I'm late, you say? Don't care, here we go, zeph.

It wasn't, I would have notified you if you were accepted.

This weeks payments have been sent (b31c038469b2a0c1635a4ef40ef0809e9dfbe9b7b91f71bc260164dffe8aeeb2).

---

Pathetic.

Todays payments have been made (59c523f576704c312738ed45bc8e122806d9b353a9f38a16307f016d54d0b33e).

---

Accepted.

0.025BTC

0.399BTC

The payment of this campaign has changed to be made in BTC directly, as a result, I have moved it to Services, where it should fit better, given the updated situation.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1559043.0

Yes, I've been kept busy by things that are unrelated to Opair and this signature campaign.
No, this won't have any negative influence to this campaign or other campaigns I'm currently managing.

I'll get everything up to date and inform you about immediate next moves tomorrow.

So far, for today, the big thing that changes is, payments will be made in BTC directly.
As this is being effective immediately and for the already assigned shares aswell, I'll move the thread into the BTC Services section.

It certainly is still active and operating.

I'll take spot 9 under similar conditions

<txid once this is filled>

I haven't. Based on your post history prior to enrolling (yes, your post quality drastically changed once you did your enrollment post), you are denied.

I hadn't left Twitchy any positive trust, the reason for which I explained in my neutral raiting on their account.
If a user posts something inappropriate, I deny this post and they don't get paid for it. That's the immediate penalty for it.
Unless they accumulate a lot of inappropriate posts, or totally fall out of line, I don't have to kick them over a few denied posts. I didn't consider Twitchy to have done either.

I never said you are untrusted based on the signature you're wearing.

---

Taking the stick around, you are allowed to tell me whom to enroll into a campaign and not, but I am not allowed to suggest you considering who to advertise and who not?

Twitchy is being paid for advertising a site in their signature, not for doing anyones "dirty work".
Their payment comes from the displaying of that signature below their posts, not from the content of those posts.
Should I consider their posts to be violating the forum rules, I report them, should I consider them not being eligible for a payment for some other reason, I exclude those posts.
A post which contains open harassment would be one I have to exclude, I did so in the past with a few posts by Twitchy and I will continue to do this,
that however doesn't mean I can't pay them for their "good" posts.
This doesn't mean I necessarily have to agree with what the user writes, or I "have the same agenda".
I pay for a lot of posts which contain very different opinions all over the forum, having a paid signature doesn't mean you are being censored by the people paying you,
as long as these posts are acceptable, which opinion the user has is none of my concern, I might openly disagree with them and still pay them for these posts at the end of the round.

Let us wait and get this confirmed then.

Nope, that is the truth.


"by attacking competitors with alt accounts until they give in and let him manage their campaigns" - That's wrong.
"He's literally deriving an income now from extorting signature campaigns into hiring him" - A lie.
"He even started an account game-protect to try and sell a service where he extorts online gambling houses into paying him or else they get attacked." - Again, this is wrong.

You're continuing to accuse me of things I did not do and trying to hold me accountable for the actions of accounts I got no connection with.

Because directly PMing you didn't have any results. When we talked over at slack, you didn't want to listen to me, I therfore tried bringing in theymos, in hopes you would at least listen to them.

Because you didn't make this sound like you wanted to talk about someone on my payroll, but rather were attacking me directly. At least you sounded like you intended to.

Because they violated none of the rules of that campaign and I'm not going to kick them out of it over this.
Posts I see not fit for receiving a payment are being denied and not paid, which would include posts being considered as "harassment".

Nope.

Why does it say 5y/o on yours?
My gender is no concern of this forum and I may set it as I like.

Mainly because of the PMs you have been sending around, containing wrong statements and lies about myself.
You're also wrong, you had left me a negative feedback first.

I'm here answering your "questions".

It's the PM you wrote about me "extorting" other people and stating that I am an alt account to TwitchySeal and game-protect, which is obviously wrong.

So you're again accusing me of having alt accounts and using them to harass you?

