It's for a website, and I will probably get stickers made with the logo to apply to the product I am making.

Anyways, I think this topic is about to be closed as I am talking with gjeric right now about purchasing his design.

Thanks for all of the submissions!

I generally want to avoid having letters in it if possible.  But maybe make the cpu more abstract and possibly something else inside it like a brain/lightbulb/something sciency/geeky/etc.  I want it to be something that is unique without words/letters.

Several people have submitted ideas from outside this thread.  I just want to state that it isn't a requirement to post your ideas in here but that I will need to post the winning design and who the winner is in this thread at the end.  I'll also try and be forthcoming with what my favorite ideas are the next couple days as that is only fair to everyone.

The ones I like the best seem to be an abstract shape/design that then incorporates something into it such as a brain, light bulb, flask, etc.

I am also adding two gifts of 0.02 each to the 2nd and 3rd place designs.  These will be gifts with no ownership transfer.

This is interesting.  I like the simplistic nature of it.  Maybe if the box was colored in black or dark gray and the cpu design in it was white.  My only knock here would be the computer nature of it but that is probably ok because even most of future woodwork designs will likely involve some laser cutting or cnc.  I'm wondering if it would stand on it's own without the words though.

I need a pure HTML4/CSS website.

You can copy content from my old website. bluepebbleconsulting.com

I like dark and red theme.

Thanks

Ok, a open contest for BTC 0.5

The logo is for my Information Security Consultancy Firm, it will be used on my business card and website.

The company name is Ronin Security Consultancy

The domain will be RoninS.co

I like to stick to the theme of Ronin and Katana Sword.

Please put a watermark on them, then I when I chose the one I want, I will pay you, then you can take the watermark away. 

I watched.  For the most part I really liked it.  Although I completely agree with Ken Ham on almost all his points, I really wish he had not made as many references to the Bible, or at least saved it until the end when someone asked if he would ever change his mind or what was the most important thing to him.  To use the Bible as a point of reference is irrelevant to those who do not believe in the Bible.

Also, there was more observational scientific facts that he could have shared for a few topics.  One being that there are some reasons why the stars can appear so far away even though the earth is young (It has to do with Einsteins theory of relativity.  To learn more research Dr. Russel Humphrey's studies in his book "Starlight and Time") and there is evidence in the fossil record of plenty of sea animals that are in areas that would not be expected that can only be explained with a world-wide flood, just for a couple of things. But there is only so much time I guess.  At least the discussion was started.  It really is important to seperate the historical science that cannot be observed from the present day observational and experimental science that we can all agree on.  That was a good point Ken Ham made.

And, for those that watched the debate, what was up with Bill Nye's discussion on fish sex?  I still don't really get the point he was trying to make there completely.  I never have thought much about it though!