~snip
IMO it is not a "pointing fingers and threat in PM thing" or I can assure you I would have been the first one to know as by the nature of my business over this forum I'm mostly in contact with all the "gangs" you are talking about. In this thread I have seen, instead, attempts to address trust ratings of people that didnt even know they got in DT after the new rules and experienced DT members tried to give suggestions over some disputable feedbacks that have been left in the past and now became obsolete/uncalled/dangerous (hence some members have been ~tilded by some DT1 and advised in PM of the inconsistency of some of their past ratings. Example: this user has been tagged by Lesbian Cow without reference The same user posted here and then prolly to avoid the red paint, he posted hereI'm assuming Lesbian Cow being or being not in DT would make no difference: they should have posted a reference for that "Skamaroo" tag, now we dont know why that's a Skamaroo or we would be immediately able to tag even the second account that Skamaroo created. This is just an example in this case the Skamaroo just attempted to void the neg rep and he shouldn't have done that: new red paint coming. But in case of more serious scam accusations or frauds, it is very important to provide DT members and the entire community a solid reference (or most of DT wont even bother to tag) Some experienced DT tho have PMd cases like this kindly asking them to revise their feedback and ~tilded them until solved Where is the #gang in yoru opinion? Lesbian cow was referencing this post I suppose. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4542163.msg42182892#msg42182892A lot of people in collectibles section here are very well trusted and have made huge deals with people. Many of them did not envision being on DT1/DT2 so that's why you won't find all ref links - my trust history is a lot of the same. Sure, we may have made some huge deals, but sometimes it's not here, and sometimes it's nobodies business but ours/theirs either, so no reflinks exist for positive trust. 🤷♀️ I guess on negs we sometimes got lazy. I was excluded by certain nasty individuals (lol) for a long time so I didn't care much about the system. I've tried to review and fix my ratings, but some are "historical" to me and give me chuckles and so I just can't.  |
|
|
|
So what is the consensus/deal here? I see all the arguments but somebody should come up with something. Theymos, maybe?  |
|
|
|
bump... couple of graded bitcoinpennies. New stuff coming soon. |
|
|
|
Never bought any Bcash. I did cash out some from old addresses after the fork though... Made about 4 more BTC. Thanks!!!  |
|
|
|
Chris, are you doodling stuff yet? What's up!? |
|
|
|
probably will go below 10 bucks as grin starts gaining more adoption. xmr is old news at this point, no1 cares about it.
Says a known scammer.... lol  |
|
|
|
Lol.. I would tag him but seriously, you bought from a known scammer? That site says the registration fee is $500 USD? Are you just stupid? Why would you think you get an account for $45? It screams  Used luxsocks accounts usually go for 50-100$, it's not really uncommon. I know it was my fault for not checking but you can't see a user's trust if you're not registered. I don't know how to tag others in a post and I cannot send him a private message as my account is too new. As I said, it was my fault for not taking the time to verify his trust. Understandable. The forum should change this so it shows red trust on scammers at least without being logged in ... Sorry!  |
|
|
|
This guy just got scammed $45 dollars because you can't see trust without being logged in. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5101897.msg49408123;topicseen#msg49408123If people want the privilege of viewing trust, all they have to do is sign up for a free account. Seems reasonable.
It is reasonable. But if the forum can show trust and avoid a few scams then it definitely should, especially considering guests don't even know they can have that privilege.Yes, this here ^^^^^^^^^^ |
|
|
|
Lol.. I would tag him but seriously, you bought from a known scammer? That site says the registration fee is $500 USD? Are you just stupid? Why would you think you get an account for $45? It screams |
|
|
|
e - owlcatz thanks krog! |
|
|
|
Just move on, or if you feel really strongly about it - create your own thread. Once upon a time I was really pissed about someone deleting my posts and I created my own thread... four years later the other guy is in prison Hahaha, totally true, thanks for that, I keep forgetting he's in the slammer (or better be)... Good times. I still miss Paul Revere's artwork and posts! ... |
|
|
|
|
What does it say when you login? How long are you banned for?
|
|
|
|
No. And No. Sometimes people prefer anonymity. Look at Monero for example, do you know all the devs names? Nope.... |
|
|
|
It's not a scam, despite your posts/links. To me it just looks you are mad about your neg trust from TMAN. I've actually met one of those people in real life as well. Really scam  Be neutral, do not defend some people for their position. I'm not defending anything, I'm just telling you - NO, it's not a scam. If it were, someone smarter than you would have posted about it long ago.... |
|
|
|
It's not a scam, despite your posts/links. To me it just looks you are mad about your neg trust from TMAN. I've actually met one of those people in real life as well. |
|
|
|
where exactly did you post it? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
