Can I keep the signature after the campaign, and add my own rolllin referral link to it?
Mate... If I understood correctly, you misunderstood, your signature campaign with this twitter campaign. I guess rollin signature campaign will live long as they have very limited post count for monthly basis.... Thank you, you are absolutely right! I was wondering why it took me 4 days to see the message about closing. I clicked wrong searching for the topic on Google and obviously didn't read the complete title. Either way, happy to hear the good news!
|
|
|
Can I keep the signature after the campaign, and add my own rolllin referral link to it?
|
|
|
you needed root to load the nvidia_uvm kernel module. with the nvidia-modprobe package installed, you can load the kernel module as user too or rather, it gets auto loaded.
I skipped this part of your previous comment since I got it working, but it sounds like an improvement. When I google it, it simply says to `apt-get install nvidia-modprobe`, but it doesn't exist on my system. I now know it's something I should still fix, but for now I'm happy I can use it ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
try to run the miner with sudo, as with a incorrect OpenCL setup, you'll need root to load the nvidia_uvm kernel module. Once loaded you dont need sudo again. Your missing that module, hence the failure.
This fixed it! Running once as root, compiling kernel, and now it runs as user too. From 200-400 kkeys/s (depending on system load) to up to over 7.5 Mkeys/s! Thank you so much, that's 25 times faster on average! Difficulty: 264104224 Compiling kernel, can take minutes...done! Pattern: 1test Address: 1testvSQ7NjT2bjG3Ywv8GkCNCCQmUxcz Privkey: 5HrhdHG7LzJG1k1teTKbGRhNqZzU9LxMsYTUxoNoTmUb7frNmDB Now the search continues ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) It's running at 79 degrees C now, and slowly going up, After cleaning it a bit it runs at 62 degrees C now. Edit: on performance: the GeForce 840M reaches just over 9 Mkeys/s if I close my browsers to reduce CPU (or video?) load.
|
|
|
I just found 1LimeLightHA2NqDu5hxu1RN9c78qiL97V ( blockchain). Update: right after depositing 100 mBTC to it, I messed up ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Being tired doesn't help.... I accidentally pasted the private key instead of the public key into Google and blockchain.info search field. Too bad, I liked how rare this address is, now I can't use it anymore. The BTC 0.1 hasn't gone too far. https://blockchain.info/address/1317ST8CrnHcycS46F7wFpEFRzhVSba1jG Is that your wallet? *edit* ouch - 2.3 years to reach 50% for 1LimeLight - feel for you pal. Yes, I did withdraw by myself to be sure. On my CPU it takes 210 years for 50%, it was a lucky hit. Edit: Nvidia joined the party! Now it's only 8 years for 50% ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif) But I'll find another nice one, dictionary attack with 25000 words works fine so far, and about 25 times faster from now on.
|
|
|
I just found 1LimeLightHA2NqDu5hxu1RN9c78qiL97V ( blockchain). Update: right after depositing 100 mBTC to it, I messed up ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Being tired doesn't help.... I accidentally pasted the private key instead of the public key into Google and blockchain.info search field. Too bad, I liked how rare this address is, now I can't use it anymore.
|
|
|
The instructions document and .exe application are on Google Drive now (which prescans for viruses) so there is nothing to worry about when downloading them.
Call me paranoid, but wouldn't a scammer say the same? Any application you build yourself can do anything you like without containing any known virusses.
|
|
|
The best way to fight this, is not to buy it. Up to you to pick a different name, or a different top level domain.
|
|
|
Try to name one thing that isn't being used for illegal activities..... I think it's really hard to think of something, as almost everything can be used illegally. Guns, knifes, hammer, saws, tape, bricks, cars, etc. etc. are all used for illegal activities on a massive scale. That doesn't mean that hurts them in the long run, it just means a larger demand than if it would only be used for legal activities. To compare: Every British bank note is contaminated by cocaine within weeks of entering circulation
|
|
|
I'd like to stake Address: 1 foreverDArUNEX2gVD26vautcx3b8zTZ -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is LoyceV staking address 1foreverDArUNEX2gVD26vautcx3b8zTZ on March 8, 2016 for https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318-----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1foreverDArUNEX2gVD26vautcx3b8zTZ HH92BZEyS13Z1md5bF/c8QHqdB9W2Z2amLQJPBkNa3jldMaD0AhPFhmGD/HtXFC4y0ULyAzUoqbWN8ZK7akJaNI= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- I would appreciate if someone could quote this message for me.
