As this is an archival post and there's a mirror of this thread right in the reputation section, please lock this thread.
(Btw interesting to see my thread design used for this...)

Just update your signature and I will update your rank for the next round accordingly.
Full member means also you can wear an avatar, ours is linked in the first post, don't forget to set it up.

Status is the same around here, I'm currently waiting on approval to adjust a few ground rules of the campaign.
Until then, I'm halting enrollments of newbies and also will only enroll juniors in special cases.

---

Payments are pending, will be the next hour, sorry it's been a little later today.
Last weeks payments have been sent (1370baaa3dfda48eddb73b600ccba4fc86855300448a4b8493d0b2db22179ebf).

Payments for the last round have been made (1b230624433f08ff5cec9c8ce84e5a34852755276a91b5723f2282e8ec0edad2).

---

It's been like this with rank upgrades, I'm planning on handling enrollments the same way.

---

None of the open applications is accepted.

Payments are going to be made late Sunday/early Monday, your local time is rather irrelevant to this, as we're looking on a global scale here.
It's currently 3:37am forum time on Monday, payments will be done until 65am.

As for enrollments, I most probably won't do any mid-round enrollments in the future. I will enroll people, but only into the next round, or starting at the next round.
This is only one of the adjustments I've been meaning to take, and I am currently trying to discuss with lightlord.

Around half a month ago, July 28th. Almost 65k times people have spinned the wheel already.

No, it's software-based and not video/live. Still worth having a look at, I promise you.

Let's wait for Indianacoin to announce which blocks we're going to use.

Too bad.

0.01BTC

Even if we were to change, this would only happen after a consensus was met, and not be enforced retroactively.
That being said, better be sticking to the original rules, and learn for the next one.
And on we go, and on we go.

I currently can't accept newbies until sorting a few things out with onemd.

You're wrong, at the time of the other user (grandFX) posting, the thread was actually trashed, hence "deleted" for the regular user like you and me.
It has since been restored by hilariousandco, since there was no obvious reason why the thread should have been trashed, which is why you are now abled to access it again.

How so? We're still searching for at least 1 winner.

Did you?

Hard to do without knowing what the "mistake" was. Hence this thread.

Mods are human, people make errors. This might (or might not) have been one.

Ref spam was an example, as it's an often present problem in this forum.
I don't think ther was any ref spam in that campaign thread.

That's a very bad advice. IF there was some problem, simple recreating the thread doesn't solve it.

When a thread gets moved, most mods will leave a reference thread with a reason for the move behind.
This is, from what I know, the regular procedure, as long as we're not talking about KnC, FUD or other similar spam (hence nukes).
A reason here can be as short as "ref spam."

None would base a move without reference/straightup deletion.

Either someone had a very very bad day at chosing their name, or amine14madrid (et al.) is evading their ban yet again.
I've recenty come across amine15madrid, which doesn't strike me like a good name for an alt used for ban evasion,
but then again, why use something creative when you can simply go with the most dumb solution, hence +1.

---

I probably shouldn't be surprised, as after checking the pattern, I've found several similar accounts (amine13madrid, amine12madrid, amine11madrid and that's where I stopped to look into them).

First off, welcome to the forum, both of you (you have to be new here, or at least not had a decent look around).
Secondly, suggesting to add things we already have is pointless. If you would have had a decent look around the settings, you would know that.
Here, you can select "Show post count by posts:", which looks like this for me:



The feature you requested to be added is already implemented. Have fun using it (or not).

Regardless of this situation and how it played out, OgNasty should add a clause like that to their contract with advertisers.
If they are not ready to refund the advertisers and don't want to break their contract either, a rule like that is the only way to get out of being tied up in a month-long contract with a company you can't/won't advertise for.
Not just with betcoin, but also with any future advertising partners (imagine a company turning outright scam at the second of a month and you continuing to advertise them for 30 days without any reaction/comment).

Take the swag, screw the rest