300 times lower than Bitcoin mainnet. |
|
|
|
|
For next time: use your own wallet to receive Bitcoin. I don't know "cash app", but if it doesn't give you access to the private keys, I wouldn't call it a wallet.
The downside of using your own wallet is having to pay transaction fees, but the upside is the possibility to use CPFP when the sender uses a low fee. It'll cost you, but at least you can access your money.
|
|
|
|
It's not something that bugs me all that much (out of the 203 PMs I've received, 15 don't have a subject) I'm not going to count all 237 pages of PMs, but on the last 2 pages, I count "(No subject)" 17 times already. I would have Merited you, but I've been at my limit for you for a while now. Too many patches within 30 days |
|
|
|
@joker_josue: It looks like you've fixed restricting talkimg.com to only Bitcointalk. However, that leads to the (undesired) side effect of images no longer working on text-only archive sites (I'm thinking of ninjastic.space and loyce.club). Is this the intended behaviour? If not: can you fix it by whitelisting both sites? |
|
|
|
It's the same on loyce.club. The image on Bitcointalk links to: https://talkimg.com/images/2023/05/10/msedge_7bHLnl7tph8fdbbc2c847cfb7d.png And the archived one links to: https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftalkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2023%2F05%2F10%2Fmsedge_7bHLnl7tph8fdbbc2c847cfb7d.png&t=649&c=6mSbYXUeWRSXOg If you check the page source of the current post on Bitcointalk, you'll see this link: https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Ftalkimg.com%2Fimages%2F2023%2F05%2F10%2Fmsedge_7bHLnl7tph8fdbbc2c847cfb7d.png&t=653&c=WqDhtvY22P0aDw I'm think the part after " .png" is created by Bitcointalk's image proxy, and the rest of the link is exactly the same. Both links don't work if I enter them directly into my browser. That makes me believe joker_josue fixed limiting talkimg.com to only Bitcointalk. I'll post in his topic. |
|
|
|
So I can add you in my trust list, right? That's entirely up to you. Ideally, you should do that if you trust the users on my Trust list, and the users on their Trust lists. But most people (including me) don't look that far down the line. Clearly you are a trust worthy person, someone who have a clear reputation in this community. "The community" is what put me on DT. A custom Trust list should be based on your own interpretation: do you think I've left accurate feedback? If so, include me. If not: don't include me, or even ~exclude me. It's up to you. |
|
|
|
I am not sure if LoyceV's or some other tools can be used to easily display where the members have received their merits. That's more something for Ninjastic.space to add. You can suggest it here. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
