Trust setting has been designed for that actually. Before adding or removing anyone from your trust list you should consider their judgements of how and why they leave feedback to others also their judgments to the different cases they interact in conversations.  

I read the whole case yesterday from my phone, I was not logged in. I believe your intention is not bad. But you were not clear how to use it.

No one is powerful 🤣
Before it was only on Theymos who used to pick the DT1 and rest those were picked by the DT1 were DT2. It was completely a single call from the admin which obvious was not better than the current system we have.

Before that there were campaigns that used to pay 0.1 BTC or more 😉
It's always the dollar value against the BTC you get.

For some reasons if BTC drops under $1k (God dammit it's not gonna happen) then a Legendary receiving 0.1BTC a week will not be surprising at all. I will love it 🤣

Casinos are always protected by their terms and conditions. It's a problem for a casino which hasn't made it's name yet but when a casino earn a reputation we respect their decision because of their long term loyalty to their clients. From that perspective I have no problem with the decision Duelbits made (In fact they didn't close the case, JollyGood closed it on behalf of them).
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5405780.msg60635599#msg60635599

But in a scam accusation against any service or person without knowing both side of the story I can not advocate for a side. On the thread until the OP admitted the bug it was impossible to know OPs accusations were wrong. Even Duelbits were not sure otherwise it would not take them a month to investigate. But we saw JollyGood was always advocating for Duelbits as he was protecting them. Judging from his nature it was a completely different behavior by him. If this was against any other casino then he would harass the casino.

Hhampuz seemed pissed because they were taking unnecessary time
It worried yahoo62278
examplens was worried too

Then we hear a response from Duelbits. Case in ongoing investigation and it was the only response from them. But as you will see our friend JollyGood was always trying to calm the OP as if he knew nothing could go wrong with Duelbits.

All it for $70 a week? It seems JollyGood will advocate for anyone if they pay which is obviously very dangerous (in the past, I was in a signature campaign. I used to get request from campaign manager and other participants to advocate for them. I could not do it a single time in the specified threads and eventually I was removed form it. By the way, I am not regretting for it but using an example).

The completely different approaching from JollyGood  leads me to suspect his motive of scam busting all these days. Although now a days he lures from 1xbit. All are aware, they are scam so there are no additional work is necessary to hammer them all the time. Could we consider JollyGoods intention is to make a good name, earn trust and then finally dump a huge scam? We have many examples including Master-P. It always make me worry when I see a user is too focused to make a name. Have people checked the positive feedback sent by JollyGood to the users who already have their names established? I am not saying the feedback are wrong but these were not necessary too. The only possible outcome is to receive a positive back.

I am still waiting to know about the feedback he left for starmyc and nemgun. starmyc received another feedback from AdolfinWolf which clears that starmvc possibly is not that JollyGood explained.

AdolfinWolf

2018-03-30

Reference

This user has set up a script for me. Very polite and extremely professional. Went out of his bounds to explain to me what he did, and always responded extremely quickly in clear terms and good english. (Something that can be hard to find these days.). User really knows what he is talking about. Can highly recommend dealing with him.. https://blockchair.com/bitcoin/transaction/bff13fb4819fbd5e4ce04642e0db1aec12f1d8c31b4659f341c2ce7cb3637132

It was not sarcasm. It's been a long time I am assuming. I can recall something I read or wrote but I was not sure that it was about two of these sites. Other day when I was checking their sites then I discovered total two different sites and that made me confused. 🤣

It's now clear they are doing massive promotion from 1xbet in the main stream media but in the online media they are promoting 1xbit, They do not care about the reputation since 1xbit is completely de-touched from 1xBet. It's obvious now 1xBet is legally operating with a license otherwise they could not promote in the mainstream media. The victims from 1xBit can use the evidence of connection and call out 1xBit.

Add pandemic. In march 2020 it was even under $4k before we saw the highest high. 

In my opinion it's the mainstream media. When price goes up the trend for them goes high. They starts hyping the media for bitcoin. As a result people think it's the time not to miss. Most people do not understand investment. They are driven by hype.

All these years I was seeing 1xBet in many leagues and used to wonder fucking shit loads of money they are spending in advertising but on the forum we know they are at the best level to scam users. I even never created any account with 1xBet because in my mind I thought they are 1xBit 🤣

Finally some good news. I don't think it was unreasonable to take 7 days time. They might needed to check several perimeters to check your case. It's good that it ended well for both you and Betfury. Edit the title to SOLVED and lock the thread to close this officially.

I don't see any problem at all to give a little advertising to a good bitcoin project if they need as long as I am not in a paid signature. Take is a YES from me. The avatar currently I have represents my Wall Observer gang, it's love for me. Whenever I get a chance in a signature where I do not need to wear the avatar I give them priority so that I can have my own avatar.

First
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5405780.msg60635524#msg60635524

I already sent you a PM.

Apology that I did not read OPs last post. "Some users are clearly defending duelbits " was not intending to you too. It was specifically intended to user JollyGood. It seems he was happy with your response and appreciated with a merit which proves a point for me. You could be a bit nice in your response but it's okay, I apology from my end.