0.5BTC

Now that's a load of crap.
I had reached my maximum allowed ticket number and I wanted the raffle to start immediately.
I decided to gift tickets to two users, and zepher, who I have been talking to alot and who I had a very nice deal with recently,
aswell as Mitchell, who is reshipping stuff for me on a monthly basis, without ever asking for any payments or sth,
both stroke me like persons I would want to do this for.
It was a way to say thanks, not an "attempt in collecting trust".

If it comes to the point where you start to threaten the family and relatives of someone, you should realize you've crossed not just a few lines.
You're disgusting, crackskifteri.

Yes, but nothing you should have to worry about.
Payments will be made in the next few hours.
Payments have been made.
69d431754552b120a65ff82c23e5b025b838822cf2050fcaba0594dd0e8d6f87

---

Enrolled into the next round.

It's correct that I did PM you about your decision to advertise Betcoin.AG & that I had suggested for you to remove that advertisement and search a different advertiser for your signature space.
I did not consider this a part of the chain of events, as I had sent similar PMs to other people aswell, kinghtdk for example, which reacted in a totally different way to those.
So to be completely thorough, yes, the first motion came from my side, however, the messages/comments on slack were in a whole other dimension than my PMs about your signature.
The reason I suggested you to make contact with ACE is, that they are the only current example of people operating under a custom rate I currently have, aswell as that they include the person, which to my knowledge had/has one of the best signature rates on this forum, Blazed.
I was trying to give you an alternative to your current advertiser, or at least trying to point you in a way where you might find one.

I was under the impression that you had researched the company you were advertising. If you did, you should have been well aware of their current status.
It's fairly easy to find the threads where you can make your own image about betcoin.ag and their current status.
I'm sorry that I didn't directly include these links in my PMs, if they could have changed your reaction.
At no point I said or implied that you had to "face consequences".

You agreed to add a rule to your signature auctions which gives you the option to remove/deny advertisers based on their reputation, or lack therof.
I had told you that I appreciated that addition and that the situation for me was over with this. I did not say, neither did I act in any way to suggest, "that was not good enough".

You're right, you have not posted any personal messages, may it be from slack or this forums PM function.
I did so, because I felt the need to share these. I don't consider this a breach of trust, but others might disagree.

You were looking into ways of releasing the dox of a person that you were believing to harass you.
Given the situation and the previous PMs, aswell as comments on slack, I, aswell as others, made the asumption you were talking about my dox.
It's correct you did never directly name me as the person to be doxed or threat doing so in a direct message to me.
However, I still was intimidated by this move and it scared me, which you probably were aware of.

As I previously explained to you, direct messages had failed, hence I stopped trying.
While you were not on slack or posting publicly on the forum, you did send PMs to several users shortly before I had created this thread, this PMs were the immediate trigger for me posting.
I tried avoiding this conflict for a long time, up until the point where I didn't see it being possible any more. At this point, I had created this thread.
You never sent PMs to my alt accounts, as I don't have any hidden alts. The one I have is publicly known and marked by myself in several ways.
I don't have to pretend to be the vicitim, if you fail to see why I am, I'm sorry for that. You continue to spread lies about me, talking about evidence when there is none and connecting me with alt accounts I have no connection to whatsoever.

I can't apologize for things I didn't do. I don't harass you with alt accounts, hence I neither can stop it, nor will I apologize for something like that.
What I contact theymos about and what not is nothing of your concern. I have contacted them about stuff in the past, I did contact them about this and I will continue to contact them if I see a situation they should probably get involved in.

I'm sorry this situation has been taken this far.
I'm also sorry for the things I made public. I was in a position where I felt cornered and this thread has been a desperate move. I still am.
I'm sorry for the way the person behind the account game-protect has acted against you, even though this has nothing to do with me.

---

I don't think Quickseller would make the mistake of asuming I'm in DT2 under dooglus, they know it's Blazed who included me in their trust list.
I also don't think Quickseller would have access to PMs I send to my campaign participants of cg.net, which lets me asume this is an alt of someone who got kicked/banned from that campaign.