|
|
|
not skipping was correct. You'r binary is compiled and ready to go. Now we need to fix the last issue: Thanks ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) is the package nvidia-modprobe installed? if not, install it. Seems like it: # lsmod | grep -i nvidia nvidia 8646656 33 drm 344064 7 i915,drm_kms_helper,nvidia # find / | grep modprobe | grep -i nvidia /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-graphics-drivers.conf /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-352_hybrid.conf /lib/nvidia-352/modprobe.conf
The contents of these files: Laptop / # cat /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-graphics-drivers.conf # This file was installed by nvidia-352 # Do not edit this file manually
blacklist nouveau blacklist lbm-nouveau blacklist nvidia-current blacklist nvidia-173 blacklist nvidia-96 blacklist nvidia-current-updates blacklist nvidia-173-updates blacklist nvidia-96-updates blacklist nvidia-352-updates alias nvidia nvidia_352 alias nvidia-uvm nvidia_352-uvm alias nouveau off alias lbm-nouveau off
Laptop / # cat /etc/modprobe.d/nvidia-352_hybrid.conf # This file was installed by nvidia-352 # Do not edit this file manually
blacklist nouveau blacklist lbm-nouveau alias nouveau off alias lbm-nouveau off
Laptop / # cat /lib/nvidia-352/modprobe.conf # This file was installed by nvidia-352 # Do not edit this file manually
blacklist nouveau blacklist lbm-nouveau blacklist nvidia-current blacklist nvidia-173 blacklist nvidia-96 blacklist nvidia-current-updates blacklist nvidia-173-updates blacklist nvidia-96-updates blacklist nvidia-352-updates alias nvidia nvidia_352 alias nvidia-uvm nvidia_352-uvm alias nouveau off alias lbm-nouveau off I don't know iff the blacklists are relevant. I am running the Nvidia-driver: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi68.tinypic.com%2F34g3dqa.png&t=663&c=Exf7ulbxRpvT-w) Judging by this I would say my X-server knows the card: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi65.tinypic.com%2F2w6yqkx.png&t=663&c=aWa1a3hj0LgzIQ) And this is what I have installed: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi68.tinypic.com%2F2qa782a.png&t=663&c=KklpUchHsoQDow) check if this file exists: $ ls -al /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-opencl.so.1
does this exist too? $ ls -al /etc/OpenCL/vendors/nvidia.icd if not: $ sudo mkdir -p /etc/OpenCL/vendors $ sudo tee /etc/OpenCL/vendors/nvidia.icd <<< 'libnvidia-opencl.so.1'
I think this is all okay: Laptop ~ # ls -al /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-opencl.so.1 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-opencl.so.1 -> libnvidia-opencl.so.352.63 Laptop ~ # ls -alL /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-opencl.so.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15901968 Nov 8 06:08 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-opencl.so.1 Laptop ~ # ls -al /etc/OpenCL/vendors/nvidia.icd -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 22 Nov 8 05:08 /etc/OpenCL/vendors/nvidia.icd Laptop ~ # cat /etc/OpenCL/vendors/nvidia.icd libnvidia-opencl.so.1 Anything else I can do/try? It's probably something really simple once you know it ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif)
|
|
|
$ find /usr -name libOpenCL.so
/usr/lib64/OpenCL/vendors/intel/libOpenCL.so Or more complete: ls -l `find / | grep -i ibopencl.so` -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 35200 Mar 15 2014 /usr/lib64/OpenCL/vendors/intel/libOpenCL.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25148 Nov 8 06:10 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26432 Nov 8 06:09 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0.0 I've been searching in this direction before, but didn't manage to fix it then. $ gcc oclvanitygen.o oclengine.o pattern.o util.o -o oclvanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread -l:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so I now get this: test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ make clean rm -f vanitygen.o oclvanitygen.o oclvanityminer.o oclengine.o keyconv.o pattern.o util.o vanitygen keyconv oclvanitygen oclvanityminer test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ make cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o vanitygen.o vanitygen.c cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o pattern.o pattern.c cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o util.o util.c cc vanitygen.o pattern.o util.o -o vanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o keyconv.o keyconv.c cc keyconv.o util.o -o keyconv -ggdb -O3 -Wall -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread So far so good! test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ make oclvanitygen cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o oclvanitygen.o oclvanitygen.c cc -ggdb -O3 -Wall -c -o oclengine.o oclengine.c oclengine.c: In function ‘vg_ocl_prefix_check’: oclengine.c:1553:18: warning: variable ‘tablesize’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] int orig_delta, tablesize; ^ cc oclvanitygen.o oclengine.o pattern.o util.o -o oclvanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread -lOpenCL /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lOpenCL collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [oclvanitygen] Error 1 Errors! If I do make oclvanitygen first, the next command does not give errors: test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ gcc oclvanitygen.o oclengine.o pattern.o util.o -o oclvanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread -l:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1 But after this it still can't find the OpenCL platforms: test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ ./oclvanitygen 1test Difficulty: 264104224 clGetPlatformIDs(0): Unknown code -1001 clGetPlatformIDs(0): Unknown code -1001 Available OpenCL platforms: If I skip the "make oclvanitygen", it gives this: test@Laptop:~/vanitygen-master$ gcc oclvanitygen.o oclengine.o pattern.o util.o -o oclvanitygen -ggdb -O3 -Wall -L/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ -lpcre -lcrypto -lm -lpthread -l:/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1 gcc: error: oclvanitygen.o: No such file or directory gcc: error: oclengine.o: No such file or directory I'm hoping your guess is better than mine ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
|
|
I'm a senior member now guitarplinker! Can I upgrade my signature already, and join as Senior from March 15? Assuming the campaign is continued of course.
|
|
|
$ find /usr -name libOpenCL.so
/usr/lib64/OpenCL/vendors/intel/libOpenCL.so Or more complete: ls -l `find / | grep -i ibopencl.so` -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 35200 Mar 15 2014 /usr/lib64/OpenCL/vendors/intel/libOpenCL.so lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 25148 Nov 8 06:10 /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Nov 16 20:51 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0 -> libOpenCL.so.1.0.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 26432 Nov 8 06:09 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libOpenCL.so.1.0.0 I've been searching in this direction before, but didn't manage to fix it then.
|
|
|
"slavery, while far from ideal, is not itself immoral."
Anybody who claims this, should be asked how his opinion would change if he himself would be the slave.
|
|
|
even online wallet like xapo and coinbase are also very good to store bitcoin.
Have you ever heard of Mt.Gox and what happened to them?
|
|
|
We do not know where is the limit now. I thought it will top at 0.01, but I was totally wrong. The price is too high.
There is no upper limit in a bubble, it can go up until a tulip is worth a big house. That being said, I have no clue whether or not this will bubble and pop or get high and stay. I do know it came up very fast, so common sense says it can also disappear very fast.
|
|
|
Usually you start the other way around: you know what to sell, and then just sell it. You wouldn't start renting a shop in a mall without knowing what to sell either, right? personally i want to see an online site where we can buy food on certain fast food chains(either mcdonalds, dominos , etc.) with our bitcoins. just my opinion ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) In The Netherlands we can! This site's name means "home delivered" and it's the provider to order food online (6000+ restaurants). They use bitpay.com as a payment provider.
|
|
|
BUT because I am selling bitcoin doubler.
If it would work, you'd be the richest man on bitcointalk! But you want to sell it, so it doesn't work, which makes it a scam. If you really want something like a pyramid: be honest about it! Ethereum Pyramid Contract for example shows a very nice way of making this. Fully transparent!
|
|
|
Wow that is really bad, i can not understand why people are doing this... i guess they are jealouse about bitcoins :/
Every new block is worth $11,000! On average that happens every 10 minutes, so it's big business, with huge stakes. They're fighting for money and power, which is ironic as bitcoin was meant to be decentralized and open/free (free as in free speech, not free beer).
|
|
|
|