I was following jollyGood and found that it's annoying how he conduct any scam accusations against individuals or company. He always comes from a suspicious perspective enjoys to create unnecessary imaginary arguments against the individual possibly he does not like or against a company which he possibly use to increase his reputation. The way the OP of that topic created the scam accusation with evidences (obviously until his last post it was not clear who was at the wrong side) it was hard to take a side even though duelbits was able to gain huge reputation in the forum over the years. But JollyGood seemed took the job of advocating for Duelbits not only in that thread but also in other thread too which obviously does not go alone with the JollyGood image. That's all for you aew.

Second for JollyGood, I tried to reach out via PM but unfortunately you did not feel to respond me. So let's conduct it here. Would you explain the feedback you left for user starmyc and nemgun?

JollyGood

2018-09-20

Reference

starmyc is a very difficult coder to deal with. I made the mistake of paying him in advance to make an Ethereum and Ripple key generator. When I asked for the source code he declined asking for more money. If I did not get the source code I would have to go back to him for every small tweak I wanted to make and therefore he would ask for more money again and again. With all the delays he took in completing my work and then getting stuck on the Ripple part working with Ubuntu I was not happy but gave him the benefit of the doubt. It was when he deleted my access to Gitlab and when he was getting work from other sources that he delayed my work because he did not know how to prioritise. I am very disappointed with starmyc. Please avoid working with him, there are plenty of good coders around so please use somebody else. I learned a big lesson, never pay in advanced, I should have paid after receiving the source code. I just read his negative feedback for me, he is lying because he never gave me the source code.

JollyGood

2019-11-05

Reference

BEWARE OF NEMGUN - do not trust him He was a senior member of the team that scammed investors out of $millions in the NVO scam. Do not invest in anything he promote as you will probably end up losing it.

I did not contact with nemgun but I took the time to ask starmyc and following was his response.

When you are affiliated with a site, it's a big problem if your IP match with your affiliates. I have not read the T&C of BC games but standard practice is you can not create multiple account from same IP, household. You can not even use two accounts from same IP. If they are asking KYC for this reason then they have full right to do it. They are following the general terms which is fair.

The only thing you can do now is to explain them nicely of what happened and convince them it will not happen anymore. The rest will depend on their justification.

I don't think when you go with an ad network then you have a choice of what you display. They give a code and the ad-network sends the ads based on the interest of the client browser. I am not expecting for one or two wrong ads a business or service will change their ad network.

Yesterday I discovered 1xBit and 1xBet are two different sites. All these days I was thinking they are same business LOL

   


I am wondering who else was dogged like me 🤣

Bitches I am in! 😘

Since duelbits asked for time then let them clear it here.

Some users are clearly defending duelbits and trying to make OP the villain. OP's main problem seems to be his communication media. His English is too bad and hard to understand. In cases like it a user needs to express his opinions without having any communication difficulty. It's unfortunate for OP.

Sometimes you need to consider that ads are not placed specifying a service. If they are using service like Google AdSense then the ad network is sending the ads and they have no control over it. There are many ad networks not just Google AdSense. 1xbit spends millions of dollar in their advertising. So obviously ad networks are one of the choice for them.

To have avatar you will need to be full member of the forum and to become a full members you will require minimum 120 activity and minimum 100 merit. Don't get confused with the post number when you are counting activities.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2766177.0

In other words, no matter how many posts you make each day or week, only 14 posts will be added to your activity in every two weeks period. If you do not enjoy spending time on the forum then it is hard to rank up.

I have no idea how the 1xbit are conducting their signature campaign but Stake.com signature is designed to make more posts. They are encouraging users to post in gambling section. I don't want to bring the campaign manager name but this is clearly mentioned in their campaign thread.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5400828.0

When someone is chasing for 100 (example number) posts a week then obviously there will be no quality but numbers.

It's old, too old LOL

Save or collect 0.01BTC and you are a Satoshi millionaire. Isn't it something to be proud of? 0.01BTC is still in reach of everyone.

Still there are people who think they will have to buy a whole bitcoin. I don't know how the psychology works but when you talk about bitcoin to someone and tell them the price they usually ask that's lot of money. Then you need to give another lecture, you can buy any amount of bitcoin anytime. Somewhere I read by 2030 there will be 1 billion bitcoin user. It seems reasonable to me 😉

I don't think you should be worried about it at all. In fact it's good for you. If a thief who somehow got access of your email wants to reset account then he can not because he will be asked for 2FA. It means you have less risk to lose the funds unless Binance itself become the victim of any hack. One thing you need to ensure that you are not targeted by phishing link attackers.

You do not keep your coins in an exchange. You keep it there if you are for a quick exchange. Once the exchange is done then you move your coins to you own wallet. This is the safest.

If bustadice does not have any problem then I do not see anyone else should have any problem.

I have not read all the posts from the reference thread but I feel this is too harsh to justify a project, before giving them a chance to defend. If we continue labeling new projects are scam then projects that are looking to build their brand around the community they will eventually lose interest from the forum. I hope we are not isolating us.

The members are free to leave whatever feedback they want but I think a neutral should be more than fine in the case.

You needed to bring some reference to support your accusation. Perhaps the email that you have exchanged or chat with the support team. This will help others to analyze the conversation and make up something from it. Right now it's just some words that you left for everyone.

I hope it resolves anyway.